The attorney in a publicized challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president told WND the Florida case took an unexpected turn in court yesterday, one he says “pulled the rug out” from Obama’s lawyers and should force a quick answer from the judge.
Attorney Larry Klayman told WND he had expected an “uneventful” hearing in the ongoing case, which returned before Judge Terry Lewis yesterday, but instead found a legal tangle that he believes means Lewis will “have to make a decision, have to put it on record.”
Klayman originally filed the challenge to Obama’s eligibility for the ballot on behalf of Michael Voeltz, who identifies himself as “a registered member of the Democratic Party, voter and taxpayer in Broward County.”
As WND reported, however, attorneys representing Obama at the case’s main hearing, which was livestreamed by WND, argued that the Florida presidential preference primary, which listed Obama as the only Democrat nominee, didn’t make him the party’s nominee for president. They urged Lewis to decide that Obama is not yet the Democratic nominee for president and therefore ignore evidence challenging his eligibility.
But Klayman told WND yesterday that Florida law is unique in that it gives the average voter “much greater freedom to challenge eligibility and fraud than most other states.”
Read More at WND. By Drew Zahn.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
It looks good that there’s more evidence that obama is “going down” but, unfortunately, romney is just obama-light and still a PUPPET of the Elite
case was dismissed, but it will continue on appeal with a new case added:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/statement-by-plaintiffs-counsel-larry-klayman-on-voeltz-v-obama-fl-ballot-challenge-dismissal
The judge mentions that the complaint does not comply with or describe anything that can “cause an action” . I assume that the point is that there HAS to be something in O’Bomer’s case that can CAUSE (trigger) a legal action. Plus CAUSE the wanted result – i.e. that he can no longer run as a candidate, much less as a candidate for the role of the President of the United States.
I don’t know what to say anymore because most people know he is illegal but not many are willing to come forward sad but true.
Last week in court in Tenn. his own party said he was not a legal President, knew it along but also knew it would take much more to get him thrown out of office and time was on their side.
Exactly – ALL the evidence is piling up. He is “British”. Evidence that can CAUSE (trigger) a successful legal action against Barry Dunham, Sotoro, Hussein, (are muslims or even Jews enemies of the State?), is now falling from the sky like rainwater.