Photo Credit: Dustin C. Oliver Creative Commons

Everyone in America now understands Barack Obama tarried for more than two years in releasing his birth certificate publicly – a document absolutely essential to determining his constitutional eligibility for office.


Advertisement


During that two-year period, the national press offered excuse after excuse for Obama’s reticence.

They claimed variously:

that it was unnecessary;

that he was obviously qualified for office;that he couldn’t get his birth certificate;


Advertisement


that the certification of live birth he had previously released was the only document necessary for proof and the only one available to people born in Hawaii;

that it was racist to ask for him to release any more documentation to prove his eligibility.

When the pressure from a skeptical citizenry and the imminent release of a No. 1 best-selling book promised to bring the controversy of Obama’s eligibility to critical mass, he was forced to release what he claimed was his legitimate long-form birth certificate – or, at least, a digital image of it.

The national press was quick to hail that document as the real deal – of course, without any efforts at verification. In fact, the national press, sans WND, chose to ignore a new raging controversy over the legitimacy of that document. To date, only one independent document expert has been quoted by the media suggesting it is authentic – and he claims to have been misquoted entirely.

Read More at WND by Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily

Photo Credit: Dustin C. Oliver Creative Commons


Don't Miss Out. Subscribe By Email Or Facebook

Email

Facebook