Time magazine is practically irrelevant. The only reason it is still around at all is because it bares the name of the parent company. So, they continues to prop up this long dead publication. Anything published in that rag is usually not even worth commenting on. Like the tree falling in forest, Time has no audience. None. When is the last time, anyone said to you, “Did you see that article in Time?”
That being said, we need to point out their completely disingenuous cover story this week. Once again, the establishment media is trying to frighten people with the creepy, right-wing militia bogeyman. How long can they continue this tactic with no evidence that militias offer any threat at all?
Well. I guess there was the Ft. Hood gunman. Oh yeah, he was a radical Muslim.
OK, than what about the Discovery Channel whacko? Oh, that’s right, I forgot, he was a radical environmentalist disciple of Al Gore.
Remember that guy who flew the airplane into the Texas building hoping to get the IRS? Surely, he was some kind of militia nutjob? Take a look at his manifesto. Turns out he was a George Bush-hating communist!
The Arkansas recruiting center shooter? Would-be Times Square bomber? Underwear bomber? Not a militia member among them. All radicalized.
Read More: By Jed Eckert
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
" – 
Loading ...
I heard that Time Magazine was a militia publication.
Yeah, probably a marxist militia publication…..
Greg==send me your e-mail address.
Tom at TAFTJ
When TIME magazine closes its doors and turns off its presses for the final time, I will be the first to stand up and say, "GOOD RIDDANCE TO BAD RUBBISH!"
If Time Magazine was an honest publication, then they would have mentioned the Muslims recruiting the ignorant of the black population for their militia training camp in New York, and other areas of the United States. These Marxist rags are running frightened of true Americans, and seeking to throw attention on groups who are no real threat to any of us, unless you happen to be a bank. These Muslim extremists are real, on video, and people like the moron Black Panthers are only a small blip of the real problem. It is always the Left who are the violent people.
I don't disagree with what's said in this article, but with just a quick glance I spotted three grammatical errors: "bares" (should be "bears"), "they continues" (should be "they continue"), and "OK, than" (should be "OK, then"). If you want credibility you need to appear intelligent.
Oh, Daystar, I'm so happy you pointed out the grammatical errors! Those flaws were bothering me, too! I hope the author reads this — and lets someone knowledgable in English language proofread his work in the future!
I'm from the era of Time, Look and life magazines… where your in-depth news along with clear, brilliant pictures (a big deal back then ) came from. Though not encompassing enough… the word dastardly comes to mind in describing their present agenda.
Amazing what the left can do to a great magazine, or a great country for that matter.
A sad epithet for a once great magazine!
Time Magazine a once noble publication with credibility has deteriorated to the pitts of mediocrity with it's biased left leaning articles coupled with a constant bashing editorially of The Tea Party, Conservatives, Independents & Republicans.
Correction" pits
IIf you think "Time" is left-wing, then have a look at "Newsweek" — it should have little Communist logos plastered all over it! Two of our most well-known newsmagazines have been co-opted by the ultra left for ttheir propaganda machine — and it works. These mags basically tell folks — if you are an intellectual, THIS is what you should be thinking.
Newsweek is pretty shabby, but communist? Ultra-Left? Seriously? Ok…just for fun, name a left-leaning media source that you think is good (even if you disagree with its sociopolitical views?
One thing I found extremely encouraging, the comments on Time's website were 100% on the side of the militia! Time was called a rag and a communist newsletter. They were asked how much longer it would be until they were sold for a dollar. It was very exciting to see people responding with disgust at their lies and deception. They've been found out.
And I bet that you'll take this as a sign that most people support militias, and that it's not just a very small group of self-selected wanks who see anything that doesn't support their world view as evidence of lies and deception.
I have no vested interest in Time. I just want to say that your choice of words in this flimsy diatribe exposes yourself as another say-anything, best-defense-is-a-good-offense right-winger–the hypervigilant, easily offended, and often unintentionally ironic. This applies to many of the comments here. You guys are a pretty nervous bunch. Sure glad that none of you is a member of a militia.
"often unintentionally ironic"
For me, the thing that makes this site most worth dropping in on. Well, that and the creative spelling and punctuation.
James with as many spelling errors that you make i do not think i would be throwing rocks!
Communist Scum!
In other words, as journalism goes, it's on the left? You sheltered people. Look, I won't argue that Time is a great magazine. To me, it's a little on the People end of the spectrum. But the New York Times is a world class paper with some real elite journalists. Let me guess…you've never read it; you don't need to. Fox says it's bad, so why bother.
"When is the last time, anyone said to you, 'Did you see that article in Time?'”
Caleb, with much of this crowd, you could have stopped that sentence two words earlier–or inserted the name of any magazine outside of, perhaps, "Guns & Ammo" (it's got such purty pictures)–with pretty much the same response,
James your lack of competence continues to amaze me!
Communist trash like you is exactly why our country is in the shape it is!
James, I am not an historian (yep, an before the h), nor am I a teacher, neither do I have a college degree. however, my personal library on the founding of our country would match or perhaps even overwhelm yours. And since it is obvious that you are a liberal, it becomes patently obvious that my understanding of that material is vastly superior to yours. With the notable exception of the fanatic muslim crowd, no group of people on this earth are more easily offended than are liberals. Such hateful, vile comments from those who pride themselves on being intellectually superior to their neighbors would tend to make the hearer/reader believe that the liberal speaker/writer is a spoiled child. So perhaps, James and Caleb, you should endeavor to actually converse with one of those you so readily denigrate and find out what he actually feels or believes. Perhaps instead of asking when one last read a magazine article, you might ask a question in person of one who actually loves his country. I wager you don't personally know many such people. Have a good day. Larry Davis
you obviously didnt get/read the article…