The EPA’s Mercury Problem

EPA 2 SC The EPAs Mercury Problem

Ninety-six. That’s the number of 60-watt incandescent light bulbs I purchased last weekend after learning the other kind, the compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) environmentalists are so in love with, are hazardous to my health and to the environment. I would have preferred a higher wattage but discovered that the 75-watt version was outlawed January 1st.

It took about three hours to replace every CFL bulb in my house and carefully place them in a huge plastic container used to transport them to the recycling center at a local home improvement store. I said a quick prayer for safety while coasting down the road in my SUV. A HAZMAT decal would have come in handy because had I been in a collision, I had enough mercury on board to make the evening news. And because I am a Conservative, they might have labeled me a home-grown terrorist.

CFLs aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. Back in 2008, some Yale University scientists isolated CFLs’ benefits down to one: lower energy bills. The scientists questioned whether a little savings was worth the danger attached to mercury exposure and “runoff downstream.”

Besides making the environment sick, researchers recently discovered that these “environmentally friendly” light bulbs aren’t friendly to humans either. According to the UK Telegraph, CFLs “should not be left on for extended periods, particularly near someone’s head” because “they emit poisonous materials when switched on.” The report found those “carcinogenic substances” should be “kept as far away as possible from the human environment” because they may cause migraines, skin problems, and breast cancer. Great.

It really makes no sense. Somehow, it’s okay to have mercury housed in delicate glass bulbs inside every home in America; yet the EPA feels compelled to enact new regulations like the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) limiting mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants promising MATS would raise kids’ IQs, prevent a substantial amount of premature deaths, reduce heart attacks, and lessen childhood asthma. I’d settle for weight control and whiter teeth.

Sounds wonderful. Problem is, the EPA’s logic is about as twisted as a CFL, considering most people don’t live next to a coal-fired plant; but every home in America using CFLs is at risk of mercury exposure.

They say the pricey CFL’s are cost efficient but fail to mention that their measure for efficiency decreases if the bulbs are switched on and off. Nor do they discuss the outrageous price per bulb or the gas usage (carbon footprint) involved in transporting old bulbs. They also fail to factor in human nature; most people will simply discard old bulbs instead of spending their Saturday driving to the recycling center.

Seems to me that enacting the most expensive EPA rule revision in history, MATS, has less to do with people and more to do with coal-fired plants. Back in January 2012, the Washington Times said the rule will cost power plants up to $18 billion a year and “will be passed directly to consumers.” I’ve always believed that Progressives love the planet but hate the people who live on it. Think about it. They are quick to condemn environmental violators but conveniently ignore the massive amounts of mercury Mother Nature herself spews out by way of volcanoes, deep-sea vents, and geysers. Maybe we should tax the planet, just for good measure.

According to Power Engineering Magazine, by 2016, EPA rules will force the shutdown of “32 mostly coal-fired power plants” in 12 states, and possibly 36 others. The shutdowns will lead to higher power costs, less jobs, and potential rationing. Before long, we’ll be rubbing sticks together to cook food, stay warm, and find our way to the community outhouse.

But, in the meantime…tonight I celebrate. I purged my home of all those hazy mercury-filled bulbs, and I’m switching on every last one of my incandescent bulbs to celebrate — in hopes the Google Earth satellite will drift my way and snap a picture. My house will be one of the brightest spots on the planet, second only to Al Gore’s.

Photo credit: TexasGOPVote.com (Creative Commons)

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. All the new mercury filled bulbs I can find are made by GE, you know ole BO’s buddy, every wonder why? and yes your right, i have no intention to drive 100 miles to dispose of the mercury bulbs.,

  2. If the safety and economy was the real reason the EPA is trying to outlaw incandescent bulbs then they wouldn’t be experimenting on us with the mercury. There is always a hidden agenda with the government, just like Global Warming, it’s all about controlling every part of our lives, right down to our breath and bowel movement released into the atmosphere. Once a person is not productive enough to warrant our allowed carbon emissions then it’s time to go and Obamacare will take care of that.

  3. You are right there has to be an agenda. Im guessing there will be an incident brought on by the governement, a power surge perhaps that make the light bulbs explode and fills everyones home and business with mercury. To which the EPA will declare all as hazardous areas and haul us all off to the fema camps. Its just a matter of time. I actually got a box of 6 ‘mercury bulbs’ in the mail from our local electric company. No thanks!

  4. I bagged mine up and brought them to our recycle center a year ago.
    Many of my lamps also use three way bulbs….so have been buying and storing them as well as the 60 watt.
    Cannot afford the new LED bubls.

  5. The left in this country is every bit as devious and down right evil in their thought processing ideology.
    Bill Gates and many of the wealthiest leftist believe the world is over populated, and they want to reduce the numbers of people on the planet.

    Wars reduce populations. Health epidemics do so too These bulbs should cause a lot of people to get sick by as the article said, “bringing the mercury right into the home”, where it can attack each individual more directly And it definitely transfers wealth from the right to the left during the process by mandating the use of the florescent bulbs.

    Where is Hollywood? They couldn’t write a better script about “Evil Government Conspiracies” than this, and it is non fiction and taking place now.

    Benghazi, F&F, Obama has given them so much material to work with but they’ll ignore it as long as a democrat is residing at 1600 Pennsylvania. If Benghazi hat happened under George W Bush, the movie of Benghazi would’ve been shot, produced and released before the elections which were less than 3 months away at that time.

    But who’s gonna believe Obama is purposely trying to kill off the people who voted for him too? I wonder what type of bulbs are in the White House, and at his private home?

    And I know Congress, not Obama passed the laws dealing with the type of light bulbs we have to use. It’s just that Congressional Republicans vote on a lot of things they don’t really do much investigating on, before they cast their votes.

    They believe what the Democrats say are the reasons for their proposing the legislation in the first place, rather than looking for any ulterior motive. They just don’t believe that anyone in our government is really as bad as we citizens are writing and telling them that they are. Just like they ignore Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his evidence of fraudulent documents released by Obama.

Speak Your Mind