Winston Churchill described Russia as “a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.”
The birth of Barack Obama could be similarly characterized.
The more we learn, the less we know.
Those who want to accept, at face value, the president’s assertion that he was born in Honolulu Aug. 4, 1961, to Barack Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham say asking questions about the president’s constitutional eligibility is crazy because “you don’t have any evidence to challenge it.”
Try going to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get a driver’s license without any documents and tell the clerk he or she doesn’t have any evidence that you’re not qualified to drive.
That’s not the way it works. The onus should be on the person claiming the highest office in the land to provide the evidence that he is eligible.
So far, Obama has not provided even a shred of evidence to suggest he is qualified.
Read More: By Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.