As we have observed, conservative black Americans have become more politically engaged over the last few years, particularly over the last 18 months. This includes voters, as well as office-seekers, commentators and activists. Prominent black conservatives, such as Reps. Allen West and Tim Scott, have become stars of the conservative movement.
While these folks are typically viewed with extreme derision amongst hardcore liberals and most politically active blacks, they have not garnered the sort of attention in one key area many observers thought they might: the press. Although the establishment press (commonly referred to as the “mainstream media” or “MSM” by non-progressives) has taken a few jabs at black conservatives in the recent past, they have largely ignored their political significance.
Around 90 percent of black voters support progressive causes and Democrat politicians. Many older Americans are aware that this was not always the case. What brought about the change in black voting habits took time – and would take time to explain – but I go over this in great detail in my book, “Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal ~ America’s Racial Obsession,” published by WND Books.
The answer to why the nascent black conservative movement is being disregarded by the establishment press lies in the lack – or complete absence – of coverage they have given other highly newsworthy issues of late: Black conservatism threatens the pre-eminence and perceptual validity of their ideology.
If the Democratic Party loses a substantial portion of the black vote, they’re done for – and they know it. There are two reasons for this: One is simply a matter of numbers; radicals have been able to gain ground only because they have been operating within the Democratic Party. An explosion in black conservatism would expose many of these radicals. Two, such a swing would embolden white conservatives and likely give rise to a similar transformation of Latino voting habits. Thus, it is of no benefit to the establishment press to spotlight black conservatives, let alone provide a forum for their message.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
The Main Stream Media does not want to acknowledge that such a thing exist as a Black Conservative.This should surprise no one!
I'm beside myself with frustration that the RINOs in the U.S. House will not even subpoena Obama's Hawai'ian vital records.
I'm about 90% certain this would show an original birth certificate disclosing that Obama the alien Luo was not the birth father of Barry the bastard. Even the analysis of Barry's DNA would disprove Obama the Luo as birth father. The Obama political manifesto "Dreams from my Father : A Story of Race and Inheritance" is a total fabrication and a gigantic hoax. This is political dynamite, but few seem to realize it.
I'm about 70% certain this disclosure would grease the skids toward comprehensive investigations that would show Barry is not more African than any random white dude on Main Street, and became a citizen of Indonesia upon his removal to that fascinating island nation as a young lad. I'm mystified why not even black conservatives take an interest in demanding official inquiries or following up with informal investigations.
Recent advances in biotechnology make it possible to collect and analyze epithelials from anything a suspect touches:
http://www.kansascity.com/2011/02/16/v-print/2661…
Posted on Wed, Feb. 16, 2011
Convicted sex offender faces more charges in Waldo rapes case
By CHRISTINE VENDEL
The Kansas City Star
****
The so-called “touch DNA” used in these cases is a relatively new technology. Lab experts look for DNA in sloughed-off skin cells and process it using the same techniques as other DNA that comes from blood or bodily fluids.
But finding good DNA profiles is trickier because the cells are harder to see and there are usually fewer of them compared with cells found in bodily fluids. The skin cells often are mixed with cells from others who have touched or been near the same object or area.
The results of the DNA tests from sloughed-off cells have the same potential as bodily fluids as far as matching them to a particular profile, said Scott Hummel, a forensic specialist in Kansas City’s crime lab. The complex work in the Waldo cases took about eight months, he said.
****
@ Go to KansasCity.com for a video.
The Star’s Tony Rizzo contributed to this report. To reach Christine Vendel, call 816-234-4438 or send e-mail to cvendel@kcstar.com.
© 2011 Kansas City Star and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. http://www.kansascity.com
DNA common to, say, three random objects touched by Obama should be his. Analyze those and you're likely to find father Caucasian mother Polynesian, disproving both Stanley Ann Dunham and Obama the Luo tribesman as parents. Whatever, odds are overwhelming the father was not an African, so "Dream from my Father", the political manifesto, was a hoax.
Soon, I suspect, it will be possible to collect and analyze DNA from downwind a subject who passes flatus, forward or back. Look for Obama to take countermeasures; no beans or carbonated beverages.
There needs to be a conservative news event. I had wondered how a sucker punch would work. Since the MSM goes full tilt with coverage of damning news they might be sucked into covering an event billed to suit their whims then revealed during the offing to be completely different.
One must wonder what is in it for the MSM to hold such a position. I wonder if the question ought to be asked in a congressional hearing. Maybe that of the Pigford fraud which the media refuses to cover.
Some races may be a bit more prone to one form of sin than another form but the facts seem to be that none of us have anything we can brag about. Every race can be just as honorable or dishonorable as the next but the heart knows no race. Without God there there is no conscience.
As touching the Pigford fraud I believe that is more USDA than Pigford but it is manifest that there are many Blacks taking advantage of this but Wisconsin show the same trend with the white union hands so it is more a matter of attitude than it is of race.
The primary question needs to be why the USDA had money to loan and the power to discriminate in their loan policies. The government did not accumulate the capital to loan but had to take it from the one who did earn it and the government should have no direct interest in loan policies except to keep them relatively honest and giving each side the right to protect their own interests, By skewing the loan parameters the government has created far more of a problem than it has solved,
Again, this is not a racial problem. It is a political problem.
Race is only an issue in politics when it creates voters. Actually, these days everything that can create or motivate a voter is politics instead of working to refine the great covenant called the constitution. What a pity we qualify people to office who claim rising through gritty streets or even through the bastions of “I'm better than you” colleges instead of everyday honest and decent Americans who specialize in being good neighbors and citizens. I guess we honor thuggery and a smooth tongue far more than it's due. From: notifications@intensedebatemail.comTo: adirondack_1@hotmail.comSubject: Whit replied to your comment on Why media ignore black conservatives
Thanks, a good definition. A_pen7, It seems that we may be hard wired to honor thuggery since it was noted by James.
~ Jas 2:6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats?
7 Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?
8 ¶ If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.~
I think we need to define our rich for there are two types, one, like Abraham, grew his wealth and was generous. The other gathers wealth by fraud and deceit, of which we have some fine examples elected to government office but they are never condemned or counted among the rich. Do we believe they will give us special privileges if we bow to them? It would seem so and demonstrated in Wisconsin. There are those clinging to privilege opposing those holding to principle.
It is encouraging to see more and more comments on those who honor principle over privilege for that is what made this country great. The government is a liability to commerce just as all other factors of overhead are a liability but it gives direction so that we have a common understanding on arbitrary decisions. Best illustrated in the way we have structured our highways so we all know how to respond to traffic;. We have rules and laws that deal with driving the wrong way on a street and we have to deal with those who insist on driving the wrong way in political traffic.
I agree. I never learned any scripture, it's just natural observation. What I do know of it I findthe lessonstrue. I also believe that the founders logic was sound in constructing a government that recognized the faults of man and how unchecked they had destroyed every government before and all soonleft a subjugated and suffering people in their wake until they did.Man has not changed. Nature has not changed. Our form of government has from what it was intended though. From: notifications@intensedebatemail.comTo: adirondack_1@hotmail.comSubject: Whit replied to your comment on Why media ignore black conservatives