I am a conservative. I am a follower of Jesus Christ. The less ‘offensive’ translation is that I am a born-again believer. The even more watered-down version is simply that I am a Christian. To water my life down any lower would have me simply claim to be an American citizen (‘legal,’ of course) who is so sorry for all of the wrongs I, or any other American who took the land away from the Indians, have committed.
Sorry, but I am simply sick and tired of being a watered-down politically correct human being. In looking at the current political “song and dance” script being played out in Washington, especially after the pathetic reality of the November 6th election — that the Democrat machine was far more organized than the wimp GOP counterpart and that the union clout had an impact (not to even hint at ‘rigging’), I am convinced that the values in which many of us still profess to believe are in deep trouble.
In searching for stories to post on my own website, it sickens me to see how widespread and deep the government corruption is at all levels. As conservatives, it is easy and convenient to blame those nasty liberals and progressives – those corrupt Democrats. But, if you view the landscape from the opposite side, there is an equal amount of blame to go around in chastising those evil, corrupt, and self-serving career-opportunist conservatives.
The truth is that BOTH liberals and conservatives have created the disgusting mess we are in as a nation; and both liberal and conservative politicians have gotten fat, flabby, and powerful on the backs of both conservative and liberal Americans who are simply trying to “do what is right” in raising their families in an uncertain world. These opportunist politicians have played the ‘divide and conquer’ game quite well, pitting American against American – the poor against the rich (the fabricated ‘99% versus the 1%’), the union against the non-union, the male against the female, the gay against the straight, the citizen against the illegal, and even the white against the black and Hispanic.
The one person who could pull us all together as AMERICANS is our President, Barack Hussein Obama. Sadly, he has a track record of dividing, not unifying – for obviously partisan political reasons. If a leader who pledged at the beginning of his first term to provide the most TRANSPARANT ADMINISTRATION ever is now completely silent on such an empty pledge, then the battle – the REAL battle – would appear to be, as it always has been, up to US – as in unified United States citizens, both conservative and liberal, who simply want what is best for our country (whether it earns any government “free stuff” for us or not). Career politicians cannot comprehend such a completely AMERICAN concept.
Maybe it is time for all of us Americans to shed our labels and loyalties (Democrat-vs-Republican, conservative-vs-liberal, union-vs-non-union), and all of the other divisive political games played by both parties over the years to divide us, and unite in making the new “them” all of those who have pitted us against one another simply to elevate themselves.
visit me at: ON TARGET NEWS (www.ontargetnews.com)
Photo credit: DonkeyHotey (Creative Commons)
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Republican or Democrat; Is there a Dime’s Worth of Difference?
Do remember to read the words CLOSE and think exactly what these words mean, as you will not get the full understanding of the article if you read it fast.
You folks know the two parties overlap in ideology and state it, and then ask; why? Why nothing ever changes?
Who said, “There is not a dime’s worth of difference between them.”, referring to the Democrat and Republican Parties?
You see the similarities, yet you try and support the Republican side as being the true conservatives; again why? You fellas must need to understand from where both parties developed and exactly under what conditions they evolved into the monster we see today, but you fail to properly address.
To know why things are the way they are, and to understand today, we must first understand the preceding history, in detail. There is ABSOLUTELY no other way to understand this!
Consider Jefferson and his ideology of the “Democrat-Republican” party. Understand the Federalist/Whig party and how Alexander Hamilton related to it.
The Jefferson party eventually became known as the Democrat party. Here you have to look back and understand what the OLD Democrat Party stood for, especially in the South. The Whig party held on for a few years until people became disenfranchised with it due to aristocratic ideology. However the Whig Party members never died out, they just assumed their positions in different parties. The main party this affected was the left-over, over-looked Republican Party from Jefferson.
The Republican Party until 1824 was under Jefferson as the Democrat-Republican Party. However here, one must be careful to STUDY the differences of the original Democratic-Republican Party and the FIRST and early splinter or remnants of the Republican Party, after 1824, when it’s name was left out by the singular named Democrat Party. (Note: The Whig Party was the party of “Big Business” and true “Elitism”, or real “Aristocracy”. .
Alex Hamilton believed the common man did not possess the ability to govern himself, nor did Federalists/Whigs in general. You can see this ideology in place today in both the Republican and Democrat Parties. Note also, the Whig Party is also called the “Federalist Party”. Actually being known as the Federalist Party under Hamilton and then, eventually, as the Whig Party as the Republican Party began to splinter apart in 1824. For the most part I use Whig Party interchangeably with the Federalist Party.)
During the late 1840?s and 1850?s the Republican Party had accumulated the remnants of the Whig Party and was also now adding many tens of thousands of immigrants from Europe who had lost their Marxist Revolution in efforts to gain the great countries of Western Europe. They were either banished to the US or fled here to avoid prosecution. This actually built a huge base for the Republican party to grow with.
Society did not care for an elitist party that thought the common man could not make rational decisions, so the Whig Party fell out of favor just as the Federalist Party did years earlier, and for the same reasons. This had the effect of changing the Republican Party
to an “Elitist” Party that favored Big Business as well as “State Capitalism”.(Do read and learn about “State Capitalism.”) This was the NEW Republican Party that sponsored Abraham Lincoln. And this is where YOUR problems began!(Note the Marxists of that time were more interested in workers’ rights and a democracy than in business itself, although they saw workers’ rights as a means to limit big business.
In short, Lincoln conducted a war that set MANY precedents which also broke MANY US Constitutional Laws! (In the past both the Federalist and Whig Parties were well known for ignoring the US Constitution.) It was in the name of Big Business, greed and wealth, power and based upon State Capitalism. The Republican Party of that era was the Progressive and Liberal Party, increasing its’ membership with the remnants of the Whig Party. Their main support, by far, coming from the New England States, the very same states that had so consistently supported the Federalist and Whig Parties!
Also note AGAIN: the fact that many Marxists from Europe were immigrating to the Northern US during the 1850s and 60s. They left because of their failed 1848 Revolution in several European Countries. The thing of interest here are these Marxists ALL joined the Republican Party. Many were members in Lincoln’s Army as Generals, public officials, 1 governor and many others in Republican positions appointed by other Republicans. We are talking in the 100?s of thousands that immigrated here while there were thousands working for the government in different capacities. Also note that Lincoln was friends with Karl Marx who helped some of these people immigrate here as well as helping Lincoln with his speeches.
Slavery made the perfect pretext, especially since many people opposed it, inparticular Northerners. Note; That during the 1860 Presidential Campaign the Democrat Party split into two factions, Northern and Southern Democrats. This is fairly self-explanatory, but one can read the differences to see why the two parties would never be the same.
After the war the OLD Democrat Party of Jefferson was destroyed. Its’ principles and political proponents of the South were shut out of politics, leaving them with only the Northern Democrat Party to represent them. The philosophy and ideology evolved over time from that base of Northern Democrats, which also embraced the part of platform of Lincoln which disregarded and nullified parts of the US Constitution, while at the same time holding the ideology of being the “Peoples” or “Workers” Party. Both parties have refined and generalized this over time to include more of the public sentiments, to the advantage of each party. Both parties now interpret the US Constitution as a Living Document. (Please learn what a Living Document is.)
The end result today is, the Republican Party is still an elitist party with support for Big Business. This is shown as State Capitalism. While the Democrat Party is still known as the Worker’s Party and is shown by liberal ideology supporting workers. The connections of the two parties are these facts, including the last couple of opinions which can be addressed as relevant facts;
1–Both parties now support Big Business in varying ways under the pretext of rights, concerning both people and Business.
2–Both parties have co-opted the US Constitution in doing so. Both see the US Constitution, not to be interpreted strictly but as a Living Document.
3–Both parties profit off this at the expense of the public, both monetarily and in Governmental Power.
4–Both parties now have their own elitist members that are exceedingly rich and powerful.
5–Both parties are in essence playing both their ideological ends against each other for the vote of the people to continue their version of State Capitalism and their continued destruction of the US. Yet both ideologies runs contrary to the US Constitution and the Rule of Law because of it being interpreted as a Living Document.
6–Both parties have COMPLETELY left the guidance and frameworks lain forth by our Founding Fathers, with only their interpretation of what the US Constitution really means.
7–Both parties use public money and debt to continue the charade by forms of bribery to the voter.
8–Both parties revise, oppress and deny HISTORY in the attempts to keep this out of the public eye.
9–Both parties have common interests that their elite members collaborate on as one party. Such people have no problems switching political parties or seemingly opposing their own party.
10–Both parties in collusion have created, NOT a Republic, but destroyed it and created a Federal Democratic Union and an EMPIRE!
11–Both parties NEVER accomplish anything because they are the same side of the same coin. Our problems will only become worse because the basis of wrongs is accepted by both parties.
12–Both parties are entirely willing to destroy this country if they cannot continue their charade. They did this once, so there is no reason they wouldn’t do it again.
Consider this: There was a war in this country about 150 years ago. One side was defeated by another side that committed unconstitutional acts in achieving this victory. The end result is that by defeating one side and corrupting the Constitution in doing so, the victors sowed the seeds of their own future defeat…. Can you the reader figure out the rest of the story?
Back to JEANNIEMAC
In reading the above treatise it should become obvious that the original modern day Republicans and the Republican Party came into its’ own under Abraham Lincoln. Accordingly this makes the Republican, first and foremost LIBERAL party. However the term liberal was not used by the Republican Party. The term PROGRESSIVE was used because the meaning of liberal at that time was NOT an acceptable word in politics. So, the Republican Party was known as the Progressive Party, which also means LIBERAL, but in a more subtle way.
Here are two definitions from a dictionary defining “progressive”.
1. favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially in political matters: a progressive mayor.
2. making progress toward better conditions; employing or advocating more enlightened or liberal ideas, new or experimental methods, etc.: a progressive community.
My point is this: Who people considers as RINOs are actually the mainstream and original Republicans from Lincoln’s day. They are the ones who have always carried the Republican Party since Lincoln. And for one to claim any association with the Republican Party as being a “Rule of Law” Party according to T Jefferson, that being the real conservative party, one would have to disavow Lincoln and everything he done and the entire Republican from Lincoln onward!
My friend, the RINOs in the Republican Party are actually the TEA Partiers and the Constitutional traditionalist based groups within the Republican Party! That makes you a real RINO in the Republican Party! Odd isn’t it?
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
There are a few radical changes that most people are unaware of or know little about that has crushed the Republic from within. To solve anything we must first understand where the problems lay or should I say lie:
1. Act of 1871: usurped our Constitution: Congress most despicable illegally act which cost us our Constitution making the USA government De Facto. The Act of 1871 established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain. http://theunjustmedia.com/Banking%20&%20Federal%20Reserve/The%20united%20states%20Of%20America%20%20is%20a%20corporation%20owned%20by%20fore.htm
2. The Fourteenth Amendment: July 9, 1868. Reconstruction Amendments was never legally ratified and fundamentally changed America without due process of law. http://www.barefootsworld.net/14uncon.html
3. ACT OF 1913: We lost control of our money to a private federal banking cartel. http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/general/a-brief-history-of-central-banking/federal-reserve-act-%281913%29.php
4. FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY ACT 1933: The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. All of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System. all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
5. THE USA PATRIOT ACT 2001: Freedom of privacy gone.
6. DEMOCRACY VS. REPUBLIC. A sinister rumor spreads through the United States proclaiming Democracy (socialism) equal to or better than the Republic (equality under the law). http://www.c4cg.org/republic.htm.
So…: 1. We have lost our Constitution and therefor its laws of protection for the citizens of the USA. (That explains a lot doesn’t it?) 2. We lost control of our money to the Federal Reserve. 3. We declared bankruptcy and lost the country and ourselves (we are now chattel corporations) along with all our property to the Feds that is “deeded” to us but we do not own anything out right. 4. We lost what little freedoms we had left to the Patriot Act. 5. We now believe that a form of socialist communistic style democracy will save us from what is said of our horribly outdated collapsed Republic. All these things we have lost but this is still not the worst lose for America: That which truly made us the Greatest Nation On Earth: UNITY.
People are scrambling to find law to use against the government to take back control and can’t understand why they are not working? Why the DOJ thumbs its nose at the Constitution and the laws of the people?
There really is not much left of the country that was once: The “UNITED” States of America. We now have the NWO ObamaNation. As a country we could eventually overcome our de facto government problem…”IF” we had one thing again: UNITY. We were GUARENTEED separation of religious belief or none belief , color and any creed. But we were indivisible when it came to our Constitutional laws that protected our freedoms to be different in who we are and what we choose to individually believe. Our differences united us…they did not fractionalize us when it came to the Constitutional law of the people.
This may sound cliché: If we would put OUR countries best interests ahead of our own, before our self-interests, as our founders did, the Republic “for which we stand” would stand once more.
ONLY UNITY has the power to bring back what made us great in the first place: Equality under the Republic and the laws of our personal liberty guaranteed in OUR Constitution. Education is the key.
We have lost what made this country great…WE THE PEOPLE. The hearts of WE THE PEOPLE are our most precious commodity. Will we ever recover them again is the question? Will we ever get the chance to win back what was “given to us paid for with the blood of our Fore Fathers.” This country was a gift of heritage, that we have given away through ignorance of the law and negligence to protect the Constitution. We have lost to a Constitutional De Facto government that masquerades as the CON-unistic Federal government of America… The ObamaNation.
I suffer a broken heart but my resolve and love for the Republic of the United States lives on. If you seek to find what is wrong today in this country…look no further than the chair you are sitting in. We the people broke it…it will take we the people UNITED to fix it.
In other words…it will never happen.
@nunua
Great list just for starters!
Still, that should be more than enough for people to understand that the USA is NOT recoverable from this many direct attacks on the US Constitution and people. It’s a dead end street trying to right those wrongs, as the USA is just too far gone… The best that could possibly come from this now is for the states to secede from the USA and form their own government, as a new group of states or by staying as a state and a nation unto itself. The last thing any of us needs today is all 50 states seceding and then forming a new government of 50 states. The people in some of the states are just far too different than others. So much so they shouldn’t try forming and running any government together. We could start to understand this difference of people by considering them as two distinct groups we could call for simplicity sake, conservatives and Marxists. Another good way to distinguish where these people reside is the election map of red and blue states. I find it interesting that all the red and blue states, where it pertains, are almost the same states that formed the North and South during Lincoln’s War of Aggression. Secession is your only hope of ever regaining a government of the people again….
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
O’bwana is uniting Americans — the only Americans that he could unite — non-white Americans. O’bwana can’t unite those who are not “his People”, just as Hitler probably could’t have been elected Prime Minister of England. And the Anglo-Saxons in England were close cousins to the German people, not completely different races. Conservatives and Moderates have been defined as the far end of the acceptible political spectrum, but they are both status-quo political tendencies. Only the Right can defeat the Left, and an influential group in the US won’t tolerate Right-wing politics. The same people who are behind the switch from B.C./A.D. to BCE/CE.
RINOs try to justify their betrayals with, “I was only doing it to get elected.” That’s the peacetime equivalent of, “I was only following orders.” This Nuremberg Defense of deflecting responsibility has long been rejected when moral choices are available. Good men who refuse to fight evil become evil. Good men who put the expediency of winning elections over doing what is right also become evil. The extent of their evil is proportional to the degree their (in)actions degrade the exercise of our God-given unalienable rights. Get the picture? It must be the right way or the highway.
Our freedom is based on morality, not money. It is our responsibility to do good works AND fight evil to guarantee the exercise of our God-given unalienable rights. Freedom without that responsibility is a nation-killer. It will deprave us and enslave us, as we are witnessing.
Unfortunately, we are to the point where political parties are threatening our nation as our Founding Fathers feared. Parties are being co-opted by oligarch lackeys and must be purged or avoided as necessary. In the meantime, all we need to know is whether a candidate’s platform and performance support God-given unalienable rights, the U.S. Constitution, Christendom, and Western civilization. It’s always been principle over party…or gang.
From: http://elect.ErnestHuberForCongress.com/
Here is an article I wrote that was published at another website. I’ll post the link at the bottom. It says much in relation to the people we’re dealing with and in relation to the Federal Government.—Mike
Collectivism by Force: The Liberal Mindset & the Federal Government
Posted on December 8, 2012
Collectivism-Ken-EmanuelsonBy special guest author, Mike Lamb: Many people miss the deeper understanding of the liberal mindset. Personally, I understand the liberal mindset perfectly and am familiar with all the reasons they deny the truth that others so obviously see. But for me to tell you those reasons, or anyone, you have to believe and/or accept some other concepts regarding man. One of those concepts is evil and sin. Of course full-fledged Marxists don’t believe in sin or evil as defined by Biblical standards. To not accept this difference automatically puts one in contempt of most everything John Locke ever wrote – including the basis of the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution itself (and includes philosophers such as Aristotle, Cato, and Hume).
Another concept is the duality of man, as well as coming to terms with the fallibility of man. These are the main differences distinguishing liberals from anyone else (The religion and philosophy of Islam doesn’t count, as it’s so radically different. Western philosophy and ideology cannot be applied to it in any way, which is why Islam and Muslims cannot – and will not -mix well with most Americans). Man has a dual nature, and that nature can be accounted for by God, or indirectly by the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God. Man can be classified into two distinct categories: Good and evil (or right and wrong, givers and takers, moral and immoral, righteous and self-righteous, reasonable and unreasonable, heroes and cowards, unselfish and selfish, meek and arrogant, and most any other opposing concepts). Sin is the result of evil. Evil is the thoughts all humans carry within them that contradicts good. Simply stated, if it’s not good, then it’s evil. Sin is evil stressed or shown by the physical results. To deny good by actions, even by words, is sin.
In man’s sub-conscience there is a will, a philosophy so-to-speak, that identifies him as a person, a distinct individual. We normally only see a small part of man’s will, as many factors precludes and limits him from showing his true being. But each person does in fact show bits and pieces of his innermost self, and we witness this by his actions and comments as well as how he personally upholds himself.
fallofwesterncivNo man can reason with evil. We can only try and reason with the sin, or at least confront it and limit it. Man still retains his thoughts of evil, and the thought of evil denies the truth. For if this was not true, then you could reason with anyone and they would accept the facts they could not disprove -or at least acknowledge them as being valid. Humanists in general are a good example of people who cannot be reasoned with. Yet on certain topics they seem to be most reasonable. The reason for this is, if a humanist is open to reason on a certain topic, it merely means the topic was favorable to him from the beginning – which means it is more of a matter of degree of the evil or sin being discussed than it is the morality or right or wrong of the topic.
Liberals cannot see, understand, or much less accept the facts of most conservative viewpoints and concepts because it is contrary, somewhere, in their sub-conscience, concerning their philosophy and acceptance of life. It doesn’t matters as to the amount of facts presented or the logic involved – if a person wants and believes in something deeply enough, he will NOT change his opinion. In holding such a dogmatic view, what I would call a non-factual, non-basis dogmatic view of life, that person has to have deeper underlying motives that are based upon evil. Greed, selfishness, arrogance, power, money, self-righteousness, lust – you name it. If it’s a wrong, immoral or bad concept, its’ basis lies in evil and we see it as the denial of the truth.
So the question becomes: How can a person change these concepts in another in order to see the truth and logically submit to it? You can’t, and no amount of arguing is going to change this. It’s simply because of the nature of that person, and what lies within them.
monsterfedI am referring to my critics and opponents as well as anyone who supports the Federal Government over the Sovereignty of States. They can’t see themselves in the article above, but yet there they are supporting the collective over the individual rights. Self-Determination becomes a collective principle. It’s easier to think of these people as “takers” and “self-righteous”, as they claim with their self-righteousness the collective rights to take at will by a common vote, anyone who produces anything. They claim the Federal Government as the highest authority because as a collective, the Federal Government can take and redistribute your wealth at will by a simple vote. And this is the same thing Lincoln did in 1861 in order to ensure that the Federal Government survived its’ crisis. They looted the wealth of another country by force in order to keep their government afloat. The only difference was, Lincoln did this without any vote.
Today the results of this are clear. There is no doubt that Lincoln changed the fundamental basis of interpreting the US Constitution and what relationship the states played in relation to the Federal Government. He set the precedents for a collective society to emerge that would eventually completely negate all aspects of the US Constitution, and all principles that pertained to the original Republic – and would instead replace it with a Democracy that allows the takers to vote themselves all the largess of the government…to the point of bankruptcy.
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
Link to article here:
http://missouritenth.com/2012/12/08/collectivism-by-force-the-liberal-mindset-the-federal-government/
The Founders avoided the makers/takers problem by restricting voting to property-owners who could pay a poll tax. Simple. Those advocating expanding the franchise did so in complete awareness that allowing the poor to vote would create exactly the taxation-without-representation problem that incited the Revolution. I hear pundits claim that Californians voted to raise their own taxes. What putrid BS! Taxes were raised only on the top few percent of earners by voters whose own taxes wouldn’t be affected. Whether it’s the Parliament in Westminster or the peons in L.A., the fact is that people are taxing others without any meaningful representaion for those others.
@Jacobite
EXACTLY! 100% CORRECT! BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!
I cannot stress enough how correct you are in your statements concerning the vote, the FFs and poll taxes! This is an ABSOLUTE MUST, with NO exceptions concerning voting! This is actually what defines the country as used to being a Representative Democratic Republic. Today with the full vote it is similar to a full Democracy except not all the issues are voted on at the polls. But the fact is a full democracy is defined by the full vote and a pure democracy is defined by having the full vote on all bills being considered as law. It used to be said to the King of England, as a complaint from the colonists, “Taxes with no representation.” Today it is no taxes with representation for the people who don’t deserve the vote, can’t understand the vote and votes for what taxes are paid, to be given to them by the way of entitlements from the public largess by those who do pay the taxes.
If this country ever reforms from any way from any seceding states, the first thing concerning the vote is to limit it! Aristotle said the average common citizen made for the best government. Exclude ALL people who has no vested interest in the country and cannot read or write. ALSO exclude ALL people with a worth over app. 50-75 lbs of gold. (Absolutely no one with more worth.)
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
In Aristotle’s time, the average common citizen of any Greek city-state was pretty uncommon. 50% of the population out right off the bat — women. Most men were either slaves or non-citizens, so the common citizen might have been only 25% of the populace. Aristotle knew democracy devolved into tyranny, so the least-bad govt was aristocracy, as even oligarchy was preferable to tyranny.
@Jacobite
Well yeah… and it hasn’t changed unto this day either!
Although I do think one can be too wealthy to vote also.
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
History lessons aside- what we MUST do is focus on how to re-build AMERICA. We MUST be unified under our leadersship, and BELIEVE THAT OUR best INTERESTS are in their Hearts. Show me how to do that with his current administration, and you will PROBABLY be able to show me how to turn water into wine. Can we ‘agree to disagree’? Yes/No it depends on our focus, and the wedges that have been drien are ALMOST insurmountable. It sounds passe’ to call GOD into this, because this is a central issue. The right feels like GOD has ordained them, the left is unsure if GOD even exists. I’m gonna watch it play out, and- even without a program…I KNOW who WINS…
The United States of America is going to crumble. Our economy is going to fall, causing the current regime in Washington to bring us under the economic arm of the UN or EU. Our military is being emasculated to the point we are going to find it difficult to defend ourselves against an attack by a global powerhouse like Panama or Uganda. This nation, founded on Christian beliefs and principles, is now firmly anti-Christ. The Churches of America are no more than impotent social clubs. As everyone who watched the Democratic Convention 2012 knows, a huge plurality of our population actively rejects God. Nobody, no political, social, military, or religious group will be able to prevent or stop the judgmeny of God. The problems we are starting to see will become like minor bumps in the road as the wrath of God continues to be poured out upon us.
In the next stage, people who dare to say the things I just said will be arrested, tortured, and killed. To be a born-again believer in Jesus christ will be a hate-crime, punishable by death. And, as America descends into chaos, the world will crumble with us. There will be war in the Middle-east – nuclear war – and the entire world will be draw into it. Hundreds of millions will die all over the globe. Next comes the good news.