The Media continues to attack tea parties

As with too many DC establishment pundits, Dana Milbank may only know pretty, as in pretty boy in an empty suit. However, it’s clear he appreciates nothing of the beauty that is freedom in America’s political discourse.

Do these people look hateful? they do to the media

I imagine the Left burning Bush in effigy, calling him Hitler in signs at protests and making movies with presidential assassination plots doesn’t offend Milbank’s seemingly selective aesthetic sensibilities too much. However, if some incredibly small number of fringe people the overwhelming number of serious conservatives and Republicans don’t much like either attend an open rally and speak their twisted minds, … well, we can’t have that, now can we?

Now, objecting to the health-care bill is one thing. But doesn’t it send the wrong message for House Republicans to hold an event on the Capitol grounds full of hateful and gruesome words and images?

“I’m not worried about the message of freedom,” Hensarling replied, before joining his colleagues on the podium to the beat of the Who’s “Won’t Get Fooled Again.”

I was at this event, walked it from back to front and side to side. I looked at the signs, I heard the calls. Honestly, I personally didn’t see anything that was over the line. The difference I suspect is, unlike Milbank and some others, I didn’t go there only to go looking for them.

What a worthless and totally disingenuous hit job on the wonderful act of democracy that took place on the lawn of the Capitol yesterday. Milbank’s twisted account driven by his own bias is worthy of nothing but dismissal.

Read More: By Dan Riehl

Related posts:

1. Media Thinks Tea Parties Attack ‘Their Guy’
2. Tea Parties And Thugs
3. Media Didn’t Care About Protest Signs Threatening Bush
4. Liberal media bias continues unchecked
5. Media Double Standard: Only the Right’s Signs Are Worth Covering