Kerry’s Wife Major Donor To Radical-Left Slush Fund

John Kerry SC Kerry’s Wife Major Donor To Radical Left Slush Fund

Secretary of State John Kerry’s wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, is a primary donor to the Tides Foundation, one of the country’s biggest financiers of the radical left.

Tides is controversial clearinghouse that funds groups such as MoveOn.org, ACORN, Media Matters for America and a litany of so-called anti-war organizations.

Tides is also heavily connected to the Occupy movement.

The group funds a controversial environmental organization, the Apollo Alliance, which helped to craft sections of President Obama’s 2009 stimulus legislation.

Kerry, through her personal foundation, has donated more than $4 million to the Tides Foundation.

Read More at Klein Online . By Aaron Klein.

There Once Was A Place Called America…

constitution 2 SC There Once Was a Place Called America...

“There once was a place called America,” our children’s children will one day write, “a bright and shining city on a hill, divinely placed by God to serve as a beacon of hope to the entire world. A land filled with generous-hearted souls who showered the needy the world over with their abundant blessings.”

You see, America was founded by a handful of God-fearing patriots who didn’t always agree but believed certain things like life, liberty, and the personal pursuit of happiness were worth dying for. And to ensure their ideas would survive the ages, they crafted one of the most revered documents ever put to paper, the United States Constitution.

It wasn’t long before this exceptional nation became the envy of those who thirsted for freedom and the enemy of those who despised it. Some loathed America to the point of making threats while others declared war. But a certain few understood defeat was increasingly less likely and instead devised a plan to take down America from within, one small step at a time.

The leader of the former Soviet Union Communist Party, Nikita Khrushchev promised his beloved Communism would bury the capitalistic West without declaring war. The plan was outlined in a fascinating book called “The Naked Communist,” written in 1958 by a man named Cleon Skousen who accurately warned Americans of troubles to come unless things changed.

Skousen laid out the dangers Americans faced, point by point, almost as a Communist roadmap to America’s demise: Progressives captured the Democratic Party (goal number 15); civil rights actions were taken in courts to “weaken basic American institutions” (16); the educational system was infiltrated (17); rioting like the Occupy movement was encouraged (19); the press was infiltrated (20); domination of the big screen and television waves (21); cultural standards of morality were broken down (25); homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity were presented as “normal” (26); churches were infiltrated by those promoting social justice (27); and prayer in schools was eliminated (28). Moreover, the Constitution and founding fathers were discredited (29 & 30) and American culture belittled by those promoting “cultural sensitivity training” seminars similar to one recently uncovered by a video showing employees pounding on tables while chanting anti-American rants led by a man representing the organization, Souder, Betances, and Associate, reaping more than $3.3 million taxpayer funds according to USASpending.gov.

Skousen may have been a prophet, seeing that most of his predictions came to pass. Too clever to be labeled Communists, they chose the name “Progressive” and in the name of change set out to dismantle the Constitution, piece by piece. Progress was slow but steady, that is until their savior, Barack Obama, arrived.

And no one was outraged because the Communist mission was complete. As former KGB agent Yuri Besmenov so eloquently described, without war or bloodshed, America and her people were demoralized, no longer having the reasoning ability to distinguish right from wrong, or to comprehend the immensity of the treasure they’d buried just outside the gates of Hell.

Victory! Indiana, South Carolina Anti-NDAA Bills Fly Through Committee

Obama NDAA SC Victory! Indiana, South Carolina Anti NDAA Bills fly through committee

Yesterday, Feb. 13, “anti-NDAA” legislation passed senate committees in both Indiana and South Carolina.

In Indiana, S.B. 400 was championed by Sen. Jim Banks and Elkhart County Sheriff Bradley Rodgers, who both spoke before the Corrections and Criminal Law Committee hearing in support of the bill.

Sen. Banks pointed out the sections of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 that violated the U.S. Constitution, specifically Sections 1021 and 1022 that allow for the indefinite detainment of American citizens without due process.

PANDA Indiana Team Leader James Kerner praised Sen. Banks’s speech, saying, “I suggest the ACLU, Occupy movement, Tea Party movement, and Oath Keepers throw their full support behind Sen. Banks. He should be made a household name like Ron Paul.”

Sheriff Rogers spoke of the oath he took to uphold the Constitution and asked if he would be prohibited from taking action if federal agents illegally kidnapped citizens in his district.

The committee’s answer: “No.” The bill passed unanimously, 8-0.

Likewise in South Carolina, word comes from the Tenth Amendment Center that legislation seeking to nullify the “indefinite detention” provisions of the 2012 NDAA was approved by the state Senate Judiciary Committee, 14-6.

The bill was pre-filed last fall by Sen. Tom Davis and called Sections 1021 and 1022 of the 2012 NDAA “a direct threat to the liberty, security, and well-being of the people of South Carolina.”

The next step for the bills in each state is to reach the floors of their respective senates for a vote.

Thanks to organizations such as the Tenth Amendment Center, American Civil Liberties Union, Bill of Rights Defense Committee and tireless grassroots activists everywhere, successes for defeating the 2012 NDAA are starting to happen all across the country.

 

Contact:
Dan Johnson, James Kerner
PANDA National, PANDA Indiana
jarkerne@gmail.com
dan@pandaunite.org

 

Photo credit: watchingfrogsboil (Creative Commons)

Black Bloc ‘Special Forces’ Of Occupy Movement

Breitbart News Chair Steve Bannon and former FBI informant Brandon Darby joined Sean Hannity to discuss the long-reported story of Occupy Wall Street and the violent, anarchist faction “black bloc” that often works with the “Occupy” movement to cause vandalism, destruction and violence, especially against law enforcement officers.

Liberalism: Racism And Sexism At Its Core

Occupy Wall Steet sign 2 SC Liberalism: Racism and Sexism At Its Core

If one were to try to define liberalism, phrases such as “government oversight”, “anti-big business”, “environmentalists”, “level playing field”, and “entitlement society” would probably come to mind.  The progressive agenda relies heavily upon the belief that the government should and must drive an economy from a macro level; and in some cases, a micro level should the need arise.  If government serves as the magistrate over business, or actually manages business practices, then fairness and equality is assured for the labor force according to liberal philosophy.  This same mentality drove the original union labor movement in the United States, a movement mostly based upon Marxist theory.

Ironically, a person who attempts to define liberalism doesn’t typically identify specific racial, female, or sexual orientation rights.  One probably wouldn’t associate liberalism with an agenda rife with illegal worker “rights”, forcing privatized businesses to include birth control in its insurance coverage, or repealing “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell.”

Why is it then that many of those who fall into one or more of the categories above identify themselves as Democrats?  The Democratic Party has sought to “buy” its way into prominence for generations, having promised easier paths to entitlement programs like food stamps and other forms of public assistance, pandering to any special interest group with a large following promising things like birth control, gun control, the green movement, gay marriage movement, the Occupy Movement and so on.  On the outside, the party appears to be inclusive of anyone with an agenda, but we should take a much deeper look at them to understand what it is that Democrats truly desire.

Large and invasive government oversight of the populace means diminishing key Constitutional rights, including property ownership, thereby forcing and moving the population into cities.  Once the American people are moved into large metropolitan areas, they will and can be easily controlled.  Eminent Domain, or government takeover of private property, has been instituted in various states over the past decade.  Government bailouts of private industry, which puts the government in a position of ownership in the company, and bank bailouts that allow the government to limit the amount of money employees can make are all part of the grand scheme.

Increased printing of currency decreases its value, subsequently creating an economic environment of hyper-inflation.  The devaluation of currency makes it much easier for the government to impose even more power over a population.  We have seen similar events play out in other regions of the world in both the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

Having demonstrated the goal of the Democrat’s idea of “liberation,” or “liberalism,” one begins to see the painting revealed on the canvass.  Catering to certain minority voting groups, even if they have no desire for larger government intervention, is the worst kind of racism and sexism.  Propagating particular ideologies in order to garner votes is similar to pork barrel spending, or tacking on additional spending measures to specific unrelated bills assuring their passing, but on a human level.  When an individual or group feels slighted and allies itself with an ever-growing support function, in this case a government party, the group grows in size and power.

African-Americans, at heart, are a very conservative group of people.  They believe in traditional marriage, are church-going and largely Christian, and yet align themselves with the Democrats who continue down the avenue of race-baiting and promising rights their group already has thanks to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and desegregation laws passed in the 1960’s.

Laws assuring minority rights, including the same pay for the same job, have been on the books for decades.  Why then do feminists throw themselves at the feet of the leaders of socialists and communists?  Women currently outnumber men in the workplace and in many cases are making more money than their male counterparts.

The Democratic Party has bought votes from minorities, promising much but delivering little over the previous century.  A lack of cohesion with no congruent message from the left side is proof positive they don’t care about their constituents, only their votes and numbers.  Making it easier for groups of people to access government entitlements, especially in large urban areas, is deplorable and racist.  Keeping population centers poor and under-educated is abhorrent behavior and shameful.  When a party involves itself in contraception and “family planning”, it is doing nothing more than labeling itself sexist by purchasing those votes.  If a leftist president invokes a form of amnesty just prior to an election, paving the way to citizenship by a group of folks largely ignored for almost four years, it is engaged in wholly racist actions.  Supporting a group of people who want to bring about “fairness” by increasing taxes and “spreading the wealth around” plays right into the hands of power-grabbing “liberals.”

The work is largely covert and subliminal by the Democrats but has become more and more emboldened by a largely ignorant voting base.  Taking time to educate oneself is essential to freedom; allowing your vote to be purchased based upon a special interest is damning.

Obama.com Linked To China, Occupy, Radicals

We’ve come to expect in Obama’s corrupted view of capitalism an unholy alliance of government and business. We’ve come to expect Obama’s mega-donors getting carte blanche access to government slush funds. Case in point is mega-donor George Kaiser, who fleeced $500 million of the American taxpayers’ dollars in the Solyndra boondoggle.

But the Obama.com website takes crony capitalism to a new level.

Owned by Obama mega-donor Robert W. Roche’s Shanghai, China-based Acorn International since 2008, Obama.com really isn’t a website at all.

Well it is, but it isn’t.

Type in the URL, and you will find that it doesn’t go to Obama.com, but Obama’s “donate” page. According to a recent Government Accountability Institute (GAI) report, since 2008, Roche has changed the redirect over time from Obama inauguration merchandise, to pushing Obama’s government takeover, to (now) the “donate” page.

And the “donate” page is the most troubling.

According to the GAI report, 68% of the redirects to the “donate” page are from foreign countries, which means that more than likely, a large amount of Obama’s fundraising is illegal.

How could that be? Doesn’t the Obama campaign check?

In a word: No.

The “donate” page doesn’t check the legality of donations below $200. It doesn’t ask for the three-digit security code (often referred to as the CVV code). It doesn’t verify the address of the donor with credit card billing information. It doesn’t do anything to validate the card.

But that isn’t the end of the matter.

According to the GAI report, Obama.com is administered by an obscure four-employee company in Waterville, Maine: Wicked Global, Inc. The head of marketing is Gregory Dorr, who has ties to the Occupy movement, the terrorist-connected Code Pink, and a host of other Leftist front groups (including Maine Voices for Palestinian Rights, an anti-Semitic group.)

This Is America On The “Drug” Obama

This past weekend, I saw the late Andrew Breitbart’s swan song Occupy Unmasked that exposed the Occupy movement for what it is: an orchestrated distraction by the hard Left and unions.

In a way, it was like preaching to the choir. I already knew the mainstream media had coordinated with the hard Left (including anarchists) and unions to make “Occupy” what Time magazine called “The Story of the Year.”

I already knew that the mainstream media was hiding the rapes and murders and OD’s and rats and STDs. Hiding the fact that college students were being bussed in; and the homeless and unemployed were being paid to act as props for the real Occupiers: the SEIU and anarchists.

Yes, the same SEIU that gave $100 million to Obama in 2008. The same anarchists that are a part of Obama’s “community organizing” circle of radicals.

But seeing the film moved this knowledge from the head to the heart; that is, enabled me to feel it viscerally.

And America, that is a scary feeling. For SEIU and the radical Left want one thing and one thing only: the destruction of America. To destroy America so that their perfect socialist utopia will rise from the ashes.

What the details of this socialist utopia will be doesn’t matter.

What matters now is destruction.

It reminds me of those “This is your brain on drugs” commercials of the 1980s. A commentator shows a pan filled with hot butter and says: “This is your brain.” He then cracks an egg into the pan, where the egg sizzles and sputters, never again to return to its original form, and says “This is your brain on drugs. Any questions?”

Another term of Obama will make America’s “fundamental transformation” complete. America will go beyond the point of no return. SEIU, the radical Left, and their dear leader, Barack Hussein Obama, will finish the job of destroying this nation and remake it into something unrecognizable, never to return again to the greatest nation on earth.

God help us if they are successful.

Did Targeting The 1% By “Occupy Wall Street” Movement Lead To NY Shootings?

Occupy SC Did Targeting the 1% by Occupy Wall Street Movement Lead to NY Shootings?

Ever since the Oklahoma City bombings, liberals have been claiming that right-wing rhetoric leads some to aggressive and sometimes violent action against people. Talk radio and anti-homosexual and anti-abortion messages have been blamed for the shooting of Gabrielle “Gabby” Giffords, abortion doctors, and bullying of homosexuals.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated a number of conservative organizations like the Family Research Council as “hate groups.” Did the “hate group” designation of the FRC inspire Floyd Lee Corkins to punish the conservative organization for its social and political views? The media have nearly ignored this anti-Christian shooting story. It doesn’t fit their liberal talking points.

In New York City, a man shot and killed a former colleague at the company where he was fired and wounded a number of bystanders. Was he following the directives of the Occupy Wall Street worldview that was endorsed by a number of big-name liberals? Was a shooting in New York City a way at attacking Mayor Michael Bloomberg for standing up for the banks and Wall Street? Here’s what Bloomberg said about the Occupy Movement:

“Everyone’s got a thing they want to protest, some of which is not realistic. And if you focus for example on driving the banks out of New York City, you know those are our jobs. . . . You can’t have it both ways: If you want jobs you have to assist companies and give them confidence to go and hire people.”

Read more at Godfather Politics. By Gary DeMar.

Photo credit: Michael Kappel (Creative Commons)

Olympics 2012 And “Socialist Sentiments”

 

2012 Olympics SC Olympics 2012 and “Socialist Sentiments”

Since my childhood days, I have loved watching the Olympics. I still remember in 1968 as a 12 year old watching the Mexico City Olympics when John Carlos and Tommie Smith raised their black-gloved fists high in the air as a symbolic gesture to make the world aware of racial discrimination in America. The next day, I went to Madison Junior High School wearing all black and a black glove on my right hand going down the halls yelling “Freedom for the Blacks! Freedom for All!” Long story short, I was suspended from school that day and my Dad was not a happy camper. Maybe my actions were misguided and “Junior High-ish”, but the spirit behind them was the passion in my heart for Freedom and legitimate Civil Rights for all. Go Chick fil a!

As I watched the opening of the 2012 London Olympics, I was excited to see much of England where I did undergraduate work at University of Brighton, and London where I received my Ph.D. and where many of my dear friends reside. As I was enjoying the English scenery and the ceremonies unfold, I began to notice a political theme creep into a glorious athletic event. Yes, there were images of cultural and musical icons as diverse as the Beatles and Mr. Bean to Mary Poppins and Madonna, but it was the British Multicultural Lefty Socialism that grabbed my attention and frustrated my heart.

At first I thought, “OK Jake relax, your Conservative Christian worldview and values are causing you to see things that are not there.” I took mental notes on the NHS (British National Health Service) and CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) signs and messages in the ceremonies and tried to focus on the ultimate purpose of the Olympics, the athletes. But the next day when I heard Labour Party MP Paul Flynn proudly declare that “wonderfully progressive socialist sentiments and ideas were smuggled into the opening romp” through the “the eloquent messages of Danny Boyle on NHS, CND, and war futility”, and when Carl Sargent of the British Left-wing Labour Party boasted that the London Olympics opening ceremonies were “the best Labour party political broadcast I have seen in a while”, I knew my disgust over politicizing the Olympics were bonafide and justified.

Conservative MP Aiden Burley shared my sentiments when he tweeted “The most leftie opening ceremony I have ever seen – more than Beijing, the capital of a communist state! Welfare tribute next?” And “Thank God the athletes have arrived! Now we can move on from leftie multicultural crap. Bring back red arrows (sic), Shakespeare and the Stones!”

OK, OK, I know it was just The Olympics, and I won’t go there about the absolutely stupid things President Carter did to ruin the Olympics in 1980 and 1984 or the horrendous way the Media elites then and today handled the Jew hatred of that dark 1972 Olympic Day in September when 11 Israeli athletes were murdered in cold blood by militant Muslims. And yes, I know London Mayor Boris Johnson said that the open ceremonies “were a smorgasbord. The comedy was brilliant, the Mr Bean stuff, the Bond stuff” but then he gleefully added, “The thing I loved was the heavy political stuff. I loved the emergence of the urban proletariat and the rise of the chimneys and the forging of the ring.”

My disgust at British Socialists was renewed. London’s Mayor needs a history lesson down the dark corridors of the mad Marxist machinery that in its path destroys life and liberty. What may appear to be a benign and tolerant statement of British history by London’s Mayor is a sad failure to recognize that when Karl Marx wrote his diabolical book “The Communist Manifesto” in London, England in 1848, he unleashed a vile army of “urban proletariat” demons that were not only responsible for the death of over 100 million people in the twentieth century but whose proletariat philosophy still haunt mankind with the specter of Communism, Socialism, Collectivism, Progressivism, and Big Government-ism from the English Labour Party to Barack Obama’s Democratic Party.

When Labour Party MP Paul Flynn says that “wonderfully progressive socialist sentiments and ideas were smuggled into the opening romp”, people don’t realize that he is reflecting the stealth Fabian Marxist and socialist roots of Labour Party’s worldview (See Chapter 5 Fabians in my book MOBOCRACY) and how those ideas have been smuggled into Obama’s Democratic Party by the Congressional Progressive Caucus and by Obama himself and his Socialist-Marxist disciples. (See Chapter 12 Barack Obama “The Intellectual” From Marx to Alinsky of my book MOBOCRACY)

The subtitle to my book MOBOCRACY “This is What Democracy Looks Like” is: “The Cultural and Political War to Destroy our Republic under God.”

The sub-title points to the clever way the underground and above-ground academic and cultural Marxists, Fabian Socialists, and Progressives have permeated American Judeo-Christian culture with “progressive socialist sentiments and ideas.” For the past one hundred years, they have been grinding us down to the point where it is bone upon bone battling over what direction we will walk in the future. From Fabian influence in American Universities to the 1935 Communist International Popular Front that called for the building of progressive coalitions of various institutions from political parties, labor unions, university professors, musicians, artists, and intellectuals, they have infiltrated our Christian constitutional culture with Marxist values that are destroying our Republic under God.

Sadly, they are well on their way to succeeding as many Americans have turned soft and lazy, relying on the collective for security rather than individual responsibility. Far too many Americans lack the discipline it takes to work hard and to study the historical origin of America’s greatness. They are being progressively influenced by a politically correct entertainment and educational culture that is coupled with cheap sound bites and slogans that promises hope, change, and free stuff from crib to crypt. Unlike Nazis and militants Marxists, you don’t have to burn classic books to destroy a culture; just get people to stop reading them unless of course it’s Harry Potter, Twilight, or Hunter Games. God forbid Americans actually read, study, and know about our Founders, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Federalist and Anti-Federalists Papers.

The mantra of the Fabian, Gramcian, Frankfurt, and Alinsky Marxists from the get go has been “let us grasp the weapon of culture and destroy the British and America God centric Judeo-Christian Culture and preplace it with government man centric Marxism.” That is why 93-year-old folk singing icon Pete Seeger, who would often declare “songs are weapons”, sang songs with Woody Guthrie praising the Marxist mass murderer Joseph Stalin in 1940, joined the Communist Party in 1942, and campaigns today with Bruce Springsteen, Crosby, Stills and Nash, Jackson Browne, Jesse Jackson, Susan Sarandon, Michael Moore, Sean Penn, Matt Damon, Rage Against the Machine, and a myriad of other cultural and political court jesters from the Left for the Socialist Occupy Movement and Barack Obama’s re-election campaign.

Many Americans know the song “God Bless America” (who can forget on 9/11/2001 when both Democrats and Republicans sang that song on the steps of the Capital or when Kate Smith use to sing it over and over again during WWII), but few know that it was hated by many socialists like Pete Seeger and Woody Guthrie who back in the day made the song “This Land is Your Land” their replacement for a song they despised. As Woody would play his songs, he would proudly display on his guitar the slogan “This Machine Kills Fascists.” A fascist to Woody, Pete, and the bohemian Marxists of yesterday and today is anyone who embraces our Founding Father’s Judeo Christian constitutional republican worldview and values. That is why to this day, Pete Seeger and many other cultural and political icons in British and American society flock together singing the same tunes of “this is what democracy looks like”, redistribution of wealth, social justice, national health care, “government must solve our problems”, and “I want my Obama money!”

In contrast to the selfish demands of the Left, I am beaming with pride as America’s Fab Five won the Team USA Gold medal in girl’s gymnastics, and Michael Phelps established the amazing all-time medal wins in Olympic history. I suppose, like American entrepreneurs, Obama will try to take credit for their success too. I am also profoundly concerned that far too many Americans and Europeans have either embraced the Fabian socialist “Labour party opening ceremony’s political broadcast” or are foolishly duped into accepting “the urban proletariat…. progressive socialist sentiments and ideas that were smuggled into the opening” ceremonies.

As I watched our wonderful American teenage Fab Five with tears in their eyes, hands on their hearts, and hope in their future, I prayed that the God in whom we Trust would illuminate our understanding that He governs in the affairs of men, and that without Him, we perish. In Election Year 2012, let us fight for the future of America’s Fab Five and all of our children by telling the Fabians in Congress and the White House “we are on to you, and we want you out of our children’s future, starting January 20, 2013.”

Now go get involved to turn our Republic back to its constitutional roots!

Photo credit: Viktor Hertz (Creative Commons)

Colorado Shooter ID’d As Part Of Occupy New York

Nationally-known private investigator Bill Warner was the first to connect Colorado massacre shooter James Holmes to the Occupy Black Bloc group, citing the similarities and MO of the anarchistic group to Holmes.

A photo from October 2011 has now surfaced of an Occupy New York protester being carried away by police that appears to be James Holmes. A private investigator from Kellerman Investigations has named the protester in this photo as being Holmes, and a website called Godlike Productions has a post where facial recognition software was used, comparing the photo from 2011 with Holmes’ “Joker” photo posted days before the massacre on his “Adult Friend” profile.

If indeed Holmes is part of the Occupy movement, and specifically the Occupy Black Bloc group—which is basically a clone of Obama crony Bill Ayers’ Weathermen group—then Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the whole of the Mainstream Media have a lot of explaining to do. Why? Because while they were all praising and extolling the Occupy movement, the Black Bloc group was rioting, destroying private property, and planning to set bombs.

What do they expect? A group that identifies themselves as anarchists? The President of the United States praising and extolling them? What does he think is going to happen when an Occupier with a screw loose joins with an anarchist group?

More to the point, however, is that the Occupy movement is nothing more than the Left’s army of “anti-war” protesters that was used as a Saul Alinsky tactic to get the Left—specifically Obama—into power, which then was miraculously “fundamentally transformed” into the Occupy movement.

Is Barack Hussein Obama the original “Occupier,” being part of the phony “anti-war” movement and thus directly connected to a group James Holmes was a member of (and thus partially responsible for the Colorado massacre?)

Perhaps that is going too far.

Perhaps not.