In a groundbreaking development that has been ignored by virtually all other media outlets, WorldNetDaily published a bombshell report that could tear apart Barack Obama’s carefully crafted backstory.
Despite attempts to marginalize so-called “birthers,” millions of Americans remain unconvinced that Obama was truly born in Hawaii as the administration claimed.
That doubt is not confined to the U.S., however, and one British man is doing his best to disseminate what he believes are the facts regarding Obama’s true origins. Jerome R. Corsi detailed the current legal battle London lawyer Michael Shrimpton currently finds himself in – and how it could ultimately lead to the revelation that Obama was born in Kenya.
WND.com reports Shrimpton was in court recently for a hearing regarding charges that he sent a baseless warning to the British government about a 2012 terrorist attack that never occurred. According to the article, he claimed German agents smuggled a nuclear weapon from a Russian submarine that sank in the Barents Sea 12 years earlier.
He claims, however, that intelligence information being withheld would result in his acquittal upon being released to the court.
WorldNetDaily was reportedly the only media outlet present during the hearing despite – or perhaps because of – the fact that this case could blow the lid off of Obama’s much-disputed birth story.
In a surprise move, however, the trial was postponed until November. This would mean that any potential damaging testimony against Obama would not surface until after the midterm elections.
As Corsi reports, Shrimpton first presented allegations that Obama was born in Kenya, and to a woman other than Stanley Ann Dunham, during the 2008 election cycle. In a video made during that period, he laid out a string of charges supporting his position – including the accusation that Dunham was not pregnant the month before Obama’s ostensible birth.
Conceding he is no doctor, Shrimpton said he believes medical professionals would agree that “if a lady’s giving birth in August, we like to see her pregnant in July.”
He also contends that a clandestine CIA investigation failed to find a match between Obama’s DNA and that of his supposed maternal grandparent. According to his narrative, Obama was actually born in 1960 to one of his father’s mistresses in Mombasa, Kenya.
Evidence exposing this cover-up, he concluded, would be in the possession of British intelligence, since Kenya did not achieve independence until 1963.
These and other claims are expected to resurface during Shrimpton’s upcoming trial, WND reports. While it appears they will not be investigated prior to the midterms, this case is one worth watching closely as it has the potential of forever changing American history.
Corsi and WND are planning to publish at least two additional reports related to this developing story.