What’s Gained And Lost In The AWB 2013

Dianne Feinstein SC Whats Gained and Lost in the AWB 2013

Understandably, in the wake of a harrowing massacre and a recent string of other notable mass shootings, we are left with a feeling of vulnerability, knowing another shooting of this magnitude can spontaneously sprout in a neighborhood near you. Feeling we have reached the tipping point in our national dialogue on guns in this country, politicians feel the time is ripe to dust off the old Assault Weapons Ban, once implemented for ten years in 1994. Anecdotally, we understand that with a military style “assault rifle” (sure, I’ll use their terminology) coupled with high capacity magazines, there is the potential to unleash many times more carnage than say the common handgun. But how much safer is this ban really going to make us?

Few people realize that the assault rifle’s contribution to gun crime and homicides is surprisingly insignificant with figures of it’s use ranging between 2 to 7 percent. With under fifteen thousand murders committed annually in this country, only a few hundred are perpetrated with this type of rifle.

I compare imposing an assault weapons ban to the idea of banning swords, expecting it would lower stabbing deaths. Though the premise that a sword is a far deadlier blade weapon than a knife is true, it would fail to lower stabbings because they are hardly used for that purpose.

If gun control advocates had it their way and tomorrow there are no more combat style rifles in the hands of the common man, that wouldn’t translate into the elimination of a couple hundred homicides. All that is doing is changing the firearm that’s going to be used. If we were to examine each case of a murder in which that type of weapon was used, granted there would be some cases where the enhanced features of the assault rifle enabled more success and more people slain. Yet we would also find a lot of cases where the results would be no different had the murderer used a six shot revolver.

At the end of business, we’d be looking at the success of this bill in reducing gun crime with a microscope. “Even if we save just a few lives, it would all be worth it” some might say. Perhaps so. We would likely save many more lives if we were to slash the speed limit across the country by a modest 5 miles per hour; yet we wouldn’t stand for that because we have places to go, and we want to be there five minutes ago. We would save many more lives if we were to ban the public serving of alcohol; yet we wouldn’t stand for that because we have calculated that the ten thousand senseless loss of lives annually is worth having a rocking buzz.

Folks, I am an owner of an AR15 along with a robust load of thirty round magazines. I am a veteran of the Iraq War; and even after my time in the service, I continue to pursue Warriorship in arming, equipping, physically conditioning, and training as part of my noble way of life. I and millions like me do not deserve to become criminals with the passing of a single piece of legislation. For clarity, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 would grandfather current lawfully obtained arsenals; but we can expect future pieces of legislation that will deem this isn’t doing enough to keep us safe.

I have no moronic fantasies of overthrowing a tyrannical government, or of resisting a foreign occupation on American soil, or of a Zombie Apocalypse. I do not think violent solutions are a remedy for any of our political grievances of today; and at the same time, it needs to be an available option to put a government we put in power in check. And that is why firearms ownership is such a crucial civil right. It’s about something much greater than hunting, or sport, or hobby, or even home defense and self-protection. It’s about citizen empowerment. We have a 2nd Amendment because having a powerful citizenry is an important component to a free republic.

Weighing the scant amount of safety we are gaining with the surrendering of an awesome inheritance and lofty concept of freedom, I judge this proposed legislation in the Assault Weapons Ban 2013 to be a bad trade of liberty for security. We need to be more careful of what we are giving up for peace of mind and how much domination we allow government to have over us, no matter how benevolent the intentions.

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. I get kick out of the Socialist (oops, I mean Democrat) propaganda their putting out about ‘assault weapons’. They are forgetting some important facts: 1) There is no such thing as a fully automatic AR-15 rifle; they are both semi-automatic: You have to pull the trigger each and every time to fire the weapon. As to a M-16 being fully automatic that’s a crock: in order to make this weapon fire more that 1 round with each trigger pull, you must have a selector switch and then with the newer weapons it will only fire three round burst. 2) As to a hand gun being an assault, it’s to laughable to even comprehend how those idiots came up with that one; also those like mine (.45 ACP) has a mag that can only hold 9 rounds. I tried once to use a 15 round mag in mine and it felt our of balance. 3) As to machine-guns you need a special permit to even purchase one and another one just to own it. Both cost you a lot of money just to get them and then you have to renew them each and every year for just about as much as it originally cost. 4) Last but not least most close in murders were done with a hand gun and if it was a multiple you find that the person had to reload or used multiple weapons.

    As the saying goes: “AN UNARMED INDIVIDUAL IS A SLAVE; WHEREAS AN ARMED ONE IS FREE!”
    I’m not a slave nor will I ever be one, and also I will not let my family and friends become one. I just hope those that continually scream for more gun control will soon realize that if their dream of no more guns come true they’ll have sold themselves and their children into SLAVERY.

    US COMBAT VETERAN: Vietnam ’68 – ’69; Door-gunner, 1st Cavalry Division (AM) and now a retired USAF TSgt.

  2. The Administration distracts, to divert to deceive, the gun issue is nothing more than a distraction, our focus needs to be on Benghazi, that is the key that can end this nightmare. Demand that your elected representatives open an honest and thorough investigation on who did what when, and who did nothing to protect four brave American’s that were slaughtered by the Muslim insurgents with weapons that in all probability were given to them by Bozo and his criminal Administration.

Speak Your Mind