Why is the left feigning outrage over the “47% comment” made by Romney?
Whether he is aware of it or not, Romney just unmasked the left’s whole campaign strategy. Obama is working towards an entitlement society. Everything that is happening is not an accident. The plan is to get us past the 47%. The European Union, through the Progressive Socialist movement, has destroyed their financial institutions and polite society. The Progressive Socialist (Democrat) agenda in the United States has us on the same path. If we are unable or unwilling to move our country back toward the right, we will never be able to undo the damage. No constituent group is willing to give up their pet entitlement once they are receiving it. Social Security… Medicaid….. Medicare….none of these programs were a “right” until they were created. If we let Obama have another 4 years, we will not recognize our county at the end of his second term. These programs are moving the country closer and closer to the financial abyss, but the politicians are unwilling or unable to tell the truth about the programs for fear of being punished in the press or at the ballot box.
Obama in his own words: “What I think will re-engage people in politics is if we’re doing significant, serious policy work around what I will label the ‘working poor,’” he said, “although my definition of the working poor is not simply folks making minimum wage, but it’s also families of four who are making $30,000 a year.”
“They are struggling. And to the extent that we are doing research figuring out what kinds of government action would successfully make their lives better, we are then putting together a potential majority coalition to move those agendas forward.”
See the entire interview here.
This is Obama’s campaign strategy. Romney’s secret tape reveals the left’s whole coalition building strategy. This is why the Progressive Socialist media has to stigmatize and marginalize this comment. This kind of truth-telling must be marginalized and punished to make an example of the perpetrator. The truth is “racist”; the truth is mean-spirited; the truth is just downright out of touch. Common sense and the truth must not be allowed to impact the debate. The truth is hate speech.
Photo credit: American Life League (Creative Commons)
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Liberals are like those naughty kids in the movie Pinocchio that were tricked into following that man who said they could get anything and do anything they wanted if they just followed him. –And you might recall that they all turned into jackasses.
haha…
LOL! Couldn’t have said it any better myself!
I don’t like or approve of the way writers use the term “PROGRESSIVE”.
I also seriously doubt anyone knows how the term came into use in the United States, which is a reason Democrats today are referred to as progressives.
Before the 20th century, in politics socialist was a dirty word. At the same time Marxism and communism were just catching on, but were also considered dirty words. (I mean dirty in the sense that people took offense to these words.) This left the word “Progressive” as the word to use in meaning “change” or “new” or anything related the social characteristics concerning politics/political science.
It was Theodore Roosevelt whom the word “progressive” is most associated, though it goes back to Abraham Lincoln himself. Both these presidents were known as being great reformers in their day. Social reformers that has affected the course and makeup of this country. These two presidents are also REPUBLICANS! And the Republican Party as ALWAYS been a PROGRESSIVE party. Even through the eras of Bush, this has not changed.
One needs to put the terms into proper perspective today in order to judge and know where the two political parties really stands. The Republican Party is Progressive; So what does that make the Democrat Party you ask? They are also progressive, but in a more direct and forceful way than the Republicans. Actually the Democrat Party, while being progressive is also Marxist, communistic and socialistic in ideology. Being progressive is just one step, a lower step of Marxism itself. Then one can add the other words of communist and socialist to the Democrat Party in order to more closely define that party.
I suggest that all of you and especially any authors of any article, please get your terminology straight before releasing your articles for public consumption. This is NO time to play loosely with the definition of words, their terminology.
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur