(Part 9 of an exclusive Western Journalism investigative report)
Today is the One Year Anniversary of the Placement of Obama’s Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate on the White House Website, a Red-Letter Day to be Sure
Advertisement-content continues below
Forensic Hurdles and the Obvious Choice, a Digital Forgery
Just this past month, Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker filed a concurrence in denial of a mandamus petition over a request for an original copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate be filed with the State in the Courts Order:
Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.
His statement resulted from a failed ballot challenge from Alabama, although Justice Parker is referring to the findings by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office.
I believe we are at a point to make some reasonable conjecture.
Advertisement-content continues below
A forgery for a “certificate of live birth” must be created to give the appearance of propriety to Obama’s claims of citizenship. Otherwise, he is simply a usurper; the cries for verification have become too loud to ignore. Donald Trump and Jerome Corsi’s best selling book “Wheres the Birth Certificate?”, which was released in May 2011, turned the tide and forced Obama to make an about face on this issue. Obama could not release his actual and genuine “certified” copy as it would show him to be ineligible to hold the Office of President as it is most likely a birth certificate by affidavit.
Given this set of circumstances, several technical difficulties come into play that limit his choices to accomplish the goal of creating a forgery for his birth documents; these hurdles are discussed below.
1.) It cannot be easily placed into the bound volume residing in the records of the State of Hawaii; the reason for this is that it is forensically impossible to do so for the following reasons:
1a.) this would require removing the entire record from the vault for an extended period; this is practically impossible.
1b.) the entire bound volume would be nearly impossible to duplicate as it would require a volume of materials that are no longer available (age appropriate). This would mean paper, spine, cover, inside flap materials, adhesives, ink, and the duplication of every record in the current bound volume, a monumental task.
1c.) to replace just his record is again difficult as it actually requires taking the bound volume apart separating the page that contains his record. A single page in a bound book is actually only one of four pages. It is a single piece of paper that is folded in half and placed with others nested to make a booklet; these booklets are then brought together and bound then placed into the spine of a single volume. It is printed on each side as well, further complicating matters.
(Note: if it is a 3 post binder book this matter would be easier to accomplish; however, any single page would either be two or four pages front to back.)
2d.) it would be next to impossible to cut and replace a page; this would then be two pages (front & back), and it would be grossly evident given close examination.
1e.) forensic and chemical tests on the paper and materials would again preclude the substitution or replacement scenario, as aging leaves it‘s own evidence that is difficult to duplicate and in some cases geographic dependent on how it effects a record.
1f.) a bound volume that has records added as is it made (being added through time) brings a matter of complexity to any attempt to enter a forged record of this type. This book then would capture certain biological material (spores and pollen) and information of the seasons as flora blooms and blossoms along with fungi and humans that handled this volume.
(Note: examination of this type of evidence would be another method to ascertain that the book or records contained forgeries.)
2.) Microfiche records may or not exist for his record; if so, a forged microfiche record may be able to be made. However, it would require remaking the entire reel or sheet, then substituting the forged record during the exposure and creation process. This is probably a more feasible process; however, it would need materials that would pass forensic examination. Original materials that date to the time the reel or sheet was last created is probably next to impossible to obtain to complete this type of forgery.
Any forgery for a bound volume breaks down rather quickly as being insurmountable when the technical hurdles are considered. The only reasonable alternative is to create a digital image and substitute it for any “claimed” certificates Obama received from the Hawaii Department of Health, a bait and switch scenario. An honorable mention needs to be made to Loretta Fuddy, Director of Health for Hawaii; Neil Abercrombie, Governor; and David Louie, Attorney General, who played their parts extremely well to aid Obama in this masquerade over his birth certificates. One can only hope that the legal and political consequences prove disastrous for them in the future as they assisted in the deception of the American people.
The actual forger was so incompetent that whoever made this forgery did not know that all they had to do was print the document on a safety paper background, then scan that and post it on whitehouse.gov, making detection more difficult. Obama is strictly second rate as he cannot even get a world class forger to create his false and fraudulent documents; they are on par with his Cabinet and Czars, all second and third string players. Was the actual perpetrator of this crime an unwilling participant to this cabal and left tell-tale evidence for others to find? We can only hope so.
(Note: I personally believe it was incompetence born of arrogance as the press corps would give cover to any actions Obama and his agents cared to implement so he could be careless.)
All the subterfuge of the press gaggle and Obama’s own statements of April 27, 2011 were obfuscation for the placement of a false and forged document on the web. Officials of the State of Hawaii have facilitated this. Operation Sideshow is looking like an actual operation and cabal conceived, planned, and executed with a host of accomplices. Some were active and others were passive as a fawning and pliant press; without their capable or incompetent services, this could never have been possible.
Obama needs to end this matter by releasing his birth certificate documents for examination from Hawaii’s vital statistics vault. Forensic analysis of the original record(s) is necessary to clear this matter up. This can be done by Obama waiving any confidentiality requirements as he did in his letter of April 22, 2011 per Hawaii Statute §338-18 and allow his records to be examined.
His refusal to release his documents is ominous and mystifying if in fact his records are as he claims them to be. Ms. Corley needs to state that the “Certificate(s) of Live Birth” she received from Ms. Fuddy is the same as the one posted on whitehouse.gov. I personally think she would decline such a claim now that it has been declared a forgery. Who knows what she will do?
She was probably only sent to fetch the certificates and instructed not to view the documents so that she could not be compelled to testify on the contents of the sealed envelope at a later date if it all blew up in their faces. This way, she could use plausible denial as a defense; all she would have done was turn over a sealed envelope to Bob Bauer (the White House counsel) who would have a certain amount of executive privilege from congressional oversight and possibly the courts as well. It was probably cheap insurance for them, though only a well-reasoned guess on my part.
Part Ten is a simple method to determine for yourself that Obama‘s long-form birth certificate is a forgery; this method was developed by Nick Chase, a retired expert in typewriters and type set machines for the printing of technical documents and newspapers.
Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.