Where Have All Of Our Generals Gone?

General Carter Ham 3 SC Where Have All Of Our Generals Gone?

It is stunning to me that over the course of the past four years, our military generals are being eliminated for one reason or another. This ongoing list includes:

Gen. David Patraeus

Gen. William Ward

Gen. David Mc Kiernan

Gen. Stanley Mc Crystal

Gen. Carter F. Hamm

Well, there is five right off the bat.  What do these brave men all have in common? They have all served under the Obama regime and have all been either fired, forced to resign, or forced to retire for one reason or another.

Knowing that these men all have held top positions in the military, and that they would have the means to remove an ineligible President by force if necessary, is it possible that the Obama regime wanted these potential threats out of the way in preparation for any future policy decisions that he may be planning to make?

We already know that in his first term, Obama has circumvented Congress and the US Constitution on several occasions.  Is it possible that a military coup may have been in the works? These military men must cringe every time they would have had to explain to someone’s family that their son or daughter died in service to their country while knowing full well that they had a better chance at survival if they didn’t have to abide by such strict rules of engagement placed on them by the Obama regime.

The way I see it is that Obama is simply removing all of the clear and present dangers to his Presidency while he remains a clear and present danger to the United States of America. These are clearly times that try men’s souls. As always, my fellow Patriots, stay safe and always be aware of your surroundings.

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. A quiet conversation I had early on with my eldest regarded this very thing. I’ve been associated with the military through my father, husband, and son, daughter and other familiy members for many years but I have never seen anything quite like this before. I started putting two and two together when they were removed, demoted or resigned. I am an old lady, but I can see as well and better than some. I didn’t think my suspicions were unwarranted and recent articles such as this have confirmed what I feared; solidification of position by the regime to decimate the military and stop them from every having the power to remove him because of his obnoxious, irresponsible, and yes, treasonous behavior. I’m done, I don’t think I need to further elaborate.

  2. “I didn’t think my suspicions were unwarranted and recent articles such as this have confirmed what I feared; solidification of position by the regime to decimate the military and stop them from every having the power to remove him because of his obnoxious, irresponsible, and yes, treasonous behavior. I’m done, I don’t think I need to further elaborate.”

    True but there is more.
    There has been a purge going on in the military for several years, at least 12.
    They stopped promoting officers who were conservative first. Then they let retirement get a few more. Now they are finding reasons to fire or force out all officers of highest ranks. This is nothing more than a consolidation of military power. Soon, if not already all the conservative officers will be gone and only the NWO pawns will be left. This all the more reason thta it is imperative that secession be undertaken asap. Soon you will lose what little support you have left in the military. People you have NO idea how important this is. You have NO idea of the consequences you face by continuing to stay with such behavior. It is ONLY going to get worse, much worse in the coming days. It’s NOT a matter of years any more! Determine your future NOW before it is too late. Before it is determined for you!

    Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
    The South was Right. You didn’t listen before; Are you going to this time?

    • Michael thank you for taking this further than I. I just get SOOOOOOOO exhausted thinking about it, worrying about it knowing that I have no power , that we have no power over this.

    • it is too late now I fear. there’s so many of them. All we can do is hope the scum in D.C. can’t get along and end up fighting among themselves and push us over that clifff NOW….the R’s (who I don’t trust anymoe than the D’s) are too willing to comprimise, why? there’s not a nickels worth of difference between them. All that BO has done and no one down there wants to take him on. It’s very scary. And I can’t believe he was re-elected fairly by the people. We reap what we sow. Didn’t know any better for years, but, started to get very suspious after 911 and watched Bush pass crap like the Patriot Act. Even before that I wondered, but, didn’t stir the waters with questions etc. about that which I knew was wrong. Now I have to live with (as we all do) our lack of civic obligations and where it has taken us. Still I don’t think enough of us can do anything now bkz over half the counry is propandized to a point of no return. It’s getting dark out there folks. I suppose lots of prayers and getting prepared to bunker down as it might be a Very bumpy road aheard. God Bless America

    • History repeats itself. Hitler did the same thing. Stalin did the same thing. It`s in Alinski`s book on how to destroy a country. Three steps to slavery. Control all the government departments. Control the media. Control the voting. and last control the military. Did I miss anything he hasn`t done or control? Welcome to modern slavery.

  3. “What do these brave men all have in common?”

    Well, conspicuous among their traits is timidity. Also conformity in uncritical “go-along-to-get-along” groupthink, subservience to career politicians, slavish sucking-up to well-connected defense contractors, “cover-your-tochus” blame-shifting, systematized customary abuse (sexual and otherwise) of subordinates, a crippling sense of privilege, and an addiction to PowerPoint presentations.

    Have Ieft anything out?

    Readers here are directed to the “Leadership” articles on Jim Dunnigan’s StrategyPage.com, as well as to the recent (October 30) publication of Thomas E. Ricks’ The Generals: American Military Command from World War II to Today. I quote here the Amazon.com book description in toto:

    History has been kind to the American generals of World War II—Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, and Bradley—and less kind to the generals of the wars that followed. In The Generals, Thomas E. Ricks sets out to explain why that is. In part it is the story of a widening gulf between performance and accountability. During the Second World War, scores of American generals were relieved of command simply for not being good enough. Today, as one American colonel said bitterly during the Iraq War, “As matters stand now, a private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war.”

    In The Generals we meet great leaders and suspect ones, generals who rose to the occasion and those who failed themselves and their soldiers. Marshall and Eisenhower cast long shadows over this story, as does the less familiar Marine General O. P. Smith, whose fighting retreat from the Chinese onslaught into Korea in the winter of 1950 snatched a kind of victory from the jaws of annihilation.

    But Korea also showed the first signs of an army leadership culture that neither punished mediocrity nor particularly rewarded daring. In the Vietnam War, the problem grew worse until, finally, American military leadership bottomed out. The My Lai massacre, Ricks shows us, is the emblematic event of this dark chapter of our history. In the wake of Vietnam a battle for the soul of the U.S. Army was waged with impressive success. It became a transformed institution, reinvigorated from the bottom up. But if the body was highly toned, its head still suffered from familiar problems, resulting in tactically savvy but strategically obtuse leadership that would win battles but end wars badly from the first Iraq War of 1990 through to the present.

    Ricks has made a close study of America’s military leaders for three decades, and in his hands this story resounds with larger meaning: about the transmission of values, about strategic thinking, and about the difference between an organization that learns and one that fails.

    This culture of tolerance for cruddy leadership is not unique to the U.S. Army. The Navy has recognized the same problem in their own top ranks, and has been terminating the careers of more and more commanding officers with grim readiness in recent years, holding their ships’ masters to higher levels of professional conduct than times before. This began in the wake of the Tailhook scandal, and in plenty of cases the reliefs are still undertaken for reasons of “zipper control problems,” but close attention to competence in command is the Navy’s cause for getting the more tarnished of their Little Tin Gods out of captaincies throughout the fleets.

    Just because a man has been given permission to put stars on his collars doesn’t make him a fit object for uncritical worship. If anything, the higher your rank, the more important it is to keep you under hot, hard scrutiny for the quality of your decisions and your personal comportment.

    • HA! WELL NO ONE IN THIS TYRANNICAL DEN OF INIQUITY IS QUALIFIED TO KEEP THEIR EYE ON ANYONE , MUCH LESS THE MILITARY. WHO’S GOING TO WATCH THE FOX AT THE TOP? HE’S THE WORST OF ALL.

      • “…TYRANNICAL DEN OF INIQUITY…” et Caps Lock cetera.

        Well, the character of any nation’s professional military cadres tends with grinding reliability to reflect the qualities of its national government.

        We should be thankful, I suppose, that the intrinsically conservative (culturally as well as politically) traditionalism of the Society of the Cincinnati still pervades the U.S. Army. No matter how bad it might get at Carlisle Barracks and in the Pentagon, they’re still better than what we’ve got festering across the river in Mordor-on-the-Potomac.

  4. Patriots are being systematically weeded out to be replaced with high-ranking military personnel of a liberal bent. These personnel may or may not have required military background. What will be important is the liberal frame of mind that will permit them to turn on American citizens in direct opposition to the United States Constitution that is reduced and demeaned every day under the current fake leadership.

  5. In the Soviet Union, I know they had a “purging of the Red Army” under (1937-38) Stalin. Senior officers of unquestioned bravery and experience in armed conflict, that would question Stalin’s absolute authority paid heavily for their disloyalty. Treason trials were held where Stalin was no respecter of rank or family; he had most of them all shot. Field Marshals, full Generals, Lt. Generals, sixty-seven corps commanders, a hundred and thirty six of one hundred ninety-nine divisional ones. He gutted just about the whole senior staff! What followed were “new” officers bending to the political will of the tyrant. “Political” generals that we see crawling all over the pentagon nowadays. Hussein Davis Obongo wants total control on who he wants as commanders of his military establishment. If you read: “Fool Me Twice,” you will see that this Indonesian wants our military converted to “global warming” policemen tracking down “carbon footprints” all over the world. In that case he needs commanders that cling to the directives of the EPA, The Sierra Club, and the policies of that Agenda 21 threat. The “warrior” soldier would be considered a “domestic terrorist” by Janet (BigSis) Napolitano. Today’s soldier would be made nice and compliant.

  6. Avatar of SantaClause says:

    from HLS. 20 TO25% OF YOUR MILITARY,,, Will shoot Obama on the spot!!!! 80 to90% voted for Romney !!!! LIKE HILLARY,,GENERALS CANT STAND OBAMA !!!
    I BET ONE DAY SOON A X MILITARY POP A CAP ON ALLAH OBAMA AND HIS REGIME !!!!
    Anyone cant chit on the CONSTITUTION AND GET AWAY WITH IT !!!!

    • “80 to90% voted for Romney….”

      And a majority of those men and women supported Dr. Ron Paul in the nomination process instead of Willard the Wussy.

      I would like the RNC “establishment” to explain yet again how Dr. Paul was supposed to be “unelectable.”

      Wouldn’t you?

      • Tucci78
        Romney gave Ron Paul the shaft, as there was fraud committed Ron Paul in Romney getting the bid. What’s the saying, what goes around, comes around? Seems Obama done the same thing to Romney that Romney done to Ron Paul. Only difference is this time people seem just a little upset where they didn’t when Romney done the same things to Ron Paul. What people fail to realize here is that Romney and Obama already knew the outcome, as they are both members of the very same “Elitist” organizations.

        Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

      • NO!

        • And of course no explanation as to why you wouldn’t want an explanation from the RNC poo-bahs about their reasons for considering the enforcement of the U.S. Constitution “unelectable.”

          Is it simply that you like how the Republican “establishment” so expensively screwed the pooch in this election by forcing the Etch-A-Sketch upon us, or that you have some qualms about treating that Constitution as the law of the land?

  7. Interesting article; Obama supporters not welcome to do business here

    http://southernnationalist.com/blog/2012/11/18/arizona-gun-shop-tells-obama-voters-they-arent-welcome/

    Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

  8. Three words will give you the answer: CONTROL THE MILITARY! Now I can add the rest. YOU WILL CONTROL THE COUNTRY!!!!

  9. If the military was ever capable of being a threat to Obama he could NEVER has gotten to this level of destruction of the country. They never were a threat and he knew it. Our “mighty men” FAILED US!

    Honor them? Respect them? NO. NEVER. They do not merit it. Throughout the Obama reign of ruin these fools knew the course he was on and did NOTHING to oppose it. They could easily have stopped his BS by merely standing in front of him and saying NO. Save for McCrystal’s short squeak of bravery none of them have said “we will defend the Constitution”, they all turned tail up and said YESSIR!

    The average GI may not think that way but SO WHAT? The military machine with its logistics, coordination and planning is run by the Pentagon not GI Joe. The National Guard is being equipped (with German built GLS armored cars, how appropriate) and trained to conduct Urban Warfare upon “dissidents”. Pretty obvious who they’re aiming at – those who oppose Obama. Anyone opposing his Royal Highness is – to the military and DHS, – a dissident!

    WHERE is the protest? It isn’t there. They WILL attack US.

    Honor the military? Only if they show they earned that honor. Until then I’d sooner place a wreath at the tomb of the unknown Communist.

    • @stRanger
      Note that the “National Guard” doesn’t exist anymore in the same capacity it once did. Originally it was under the control of the states. This has been changed and now the National Guard are under direct Federal control. I wonder who changed this? Originally this was composed of state militias. Now the militias are vilified and people don’t have a clue to their once association to the National Guard. It is not the same as it used to be. Today it is nothing more than the reserve Army or Army Reserves.

      Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

      • That’s true, Michael I am aware of that. But they live among us as neighbors and as such they should know what We the People are going through. To willingly train to aim their weapons at US without protest is merely reinforcing Obama’s dictatorial rule.

        I’ll say it again. IF the military stands up and says NO Obama is helpless. But they don’t. They salute, say yessir, institute suicidal ROEs in Afghanistan then train to ATTACK US. I find nothing there to respect. Any protest of what I am saying is meaningless. The military is on the side of the Communist Government of the Muslim Obama merely by passively allowing him to continue as he is.

        Period.

  10. HOW DARE YOU? MY FATHER, SON, HUSBAND, DAUGHTER , BROTHERS AND UNCLES SERVED WITH HONOR. WHAT HAVE YOU EVER DONE? YOU PIG

    • @lindarosemary
      I know you mean well, and I know your family meant well with their service. My dad served in both the Navy and Army, as did several cousins. I have many friends that were in Nam too! They understand what I’m saying and I hope you do.

      People served for what they “thought” was a good cause and patriotic case, but it was not. They were deceived as most people have been. In Nam most had no choice but to serve or flee to Canada. Now i ask, where has all those good intentions gotten us? Here of course, but only after you started seeing the real government you were serving. The intent was good but the results have been bad and maybe horrific. I fault no person for serving for what he thought a good cause, but they must understand their service was in vain. That is what gets people to post such negative comments about the military today. They are now seeing the bad that has resulted from too much military, too big a military and too much Federal Government. I can’t respect these people fought for because I knew the deeper meaning of what it led to, but I can still respect those people, those soldiers for trying. But in order to redeem themselves they may have to oppose the very ones they thought they were supporting. They must prepare themselves if possible! It boils down that for the military and men to be doing the proper thing, to be truly patriotic, they must directly support you the people and not as a representative of a government. Governments only misuse people, even their people for their own gains and many of you see this today.

      Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

    • Are they serving NOW?

      Can’t YOU tell the difference?

      YOU are the problem here, not me. I see what is happening NOW not the fine work your relatives did THEN.

      LEARN TO SEPARATE WHAT WAS FROM WHAT IS OR GO DOWN USELESSLY WAVING THE FLAG. I wore that uniform too during an era where we all should have learned what “Lawful Orders” mean from a cowardly slab of road kill named Calley.

      YOUR military is not in charge NOW. Get that through your head – PLEASE – the past is GONE. Your personal slur is only an indicator of how little you actually understand. Please grow up.

      • NO you are the problem. I see what is happening too, but the military do NOT deserve your slander. Do not lump them all into Calley. Look to this president! He’s determined to destroy this country. He’s trying to take down the mlitary, and I never said anything about their having control. FAIL!?? The failure is in a population that voted the guy in, in the first place.
        I am hoping none of the wounded warriors I know will read your bilge. It’s the most hurtful insane stuff I have read in a long time. I am done with you.

        As for personal slurs; take it like a man. You started the slurs when you wrote your first piece and put all the blame on the military. What you wrote was so wrong.

        • My, you wound so easily. You also miss the point and are blind to reality. Had THIS military obeyed its own OATH Obama would still be delivering leaflets in Chicago. Try connecting a few dots. It doesn’t matter WHAT GI Joe says or does and MY post was directed at military leadership at the Pentagon level. Apparently you can’t make the connection.

          So mosey off and sulk if you want. Or go back and reread my posts. Your choice. I don’t care which.

  11. THIS IS AN APOLOGY TO FLOYD, MY APOLOGIES! MY COMMENT WAS NEVER MEANT FOR YOU! IT WAS MEANT FOR THE GUY CALLING HIMSELF stRANGER. HERE IS WHAT HE SAID:

    If the military was ever capable of being a threat to Obama he could NEVER has gotten to this level of destruction of the country. They never were a threat and he knew it. Our “mighty men” FAILED US!

    Honor them? Respect them? NO. NEVER. They do not merit it. Throughout the Obama reign of ruin these fools knew the course he was on and did NOTHING to oppose it. They could easily have stopped his BS by merely standing in front of him and saying NO. Save for McCrystal’s short squeak of bravery none of them have said “we will defend the Constitution”, they all turned tail up and said YESSIR!

    The average GI may not think that way but SO WHAT? The military machine with its logistics, coordination and planning is run by the Pentagon not GI Joe. The National Guard is being equipped (with German built GLS armored cars, how appropriate) and trained to conduct Urban Warfare upon “dissidents”. Pretty obvious who they’re aiming at – those who oppose Obama. Anyone opposing his Royal Highness is – to the military and DHS, – a dissident!

    WHERE is the protest? It isn’t there. They WILL attack US.

    Honor the military? Only if they show they earned that honor. Until then I’d sooner place a wreath at the tomb of the unknown Communist.

  12. “What If?”
    November 18, 2012 by Cole Cleburne Blog Owner of “Fire Eater”

    What if the Current president had been elected by less than 40% of the popular vote?

    What if he declared martial law and suspended habeas corpus, so that anyone could be arrested without being charged and held indefinitely?

    What if he shut down all news media opposed to his agenda and jailed the editors?

    What if he signed an arrest warrant for the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?

    What if he arrested the majority of one state’s legislature because there was a chance those legislators may oppose him?

    And what if he created new states formed out of existing states simply for political expediency?

    What if he deported his most vocal critic in Congress?

    What if his greatest achievement in office, actually held no legal power and was simply political maneuvering, to win a war?

    What if he violated the 2nd Amendment by disarming the states of his choosing?

    What if, after only one month in office and without congressional approval, he unleashed the full might of the military on any state that refused to pay federal taxes?

    What if the military, while carrying out his orders, killed thousands of civilians, burned down homes, destroyed property and torched countless cities; while robbing and raping citizens?

    What if, due to all of his violations of the Constitution, which he was sworn to uphold, we built a huge monument in Washington D.C. to honor him; and we call him our greatest president ever?

    ***All of you here know the consequences of these “What If’s.” The South does! The rest of you don’t seem too.

    Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

    • Tsk! It’s purest heresy for an alleged conservative to state plain fact about “Father Abraham” Lincoln.

      From an essay titled “The American Lenin” published some several years ago:

      It’s harder and harder these days to tell a liberal from a conservative — given the former category’s increasingly blatant hostility toward the First Amendment, and the latter’s prissy new disdain for the Second Amendment — but it’s still easy to tell a liberal from a libertarian.Just ask about either Amendment.If what you get back is a spirited defense of the ideas of this country’s Founding Fathers, what you’ve got is a libertarian. By shameful default, libertarians have become America’s last and only reliable stewards of the Bill of Rights.But if — and this usually seems a bit more difficult to most people — you’d like to know whether an individual is a libertarian or a conservative, ask about Abraham Lincoln. …If libertarians ran things, they’d melt all the Lincoln pennies, shred all the Lincoln fives, take a wrecking ball to the Lincoln Memorial, and consider erecting monuments to John Wilkes Booth. Libertarians know Lincoln as the worst President America has ever had to suffer, with Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and Lyndon Johnson running a distant second, third, and fourth.Conservatives, on the other hand, adore Lincoln, publicly admire his methods, and revere him as the best President America ever had. One wonders: is this because they’d like to do, all over again, all of the things Lincoln did to the American people? Judging from their taste for executions as a substitute for individual self-defense, their penchant for putting people behind bars — more than any other country in the world, per capita, no matter how poorly it works to reduce crime — and the bitter distaste they display for Constitutional “technicalities” like the exclusionary rule, which are all that keep America from becoming the world’s largest banana republic, one is well-justified in wondering.

      Note: This essay was written well before our Magical Mystery Mombasa Messiah was more than just another thug in the Cook County machine, else he’d certainly have been included in the “worst presidents” list.

      • @Tucci78
        –lol– Man I’d love to hang’em all, from Lincoln onwards. None of’em have been true to the US Constitution, but only in degrees are they ranked.

        As for what I consider myself. I can tell you what I don’t consider myself.
        I don’t consider myself a Marxist, socialist, Fascist, liberal, conservative, Democrat, Republican or Libertarian. Independent is none explanatory and has no ideology except what suits them at the time. I’m not quiet a Constitutionalist because that is dependent on which of the above is in power and the way one interprets the Constitution, although I do believe in the strict interpretation of it. Doesn’t leave me with many choices; does it?

        I guess at the moment you could call me a secessionist, but that also doesn’t carry any specific ideology. I just want what’s right for the people, and what is right for the people is this; treat your neighbor as yourself. Only want the things for yourself that you would want your neighbor to have also. That would include the government staying out of our lives, as little laws and taxes as possible, the right to be left alone and the right to do as we please as long as it doesn’t directly affect your neighbor or another. (I mean direct in the physical sense. ie. your trash on his property is directly affecting your neighbor, but the hog your smoking is not, nor the cigarette.) The right to my own life and to do with it as I please.

        I could continue writing the above for ages. However it is easier to state it this way. I have a right to every last thing as long as it doesn’t directly affect another. I do not have the right to yell fire in a theater. Nor does any part of the government have any rights except what we/I specifically give them, directly spelled out.

        I wish only for you what I would wish for myself…

        Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

        Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

        • “As for what I consider myself. I can tell you what I don’t consider myself.
          I don’t consider myself a Marxist, socialist, Fascist, liberal, conservative, Democrat, Republican or Libertarian. Independent is none explanatory and has no ideology except what suits them at the time. I’m not quiet a Constitutionalist because that is dependent on which of the above is in power and the way one interprets the Constitution, although I do believe in the strict interpretation of it. Doesn’t leave me with many choices; does it?”

          How about “individualist,” in the sense that you consider the individual human being to have unalienable rights to his own life, to his own liberty, and to his own property? And that the only legitimate purpose of civil government is to provide for the protection of these rights?

          But I suspect I’ve got a solution for you in yet another quotation from writer L. Neil Smith.

          A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being for any reason whatever; nor will a libertarian advocate the initiation of force, or delegate it to anyone else.

          Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim.

          You’re almost without fail a small-”L” libertarian. Not necessarily an adherent to the Libertarian Party, but a libertarian nevertheless.

          You just didn’t know it.

    • Michael for heaven’s sake our problem today is OBAMA not Lincoln. Can’t anyone on this site stay in the current time frame and Century even? The issue is NOW not BACK THEN. You’re doing nothing more than muddling the discussion.

      No wonder Obama is winning!

      Enough for me today. I’m going someplace where they at least know that it is 2012, AD.

      • @stRanger

        You need to understand history of the past before you can understand history of today. Not doing so is the number one reason why history repeats itself.

        The mistakes Lincoln made led to the mistakes other presidents made after Lincoln and this eventually accumulated over time until it reached the presidency of Obama. Obama is doing nothing more than taking all the bad laws that has ever been passed from Lincoln’s time onward and now he is building his own government from them unconstitutional laws. Lincoln set the precedent for all this to happen because he was the one that originally broke the US Constitution by committing treason. In the process he also changed the way the US Constitution was to be interpreted, from a strict sense to an ever changing Living Document sense. This is why any president and anyone in congress and any SC justice can interpret the US Constitution almost any way they so desire. This then explains how ObamaCare passed the SC. It’s simply a matter of how they interpret it on any given day, which is what Lincoln is responsible for.

        Now, since you didn’t know any of that; How are you proposing to fix a system that is not fixable? Are you gun-ho happy or something?

        Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

        • I love Abraham Lincoln and you must be a foreigner, a liar, a leftist, an idiot or otherwise ignorant in what your brain picked up and decided to use in the manner it has. All I can say is for you to take a flying leap and kiss the A** of the American people, including Abraham Lincoln, one of our greatest Republican Presidents.

          • @blackyb
            “I love Abraham Lincoln”

            Of course you love Obama too.
            Your love betrays you.
            That along with the rest of your diatribe only proves why this country must permanently split apart. Who wants to be forced to live among people such as you? Not I for one and there are millions more who feels the same way.

            Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

        • You assume that I’m not familiar with history. You are WRONG. But that’s NOT the point. The point is that we must deal with Obama NOW. I am also fully aware of the dangers of not appreciating that history – I’ve preached that for some time now.

          The real POINT is to get after THIS Usurper NOW. You can refight the Civil War and Reconstruction when that is taken care of.

          The history we need to be preaching and teaching are the methods used by Communists world wide (and Nazis in Europe) when they collapsed governments and took control and the carnage that ensued. Those methods have been adopted by Obama and his ilk NOW. The references should be direct between this Communist take-over and those of the past which resulted in 150,000,000 DEAD. The Communists of the past caused untold devastation on the world by forcing a system of government upon people which has NEVER worked. One of Obama’s allies Bill Ayers has stated he’d be comfortable adding to that number another 25,000,000 – the “dissidents” murdered off when shoving Communism down America’s throat.

          THAT is the history that should be broadcast. Bringing Lincoln into it would only drive away people just like the Republican Party did when throwing the last election by going FAR off message.

          We need to survive THIS crisis and bringing in obscure references to Lincoln is not the way. FOCUS!!

    • Habeas Corpus has been suspended! Its called the NDAA or National Defense Authorization Act, which Obama passed just this year under executive order. You can be put in jail for any reason and held for any length of time, with no due process….

      • @DoYourHomeWork
        “…NDAA…

        Lincoln done the same thing in the North and imprisoned 10s of thousands of Northerners. He shut down well over 300 newspapers and burned the buildings. He threatened to arrest a SC justice and he deported a US House Rep from Ohio. What kind of power is that? Obama can do this and more right now if he so chooses.

        Michael- Deo Vindicabamur

  13. Where have our generals gone? I imagine by way of our decent teachers, professors, preachers, judges, business owners, Constitution, respect and honor for God, the parents and country. These are being replaced by those in the image of the usurper in our White house to finish the agenda his handlers started.

  14. Do you know that this is what Hitler did when he was acquiring power? First he got rid of other parties, unions, opposition companies…then it came time for the military. They were the last ones that could oppose him and he got rid of those that did. ‘Nough said?

    • He is just replacing the generals with ones who will abide by his orders. Replacing judges, pollsters, teachers and putting in their place people who will conform to his agenda. This is not a sudden move. Obama was being groomed from youth on up.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] We already know that in his first term, Obama has circumvented Congress and the US Constitution on several occasions.Is it possible that a military coup may have been in the works? H/T: Western Journalism [...]

  2. [...] We already know that in his first term, Obama has circumvented Congress and the US Constitution on several occasions. H/T: Western Journalism [...]

Speak Your Mind