Dr Alan Keyes in this video answers a question about the mystery of Barack Obama’s misuse of Social Security Numbers.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Wouldn't it be nice if DrAlanKeyes could go on Fox (others would not have the guts to invite him) to tell this story. Our country is in serious trouble because of this imposter in the white house. The house and the senate have put on blinders. Are they afraid for the lives of their families and themselves?
I ( & others ) wonder why the Congress doesn't really seek an answer to this and other Obama questions. I guess, it just to get re- elected. Why don't ' they ' care ?
Congress, the Senate, the CIA and the FBI are not doing their jobs to protect this country and it's Constitution. Could it be that they are they afraid for the lives of their families and themselves?
This is serious!!!!! Obama and his administration combined are the most dangerous thing the United States is facing, along with the MSM (News Media). It seems as though the MSM does not care for what is best for this country either.
I AGREE WITH YOU. WHAT SURPRISES ME IS FOX NEWS IS NOT LIKED BY THE WHITE HOUSE. I ALSO WITH LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURTS WITH NONE OF THEM HEARING THE CASE AGAINST OBAMANATION. I TRULY THINK OUR COURTS ARE FULL OF BS ALONG WITH OUR POLITICANS. ACORN IS A FRAUD AND THEY HAVE NOT EVEN DEFUNDED THIS OBAMANATION.
May have know he would beat around the bush when being asked about an illegal circumstances concerning another black. If he was even a known murderer, just being a black would be ok with all the other blacks. They don't even have enough sence to know he is half white. They are envious they don't have anything illegal to get away with themselves.
Sounds to me like he WANTS for obama to be investigated.
James, I agree totally with Rene. You need to re-watch the video and come to the opposite conclusion. Maybe you misunderstand Mr. Keyes' sarcasm. The part of the public needing to know for certain who the man with his finger on the "nuclear trigger" is should have been the turning point for you…whassup?
Is Trump the only presidential candidate that actually will call out Illegal congressmen? Also Issa, Grasley, and even inhoff seem to be able to challenge the Illegal actions in congress, attorney generals, and official offices of congress. Sarah Palin may also be in that category of challenging the status-quo. but most of the rest are just "good ol boys" waiting to retire on their huge over paid life time salaries.
Trump was never a candidate, he would not pass the"lets see your books" That man has more debt than some countries. He is living off borrowed money and that will surface soon and he will be exposed for his foolishness. See when lending gets tight and he has problems getting loans he kingdom shall implode.
So let me understand this!
Yesterday you were a attorney but today you are a banker & financial analyst?
Sorry ireuel I am just not buying it!
More likely a fool would describe you better.
No I never said I was any of these, actually I am a Engineer.Now where did you come to these assumptions. Oh ya you like to word smith to keep the crowed appeased. I get it now.
Fool;;; I think that is a new one. Wow your vocabulary is very large.
Ireuel unlike you I do have a formal education.
So let me get this right!
Yesterday you were a Attorney?
This morning you were a Banker / Financial Consultant – Adviser etc.?
This afternoon you are a Locomotive Engineer?
Do i have it right now?
I must admit that, in the beginning, I thought Alan Keyes was a little, I don't know, "odd," maybe? But the more I listen to him, I realize that it's just that he's extremely intelligent and I haven't been exposed to enough people of his caliber. Mr. Keyes was succinct and to the point with just enough wit, sarcasm and humor to bring home his argument effectively with the ring of truth to it. I realize that Alan Keyes was backhanded and fraudulently treated by the king of fraud, Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro or that other Indian name he's been found to have, whatever it is. Anyone who believes the drivel about the fraud man being born in Hawaii has either jelly for a brain or is a total lying dog him or herself, period. I liked the way Mr. Keyes described the yellow bellied politicians of today as worthless of being our representatives. Good Job, Alan, appreciate it.
Dr. Alan Keyes is a very intelligent man. I would love to see him appointed as a special investigator
of this issue pertaining to Obama's social security number.
Dr. Alan Keys is bold and intelligent. He has called out Obama to his face in a past debate and pretty much told him that he was a phony Christian. Obama was indignant that anybody would question his 'faith". You can know them by their fruit: wolves in sheep's clothing.
Dr. Keys is so right that those who are in office are cowering in the dark because they have no real sense of loyalty to the truth or Constitution or the people and therefore stand for nothing.
Let's start calling the politicians who won't want to see Obama vetted "cowards and traitors", they have earned it.
It is a disgrace that neither the Legislative nor Judicial Branches of government will resolve, for the people, both the fraudulent birth certificate claim and the fraudulent social security number claim.
SOOOOO the issue here is: something is WRONG, Obama is ILLEGAL and he is NOT eligiable to be in the office he holds! The man has made a mockery of this nation and he has been set up to be where he is and yet if anyone else did what he did they'd be thrown in jail! So, let's right the wrong and stop making the issue race! obam is both "WHITE and BLACK" so what race will people go against and which race is the problem! there are two…you bigots, it's a matter of TRUTH!!! Obama is "ILLEGAL" Pure and simple!!
The Obama Administration's problems continue to mount in The New Black Panther Cover-Up
WND Exclusive LAW OF THE LAND-Is New Black Panther cover-up cracking?-Judge orders explanation why documents have been withheld-Posted: August 12, 2011-12:30 am Eastern-
By Bob Unruh-© 2011 WND
Eric Holder
The alleged cover-up of the Obama administration's decision to abandon a prosecution of voter intimidation against the New Black Panther Party following the 2008 election may be starting to crack, according to Judicial Watch, which investigates and prosecutes government misbehavior.
The organization announced today that a federal judge is demanding the government explain why some documents should be withheld from the public.
The order from U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton rejected the Obama Justice Department's argument that paperwork processed after the government dismissed the case against the New Black Panther Party and several members could be withheld under the description of "attorney work product privilege."
The judge wrote, "Although an injunction remains in place in the New Black Panther Party case … the filing of the motion for voluntary dismissal largely marked the end of the litigation. As such, the documents prepared subsequent to that event were not prepared in contemplation of litigation and are thus outside the scope of the work-product privilege."
WND previously reported on the Philadelphia case, which was documented on video.
The Justice Department originally brought the case against the organization and several individuals who witnesses say derided voters with catcalls of "white devil" and "cracker" and told them they should prepare to be "ruled by the black man."
One poll watcher called police after he reportedly saw one of the men brandishing a nightstick to threaten voters.
"As I walked up, they closed ranks, next to each other," the witness told Fox News at the time. "So I walked directly in between them, went inside and found the poll watchers. They said they'd been here for about an hour. And they told us not to come outside because a black man is going to win this election no matter what."
He said the man with a nightstick told him, "'We're tired of white supremacy,' and he starts tapping the nightstick in his hand. At which point I said, 'OK, we're not going to get in a fistfight right here,' and I called the police."
Subsequently, former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams testified before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission that the Voting Section of Holder's organization is dominated by a "culture of hostility" toward bringing cases against blacks and other minorities who violate voting-rights laws.
Further, two other former U.S. Department of Justice attorneys later corroborated key elements of the explosive allegations by Adams.
One of Adams' DOJ colleagues, former Voting Section trial attorney Hans A. von Spakovsky, told WND he saw Adams was being attacked in the media for lack of corroboration. He said he knew Adams was telling the truth, so he decided on his own to step forward.
Page 1 of 2
So let me understand this!Page 2 of 2
Adams had been ordered by his superiors to drop a case prosecutors already had won against the New Black Panthers. When they were ordered to stop prosecution, Adams and the team of DOJ lawyers had already won the case by default because the New Black Panthers declined to defend themselves in court. At that point in the proceedings, the DOJ team was simply waiting for the judge to assign penalties against the New Black Panthers.
Judicial Watch's comprehensive investigation of the New Black Panther Party scandal previously found information that top political appointees played key roles in the decision to dismiss the case.
That information "directly contradict[s] sworn testimony by Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that no political leadership was involved in the decision," Judicial Watch said.
The latest judicial decision moves the case forward, Judicial Watch said.
"Because the case had essentially ended on May 15, 2009, Judge Walton found that 'it is difficult to see how' the 24 documents created after May 15, 2009, 'were prepared or obtained because of the prospect of litigation, which is the testing question the court must answer in evaluating the DOJ's work-product claim,'" Judicial Watch explained.
While Walton said the documents could be withheld under the deliberative process privilege, an entirely discretionary claim of exemption, he also found the DOJ failed to satisfy its burden of showing that the 24 documents may be withheld in their entirety.
Rules allow only information that is "predecisional and deliberative" to be withheld.
The judge said, "As it stands now, the description of the DOJ's segregation efforts is too general for the court, and the plaintiff, to evaluate whether any factual material in these documents is 'inextricably intertwined' with the deliberative material and would thus permit the DOJ to withhold the documents in their entirety."
"The Obama Justice Department is going to extraordinary lengths to make sure no more details emerge regarding the Black Panther scandal," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
"We already know the Obama administration's claim that political appointees were not involved in this decision is patently false. And now Justice Department officials continue to fight tooth and nail to stonewall the release of additional information. What else do they have to hide? This new court ruling means we may pry loose some additional information on this voter intimidation scandal."
The judge gave Obama's team another chance to make the process good, if DOJ officials would submit "a renewed motion for summary judgment accompanied by a declaration or other documentation that solely addresses the segregability issue."
Failing that, the judge said, some disclosure would be required.
Judicial Watch explained that government documents it previously received show top political appointees at the DOJ were involved in the decision to dismiss the New Black Panther Party case, including Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, the third highest ranking official at the Obama Justice Department.
Attorney General Eric Holder also received "an update on a planned course of action in the NBPP" from Acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King, dated May 12, 2009, just three days before the case was dismissed, according to a Vaughn index uncovered by Judicial Watch.
A Vaughn index describes documents being withheld from disclosure under FOIA and the basis for the withholdings.
However, Perez' testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights explained no political leadership was involved.
Read more: Is New Black Panther cover-up cracking? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=332453#ixzz1UqN7RNCv
The Obots ! Deception Spin & Lies are their calling cards!
Known Obots for this site: Ellen, Granite, Ireuel & his numerous aliases, James McPherson & his numerous aliases, 1oldcoyote2.
Note: So many aliases have been used by these people over a period of time that it is difficult to
remember all of them so to list here.
WND Exclusive CERTIFIGATE-'OBOTs' admit lying in scheme to punk WND-Now deny ex-Fannie Mae chief James Johnson is their White House contact-Posted: August 09, 2011-8:50 pm Eastern – By Jerome R. Corsi – © 2011 WND
This is the fifth in a series of continuing articles aimed at exposing the "OBOTs" – radical supporters of Barack Obama dedicated to disrupting people who question his eligibility to be president.
The first article exposed former California lawyer William L. Bryan, aka "P.J. Foggy." The second article exposed Foggy's sidekick, Kurt Coleman, aka "Rikker." The third article exposed James A. Johnson, former head of Fannie Mae, as "JimBot," the White House contact and organizer of the "Fogbow" OBOTs posting on Bryan's website Fogbow.com. The fourth article documented Internet posts by Bryan confirming the identification of Johnson.
Editor's note: The following article, including the taped telephone recording, contains sexually suggestive language that some will consider offensive.
NEW YORK – In the disinformation world propagated by the radical Obama supporters known as OBOTs, " short for "Obama Robots," participants typically post their strongly partisan and frequently acerbic comments under a user name to hide their identity.Following WND articles exposing the OBOT claim that James A. Johnson, former head of Fannie Mae, was their White House contact, organizer and funder, OBOT posters on Fogbow.com have changed their story and contend they lied in an effort to "punk" WND.Foggy denial-Currently Bill Bryan, the creator of Fogbow.com who posts under the username "P. J. Foggy," has issued repeated denials that Johnson is involved with the OBOTs posting on Fogbow.com.In his various posts,Bryan justifies the lying as part of an elaborate campaign the OBOTs conduct to "punk birthers," with tactics that have included falsifying documents, influencing court proceedings and harassing ordinary citizens who dare to question Obama's eligibility to be president.Bryan's current theme is that by lying in his posts on Fogbow.com, he convinced WND to publish a story falsely identifying Johnson as "JimBot" on Fogbow.com.Exhibit 1 clearly shows Bryan bragging about lying, in a comment posted on Fogbow.com Aug. 1.Exhibit 1: Bill Bryan, posting as "P.J. Foggy," brags he lied about James A. Johnson Again, on Aug. 2, as seen in Exhibit 2, Bryan boasted he would post comments on the WND forum claiming he lied if WND wrote additional stories on Johnson.Exhibit 2: Bill Bryan, posting as "P.J. Foggy" claims he fooled WND by lying This leaves Bryan in the position of either having impersonated the identity of Johnson though his various posts dating from 2009 until last week or claiming he had always been lying about Johnson.A brief look at a Fogbow.com webpage from mid-July gives a snapshot view of the foul language, insults and ridicule that occasion every mention of WND on the website.Bryan,himself, typically takes the lead in bathroom language, as seen in Exhibit 3.Exhibit 3: Bill Bryan post undistinguished by scatological language
Despite repeated phone calls from WND,Johnson has not commented.NeonZX is'not grumpy'WND has previously reported that NeonZX uses the username"JimBot"as a type of double-cover that permits prominent Democratic Party operative Johnson to make phone calls and direct the group.
NeonZX/JimBot posted on his YouTube site a video of himself entitled "Grumpy Neon?" in which he playfully mocks Bryan for putting him on the "grumpy" list. In the video, which has since been removed, NeonZX displays a kitten, repeating a theme in the various videos of cats and kittens he has posted on his YouTube channel. BirtherReportDotCom post a rendition of the video with its own commentary.
Page 1 of 2
Ireuel unlike you I do have a formal education.Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4 is a screen capture of NeonZX taken from the "Grumpy Neon?" video.Exhibit 4: "NeonZX " screen capture from the "Grumpy Neon?" video A second video on the YouTube channel is revealingly titled "NeonZX."This video displays an image of the extraterrestrial adversary known as "Dalek" from the British science fiction television show "Dr. Who," which NeonZX uses as his avatar when posting on Fogbow.com.According to administrative records maintained on Fogbow.com, NeonZX joined the website at 7:27 a.m. on March 10, 2009.When checked by WND, NeonZX had posted 1,064 comments on Fogbow.com, for an average of 1.21 posts daily.NeonZX, upon registering, listed he was 49 years old.With typical "punking" humor, NeonZX mocked the idea that posters on Fogbow.com shared identities, drawing from the character of "Neo," the character played by Keanu Reeves in the "Matrix" movies, as seen in Exhibit 5.Exhibit 5: NeonZX uses "Matrix" movie theme to assert he is the only "JimBot."WND has now had two phone discussions with NeonZX in which he refused to provide his identification.The phone number, with a Washington, D.C., area code, traced to a disposable cell phone purchased by an identified user.Neon ZX initiated the second phone call, which he taped and posted on TheRegulator.net, only to remove it a short time later."[Fogbow.com] isn't an organized effort," NeonZX said in the phone call, continuing to protest the contention that Johnson had organized the effort from the White House."It's just a bunch of us out here having fun."The phone call can be heard here:Exhibit 6 shows a NeonZX Internet post on Politijab.com in which he contradicted the claim the OBOTs were not organized, bragging instead that: "Of course, I let them believe as they wish, but we here all know the true hierarchy of the organization. Wouldn't it blow their mind if only they knew how deep the rabbit hole really is?"Exhibit 6: NeonZX brags OBOTs are highly connected In Exhibit 6, NeonZX also bragged about his sophistication with phone technology, suggesting he could use high-
security cellphones, complete with secure-encryption systems.Larry Sinclair charges NeonZX with death threat.Larry Sinclair, the author of the book "Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder," has filed criminal charges against NeonZX that resulted in an FBI investigation.As WND reported in February 2008, Sinclair alleged that he used cocaine and engaged in homosexual acts with Barack Obama when Obama was an Illinois state senator. In 2009, NeonZX taunted Sinclair with a photo of a Fox News report on a Daytona Beach resident burning down a rental home in an outdoor grill fire, as seen in Exhibit 7.Exhibit 7: Sinclair Accuses NeonZX of Death Threat.NeonZX told WND he posted the picture because he saw an Internet video of Sinclair using a barbeque grill in an enclosed porch area."If he was stupid enough to use a grill in an enclosed area,I thought he was stupid enough to burn down his house," NeonZX told WND, denying he intended his Internet posting to represent a threat to Sinclair's life.Sinclair reported the incident to the FBI and told WND that Special Agent Brenda Borne of the Washington,D.C. FBI office had interviewed NeonZX, who Sinclair identified as "James Berry."NeonZX confirmed to WND that the FBI had interviewed him over the Sinclair incident, but he equivocated when asked by WND if the investigation was continuing.FBI Special Agent Brenda Borne did not return repeated WND calls asking for comment.Exhibit 8 shows a posting on DailyKos.com on Oct.17,2010,in which NeonZX made clear the U.S.District Court for the District of Columbia had made public Sinclair's book as part of a plaintiff's exhibit.Exhibit 8: NeonZX posts on DailyKos.com offering Larry Sinclair's book free.NeonZX then linked to a Scribd.com posting of the court papers & Sinclair's book.As seen in Exhibit 9, NeonZX's account profile on DailyKos.com gives no reference to his identity.
Exhibit 9: NeonZX account on DailyKos.com.NeonZX also posts comments on TheRegulator.net, another website dedicated in general to attacking and ridiculing those questioning Obama's eligibility and in particular to attacking and ridiculing Larry Sinclair.Speculation that NeonZX is the "Justin" who created Politijab.com,an OBOT website that is currently off the Internet,is incorrect.The head of Politi-
jab.com has been identified as Justin Schillo of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Get the most comprehensive special report ever produced on the Obama eligibility issue.
Previous stories:
From A to Z: What's wrong with Obama's birth certificate?
THE FULL STORY: See listing of hundreds of exclusive WND reports on the eligibility issue
It is up to congress and others to check this out and see why our leader born in Hawaii having a SS number from a state he never lived in. With Holder having the DOJ and other ctonies in place it is hard to get down on this from outside of Washington. It has to get to the congress to get it rolling.
I hope this will have some impact on the 2012 elections, but honestly with the current list of presidential candidates do you really think ANY ONE of them will have the guts to even bring the subject up? Wish they would, but like the members of Congress have done, they will probably choose to just cruise on by it and let it be. The American people deserve to know just who Barack Obama is, everything about his background from birth to death. (Oh, we can only hope!)