The Real “Game Change” Of 2008… Drudge Goes In The Tank For Obama

obama speech 7 SC 300x206 The Real “Game Change” of 2008… Drudge Goes In the Tank for Obama

It is totally understandable that hard core conservatives would like nothing more than for Andrew Breitbart’s shocking death to have some sort of larger meaning. The fulfillment of his promise that college tapes of Barack Obama will insure that he will finally be “vetted” during the 2012 election would certainly achieve that desire.

However, I have been warning conservatives not to get their hopes up. There was never any chance whatsoever that this fantasy would come to fruition. There is also a fascinating story behind Breitbart’s post-death “Obama vetting series,” which, incredibly, has never been told. The real reason Breitbart was so focused on “vetting” Obama in 2012 is that he was prevented from doing so in 2008 by the internet’s undisputed king, Matt Drudge (and yes, I can/will prove it).

The videos Breitbart promised are now being released, but as someone who not long ago knew Andrew and his playbook as well as any of his many friends and associates, I am quite confident that they will have zero impact on the election and may even help Obama.

First of all, since he has already been president for four years, there is nothing that Obama could possibly have said in college that the mainstream media will deem remotely relevant, no matter how “explosive” the tapes may be. We all know that the media is absurdly protective of him to begin with and comments from college years can be far too easily dismissed as the “experimentations of youth.”

Anything which exposes Obama as a legitimate socialist/radical (frankly, I think we already have enough information to conclude that), may have helped in 2008 when the American public didn’t know him, but it will have zero effect in 2012 when he has been president for four years and is perceived mostly a having governed as a moderate liberal.

Read More at howobamagotelected.com.

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. Re:

    “We all know that the media is absurdly protective of him to begin with and comments from college years can be far too easily dismissed as the “experimentations of youth.”

    “YOUTH?” According to my calculations, he was already in his 30′s when at Harvard.

  2. You are probably right – makes no difference now. Mostly, because people have already come to the conclusion that this man does not fit the two party system and has an agenda a little different than any President we have had. He was confusing to most people. Now when I talk to a new Tea Partier, what I get is “Ahhhh now it all makes sense”…and we have a new voter. I don’t think we will do any good at all for the masses except keep doing what we are doing. Our vote is our sword – both in getting him out and cleaning up congress. Unless the UN tries to take our guns – we are a peaceful group – we know what we need to do to get our country back to it’s shining city that was. We will reclaim our freedoms we’ve lost.

  3. “but it will have zero effect in 2012 when he has been president for four years and is perceived mostly a having governed as a moderate liberal.”

    I respectably disagree with that statement.
    A “Moderate Liberal” would not have pushed for and signed Obamacare.
    A “Moderate Liberal” would not have pushed for and passed Finance Reform.
    A “Moderate Liberal” would not have bowed to other Countries kings and Dictators.
    A “Moderate Liberal” would not have brought in Socialist and Marxist Csars to rule the Country with no Congressional oversight.
    A “Moderate Liberal” would not have allowed Lisa Jackson to detroy the Country as the head of the EPA.
    A “Moderate Liberal” would not be WANTING to bankrupt the Coal Industry, and having gas prices up tp 8-9 $, election year or not.
    And son.
    On second thought, strike that respectfully, this whole article stinks to high heaven. I believe it’s the author who is protecting Obama, especially if he actually thinks Obama has governed like a “Moderate Liberal”.
    As far as the “vetting” Bretbairt wanted to do, people are missing the point here.
    It’s like an 8 course meal. Videos will be released up to the election. The 1st one was a pig in the blanket appetizer. The rest will get more intense and meaty, up until desert a couple of weeks before the election.
    And THAT is why the MSM is acting like scared school girls. They know this, but won’t tell YOU.
    But, it’s coming, mark my words.
    It’s going to get GOOD by November.

  4. I still think that we should question Obama on how he traveled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport that requires you to be a citizen of that nation to obtain one and when did Obama change his name legally back to Obama after his adoption?

  5. This story isn’t even worth reading. Any one can clearly see he is not a moderate he is hard cord liberal. plain and simple.

Speak Your Mind