Does this guy wimp out like most other Republican congressmen, or does he offer a different response? Check it out:
can’t hear it
It would have been nice to hear it !!?!?!?
Obama has lied to the American people everytime he opens his mouth its no wonder the mendacities on the white house web site are accepted by our reps and senators. Obama’s high crimes and misdemeanors can be ignored because there is a possibility he will lose the election. In the mean time after he loses, he will have armed secret service protection for him and his family for life, an annual salary of over $150 thousand, plus money for office and employees; all on the taxpayers dime. VOTE ALL THE COWARDS OUT in 2012 and start over.
Appeal to election officials of the several states, usually the state secretary of state, to bar Obama unless he publishes his original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents, confirmed by Obama’s DNA, and sufficient evidence that Obama did not relinquish his U.S. citizenship by being naturalized as a citizen of Indonesia.
See my main comment herein, March 14, 2012 at 1:17 pm.
That’s exactly what every state should do.But I hope at least 3/4 OF THEM WILL
Actually, Obama’s impeachable offenses can NOT be ignored, because there is a possibility he will WIN the election, in the country’s most violent and corrupt election in history, with millions of illegal aliens voting illegally, and substantially unlimited illegal Comintern funds flooding the election process, and people still believing the lie that he is half Negro.
Don’t believe the nonsense that Obama can’t be impeached because he’s ineligible. The evidence will conflict whether he retained U.S. citizenship, and it’s almost certain he was eligible at the time of his birth, but there are ample grounds for impeachment, which the House is duty-bound to consider. It won’t be a walk in the park, and Obama might use it as a pretext to try to rule by decree and suspend elections, but it’s the constitutional duty of Congress to impeach in cases of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
In providing for impeachment, “. . . the gaze of the Framers was concentrated on the struggles with royal oppression during the seventeenth century . . . . Like the Colonists, the Founders were haunted by the threat to liberty of illimitable greed for power.” Raoul Berger, “Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems” page 104.
Looks like those times are here again, when Congress must check a pretender to the Office of President with illimitable greed for power. Failure of Congress to act is sedition.
Oath-givers must remember that their obligation is to the Constitution, not to any individual.
Demand that impeachment hearings be held on Obama forthwith, starting with subpoenae of his vital records and his DNA.
Appeal to election officials of the several states, usually the state secretary of state, to bar Obama from their respective ballots unless he or an official investigative authority publishes his original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents, confirmed by Obama’s DNA, and, moreover, sufficient evidence that Obama did not relinquish his U.S. citizenship by being naturalized as a citizen of Indonesia.
See my main comment herein, March 14, 2012 at 1:17 pm.
eigriff, I agree with your comments, with the exception of the statements regarding the upcoming election problems.,and Impeachment idea. We KNOW that fraud will rule in the obama camp, and there’s EVERY CHANCE that he could pull off another steal. My take is; push for an INDICTMENT for his treasonous acts against America. There are MANY! The Bitrh certificate , and the SS# are only the tip of the iceburg.. We can put up with babbling Biden for the rest of this term, and that will put a halt on his fast forward plans for our ultimate destruction, and a future of forced living under a Dictator. The precise steps have been followed to the letter, and there is NO DOUBT in my mind that the plan is underway. As for the future, sans obama, it is my contention that we need an experienced, knowledgable, and intellighent Patriot as a replacement. The only wise choice for that job is Newt Gingrich. Read his “Contracts With America”, then make an educated decision. The hardsell Politicians with NO definable experience with the DC machine cannot do very much to turn us around. Think about it; The “snake oil salesman”, and the ONE TERM Senator are not capable of pulling off the gigantic job of reversing all of obama’s ruinous appointments, and legislation that he signed into law, obamacare being just ONE, of the many , portions of the plan that were forced upon us. It is just the most obvious, longest lasting, to date, surreptitiously devised, ( “we need to pass the bill BEFORE we can find out what is in it”) disaster. But, if the election should go forward, niether one of them could dabate intelligently, or forcefully, against obama’s teleprompter devices. There is serious work to be done in DC. We need an experienced, no nonsense, leader to pull us out of the mire! We NEED Newt. And then we need term limits, and the rRETRACTION of the Senate’s ability to GIVE THEMSELVES RAISES!. It has become a Government run rampant, not at all what our forefathers had imagined.
yes it would have been nice to hear, guess we have to call his office to find out what he really said.
I can’t hear it either, but if he said the question was whether the “birth certificate” proffered on 27 April 2011 is genuine, he’s another silly twit, dumb as the bull charging the toreador’s cape. The latest proffered “birth certificate” is a partial picture of the amended birth certificate required in adoptions. It’s “genuine” as far as it goes, but it’s not his original birth certificate. It’s effectively a certificate of adoption. Obama claims his adoptive father as his birth father so that he can fraudulently pretend to be half Negro.
The question is, when will we see the original birth certificate showing Obama’s actual birth parents? Obama will never willingly disclose it, even though it shows he was a natural born American citizen (Dr. Fukino’s press release 27 July 2009 and subsequent interview with Michael Isikoff). Comparison of Obama’s Y-DNA with that of close male relatives of Barack Hussein Obama the black Luo tribesman shows that Obama could not be the son of the black Luo. Full analysis of Obama’s DNA will prove it’s biologically impossible for him to be the son of a Negro father and a Caucasian mother. The Luo is in the vital records as Obama’s adoptive father. Obama’s whole political career is based on the false pretense that his father was a specific black man. Probably his warm mahogany complexion comes from a predominantly Polynesian mother. His father was probably Stanley Armour Dunham, Stanley Ann’s father, a pale item whose heart’s desire was to have a son, which his wife could not give him. His mother was probably a native Hawai’ian wahine, who submitted to an artificial insemination procedure under conditions calculated to produce a male offspring. Maybe she got some womb rent for school expenses.
This raises a further question: After all these years, will we finally find an American official with both the power and the guts to subpoena Obama’s original birth certificate. Arpaio has the guts (prominently displayed) but lacks the power. If he had the power to obtain Obama’s original birth certificate, why didn’t he do so?
The gutless wonders with the power to get Obama’s original birth certificate are afraid of being called racists if they subpoena it, but the original would show that it’s Obama who is the racist, by pretending to be black and using the fraud to appeal for support on racial grounds and fraudulently denigrate his critics and opponents as racists.
While currently stymied on verifying Obama’s eligibility at birth (and disclosing his racial pretense) we need to investigate the real eligibility issue, the effect of Obama’s naturalization as an Indonesian citizen on his U.S. citizenship. Obama has conspired with Indonesia’s President and others to conceal evidence of Obama’s Indonesian naturalization, but circumstantial and legal evidence can probably establish it. It is argued that Obama was a minor when naturalized, so could not have formed the necessary volition and intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship. But evidence uncovered by official legal process, such as subpoena and search warrant, though it would be conflicting, would likely give the each of the state secretaries of state adequate grounds for barring Obama from their respective ballots. Such evidence would likely include words and actions by Obama as a young adult that would ratify and confirm his volition and intent as a minor.
Obama has had free rien to succesfully confiscate, and hide, or destroy his records of Birth, School, ostensibly all records of his lifetime. The Arpiao investigation has been the most succesfull, so far. I am confident that he will unearth much more, IF he has enough safegaurds around him.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I was sent this infographic the other day. It explains ...