What Does The Law Say About Obama’s Eligibility?

Obama Eligibility What Does The Law Say About Obamas Eligibility?

PHOENIX, Ariz. – A challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy of the Oval Office was thrown out because “the voters ruled” on his eligibility in the 2008 election. Another was tossed when Obama didn’t even bother to show up to refute the evidence. And cases have been rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court because the justices are “avoiding” the issue.

But this week, for the first time, the results of a formal law enforcement investigation into Obama’s eligibility will be released.

WND TV will live-stream the news conference scheduled by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., Thursday at 1 p.m. Mountain Time in Phoenix, or 3 p.m. Eastern. Arpaio previously has indicated there might be a “shock” in the report.
Read more at World Net Daily.

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. I have some concerns about this Arpaio Investigation. I don’t doubt his sincerity nor his integrity but there will not be any legal action against Obama even if they can prove he’s not a “Natural Born Citizen”. The best thing we, as Americans, can do is to vote the SOB out of office. If the Clintons couldn’t prove he was ineligible, Arpaio can’t either.

    • The mystery is in California where the Secretary of State tells me that only the Political Parties tell her the names to place on the ballots. All liability falls back to the Political Party.

      The Secretary of State says to me in email that the criteria used by Political Party’s is the candidate for President meets these requirements:

      1. Natural born Citizen
      2. 35 years of age or older
      3. 14 years residence in the United States.

      Well?
      California Democrat Secretary of State doesn’t question this, and has not asked anyone in California Government to question Obama Eligibility or the California Process for Presidential Elections.

      TOTALLY INCOMPETENT AND IN CONTEMPT OF THE UNITED STATES AND OUR CONSTITUTION.

      • dynahog, it looks like to me that the California’s DEMOCRAT Secretary of State made no effort to check into whether Obama was actually eligible under Article II, Section 1 of our constitution to run for President. She would vote for a dog if you put a Democrat label on it. She is trying to justify her ineptitude by projecting the blame elsewhere; a typical Democrat strategist. I agree with your assessment of the California Secretary of State. When you have a political Party who knowingly ran someone not meeting the requirements of our constitution the only answer is to vote them all out of office. Of course, in California this will be nearly impossible because so many of them are dependent of big government.

    • I saw where you mentioned that if Clinton’s couldn’t prove OBama ineligible then Arpaio won’t be able to either.There was a article that you should be able to easily find,that describes eight separate attempts to legally modify the law through congressional action putting aside the “Natural Born Citizen “clause.The attempts start in 2005 I believe and the last attempt was Feb of 2008 sponsored by Hillary Clinton and co-sponsored by Barak OBama.As you recall Nancy Pelosi also certified as vetted OBama to be placed on the ballots as a Presidential contender.It’s been proven over and over that he is an illegal Pres .we just can’t find anyone left to prosecute him.My last stand was to join the Tea party (when they opened enrollment) I’m doing my part and still feel as though it’s not enough.Good Luck to you and your family

      • join your local militia !!!!! google constitutional emergency or American patriot and join your state chapter today, the tea party was our last line of peaceful protests…. buy weapons and ammo the reason you feel its not enough…. is because it ain’t !!!! these commie bastards will only listen to one thing and it ain’t peaceful protests

      • 94th Congress (1975-1976)
        H.J.RES.127
        Latest Title: Joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that a citizen shall not be ineligible to the Office of the President by reason of not being native born if he has been a U.S. citizen for at least 12 years and a resident within the United States for 14 years. Sponsor: Rep Matsunaga, Spark M. [HI-1] (introduced 1/20/1975)

  2. No where in the Constitution do Voters decide eligibility.
    Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: “natural born citizen” is not anywhere in Law or up to the People.

    A Constitutional Amendment is not decided by The People per se. Post facto it is only decided by 2/3rds votes in both houses of Congress, a signature by a President, and a 2/3rds vote among all States (50).
    Article V
    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
    ============

    Constitutional Amendment proposals over about the last 40 years from Republicans and Democrats in either House or Senate were forwarded to the respective Judiciary Committees, but no floor votes occurred. Thus there was never an Amendment to change Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.

    The essence of these proposals is in the latest:
    ‘‘A person who is a citizen of the United States, who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20
    years, and who is otherwise eligible to hold the Office of the President, is not ineligible to hold that Office by reason of not being a native born citizen of the United States.’’

    All of the proposals over a 40 year span read about the same, except for the number of years residency in the United States. The intent was to make eligible those American Citizens that were “native born”, but not necessarily “natural born” citizens.

    A “native born citizen” is one born in the USA.
    A “natural born citizen” is one born where both parents were American Citizens.

    Some difficulties here are those born outside the United States to two American Citizen parents. Ref. Barry Goldwater US Supreme Court decided he was a “natural born citizen” because both parents were American Citizens when born in the Arizona Territory (before statehood). John McCain US Senate unanimously decide he was a “natural born citizen” because both parents were American Citizens when born in Panama.

    I think others need to be included such as “naturalized American Citizens” and/or their children and/or when one parent but not both are “naturalized” versus “native born” versus “natural born”.

    NOW AS FOR TODAY and in 2008 as well, there has never been any change to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. So WHO gave Barrack Hussein Obama II special treatment and why?

    Obama is not a “natural born citizen” because his father at birth was British born in the British Protectorate of Kenya. The Republic of Kenya did not exist until 12/14/1964. There is no verifiable evidence of Obama being born in Hawaii. His claim of a Long Form COLB at the White House website is a forged document that does not satisfy the requirements of proving American Citizenship for application to get a Security Clearance, to get Social Security or to get Medicare. It simply does not fly.

    For Social Security, there is the issue that (a) SSN’s are never recycled, (b) Obama uses a SSN assigned to a male in Connecticut who moved to Hawaii and died (Obama’s Grandmother worked in a State Office with access to the death and SSN). My guess is he never applies for it.

    For all the education claimed by Obama, all records are sealed, and not one classmate remembers him.
    In Indonesia, the school Obama attended lost all records.

    The number of SSNs appears to be at least six (6) for this Con Man from Space.

    There is no evidence Obama has ever possessed a Passport.

    ///////////// Dumbfounded over this Act of Treason and everyone calling themselves Democrat and in Congress in 2007 or 2008, is Dead-Silent. /////////

  3. Unfortunately,it really doesn’t matter wat the actual law says or what the Constittion says becaue as everybody is aware of by now almost all (ifnot all) of the Judges interpret he law as they see fit instead of using the actual Constitution as their Guide. That is why our nation is now in the pitts because Judges and lawmakers have strayed away from the actual meaning and intent of our Constitution and have been doing this for many years. We as a nation need to return to our great Guide for our Republican form of Government nation which is our Constitution. That is why it is vitally important that all Constitutional minded Americans vote for Ron Paul, the only candidate that abideby an respects the Constitution. If this would hppen and Ron Paul won the election in November then many of our nations problems could easily be solved and corrected. Ron Paul 2012. The only Presiden America needs.

  4. THE PRESENT ADMINISTRATION HAS NO REGARD FOR THE LAW,, AS WE ” JOHN Q. PUBLIC,” THAT IS US FOLKS OUT HERE IN NEVER NEVER LAND THAT THE CLOWN PRINCE DOES NOT THINK EXISTS, iN NOVEWMBER THE TRUE COLORS OF THE CLOWN PRINCE WILL BE SHOWN AS HE TRIES TO WIN WITH THE STUFFING OF THE BALLOT BOX AND A BUNCH OF ILLEGAL VOTERS.
    WE JOHN Q. PUBLIC HAVE GOT TO STAND TOGETHER, IN NOVEMBER 2012, ON THIS ONE AND SHOVE, I SHOULD SAY KICK,THIS MISGUIDED, NON RESIDENT OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.

  5. This is the way I see it,,,there are too many involved with the whole set-up and none want to be caught in a criminal act, so the message went out to all Judicial Courts, law Officers, State Capital’s, FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and Attorney General Holder. All the main players, and once they were told, that meant, they knew. The longer they held out, the worse it has gotten because of us birthers continuously wanting the truth. Now Obama got into office and no one wants to admit he is ineligible, and besides that they don’t want the world know they allowed it to happen. It would make the whole Washington DC look like fools and criminals of the people to boot. And, the citizens, would look like fools as well for electing him. I didn’t vote for the usurper, I knew he was bad news first time I saw him. If you really want to know about Obama and Hillary, here is a good site to check out. If you thought he had never done anything except be a community organizer you need to know what that was all about. Go to, http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm You will find two more places to give better details of what he is to do. They are called, Service Plan-Part 1 and Service Plan-Part 2. Some will be shocked and wise ones will realize they were right.

  6. Judges interpreting the Law and Making the Law?

    The Congress makes LAW.
    On eligibility, no one of any party disputes Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 on “natural born citizen”. They all know what it means (a person born to both parents that are American Citizens at the birth).

    Since 1975 and probably before that there have been proposed amendments to the Constitution that would enable a “native born citizen” who may not be a “natural born citizen” eligible to hold the Office of President.

    No proposal ever left the Judiciary Committees for a vote on the House and Senate floors. The words in the Constitution are the only law on eligibility of a prospective President. It also applies to the Vice President, and the post-9/11 changes in succession to the Office in the event both President and Vice President are unable to perform. Third in line is the Speaker of the House.

  7. If there isn’t anything to it then let’s have the hearing and be done with it. No one spends four million dollars to cover up pot smoking. There is a lot more to this so, let’s have it before Obama perjures himself for the second time in four years.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] His Controversial Robo Calls. »What Does The Law Say About Obama’s Eligibility?TweetPHOENIX,Ariz. – A challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy of the Oval Office was thrown out [...]

  2. [...] What Does The Law Say About Obama’s Eligibility? PHOENIX, Ariz. – A challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy of… [...]

  3. [...] dead in its tracks is now moving forward due to some surprising developments.Related posts:What Does The Law Say About Obama’s Eligibility? PHOENIX,Ariz. – A challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy of…Obama Eligibility Case [...]

  4. [...] What Does The Law Say About Obama’s Eligibility? PHOENIX, Ariz. – A challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy of… [...]

Speak Your Mind