Investigator: Foreigners Bought Hawaii Birth Certificates

Obama birth certificate SC Investigator: Foreigners bought Hawaii birth certificates

The lead investigator for Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse – which already has found probable cause that Barack Obama’s publicly released birth certificate is a forgery – says any Hawaii documentation for Obama’s birth that exists would probably be of little value.

Mike Zullo, a retired New Jersey detective now heading Arpaio’s volunteer investigative team, explained in an interview that at the time of Obama’s birth during the state’s early years, Hawaii birth documentation routinely was purchased by foreigners for children not born in the state.

Arpaio’s investigation was launched last September after constituents came to the sheriff with their concern that Obama was ineligible for the presidency and would perpetrate a fraud by placing his name on the state’s ballot.

Read more at WND. By Bob Unruh.

Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)

Lord Christopher Monckton On Obama’s Birth Certificate

A few days ago, British climate change skeptic Lord Christopher Monckton spoke to an audience in California about Obama’s birth certificate. Frankly, we need more Americans to be speaking out on this issue. There is no excuse.

Obama Is The Big Lie

Obama Closeup 2 300x224 Obama is the Big Lie

Photo credit: breitbart.com

The latest revelations about Obama’s literary agent having taken the rap for the so-called false information on his “Bio”with Acton & Dystel does not pass the smell test or any stretch of logic or critical thinking for a rational person to believe.  This saga starts in 1991 and the latest reason being floated for the misconstrued information is that it was a “fact-checking error.”   This is ludicrous at best and disingenuous at worst, how gullible does Obama think we really are?  It is widely known that all authors have complete control of their bio and other sources have pointed out Acton & Dystel required authors to provide this information for them.

Why we are being led down this path now is the real story that needs to be explored for the motivations behind all the secrecy of Obama’s past.

We must make a few reasonable assumptions to get us farther down the road and ask some rather important questions from Obama’s perspective to arrive at some level of truth.   The first is Obama must have known about the Acton & Dystel bio, after all he was more than likely the source for this misinformation, who else could have done this?  Not to mention that it had moldered for 16 years from 1991 to 2007 before it was scrubbed just two months after Obama announces his candidacy for president.   This was a deliberate act of deception, as he knew that this could be damaging to his carefully crafted imaginary image of himself and his fabricated past.

However, Obama had left Acton & Dystel sometime in 2005 or 2006.

Now that we have laid the groundwork for the important questions to follow, logic is going to take a hard left turn to the political left.  If Obama himself had confabulated his own birth narrative  we must know the reasons.  It has been floated that this was done to give him “street cred” with Chicago’s inner city black population as some skinny kid raised by white grandparents who went to exclusive and privileged schools does not sell well with these folks.

As we follow this twisted tale, he needed these credentials since he had set his eye on the Mayor’s seat for the city of Chicago.  So he concocted this tale to get himself elected, such is the state of politics in Chicago, then as now.

He also used this artifice as he ran for State Senator and the U.S. Senate from Illinois since again it would give him the credentials he needed to be elected to these higher offices.  However, he had started the practice of eliminating candidates off the “ballots” in these races and actually did not have to face any serious debate about himself or his politics, as each candidate faded away and he ran virtually unopposed.  We even see shades of this tactic with McCain in the presidential election in 2008 when it was “leaked” that he was not born in the U.S.A, but Panama.

This is one of the unexplained events since Obama had to know that his Acton & Dystal “bio” was out there in the public domain!  Either he did not care about this possible bombshell or it completely slipped his mind.

To dispel the latter, the scrubbing of the ‘bio” occurred two months after he announced his run for the president so it definitely was on someone’s mind and was within one year of the “birther” issue being leveled against McCain.  We are seeing the usual method of campaigning for Obama, remove a candidate and run unopposed, so we can accept the fact that it had not “slipped his mind.”

As to the supposition that he did not care is a more intriguing question as it raises serious questions about the integrity of our election processes and the media that would cover these elections.  If for instance Obama did not care about what anyone would think is chilling in it’s implications that it belies an omnipotence to his demeanor that he is above the law and any questioning or reproach about his past and his “current” narrative about who he really is.

The most important question that needs to be answered is why go to all the trouble to hide his real “Certification of Live Birth” and place numerous forgeries on the White House website, given this recent revelation, it simply defies logic.  If we now believe what we are being told that it was simply a “fact checking error” why would did he not release his true and accurate documents in June of 2008 and dispensed with any further nonsense about his past if in fact he was born in Hawaii!

This would have in effect negated any impact of the Acton & Dystal “bio” if it ever surfaced, it would have been simply nipped in the bud before the fact.  What’s more, no one would have probably been looking for this document anyway so the answer is murkier than we are now being led to believe.

What is the truth with Obama, this recent revelation only adds to the mystery about what we are experiencing with him as our first CIC, “Confabulator in Chief” as president.  This latest twist in this sordid affair that is all things Obama is not particularly revealing.

We are just being shown that he is a chameleon and will not reveal whom and what he really is except for some carefully constructed exercise in deception by his handlers, whoever they may be.  Which is what we have come to expect from him and his followers that make the most implausible excuses to rationalize his thoughts, deeds and actions?  However, the lingering question for me why has he gone to all the trouble to allow the “birther” issue to linger, much less cultivate when it could have been put to bed in 2008 with the release of his true and certified documents when he had the chance?

We must not forget about the Selective Service registration card that has also been declared a forgery and the refusal of the administration to release the original to Sheriff Arpaio who is investigating Obama.

What we are now experiencing is a an old Cold War negative disinformation campaign that was so effective against the communists in Soviet Russia with the sole purpose to deceive the American people to accept this usurper and imposter that lays about the White House these days.

We must stand firm and resolute to determine the truth in this matter, the stakes are simply too great to ignore the obvious.

The outstanding question is why is Obama the Big Lie?

Did Obama Biographer David Maraniss Have Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate In 2008?

David Maraniss  shocked the world on May 2 with the revelation that he was about to publish a biography on Barack Obama that included extensive excerpts of letters and journals of previously unknown girlfriends Genevieve Cook and Alexandra (Alex) McNear. He gave a taste of his book, Barack Obama: The Story, in an extensive piece in Vanity Fair, where, among other excerpts, Genevieve Cook’s journal entries revealed the sexual persona of Obama in the 1980s.

What wasn’t clear, however, is why, when literally thousands of researchers have been trying to uncover Obama’s past, that these New York girlfriends have never been discovered before? But a more salient question is why did Obama reveal the names of these girlfriends exclusively to Maraniss? And even more pointedly, why did the past girlfriends provide exclusive access to their letters and journals again to Maraniss? Why couldn’t the journals and entries be published in their entirety, as this creates a further mystery into Obama’s past.

What the video above focuses on, however, is an odd statement that Maraniss made on C-SPAN in August of 2008 after writing an extensive biographical article about Obama in the Washington Post. He states, unequivocally, after being asked about the controversy surrounding Obama’s birthplace, that he was in possession of Obama’s birth certificate, to which at this point no one had been given physical possession of, even FactCheck.org, which was allowed to photograph and examine it, but not keep. His statement also seems to indicate that the birth certificate he had in possession was the LONG-FORM birth certificate, which was not released until April 27, 2011, in that he intimates the birth certificate indicates that Kapiolani was the birth hospital, of which the short-form does not indicate.

Further, it is odd that an Internet search for these two previous girlfriends show that they were either both extremely private people, or, more perfidiously, information about them was scrubbed. Maraniss commits a blunder in the Vanity Fair article in revealing that Genevieve Cook taught at Brooklyn Friends School, which, with some extensive digging, Obama Files discovered embraces Leninist Communism. Cook, as we reveal, got her education at Swathmore College, known for radicals, and is home to none other than the far-Left Students for a Democratic Society.

ForgeryGate: US Air Force Investigator Says Obama Trying To Hide Something

This guy is brave for coming forward and talking about ForgeryGate. If you like interviewer Tom Ballantyne, you can buy his newly re-released book “Oh Really, O’Reilly?” here.

ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obama’s Fraud: Operation Sideshow Part 10

obama birth certificate ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud: Operation Sideshow Part 10

Many experts have weighed in on the analysis of Obama’s “certificate of live birth” and concluded that it is a forgery culminating in a probable cause finding of forgery and fraudulent document(s) by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office on March 1st of this year.  All of these methods used complicated computer software and other forensic methods to establish that the document Obama’s Administration posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 was a forgery.

Through all of this, we have not heard one peep out of Obama or his handlers and agents about this matter; they believe that if they ignore this issue, the media will bury the story along with yesterday’s garbage.

This is a serious Constitutional crisis and breach of federal law; however, all we get from the media, the press corps, attorney general, and legislators is a “let them eat cake” and the “devil may care” attitude. In the first instance, this cost Marie Antoinette her head, the other our very soul as a nation founded on the rule of law.  We have fallen so deeply that the politically connected and elite have become an oligarchy and can break the law with impunity while the common man is made to suffer for the slightest transgression and subject to being called before the Bar of Justice.  The citizens are treated as subjects and are made to answer through myriad rules, laws, and regulations made by an ever larger presence of these oligarchs by edict and not legislation as our president and his officers circumvent the Constitution, legislature, and the courts.

However, to face this challenge, many dedicated citizens and patriots have not turned their backs on this issue as the press has ignored the truth of this matter.  Nick Chase is one these individuals that came up with an elegant method to prove that Obama’s birth certificate document is a forgery that you can perform in your own living room.  His simply written method follows my introduction.

A Simple Method to Determine that Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate is a Forgery

Nick Chase is a retired but still very active technical writer, technical editor, computer programmer, and stock market newsletter writer. During his career, he has produced documentation on computers, typewriters, typesetters, headline-makers, and other pieces of equipment most people never heard of, and he has programmed typesetting equipment. You can read more of his work at contrariansview.org.

Is Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate a forgery? Definitely yes, for those of us who have spent a lifetime writing and producing technical documents, and who remember how they were produced in pre-computer days, and who have the technical expertise today to produce them using computers. For us, it’s been an “open secret” that the document image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 is a complete fake.

So, last summer I wondered if there would be some way to demonstrate that this “birth certificate” is indeed a fake, just by looking at the document itself and without resorting to computer software or to any knowledge about how computers produce documents.  And, after studying it for a while, I realized that the forgery fails the “pitch test.”

What do I mean by the “pitch test”? Simple.  Manual typewriters (and monospace electric-motor-powered typewriters) have a “pitch” — so many typed letters per inch.  There were many different manual typewriter type styles in the 1960s, but by far the most common were “Courier 10″ — ten characters per inch, including the space bar — and “Elite 12″ — twelve characters per inch — with “Courier 10″ predominant.

Thus, all of the typed characters in a row of text would, if placed over another typed row of text, be in perfect vertical alignment (including typed spaces) because each typed character occupies exactly the same horizontal space in its row.  That’s what “monospace” means.

So, suppose I took a line of typewritten text from the Obama document and positioned it just above another typewritten line from that same document, if the “birth certificate” were authentic, then the individual letters in the two rows should be in perfect vertical alignment — one letter directly above another — right?

Using computer software, I copied the text “6085 Kalanianaole Highway” in line 7d of the picture and pasted it above (and touching) the text “Maternity & Gynecological Hospital” in line 6c, in the process placing the “a” of “Highway” directly above the “a” of “Hospital — the next to last letter in each line.  The result is shown in Figure F (F is for forgery) below:

Chase 1 ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud: Operation Sideshow Part 10 Figure F.  In a real typewritten document the letters line up vertically.  In the Obama “birth certificate” forgery, they do not.

(Don’t worry that the pasted-in line chops off the tops of the letters of the line of text below it.  The purpose here is not readability, but to show that the letters do not line up vertically.)

As you scan your eyes to the left, you can see that by the time you reach the “6″ of “6085″ the vertical alignment is half-a-character off with the “y” of “Maternity.”  This is not possible on a manual typewriter.  It would appear that the alignment problems originate with the word “Highway,” whose letters are slightly narrower and in a different typeface than the text in line 6c.  The difference in typefaces is most noticeable in the letter “H”of “Highway” compared to the “H” of “Hospital.”

If you still don’t quite understand — look at Figure M (M is for monospace) below, which shows how the two lines of text would line up vertically (with the “6″ above the “y,” using two spaces following “6085″) if the “birth certificate” really had been typed on a typewriter instead of being digitally created.  (I have added the bleeding-heart background to make the copy-and-paste more visible.)

Chase 2 ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud: Operation Sideshow Part 10Figure M.  In a true monospace (typewritten) document the letters are in vertical alignment.  (Courier typeface used here.)

I carry a copy of Figure F in my iPhone so I can show people why the “birth certificate” is a forgery.  If you happen to be near a copier when an Obama supporter wearing the T-shirt passes by, strip off the shirt (male supporters only!).  Place its backside on the copier glass — being careful not to wrinkle or stretch the fabric — and make two photocopies enlarged 200% or more.  With scissors cut out the words “6085 Kalanianaole Highway” on line 7d from one copy and position them above the words “Maternity & Gynecological Hospital” on line 6c on the uncut copy, doing the best you can given the limitations of T-shirt fabric to line them up as was done in Figure F.  You should see something similar to Figure T, below:

Chase 3 ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud: Operation Sideshow Part 10Figure T.  The letters do not line up vertically in the digital version of the “birth certificate” printed on the Obama campaign T-shirt.

This alignment was much more difficult for me to achieve than the one shown in Figure F because the T-shirt fabric twists downward at the word “Hospital” in line 6c.  I lined up the two “a”s along the vertical threads they touch (which corrects for the twisting of the fabric).  When properly aligned, you can see the typewriter letters don’t line up vertically, just as they did not in Figure F.  This works even if the T-shirt has been worn and put through the wash several times, as was the T-shirt used for Figure T.

It is an issue of evidence — concrete proof the document is a forgery.  And it is only one of many (more technical) concrete proofs offered up by respected professionals who have debunked the “birth certificate.”

You can challenge your friends to go on the Internet and search for any reliable evidence that anybody has posted that disproves Figure F or any of the proofs offered by others dissecting the digital PDF “birth certificate” which was released at whitehouse.gov.

They won’t find any, because there isn’t any.

Part eleven discusses the evidence against the many claims of Obama, his past and summarizes, and concludes this investigation.

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten

Part Eleven

 

Today Is The One Year Anniversary Of The Release Of Obama’s Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate! Operation Sideshow Part 9

Obama birth certificate SC Today is the One Year Anniversary of the Release of Obamas Forged Long Form Birth Certificate! Operation Sideshow Part 9

(Part 9 of an exclusive Western Journalism investigative report)

Today is the One Year Anniversary of the Placement of Obama’s Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate on the White House Website, a Red-Letter Day to be Sure

Forensic Hurdles and the Obvious Choice, a Digital Forgery

Just this past month, Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker filed a concurrence in denial of a mandamus petition over a request for an original copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate be filed with the State in the Courts Order:

Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.

His statement resulted from a failed ballot challenge from Alabama, although Justice Parker is referring to the findings by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office.

I believe we are at a point to make some reasonable conjecture.

A forgery for a “certificate of live birth” must be created to give the appearance of propriety to Obama’s claims of citizenship. Otherwise, he is simply a usurper; the cries for verification have become too loud to ignore. Donald Trump and Jerome Corsi’s best selling book “Wheres the Birth Certificate?”, which was released in May 2011, turned the tide and forced Obama to make an about face on this issue.  Obama could not release his actual and genuine “certified” copy as it would show him to be ineligible to hold the Office of President as it is most likely a birth certificate by affidavit.

Given this set of circumstances, several technical difficulties come into play that limit his choices to accomplish the goal of creating a forgery for his birth documents; these hurdles are discussed below.

1.) It cannot be easily placed into the bound volume residing in the records of the State of Hawaii; the reason for this is that it is forensically impossible to do so for the following reasons:

1a.) this would require removing the entire record from the vault for an extended period; this is practically impossible.

1b.) the entire bound volume would be nearly impossible to duplicate as it would require a volume of materials that are no longer available (age appropriate).  This would mean paper, spine,  cover, inside flap materials, adhesives, ink, and the duplication of every record in the current bound volume, a monumental task.

1c.) to replace just his record is again difficult as it actually requires taking the bound volume apart separating the page that contains his record.  A single page in a bound book is actually only one of four pages.  It is a single piece of paper that is folded in half and placed with others nested to make a booklet; these booklets are then brought together and bound then placed into the spine of a single volume.  It is printed on each side as well, further complicating matters.

(Note: if it is a 3 post binder book this matter would be easier to accomplish; however, any single page would either be two or four pages front to back.)

2d.) it would be next to impossible to cut and replace a page; this would then be two pages (front & back), and it would be grossly evident given close examination.

1e.) forensic and chemical tests on the paper and materials would again preclude the substitution or replacement scenario, as aging leaves it‘s own evidence that is difficult to duplicate and in some cases geographic dependent on how it effects a record.

1f.) a bound volume that has records added as is it made (being added through time) brings a matter of complexity to any attempt to enter a forged record of this type.  This book then would capture certain biological material (spores and pollen) and information of the seasons as flora blooms and blossoms along with fungi and humans that handled this volume.

(Note: examination of this type of evidence would be another method to ascertain that the book or records contained forgeries.)

2.)  Microfiche records may or not exist for his record; if so, a forged microfiche record may be able to be made. However, it would require remaking the entire reel or sheet, then substituting the forged record during the exposure and creation process.  This is probably a more feasible process; however, it would need materials that would pass forensic examination.  Original materials that date to the time the reel or sheet was last created is probably next to impossible to obtain to complete this type of forgery.

Any forgery for a bound volume breaks down rather quickly as being insurmountable when the technical hurdles are considered.  The only reasonable alternative is to create a digital image and substitute it for any “claimed” certificates Obama received from the Hawaii Department of Health, a bait and switch scenario.  An honorable mention needs to be made to Loretta Fuddy, Director of Health for Hawaii; Neil Abercrombie, Governor; and David Louie, Attorney General, who played their parts extremely well to aid Obama in this masquerade over his birth certificates.  One can only hope that the legal and political consequences prove disastrous for them in the future as they assisted in the deception of the American people.

The actual forger was so incompetent that whoever made this forgery did not know that all they had to do was print the document on a safety paper background, then scan that and post it on whitehouse.gov, making detection more difficult. Obama is strictly second rate as he cannot even get a world class forger to create his false and fraudulent documents; they are on par with his Cabinet and Czars, all second and third string players.  Was the actual perpetrator of this crime an unwilling participant to this cabal and left tell-tale evidence for others to find? We can only hope so.

(Note: I personally believe it was incompetence born of arrogance as the press corps would give cover to any actions Obama and his agents cared to implement so he could be careless.)

All the subterfuge of the press gaggle and Obama’s own statements of April 27, 2011 were obfuscation for the placement of a false and forged document on the web.  Officials of the State of Hawaii have facilitated this.  Operation Sideshow is looking like an actual operation and cabal conceived, planned, and executed with a host of accomplices. Some were active and others were passive as a fawning and pliant press; without their capable or incompetent services, this could never have been possible.

Obama needs to end this matter by releasing his birth certificate documents for examination from Hawaii’s vital statistics vault.  Forensic analysis of the original record(s) is necessary to clear this matter up.  This can be done by Obama waiving any confidentiality requirements as he did in his letter of April 22, 2011 per Hawaii Statute §338-18 and allow his records to be examined.

His refusal to release his documents is ominous and mystifying if in fact his records are as he claims them to be.  Ms. Corley needs to state that the “Certificate(s) of Live Birth” she received from Ms. Fuddy is the same as the one posted on whitehouse.gov.  I personally think she would decline such a claim now that it has been declared a forgery. Who knows what she will do?

She was probably only sent to fetch the certificates and instructed not to view the documents so that she could not be compelled to testify on the contents of the sealed envelope at a later date if it all blew up in their faces.  This way, she could use plausible denial as a defense; all she would have done was turn over a sealed envelope to Bob Bauer (the White House counsel) who would have a certain amount of executive privilege from congressional oversight and possibly the courts as well.  It was probably cheap insurance for them, though only a well-reasoned guess on my part.

Part Ten is a simple method to determine for yourself that Obama‘s long-form birth certificate is a forgery; this method was developed by Nick Chase, a retired expert in typewriters and type set machines for the printing of technical documents and newspapers.

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten

Part Eleven

Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)

How Hawaiian Officials Helped Cover Up The Obama Forgery: Operation Sideshow Part Eight

neil abercrombie SC How Hawaiian Officials Helped Cover Up The Obama Forgery: Operation Sideshow Part Eight

Completing the Case for a Birth Certificate by Affidavit from Statements of Neil Abercrombie Governor of Hawaii

We are now at a point to discuss Neil Abercrombie’s remarks of January 18, 2011 in detail and to refresh our memory about not being able to release Obama’s records as shown in this quote from the Daily Mail a United Kingdom newspaper dated January 20, 2011:

Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.  He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists’ was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.  And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

In Part Six, we were introduced to the kernel or fingerprint of the evidence we have been looking for on the type of birth certificate Obama actually has.   Neil Abercrombie appears to be an honest man, at least in January.  What he has actually described is an affidavit for birth registration that was not attended by any medical personnel.  The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act of 1955 was fully in force in 1961, and a birth certificate by affidavit would have all the information he describes.

He drops the quest to release Obama’s information and retreats from his earlier remarks.  However, Governor Abercrombie has solved the riddle on what actually is in Obama’s records in Hawaii’s vital statistics vault in a bound volume of birth records.  His statements allude to only an “unspecified listing or notation”; however, this is just politispeak for a birth registration by AFFIDAVIT, which can now be taken as an implied FACT with the Governors statement:

Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

This is the very definition of a birth certificate by affidavit available in 1961 in accordance with the Heath Statistics Act of 1955 for the Territory of Hawaii.

In regards to the publishing of Obama’s birth announcement in the Sunday Advertiser and the Honolulu Star occurred on Sunday, August 13, 1961, we also know that both newspapers shared office space and used this department for birth announcements.  The fact that the publication is triggered by a registration application being received by the Hawaii Department of Heath in 1961 means that they will complete a birth certificate for the registration, in this case for baby Obama.

The “certificates of live birth” copies given by Ms. Fuddy, Director for Hawaii’s Health Department  on April 25, 2011 to Obama (a short four months later) contradicts the Governor’s entire statement regarding a “birth certificate” if we assume the “certificates” are the forged document residing on whitehouse.gov.   The certificates that were given to Obama are in all likelihood “certificates of live birth” by affidavit, if we believe Abercrombie’s description of the records.  The forgery was switched for the genuine article.  We have no reason to doubt his description, as he was forthcoming on his investigation of Obama‘s records in January and the substitution is blatant and obvious given his statements.

In another bizarre twist to this story, Governor Abercrombie, on the same day that Obama issues his now famous “sideshows and carnival barkers” statement, issues a press release reiterating Ms. Fuddy’s letter of the 25th.  Only this time, he mentions that Dr. Alvin Onaka, the State Registrar, certified the copies; this detail was missing in Ms. Fuddy’s letter since she stated she witnessed the copying of Obama’s record.

There is also a statement from the Attorney General, David Louie, about how Obama’s records were released according the “letter of the law”, in an attempt to lend credibility to this about face by Obama.  We have already established that government requests for documents already have “special status” under Hawaiian statute §338-18 (2), (3), (4) and (5) for these issues.  Ms. Fuddy also dispels this myth, as it was only a discretionary rule she invoked as allowed under the statute as “departmental policy” and not “law” as the Attorney General states.  However, I am still puzzled by the fact of the Governor’s remarks to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser of January 18, 2011.

Given the hyperbole in the press release, we are still left with the decisive factor for a birth certificate by affidavit when all of the evidence and statements are considered with the pivotal statement he made that Tuesday:

Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

Neither Governor Abercrombie nor any of his staff have attempted to explain the above statements he made in January; all of the obfuscation in this press release is cover for incompetent remarks by the governor made back then, or they are camouflage and fabrications for a cover-up now.

Then we have this Alice in Wonderland story from Fox News about Governor Abercrombie and his friend Mike Evans, who retracts his remarks from the previous day after making an appearance on a syndicated radio show (the quote is from the Fox story):

Evans, who says he has been a close friend of Abercrombie since the 1980s, appeared on Minnesota’s KQRS radio last week and said he’d been told by the governor himself that Obama’s birth certificate was nowhere to be found. Evans told KQRS on Jan. 20:

“Yesterday, talking to Neil’s office, Neil says that he searched everywhere using his powers as governor ….. there is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii.  Absolutely no proof at all that he was born in Hawaii.”

Later on in this article, it corroborates the Governor’s statements made to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser on the 18th with this excerpt from the article:

“Halfway down the story it said the long form certificate was not on file at the two hospitals,” Evans said. “It says the hospitals say there’s no birth certificate and says Neil says he couldn’t find it.”

(Note:  When I first looked for the Star-Advertiser article, it was missing from their archives, leaving me to use a foreign source as the story appears to have been scrubbed from their archives.)

The question at issue is: how does a record in a bound volume go from an “unspecified listing or notation” to a full-fledged “certified certificate of live birth” that was hospital-generated in four short months signed by the deceased Dr. David A. Sinclair who passed away in 2003?   Four people have attested to the fact that his record resides in a bound volume, three of them Hawaiian officials, and in all likelihood, this record has been moldering there since sometime in early August 1961 as evidenced by the birth announcement in the Honolulu newspapers.

We can now accept that the idle speculation that Jerome Corsi reports on February 25, 2011 was the start of an actual cabal to place false documents on whitehouse.gov and intimate through a negative and false assumption for them to be considered genuine by the media and public at large.  We can only surmise that it was.  Not the president or any of the presidents agents, or any officials of the State of Hawaii, have made any definitive statements regarding what it was that was placed on the White House website on April 27, 2011.

Dr. Fukino’s comments are immaterial and incompetent as she is no longer an Official of the State of Hawaii.  She is damaged goods as she has violated Hawaii Statute §338-18 and impeached herself with her previous comments; Obama’s long-form birth certificate is yet to be posted on whitehouse.gov.  This would not happen for another 16 days, so she cannot shed any light on this matter!  As stated earlier, her comments are fortuitous, or they are complicit.

In addition, we have Obama’s incompetent remark, “no matter what we put up.”  Operation Sideshow appears to be an actual operation ran by Obama and his aides, aided by the press and officials of the State of Hawaii to place a forged document onto whitehouse.gov.   What has been established by at least four sources, Bob Bauer, Dr. Fukino, Ms. Fuddy, and Mr. Wisch, is that Obama’s actual Birth Certificate exists as of at least the 25th of April 2011 by Ms. Fuddy’s letter and that is more than likely in a bound volume in the Hawaii State Vital Statistics archive.

We have a legal conundrum since the document image on whitehouse.gov has been declared a forgery by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s investigators and is a composite image that was substituted for one of the certificates received by Ms. Corely on April 25, 2011.  Furthermore, it is not a simple scan of one of the original documents discussed by Ms. Fuddy.

These facts constitute a prima facie case for a criminal act being committed by a person or persons unknown on Obama’s behalf and possible direction.  However, it has unquestionably been aided by a pliant and fawning press corps and past and present officials of the State of Hawaii whose statements, actions, and silence has assisted these acts to fruition.

Late Breaking News:

Doug Voght, an international expert on scanners and digital documents, has filed a 22 page Criminal Complaint with the FBI charging that Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate that he released on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulent document.

I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011, is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs, and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense.

Part Nine discusses the forensic difficulties to place a forged document into a bound volume of birth records in the vital statistics vault in Hawaii.  Then we examine why Obama and company chose a digital forgery as an alternative to a hard copy forgery.

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten

Part Eleven

How Hawaiian Officials Helped Cover Up The Obama Forgery: Operation Sideshow Part Seven

 

Obama birth certificate SC How Hawaiian Officials Helped Cover Up The Obama Forgery: Operation Sideshow Part Seven

Requirements of an Agency of the State of Hawaii Contradict Officials Statements

Until sometime in 2009, the State of Hawaii required a “Certificate of Live Birth” to prove Hawaiian ancestry, supposedly unavailable since statements by DOH and Vital Statistics personnel declare only COLB available from 2001 forward.  Certificates of Live Birth were not available since the mid 1980’s as well, according to a statement of Bob Bauer, White House counsel.

In order to process your application [to prove native Hawaiian ancestry], DHHL [Department of Hawaiian Homelands] utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.

This statement was taken from an investigation performed on behalf of a retired CIA officer to look into Obama’s birth certificate.  He produced evidence that the State of Hawaii, through their Department of Hawaiian Homelands Homestead and Ancestral lands program, needed the “Certificate of Live Birth” or more commonly known as the long-form birth certificate.

The Governor, the Director of the Department of Health, two spokespersons for the Health Department, and the State Attorney General’s office have all made duplicitous and misleading statements in this matter. Why?

These statements look like opening salvos in Operation Sideshow and could be the culmination of these efforts, and entail not only the president and his aides but officials of Hawaii as well.

Jerome Corsi’s article of February 25, 2011 is prophetic, or there actually was and is an active conspiracy to give credence to the now discredited and forged documents that reside on whitehouse.gov.

The only statements we have are Obama’s lame “no matter what we put out” and Dr. Fukino’s impeached remarks of April 11, 2011 to Michael Isikoff on what it is that is contained in Obama’s bona fides regarding his birth and the forged certificate placed on whitehouse.gov on  April 27, 2011.   None of these statements is from any State of Hawaii official, then or now!

The president’s stubborn refusal to submit his documentation to third party verification leaves gaps in the narrative, through which a semi truck can now be driven and makes Operation Sideshow appears to have spanned at least 2 ½ years in the making, with 3 ½ after execution.

Is There a Dirty Secret Behind Obama’s Birth Certificate, Making the Case for a Birth Certificate by Affidavit

The question we should be asking is: what type of birth certificate does our president have?  Obama’s long-form birth certificate has been declared a forgery.  We are wasting our time in spending any more effort on what is posted on whitehouse.gov and need to turn our attention elsewhere.  The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act of 1955 and the revised laws of Hawaii allowed for the issuance of birth certificates by filing a sworn affidavit for any births that occurred in the Hawaiian Islands from 1911 to 1972.

The Birth Certificate was the same as any other issued by Hawaii Dept. of Health at that time.

Medical personnel or midwifes did not need to make any statements or physical examination of the child or mother for this type of application; a parent, grandparent, or anyone that had knowledge about the birth could submit the application.  This type of birth certificate was filed by mail or in person and was mostly rubber stamped without any official of the State of Hawaii ever seeing the child or parents that filed the application.

Certificates were mailed to the parents of the child after being recorded.

Many locations in the Hawaiian Islands were extremely remote with few hospitals and clinics, so many Hawaiians were born at home; Hawaii needed a way to record these births.

The office of Health Statistics was required to announce all birth registrations in the local newspapers; the office would periodically release this information that they recorded.  The much ballyhooed notification(s) Obama’s supporters point to as proof of his birth in Hawaii, as well as a hospital in the newspaper announcements of his birth, are now discredited.

The Sunday Advertiser and the Honolulu Star published Obama’s birth notification on Sunday August 13, 1961 nine days after his birth with his grandparents address in Honolulu as that of his parents.

It is possible that Obama could have been born anywhere in 1961 since all his mother had to do is call her parents in Honolulu to get the ball rolling.  Having his birth registered in Hawaii would benefit little Barry and his 18 year old mother.  A forged signature or even a pre-signed or signed application by her parents would have made the birth certificate a fait-accompli.  Combine the application by affidavit with five other facts and it not only seems plausible, but most likely:

1.  Obama’s mother was last known to be in Hawaii in January 1961.  She went to Seattle in the fall of 1961 with baby Obama to attend the University of Washington thru spring of 1962. Where was she for these 6 ½ months, February thru September of 1961?

2.  Stanley Ann Dunham Obama or early Soetoro passport records are missing from the State Departments archives.  These records tell of her travels and Obama’s early years, as young children were placed on their mother’s passports in the 1950′s and 60‘s.

3.  Extensive examination on Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB), his one and only “Birth Certificate” in June 2008, was declared a forgery by Ron Polarik, PhD, and others.

4.  Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” and his “Selective Service Registration” card were declared forgeries by Maricopa County Sherriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse”  on March 1, 2012.  What type of application does Obama have in Hawaii‘s document vault?

5.  The sheriff’s investigators determined that the “microfiche records” of INS forms for Hawaii for the week of August 2nd thru 7th 1961 are missing from the National Archives in Washington D.C.  New York records are still in play.

We know that his original birth registration application records exist because of the request to the Hawaii Director of Health (Ms. Fuddy) dated April 22, 2011 from Obama and his counsel.  This resulted in her stating that she “released two copies” of his original “Certificate of Live Birth” in her letter of April 25 to president Obama.  Ms. Judith Corley of the law firm Perkins Coie personally received these certificates on April 25 and verified in the press gaggle transcript on the morning of the 27th given to her on behalf of her client president Obama.

The questions are now: was Obama’s birth actually attended by Dr. David A. Sinclair (died in 2003) as shown on the forged birth certificate, or does he have another type of birth certificate, one by sworn affidavit?  The forged certificate was switched with the real “certified” certificate received on April 26, 2011 and placed on the White House website.  This forgery is purported to be the “genuine” article without any statements from anyone in the Obama administration about this documents authenticity (see Part 4 for this conclusion).  Obama’s claim to citizenship and his entire birth narrative would cease to have any validity if it was proven that he had a birth certificate by affidavit.

Part Eight continues with making the case for a birth certificate by affidavit and specially looks at the statements of Hawaii’s Governor Neil Abercrombie on January 20, 2011 and his April 27th press release.

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten

Part Eleven

Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)

ForgeryGate: Attorney Says “Discovery Is Underway” In Florida Obama Ballot Access Challenge

Attorney Larry Klayman is a patriot in trying to get to the bottom of the Obama eligibility issue in Florida. We all should pray for his safety and hope he doesn’t die of a heart attack (like certain other people trying to get to the bottom of who Obama really is.)