The fundamental facts of the presidential race at this moment are that unemployment is high, the economy is by far the most important issue to American voters, and President Obama’s handling of economic questions is overwhelmingly unpopular. Republican presidential hopefuls Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann and others are hammering the president daily on matters of job creation and economic growth.
Now some of Obama’s activist allies and supporters in the press are engaged in a sharply focused effort to change the subject. Even as economic anxieties continue to rise, some of the nation’s premier political journalists are consumed with the alleged influences of obscure religious philosophers on Republican candidates; on questions of creationism, evolution, and the age of the Earth; and on the fantasy that a Republican president might transform the United States into an Iranian-style theocracy.
For example, the Daily Beast/Newsweek recently published an article titled “A Christian Plot for Domination?” claiming that Perry and Bachmann are “deeply associated with a theocratic strain of Christian fundamentalism” known as Dominionism. A widely discussed article in the Texas Observer claimed that Dominionists — a “little-known movement of radical Christians” — are readying an “army of…
Read More: Washington Examiner
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism

Cool. Folks on the right spend years focusing on loony irrelevant side issues and trying to paint Obama as a Muslim–despite the obvious fact that he's not, and that even if he were it wouldn't matter because of the lack of "the kind of religious test for office that the Founders explicitly rejected."
And now they're upset that some on the left are doing the same? As they say, what goes around comes around.
Besides, no one has made a bigger deal of Perry's religion and Bachmann's religious "qualifications" than they have. If they want that to be part of the discussion, they can't then complain about the discussion oging in directions they didn't anticipate.