Democrats invented election fraud. The most recent example of their talent and expertise was the special election in New York’s 26th Congressional District, where a far-Left Democrat masqueraded as a Tea Party candidate. Correctly counting on the laziness of voters to know who they are actually voting for (just as Barack Hussein Obama did), he managed to garner nine percent of the conservative vote, allowing the openly declared liberal Democrat to win.
So, it looks like they want to play hardball. Well, turnabout is fair play, is it not? Here is an idea for a strategy that is completely legal, but can cause havoc, disarray, and financial disaster within the Democratic Party.
Let us start putting up our own candidates in Democrat primaries. It’s not all that difficult to get on primary ballots. It usually involves coming up with a few thousand dollars and a few thousand petition signatures, sometimes less, depending on the state and the office being run for. The candidates can run on any platform he thinks will garner votes — radical, liberal, moderate, conservative, whatever. As most Democrats, and lots of Republicans, too, have shown, lying through your teeth is not a problem. There is no law, either, that says you have to be sincere about wanting to get elected — or anything else.
This is a win-win-win strategy. It will force Democrats to spend lots of their election cash and time in meaningless primary races, leaving them strapped and exhausted come main election time. Questions and challenges raised by our candidates will force them to defend their largely indefensible positions publicly, exposing their platform’s weakness and/or forcing the Democrats to lie even more.
And – this is the part I love – our candidates might actually win. Should this happen, imagine the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments when, the week before the election, our winners drop out, leaving no time to realistically replace them, throwing the elections to the conservatives.
Is this legal? Yes. Is it ethical? No, but part of Obama-Soetoro’s “change” has been to toss adherence to ethics in elections out the window. In addition, they have made it unmistakably clear that they are out to shred the Constitution and turn the country into a neo-fascist dictatorship. As stated above, turnabout is fair play. Let’s start doing exactly what they do, and see how long it takes for them to cry foul.
Frankly, the truth is that a majority of Americans are fed up with government – national, state, and local – and political parties that ignore their wishes, that marginalize, patronize, and talk down to them, that listen only to big money interests, and feel free to rig elections in a growing variety of ways. Though the fraud has been exposed on numerous occasions, prosecutions have been rare to non-existent. Al Franken, D-MN, stands out as one of the more egregious examples, as does the case of the Philadelphia New Black Panthers, but there are dozens more.
Sadly, I think we will never restore the rule of law by following the rules while the other side openly and ostentatiously tramples on them. Indeed, we are in the disastrous mess we are in because We, the People, have opted to abide by the law in hopes that we could actually lead by example. Unfortunately, leftists are not teachable. They are dogmatic zealots who have total faith that they are superior to everyone else, and thus always right. In the meantime, they have become radical to the extreme, claiming that their ends justify whatever means they choose, including ignoring the law and violence. Given the very real possibility that our economy, society, and our nation may collapse as a result of this unfettered radicalism, it is time to fight fire with fire.
This need not be a formal effort. Individuals or small groups can pull it off with relative ease. However, as in any guerrilla warfare, if enough of us do it, it will not be possible to defend against it. Since the Republican establishment refuses to stand up and fight back, it’s up to us – the grassroots rank-and-file, the common people – to defend what we have left without them. This seems like a good way to start.
So, let’s get to work. We have primaries to win, and elections to lose!
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
We do not need to play dirty like the Democrats do. I believe that we are above that.
Turning the other cheek while being attacked repeatedly with lies and slurs by the far left gave us a socialist president and a democrat congress in '08. Now we need to employ the eye for an eye tactic or we'll be demonized and lied about again. It is time to stop playing nice. The good news is that we don't even need to lie. We just need to stand up and keep hitting them with the facts. But to remain silent will spell doom.
By saying, "We are above all that," you are throwing away a potential tactic without giving it a thought. Why dismiss a plan just because of "moral judgement"? Do you think it works to always fight a war on your own terms? It only makes sense to fight on terms that would avoid certain tactics if you are 100% certain you will win; otherwise, you should go with the best plan, the plan that has the highest probability of success.
The main thing is to win fair and square. And I hardly think that what the author of this post is suggesting is either insidious or dishonorable. It's fighting fire with fire with one's head held high. Fighting with your hands tied behind your back is plain 'ole nuts and self-destructive. We should have learned this in Vietman. I did. We can't allow ourselves to lose this seminal battle with Progressives.
So you think the future of our Republic is not worth fighting for even if it means getting down and dirty? Well I beg to differ. We must fight fire with fire!
Playing dirty is really all they know. At least Weiner is gone now but he'll no doubt be replaced by another of the same ilk.
if you want God on our side, we cannot play with the devil's rules. However, if the post is satire, nice job!
Rick, I agree we cannot play by the devil's rules, however I do not believe God takes sides, either WE are on his side or we are not. If WE choose to be on God's side, he may bless us. If not, turn up the burners.
Yes sir, a fight fire with fire tactic is respectful and unfortunately a deception that must be undertaken. Think of it this way, you tell them what they want to hear then follow the constitution. That's fair politics in a nutshell. Besides, who are we to judge what social justice means or any of the buzzwords the progressives are trained to recognize as their vote getter? The moral high ground is taken by doing what is right not in throwing yourself prostrate to an enemy of truth.
God gives no man the power to lie, that power only comes from the father of all lies… Satin.
The real problem we have to deal with in this country is the fact that our constitution doesn't have any real teeth in it to deal with those who take an oath to uphold and defend it, but then turn around and work to destroy it.
If you think having a total of 70 professed communists as elected officials (from both parties) is something that should not be tolerated, then the ONLY answer to our woes as a nation is to hold another constitutional convention and prescribe the exact punishment these traitors are due… oh and make it retro active to the signing of the constitution, we would want to leave anyone behind.
When every thing they have including their freedom is on the line things will change, but NOT until we demand it.
The only hope of securing our freedoms and that of future generations is to have elected officials so afraid of violating the constitution, that they themselves would chose to live in glass houses, then it won't matter which party is in power because the minority party (whom ever it is) will be scrutinizing everything they do with a constitutional microscope.
We did have grand jury power but the supreme court decided that unless you belong to the lawyers guild, the bar association, there should be no power to set the law in motion. Federalist 28 deals with how to confront a congress that is invested in breaking the constitution's power. When the right to redress is ignored the second right is brought up to remind those acting illegally just what the penalty is for violating the oath. The violators know exactly what they are facing which is why they fear an armed and disrespected public.
@ The Real Problem
I agree with you. In John 8:44 Jesus clearly told "the chosen" what they were and they haven't changed, except they hate Him even more!
Listen To Whatever But The Last Election Was A Sign Of The GOP And Tea Party Working Together, Yikeess, What Happened? We Handed The Libs There Worst Defeat Ever. Play By Our Rules Be Honest And Only One Vote Per. Check Each And Ev ery Voter And Anyone That Votes Has A Picture ID, Problem Solved. Remember We Have A Illegal Pres Imposter Obama Right Now, And If This Was A GOP President He Would Have Been Impeached Months Ago, Yikeess, Forged Birth Certificate And Stolen Social Security Number, Yikeess, And Thats The Truth, God Bless America And Susan Daniels.
Let's do it…. And, you are exactly right, that is exactly what they do…. The sad thing is, the Democratic party has been taken over by these thugs and the died in the wool Democrats who vote Democrat strictly because their Great Grand-daddy was a Democrat…. They would vote for a pig if he ran on the Democratic ticket. Sad thing…
I met a very wise old lady who has since passed away. Someone was getting after her because she voiced her opinion and was going to vote Republican in the up-coming election. The fellow said to her, "Why I thought you were a Democrat, when did you leave the Democratic party ?" She got right up in his face and said, "I didn't leave the Democratic party, they left me."
People who insist on voting Democratic because their family was Democratic, need to take a serious look around and smell the roses. Their party has been hi-jacked by a bunch of communist thugs.
Wake up America……
Let's not talk about doing it-let's do it-let the Republican Party become the party that roots out
the liars and cheats in the democratic party. I know the Republicans don't like to fight dirty,but
when you deal with hoodlums,cheats and people with no morals whatsoever,you need to bring
out the proverbial guns-fight fire with fire!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fine idea, but I do have a problem with part of your premise which, I'm afraid, is the stuff of urban legend now.
I live in the 26th and was fairly intimately involved with folks who directly worked in Jack Davis's campaign, none of who were in any way liberal or Democrat. The short and sweet of it is this: Davis is/was a relentless independent office seeker, but not at all a Democratic plant. You need but familiarize yourself with his enunciated policies and his staff to see that he is/was a hybrid Libertarian and diehard political opportunist. a Republican who was dissed by the Cheney staff in Buffalo some years back, an incensed Davis conveniently proceeded to run as either a Tea Partier–which, admittedly, stretched credulity beyond belief– or as a Democrat.
Jane Corman, a lovely and smart lady, ran a lousy campaign and was unable to effectively and credibly counter Hochul's mediscare message. Given the abysmally low voter turnout among registered Republicans, she lost. That's all there is to it.
That said, I still like your preemptive strategy to prevent Democratic plants. Progressive elites are capable any manner of chicanery and underhandedness.
Approval Voting is the answer. Current elections have too many spoilers, too much sabotage, too much polarization and not enough civility. As elections become even more intense, the temptation to retaliate with "Chaos" campaigns becomes even more tempting. What is the systemic solution? Approval Voting is the answer. Let the voter vote for as many candidates as he wants to; the candidate who receives the most votes still wins. In the 26thCD election, let the less informed voter vote for both "R's" knowing that the more informed will rectify the attempted sabotage. Mitigate the "wasted vote argument" by letting the voter vote for all the candidates he approves of. If your motivation has been voting for the "lesser of two evils", then Approval Voting will permit you to vote for both your heart and mind candidates. Hypothetically, if you really despise a candidate, then vote for all of his opponents. Approval Voting is the answer. The voter still only gets one ballot, however, with Approval Voting he gets to vote for more than one candidate. There will be fewer spoilers, less sabotage, less extremism and more civility. Thank you.
This kind of thinking by conservatives as displayed here by some of you is exactly why The Republican Party is looked upon as do goods & the party of wimps & holier than thee party. If you want to win this upcoming election & save this country then you will have to fight fire with fire! The Democratic Party will stoop to whatever level necessary to win! Wake up! We are in the fight of our lives in order to save this nation.
I agree wholeheartedly!!! Playing by the rules is honorable but when you get whipped by the dirty tricks of the Dems and don't fight back, all you are going to have left is your honor, which is good, but not good for much if we don't have our Country anymore.
I think somehow, Hillary ought to be persuaded to run again. DejaVu the original
Operation Chaos.
Everyone Register as a Democrat for the primarys , vote for the second best democrat , Switch to Republican in the General Election , Vote for the Best Conserative . Hang Them With Their Own Rope
I think Hillary ought to be encouraged to run again.
Gary in Colo. i am just curious? Why are you such a Hillary fan?
Not really, The point of the original Operation Chaos was to split the party (Dem)
Hillary still has tons of supporters and she would still be a viable candidate.
A bunch that voted for Barry the first time might bail ship on Barry.
If it comes down to the Dems winning in the general again at least Barry would've
still been the best one-termer he could have been.
RE "If it comes down to the Dems winning in the general again at least Barry would've
still been the best one-termer he could have been. "
But, he would still be gone!
Thanks for your explanation Gary.
FORGET BEING "ABOVE THAT" ITS WAY PAST TIME TO PUT THE SCREWS TO THESE COMMUNISTS!!! AND THEY ARE COMMUNISTS MCCARTHY WAS AND HAS BEEN PROVEN RIGHT!!!