You are here: Home / Archives for Jeremiah Wright

They Destroyed Our Country

May 9, 2013 by 15 Comments

Democrats Despise Taxpayers SC They destroyed our country

They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they promoted him.  They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they made him president, to the great injury of America and the world.  They understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)

We are talking about the Clintons, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Frank, Wasserman-Schultz, Biden, Leahy, Durbin, Murray, Kennedy, Hagel, Kerry, Dodd, Hoyer, Baucus, and many others.

They all knew Obama was an empty suit; yet for private gain and personal advancement, they trampled on the flag, betraying the very people they claim to serve, preferring Party to principle.  During the 2008 campaign, they said he was unqualified, ill-prepared, and unsuited for the office. Yet when his crooked ways carved out primary victory, they jumped on board the Ship of Fools, stoking his engine with lies, deception, and propaganda.  Hillary knew he stole victory; but like a good Party operative, she buttoned her lip and took orders, submitting to authority and covering criminality.

The Ship of Fools also carried members of the ‘progressive’ propaganda press, people who made it a full time job to promote the Democrat agenda and the joke called the Obama Administration: Chris Matthews, Rather, Maddow, Schultz, Olbermann, Moyers, Sullivan, Friedman, Huffington, Sharpton, and Krugman and legions of others.

They banded together with the likes of Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, George Soros, Saul Alinsky, Khalid Al-Mansour,  Rashid Khalidi, and legions of other radical Islamists, communists, and assorted America-haters.   Embarrassingly, many Republicans and so-called conservatives either helped the farce along or were used as pawns in the promotion of the hoax.  But the greatest disgrace of all were evangelicals.  Through sloth or ignorance, they either voted for the poser or stayed at home on election day.

And what progress have the “progressives” delivered?

  • A ruined economy.
  • Insurmountable debt.
  • Bankruptcy.
  • Record numbers on disability and food stamps, a dependency class mushrooming out of control.
  • Federal despotism.
  • Domestic chaos, violence, and deepening divisions.
  • Systemic demoralization.
  • Emboldened enemies.
  • Erosion of constitutional protections.
  • Looming tyranny.
  • Loss of global standing.

Now, with whistleblowers finally getting an ear on The Hill and in the media, we are learning the truth about Benghazi. We are seeing the end of Obama as a consequence; but, even if he exits, the disease remains.

They knew he was a catastrophe.  They knew ObamaCare was a train wreck.  They knew.  Yet they proceeded, and they may have destroyed our country.  For that, they can never be forgiven.

_______

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Twelve years ago he started a training and recruitment company. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is the author of the book “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012, and his columns appear in www.ClashDaily.com and www.WesternJournalism.com. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom.  To contact him, email:  allanlerickson@gmail.com

 

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Filed Under: Commentary, Floyd Reports, Uncategorized Tagged With: , , , , ,

Obama Linked To Satanic Cult?

April 3, 2013 by 43 Comments

Most of us fell out of our chairs while watching the mega-hit TV miniseries The Bible when the character portrayed as Satan looked almost exactly like Barack Hussein Obama.

Glenn Beck immediately tweeted out the resemblance, and Rush Limbaugh jumped on the bandwagon the next day.

It was creepy to say the least; and it was reported the Obama administration was in hysterics, with something like fifty million people seeing that particular episode.

Of course, no one honestly thinks Obama is Satan; but the apple does not fall far from the tree.

Last week, the hacker known as Guccifer released a March 21, 2012 email hacked from the account of Colin Powell, an email sent from Andrew Knight, former director of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire News Corp and now working for the Rothchild banking conglomerate. In the email, Knight urges Powell to encourage Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, to attend the playground of the elite, the Bohemian Grove—long known to take part in an occult ceremony called the Cremation of Care, where members wearing red-hooded robes cremate a coffin effigy at the base of an idol they call Moloch. Conspiracy theorist giant Alex Jones infiltrated the Bohemian Grove in 2000 and videotaped the ceremony, where a mock human sacrifice was offered to a god known as Moloch.

Of course, this is the exact kind of ceremony that Satanists take part in, substituting Moloch for Satan himself.

The Bohemian Grove has been called the American version of the Bilderberg Group, a secret gathering of the rich and powerful to decide how the world will be run. The June 2008 Bilderberg meeting at the Westfields Marriott hotel in Chantilly, Virginia was secretly attended by Democratic rivals Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Mysteriously—or not so mysteriously—Clinton shortly thereafter dropped out of the race, obviously Barack Obama being the candidate of the globalists. And if you look very carefully at the mainstream media coverage shortly after the Bilderberg meeting that began on June 6, almost to the day, the mainstream media switched from supporting Clinton to Obama. For example, Politifact, the go-to source for hit jobs on political opponents, ran a smear piece June 3 comparing Obama to Bush. On June 12, Obama released his so-called short-form birth certificate, which was immediately deemed a fraud. But who do you think began defending Obama almost to the day after the Bilderberg meeting? Politifact.  For example, on June 13, Politifact began running articles backing Obama’s phony birth certificate and continued to belch out a stream of articles defending Obama on every front.

The Bohemian Grove is a much different breed than its Bilderberg cousin, held in Monte Rio, California a month after the Bilderberg soirée. Only males are admitted, with reports of male prostitutes that “service” the attendees.

The Cremation of Care ritual always takes place—and guess who was rumored to be there? Barack Hussein Obama—although the black hood portrayed in The Bible would have been replaced with red.

Given that Obama has long been suspected of having multiple homosexual relationships—primarily through Jeremiah Wright’s church—and the Bohemian Grove is known for its rampant homosexuality;

Given that the Bohemian grove is the American counterpart of the Bilderberg group, to which we know Barack Obama attended;

Given that the “Christian” Obama backs virtually everything that traditional Christians oppose—same-sex marriage, abortion, etc.;

And given that Obama is continually caught in lies and Satan is often referred to as the “Father of Lies”—is it all that inconceivable that Obama is tied to a group that practices what many would call a Satanic ritual?

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports, Videos Tagged With: , , , , , ,

Obama And The Democrats Hate Free Americans

April 1, 2013 by 18 Comments

Obama Social Justice SC 300x300 Obama and the Democrats Hate Free Americans

Obama’s actions throughout his “presidency,” and the active support of Democrats, have made it crystal clear that he and the party hate free Americans. Everything they have colluded on has been aimed at harming We, the People, as free citizens of a capitalist, constitutional republic. From the daily attempts to shred the Constitution, to the total fraud of ObamaCare and the use of it to attack Christians, to the looting of the treasury and redistribution of our money to Big Banks and Big Unions, to the raising of already out-of-control taxes, to the destruction of our energy industries and much, much more, we have witnessed an attack on Americans unprecedented in the history of our country.

As many of you know, the push to turn us into a Marxist/neo-fascist, totalitarian, top-down dictatorship began in 1913 with the Democrats and the “progressive movement,” and has never gone away. Franklin Roosevelt and the Democrats kept the Depression alive and well in the United States for years after it had ended in the rest of the world, much like Obama and the Democrats have done with the government-created recession we are trapped in now. In both cases, socialist/collectivist policies and programs were foisted on an unsuspecting public. However, today, the blatant, outrageous lying, and the vicious attacks on conservatives are far beyond anything that occurred in the past.

What I find astonishing is the number of seemingly intelligent, supposedly well-informed “conservatives” who still do not understand what is going on. In spite of Obama’s statements about his far-left proclivities in his “autobiographies,” in spite of his associations with hard-core, violent, communist radicals like Bill Ayers and many others, and racist Marxists like “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright, in spite of his statements in the 2008 campaign regarding his intention to destroy the coal and coal-fired electric power industries, in spite of his attacks on our traditional culture with his support for all forms of abortion, “gay” marriage, suppression of Christianity, and disarming all Americans except the police (which he ultimately would like to all be federalized), these “conservatives” still think his total failure to do anything that benefits, rather than harms us, is the result of incompetence.

Thus, we find ourselves at the mercy of a man and a political party that that hate us for our economic system, our traditional religions, our traditional culture, our freedom, and the legal document that guarantees those freedoms, the Constitution. The genuine opposition to this in our elected government amounts to 15 to 20 Congressmen, and, at most, four Senators, three of whom are squishy on amnesty for criminal invaders.

All of the egregious laws, regulations, and executive orders have been forced on us despite the fact – repeat, fact – that a large majority of Americans, often including significant numbers of rank-and-file Democrats oppose them. Consent of the governed means nothing anymore to those in elected office and their bureaucrat co-conspirators. We no longer have government “…of the people, by the people, and for the people…”. With each passing day, our freedoms become fewer, as do our options. Given the massive voter fraud in the 2012 election and the refusal of the apparently totally corrupt Attorney General and his and Obama’s Injustice Department to even recognize it, much less do anything about it, the fiction that we will turn everything around in 2016 is delusional. A collectivist, totalitarian police state is being forced upon us, and We, the People, appear to be powerless to do anything to stop it.

However, appearances can be deceiving:

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Filed Under: Coachisright, Commentary, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , ,

Leftist Prayers For A Red Pope Dashed

March 16, 2013 by 11 Comments

Pope Francis SC Leftist Prayers for a Red Pope Dashed

Tuesday night’s NBC News story, “America’s Hopes for a New Pope,” was typical of how the liberal media tried to force the Roman Catholic Church further to the left. The tone of the coverage was that the Catholic Church, in picking a new pope, had to make peace with “diversity”—liberals, feminists, and homosexuals demanding state recognition of “gay marriage” in the United States.

With the selection of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina, the liberals have lost out. He opposes abortion, euthanasia, and homosexuality. A Catholic insider tells me, “Looks like we might have ourselves a relatively conservative new pope. He appears to be opposed to liberation theology and doesn’t approach ‘social justice’ from the political end.” The latter means that while he is an advocate of helping the poor, he doesn’t believe this should be done through state socialist schemes.

Liberal and “progressive” websites are already attacking the first Latin American pope as someone who may have a “dark past” and be linked to the Argentine military during the “dirty war” against the communists. The accusations, which have now been picked up by the Associated Press, show the bitterness of the left, as their hopes were dashed of a “Red Pope.”

Mark Engler, a leftist writer, had promoted another candidate, Brazilian Cardinal Cláudio Hummes, as having “significant progressive bona fides” and noted that he was “a personal friend of former Brazilian president and Worker’s Party leader Lula da Silva.” The Worker’s Party is a Marxist political organization in Brazil, and Lula was a personal friend of Fidel Castro as well. Critics say that Hummes “supported communist strikes” and allowed Lula “to make political speeches during his Masses.” In 1990, after the demise of the old Soviet Union, Lula facilitated the holding of a conference in São Paolo, Brazil, bringing together the communist and leftist parties and guerilla movements of the continent, which came to be known as the São Paulo Forum. Lula’s successor, Dilma Rousseff, the current Brazilian President, is a former communist guerrilla leader.

“Hummes would open the door for the revival of social justice ministry in the Catholic Church,” Engler had written. Of course, “social justice” is already a theme of many of the U.S. Catholic Bishops, who have funded liberal projects with parishioners’ money through the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) for decades, enraging conservative Catholics in the process. It was a CCHD project that helped train Barack Obama as a community organizer on the streets of Chicago. These schemes are ways to attain political power, and they have paid off well for Obama and his associates but not for the poor people they were supposedly intended to help.

In a 2005 story, “Champion of Workers and the Poor,” The Washington Post noted that Hummes had emerged as “a critic of the U.S.-backed free-market policies that were adopted in much of Latin America.” In other words, he helped pave the way for leaders such as Marxist Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, who clutched a crucifix until the day he died. The Post went on, “In May 1998 he [Hummes] became archbishop of Sao Paulo. On his first day in that post, he attacked the spread of global capitalism, saying the privatization of state companies and the lowering of tariffs had contributed to the ‘misery and poverty affecting millions around the world.’”

Hummes headed the archdiocese of São Paulo, Brazil, the country with the largest number of Catholics in the world, until he was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to a top Vatican post, Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy.

Engler pointed out that while the church “is said to have officially rejected liberation theology,” the complete truth is that the Vatican has “affirmed many of the central doctrines of liberation theology, especially those relating to poverty, inequality, and economic justice.” He added, “Most notably, the ‘preferential option for the poor,’ the once-radical idea that God takes sides and identifies with the oppressed and impoverished, has been mainstreamed as Catholic theological doctrine.”

Engler may have a left-wing bias, but at least he understands the global context and the battle underway for control of the church and the world. He is a monthly columnist for the Oxford, UK-based New Internationalist magazine, a socialist journal that favorably reports on “liberation movements” around the world. He also writes for Catholic Worker, the pro-Marxist journal that published the writings of Dorothy Day, now on the road to becoming a Saint of the Catholic Church. His main affiliation is with Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the far-left Institute for Policy Studies.

Engler’s article, “Will the Next Pope Embrace Liberation Theology?,” had appeared on various liberal and left-wing sites, an indication that they found the struggle for control of the Vatican to be extremely important to their global plans. Bergoglio was not their man.

President Obama certainly grasps the stakes as well. His early career was not only funded by the Catholic Church; he spent 20 years in a church whose pastor, the notorious Jeremiah Wright, preached liberation theology. Though not a Catholic himself, Obama has said that the Catholic Church’s long tradition of social justice had a “profound influence” on him. Clearly, Hummes would have been among his top choices for pope.

Photo credit: Catholic Church (England and Wales) (Creative Commons)

Filed Under: Commentary, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , ,

Socialist Framework Espoused By Barack Obama

February 14, 2013 by 9 Comments

Angry Obama SC Socialist Framework Espoused by Barack Obama

You can count on Barack Obama having a clear vision of how the United States should look, entering into (what we think is) his final term. The narcissistic perception of success will obviously be antipodal to the conservative, clear-thinking American; but he is hell-bent on turning this country into a socialist cesspool nevertheless.

Indeed, we are stuck with the Kenyan-in-Chief for another term, thanks to liberal ignorance, a cold and calculating anti-American mainstream media, and a pinch of voter fraud for good measure.

This is not hyperbole — the damages that we have seen and continue to see in the wake of this administration is unfathomable and certainly threaten our children’s future, so take note.

The best opportunity to slow Obama’s destruction is an impeachment process, which clearly is in order even if you base it solely on the Fast and Furious atrocity (let alone the latest Benghazi cataclysm, which incidentally went largely unnoticed thanks to the Lame Stream Media.) Obama’s deluge of treasonous policies are far-reaching and will only increase now that he has more “flexibility” to execute them.

We can only pray the Republican party will suddenly grow the kahunas needed to take Barry to task, but I have serious doubts — there’s simply not the leadership in place to take down this Terrorist-in-Chief and his gang of ruffian handlers. The fact remains we are now staring back at the contemptuous aftermath of Obama’s bellicose policies and looking forward to the future that looks even bleaker and more tyrannical.

Obama’s past Marxist-influenced policies, including Obamacare, incessant entitlement programs, historical debt levels, classless economics, and now the contemptible “Fiscal Cliff” plan (or lack thereof) have weighed heavily on an already distressed economy.

We can calibrate the damage and possibly even counter imminent future vexatious policies if we understand his philosophies and framework from which he draws from — at the risk of sounding obstinate and callous, we must know the enemy. He has clearly displayed to the American people over the past four years that he is indeed the “enemy within.”

So what critical information can we glean from history? What philosophies has he leaned on to deliver assault after assault on the U.S. economy and foreign policies? Can we counter and even circumvent any of his future stratagem? This blogger thinks so and will attempt to lay out this Marxist-in-Chief foundation and principles.

Influencers — The Early Years and Beyond

Obama’s early years were strongly influenced by a number of certified nut jobs. Many of his so-called mentors instilled a strong sense of racial bigotry and anti-colonialism, including his own father, Barack Obama Sr., and communist extraordinaire Frank Marshall Davis. In fact, the characters Obama has been palling around with throughout his career have been nothing short of astonishing, including the anti-American domestic terrorist-turned university professor confidant Bill Ayers, the “audacity to hope” hate monger Jeremiah Wright, slum-lord Tony Ruzko, and much more. The list is endless and staggering.

Do liberals really believe these facts and relationships do not exist or never occurred? Do liberals really believe Obama does not act on the very principles that got him there in the first place? Please, somebody wake me up from this bad dream!

Marxism — The Adaption

One of the predominant theologies that Obama aligned himself with early on was Marxism, where he embraced the classless society theorem.

Marxism: the political, economic, and social principles and policies promoted by Karl Marx, esp: a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society” – Marxist.

Obama’s early years were also earmarked by extreme anti-American principles, including his anthropologist mother who despised her country so much, she enlisted him to Frank Marshall Davis’ tutelage.

Even though Obama had his fill of anarchistic preaching, let’s not forget his other lost treasure, such as being purported of Muslim faith. Maybe this is the explanation for his abhorrent sensitivity of sorts, bowing to Muslim kings, apologizing to the Islamic terrorists that killed four Americans, and other kiss-ass exploits, all made to look America weak. This “apology tour” has made a percentage of Americans very ignominious to this administration, and rightfully so.

One could easily draw the conclusion that the “education” and exposure he received throughout his life makes him ideally suited to take on the socialist underpinnings.

My personal belief is one of Obama being a relativist and Atheist, holding Christianity in contempt, taking on a Chameleon appearance and personality when the need or situation arises, with the unrelenting long-term pursuit of making himself the “center of the universe.” This appeasement-at-will personality was never more obvious after watching Obama’s 2007 Divisive Race Speech — but I assure you there’s more where that came from. No matter how you slice or dice it, Obama has clearly hoodwinked a majority of this country (52% to be exact) and has been deemed Entitlement Messiah and rightly so — Obama is the chosen one to carry the progressive torch.

Alinsky — The Breakout

From all indications, Obama’s policies his first four years had been likened to a radical framework using very calculated means to accomplish end goals. The characteristics include a gaping shift in ideology and a sharp divide among society, culture, and politics, all practiced with calculus longanimity. This ideology can be traced back to none other than Saul Alinsky — not exactly a chap you would bring home to meet Mom and Dad, unless of course they were Madonna and Sean Penn.

Alinsky is best known for his 1971 book “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals.” The premise of the book and teachings are intended to instill radical change in American culture and economics through public discontent and moral confusion. Alinsky developed these strategies to achieve power through mass organization. If this sounds manipulatory, well, it is. This radical style is coming through loud and clear in many of Obama’s philosophies and policies.

According to the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” — a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted.

Alinsky’s infamous rules of ethics draws a considerable level of similarity to how Sharia and the Islamic code is spread to western culture, as well as a haunting semblance to what we’ve seen from Alinsky-in-Chief himself. Remember, it was during Obama’s formative years he learned the “outside looking in” adaption to take advantage of any situation and “get what you want.” Obama has obviously gained a thorough grasp of it based on the lies and deceit he has sown — birds of a feather flock together.

By most conservative standards, Obama has failed Alinsky’s Rule #12 of Tactics, one that puts him at odds with a certain policy failure and obvious fiscal irresponsibility.

The Cloward-Piven Strategy — The Perfect Complement

Then came the Cloward-Piven Strategy, which naturally complements the Alinksy method: a call to overload the welfare system in order to initiate a crisis that requires government intervention. This same strategy has also been well-documented as an Obama staple.

“The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward (1926–2001) and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.” —Wikipedia

Essentially, the strategy forces radical political change through orchestrated crisis — this is Obama’s nexus.

Many of Obama’s policies and strategies draw a distinct similarity to the Cloward-Piven strategy. It’s not far-reaching to prove Obama’s despisement of our beloved free market system driven by the private sector. In fact, he despises American capitalism as much as we despise him. If that sounds foreign to you, well, consider the fact that this Socialist-in-Chief has never held a real job in the private sector and is very careful to to appoint cabinet members with the same credentials. After all, birds of a feather…

“If this strategy were implemented, a political crisis would result that could lead to legislation for a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty. It seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”

Doesn’t it seem odd that this president has gone out of his way to avoid what’s necessary to get this country out of the abyss (that is, cost-cutting)? Did I say benefit?

A surge of continuous regulations will help support and further entrench a national socialism framework, inevitably causing the cancer of capitalism to metastasize until all Americans are utterly dependent on the government to run their lives. It’s not far fetched at all; in fact, we are very close to this hypothesis becoming reality.

So there you have it, Obama’s foundation of principles with an abbreviated look at the direction he’s taking to dismantle this country.

Connecting the dots from Obama’s past all the way up to the present gives us a clear road map to accomplish America’s demise under the American president’s guise. He will continue to impose relentless and extreme-left socialist standards onto this country, breaking her down economically and then piling on regulations and policies to slowly snatch power away from the people and into the hands of the government. That’s his plan anyway. It’s up to us to take that plan away from him.

It’s time to reflect but not lament — follow this bit of anecdotal and slightly modified advice to take back America. I will not tip my hat to the new Constitution, nor will I take a bow for the new revolution. Instead, I’ll get on my knees to pray and hope we the people don’t get fooled again.

Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)

Filed Under: Commentary, Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

To Liberals, More Is Never Enough

January 26, 2013 by 1 Comment

abortion is not health care1 To Liberals, More Is Never Enough

We just ‘celebrated’ the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s murderous decree in the Roe v. Wade case.  Since that spiritually satanic ruling, a number approaching 60-million murders has occurred.  The most damning reality is that this Supreme Court decision has made the murder of the unborn legal.  When President Obama’s former spiritual leader of 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, uttered the words asking that “God damn America,” had he been preaching about the killing of our most vulnerable – the unborn, including the partially-born-I might have been one of his cheerleaders. The wrath of God deserves to be poured out on a nation that professes to follow Him yet condones the killing of our most innocent – the unborn.

Way back forty years ago, the issue was a “woman’s right to choose.”   OK, whether or not I agree with the ‘wisdom’ of the legal decision, it became the ‘law of the land.’  But, as the title of my article states, liberals are never satisfied.  They always want more – at the expense of us all.

Had this moral issue stopped with a woman’s ‘right to choose,’ it might not have become the mega-moral nightmare it has become thanks to our current President and his progressive administration.   This President and his goon squad are forcing American employers to pay the cost of providing contraceptives and abortive procedures as part of their employee health insurance packages.  For business owners with religious or personal convictions that oppose the murdering of unborn babies, this is a sin against their God and their conscience.  But, the Obama goons say, “You will do it, or we will crush you with daily fines.”

The tidy liberal name for abortion or killing has always been “pro-choice.”  That, of course, means pro-murder, pro-killing, pro-infant slaughtering.  Excuse me for caring about the most defenseless among us, but I find it repulsive that all of those who are champions of ‘pro-choice’ are probably the same individuals who would spit on a person wearing a fur coat.  ”How dare you selfishly condone killing an animal so that you can wear a coat made of  fur,” they would hiss.  Hypocrisy just doesn’t get much bigger than that.

If a woman wants “morning after” pills, they are legal.  She can either take precautions the “night before,” or she can buy her own pills.  Makes sense to me.

The insanity of this administration’s threat to put companies that do not comply with this Godless mandate out of business defies logic.  They fine a company to the extent that the company finally closes its doors, putting all of the employees out of a job.  That sure doesn’t sound like compassionate governing to me.  It sounds like the outer edges of a dictatorship.

And all of those employees who will suddenly find themselves unemployed will add to the tax burden by applying for unemployment, food stamps, and an endless list of freebies.  Hey, maybe that is really what King Obama wants; but he and the rest of his elite crowd are too dumb to ask this question: if they reach their goal of having everybody at the public trough, who will be left to provide the dollars to buy feed for that trough?

Dale Dawson – ON TARGET NEWS www.ontargetnews.com

Photo Credit: Planetrussell (Creative Commons)

Filed Under: Commentary, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , ,

Pastor Disparages GOP, Describes Obama As Moses, In Pre-inauguration Message

January 25, 2013 by 20 Comments

Obama Saves SC Pastor disparages GOP, describes Obama as Moses, in pre inauguration message

Barack Obama and family attended a service at Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church just before privately taking his oath of office to begin his second term Sunday.

In itself, that fact scarcely bears repeating. The content of the pastor’s message, however, provides a distinct insight into the psyche of Obama’s sycophantic followers.

After years of hearing Rev. Jeremiah Wright spew unabashedly leftist, anti-American propaganda from the pulpit, the Obama family might think such outrageous speech is normal. Traditional Americans, however, should be outraged.

Pastor Ronald Braxton didn’t waste any time in fawning over his church’s special guest, comparing him and his relentless attack on individual liberty to Moses parting the Red Sea.

In both cases, he said “forward is the only option,” urging Obama to “stand on the rock.”

Continuing the ill-fitting analogy, Braxton reportedly equated those opposed to Obama’s usurpation of power to enemies of Moses and, by extension, God.

Before closing the service, the pastor initiated a chant of Obama’s second term slogan, “Forward.”

One reporter described the pastor’s message as “a worship service for the man Newsweek labeled ‘The Second Coming,’” adding, “if Obama thinks anything like the pastor he chose just before taking his oath of office, America is in for a long, narcissistic, imperial four years.”

Another conservative writer was understandably upset at the dearth of reporting on substantiative portions of the message, called out one Associated Press writer in particular.

“How did you miss that part about ‘enemies’? Were you too busy admiring how the church ‘was draped in reds, greens, and golds found in the African Kente cloth’ to pay attention?” he wrote, asking, “And how can it be that the word ‘forward’ doesn’t appear at all in your report?”

Certainly, the writer feigned ignorance, knowing full well the intent of America’s media complex is not to disseminate facts but to spread the convenient talking points provided by this administration.
Click here to get B. Christopher Agee’s latest book for less than $5! Like his Facebook page for engaging, relevant conservative content daily.

Photo credit: iambrianna (Creative Commons)

Filed Under: Commentary, Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: ,

Social Justice Politics And Class Warfare

December 14, 2012 by 1 Comment

Spirit Of Obama Class Warfare SC Social Justice Politics And Class Warfare

As I was preparing to write my weekly article, I came across a brand new report: According to the USDA, a record 47.7 million Americans are now living in poverty. A few actual news outlets have reported the very real possibility that by the end of 2012, the numbers in the U.S. could surpass a mind-boggling 50 million Americans living in absolute poverty and collecting the $134.29 average monthly benefit per person instead of working. In fact, just two months before the presidential election, the media kept a lid on the fact that there were three times more food stamp recipients added to the economy than jobs.

Big government is not just a present threat; it is a growing mindset and worldview. It is important to understand this battle for power. Here is an excerpt from my book, ERADICATE, BLOTTING OUT GOD IN AMERICA:

Social Justice is a code phrase of the left that believes in a class­less society and that all differences in wealth and property should be eliminated. It is a political movement that generally believes that people are born into an inflexible social order.

Religious liberals have invaded evangelical Christian churches with their version of social justice. They claim to back up their fight for pov­erty and world hunger by the use of selected Scriptures about helping the poor. Every individual Christian is responsible for obeying God’s Word and doing what we can to manage our resources to help those in need, and humanitarian efforts should coincide with the preaching of the gospel. Christians need to be the hands and feet of Jesus, but poverty and hunger will never completely be eradicated.

The poor you will always have with you, and you can help them any time you want. But you will not always have Me (Mark 14:7 NIV).

To liberals, social justice means a level of fairness as defined by them and enforced by the state. Their argument is that the church has not done a good job taking care of the poor – which is true – so the government must step in. The solution should never be government intervention. When government gets involved, who decides how to allocate money? This promotes an unholy alliance between the church and state. The apostle Paul wrote in 1 Timothy 5 that it is our responsibility to take care of “widows and orphans” and those who are unable to care for themselves.

Christians are to voluntarily tithe to the church and share their finances (distribute wealth) with the needy, not be forced by the government through taxes to unwillingly give to whoever the government says needs it the most (redistribute wealth). Can government be trusted to use the people’s money honestly?

If their definition of social justice is implemented and many poor people are fed, this meets their temporary physical need. With govern­ment involved, however, it would then be illegal for Christians to share the gospel with the poor to meet their spiritual need.

Life is not fair, but God is good. He is sovereign, all powerful; and He hates injustice. However, unfairness is inherent in the human con­dition. God is just; human beings typically are not. That’s where the church comes in. Jesus did not commission the Roman Government to help the poor, and He never advocated taxation on the wealthy to pay for the benefits of the less fortunate. The early church took care of the needs of the poor and also demonstrated how a system of heartfelt, voluntary distribution could work. The communal sharing of the early Christians in Acts chapter 2, for example, was virtually the opposite of the socio-economic Marxism some church leaders are calling for today.

We need to be careful about throwing the word “social” around. What is “socialized” is state-controlled. Here in the United States, we have tried throwing more money at the problem of poverty, and we have found it does not work (see Detroit). When corrupt men are in charge of distributing money, it most often does not get to the people who really need help. Communism has also failed worldwide, and Marxism should have taught the world a permanent lesson.

Over the years, our churches and ministries in America have made the average citizen better, have fed countless millions around the world, and financed the spreading of the gospel. Without nations influenced by Jesus Christ and biblical Christianity, the world would be a much darker place; and there would be considerably more poverty both spiri­tually and economically. Would a system of socialism allow the church to do any of this?

Author and commentator Erik Rush, the man credited with breaking the story about President Obama’s former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Black Liberation Theology, called social justice Christians another “well-organized group of traitors” to America. Rush said their religion has become superficial:

As with health-care reform … many are aware that social and environmental ‘justice’ issues are not about justice at all; they are calculated to deliver unprecedented levels of power to the federal government. I declare that ‘social justice Christianity’ is apostasy; its adher­ents have abandoned their faith for a cause…. While some are misguided Christians, others (like Jim Wallis) are out-and-out Marxist posers. Proverbially, they now stand with the Saddu­cees and Rome, against Israel. While I pray that God will have mercy on their souls, we must show them no mercy politically.

Jesus did not teach that the Spirit of the Lord anointed the federal government to preach. That’s the job of the church so the power and will of God can be revealed. In Isaiah 61:1-2, a verse Jesus quoted in the Gospels as well, He gives six reasons for which God had anointed Him; and not one of them mentions money:

The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor and the day of vengeance of our God…

God calls us to give cheerfully from our hearts (2 Cor. 9:7), but God does not advocate additional tax burdens on the whole of society for any cause. When Jesus faced Roman prefect Pontius Pilate, He didn’t ask Pilate for financial aid for the poor. Jesus didn’t complain about injus­tices in Galilee or Nazareth or Bethlehem. He didn’t ask for the Roman government to step in and spread the wealth. In fact, Jesus stated: My kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36).

Jesus Christ loved and cared about the poor. He did not abandon them, nor did He feed them immediately with the resources at his dis­posal. The first thing Christ himself did for the poor was to teach them… most independent thinkers admit that government programs can’t separate the truly needy from those who would cheat and take advantage of the system.

Conversely, private Christian charities and organizations are so much more effective at meeting needs and changing lives instead of basically throwing taxpayer money at the problem. Most charities run a tight ship by necessity and are just the opposite of government when it comes to eliminating fraud and waste while offering compassion to those in need.

America’s free enterprise system is not keeping people poor; it is their best chance for economic advancement. Social justice advocates would have you believe that it is the system that is the problem.

The bottom line is that if we don’t preach the gospel and lead souls to Christ, it won’t matter if they’re well fed come Judgment Day. In Romans 13, the people’s taxes paid for governing authorities put in place by God for their good, but the government never had anything to do with practicing compassion or mercy.

Other leaders of the social justice movement… often place emphasis on this present temporary world and minimize the importance of repen­tance from sin against a holy God. Humanism and socialism – the ways of man – will always fail, but God’s ways always succeed.

America finds itself in a dangerous place; we have a media and an administration selling class warfare and massive spending – and people are buying it. Many citizens forget that the gov­ernment is supposed to protect the people, not provide for them.

Socialism has failed miserably throughout the world. History proves it; and yet there are some who are willing to give it another try, this time in America. Share the truth! Education is vital, and this movement must be stopped in order to save our great Republic under God.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Filed Under: Commentary, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , , , , , ,

President Obama’s Faith And Fruit: Do Christians Know The Truth?

November 6, 2012 by 9 Comments

President Obama face WH photo SC President Obama’s Faith And Fruit: Do Christians Know The Truth?

When asked about President Obama’s faith on an MSNBC interview, Franklin Graham responded, “You have to look at what a person does with his life. Anybody can say they’re a Christian.” According to Pew Research, only about one-third of adults (34%) think Obama is a Christian, down sharply from 48% in 2009. About 20% believe he’s Muslim. Fully 43% say they do not know what Obama’s religion is.

The president claims the Christian faith, and this confuses some folks, particularly the less informed. For this reason and because we have a pivotal Presidential Election today, it is vital we address the issue and measure his actions against the Bible. If just five percent more Christian conservatives vote in this election instead of staying home, it’s over for Mr. Obama.

Some believe Obamacare is the most important 2012 election issue; and according to polls, the majority of Americans oppose it. Catholic hospitals, universities, and churches are being ordered to provide coverage for abortion-inducing drugs violating their religious beliefs. As Ann Coulter stated, “The reason we have Obamacare is not because the public was clamoring for the federal government to take over health care. It’s because the Democrats had 60 senators.”

America has never been as divided and polarized as it is today under a president who promised to reach across the aisle, unite people, and heal the world.

In 2008, American citizens, many Christians included, refused to use common sense and wisdom and judge Barack Obama by his own words; his anti-biblical stances; and his questionable Chicago associations, history, and liberal activism. Why do people of faith continue blindly supporting him and the current Democratic Party platform?

Jesus Christ taught believers to analyze and evaluate a person’s life by looking at what they do and how they live. You will know them by their fruit. If we listen to what President Obama says regarding Christianity and then observe what he does, it can be confusing; things don’t add up.

For example, most Americans – I’m not even talking about just Christians here – believe abortion is wrong and a sin. The president holds the most extreme views on abortion, including refusing to give aid to a baby born alive during a failed abortion procedure. Many consider this infanticide. Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act as an Illinois Senator.

It’s no surprise that in the 2012 campaign and election cycle, Planned Parenthood (who receives federal funding) has spent $13 million in attack ads against Mitt Romney in efforts to re-elect Obama. Some may argue Planned Parenthood provides counseling services. It’s true. They are an abortion business that counsels women to have abortions. The ratio of abortions to adoption referrals is a shocking 340 to 1. But I digress.

Let’s look at just a few of the Obama administration’s actions and policies in the last four years. President Obama was the first president in America’s history to mention non-believers in an inaugural address when he said “We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and non-believers.” In his first year in office, Obama ended National Prayer Day services at the White House. President Truman signed the first National Prayer Day proclamation, and President Reagan made it permanent. For years, it was a staple on the White House calendar.

The Obama administration required the rewriting of govern­ment documents and a change in administration vocabulary to remove terms deemed offensive to Muslims, including jihad, jihadists, terrorists, radical Islamic, etc. With the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Obama allowed homosexuals to serve openly in the military, reversing a policy originally instituted by George Wash­ington in 1778.

Before he was president, in an interview with Cathleen Falsani for the Chicago Sun Times, Obama was asked about his faith. Falsani asked “Who was Jesus to you?” He responded that “Jesus was an historical figure for me.” Obama continued, “I think it’s perfectly consistent to say that I want my govern­ment to be operating for all faiths and all peoples, including atheists and agnostics… I find it hard to believe that my God would consign four-fifths of the world to hell.”

When asked simply “What is sin?” Obama replied, “Being out of alignment with my values.” Also from the interview, Barack Obama stated, “I lived in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country in the world, between the ages of six and ten. My father was from Kenya, and although he was probably most accurately labeled an agnostic, his father was Muslim…I’m rooted in the Chris­tian tradition. I believe that there are many paths to the same place…”

It’s important to note that in the city of corruption, somehow Obama ended up following the Christian tradition under controversial, anti-American preacher Jeremiah Wright and Black Liberation Theology for twenty years.

Obama said there are many paths to the same place. The Bible clearly establishes there is one narrow path to eternal life through faith in Christ. Jesus was not vague when in John 14:6 He said He alone is the way, the truth, and the life. The Apostle Paul wrote there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12).

Barack Obama said Jesus was an “historical figure.” (Not Savior, Messiah, or the Son of God.) Also in the interview, Obama empha­sized living his life the best he can (salvation by works) to maybe get rewarded someday, and he seemed to think our government was inefficient for atheists and agnostics. He does not respect our Judeo-Christian roots. Finally, to Obama, sin means being out of alignment with his own values – not the values of Jesus Christ or the Bible.

The question we have leading up to today’s election is this: how will Christians and other people of faith vote their values? Sadly, some may not vote at all. If you are a Christian and refuse to vote, you are endorsing Obama and another four years of damaging consequences and policies; and you’re implying you are satisfied with the direction America is headed.

In 2008, American citizens were warned (just not by the elite media) time and time again that if elected, Obama would push the most leftist, radical policies in American history. But millions voted for charisma and eloquence in order to make history, rather than voting for character and experience; and sadly, many citizens didn’t pay attention to the issues.

President John Quincy Adams once said, “The hope of a Christian is inseparable from his faith. Whoever believes in the Divine inspiration of the Holy Scriptures must hope that the religion of Jesus shall prevail throughout the earth. Never since the foundation of the world have the prospects of mankind been more encouraging to that hope than they appear to be at the present time. And may the associated distribution of the Bible proceed and prosper…”

Let’s not be afraid to acknowledge that President Obama may accept parts of the Word of God, but his policies reveal a different worldview of Jesus and Christianity than many of us understand. By his own admission, he does not believe the Bible is inerrant and God-breathed. Barack Obama seems to have built his own brand of faith on a foundation of liberalism, Marxism, social justice, and post-modernism.

He needs God’s forgiveness just like you and I do; and if he is a back-slidden Christian, he needs to return to the Lord and humbly repent. If, however, he is sincerely living out a differ­ent gospel than what the Bible teaches, then he’s turned his back on the truth and is leading many naïve Americans astray. God is not fooled.

Our faith and Christian worldview should influence our politics, but our politics should never influence our faith. This is our wake-up call! For those of us who claim to be Christ followers and do our best to sincerely live our faith in public, we cannot leave Jesus outside the voting booth on Election Day. Actions speak louder than words.

Filed Under: Commentary, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , , , ,

Revenge Is A Dish Best Served Cold

November 6, 2012 by 2 Comments

obama speech 7 SC Revenge is a Dish Best Served Cold

“Don’t boo, vote.  Voting is the best revenge.”  So spoke the anti-colonial ideologue Barack Hussein Obama.  What did he mean by this statement when he addressed his glassy-eyed followers at a recent campaign rally?  What sitting president has ever talked about exacting revenge on fellow Americans?  And lastly, what would drive President Obama to further the chasm already dug by his divisive Chicago campaign team?

At his core, Obama has a strong disdain for what he has perceived as American colonialism and strong-armed influence the world over.  From the former U.S. holding and now official state of Hawai’i, the President’s birthstate (if you believe that), to the more recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama has wanted nothing more than to make America atone for what he perceives as forced U.S. dominance.  Naturally, the mindless Obama drones believe the President was speaking about “revenge against Romney,” but that line of logic doesn’t make sense. What revenge could be extolled upon a man who has never been president?  That being said, a deeper look reveals Obama’s implied statement: “We will avenge America’s position in the world and all its imperialistic endeavors.”

No other sitting president has ever asked the American citizenry to turn on itself, but this one has.  Would he also call for the American public to take up arms and turn on one another?  With such a powerful and moronic statement, Obama continues to show the world his inability to lead a country and to hold the most powerful position in the free world.

President Obama will be remembered as the most derisive president in United States history.  In his own physiological make-up, he has no ties to ancestral American slavery.  Yet he subliminally plays on the anger and resentment black Americans still feel over the greatest injustice and travesty professed on Unites States record.  It’s sad that so many African-Americans have gravitated to this hate-filled rhetoric, but Obama continues to quietly rap the racial drum to keep this group incensed.  The President also attempts to divide the country by gender, touting his pro-woman position, which includes free birth control and continued government support for Planned Parenthood centers around the country.  In all honesty, most women have the same concerns as men—jobs and feeding their families.  Obama continues to drive a stake in the heart of organized religion in the United States as well, despite his self-aggrandized Christian beliefs. Forcing faith- based businesses to include free birth control in their healthcare plans, sitting in Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s hateful “church”, and not supporting traditional marriage (a position he changed after Vice President Biden forced his hand), the President has assumed a totally secular position in his leftist-driven agenda.

More than any other election in American history, November 6th will forever determine the path our country will follow.  One road will drive us to our knees; the other will begin the healing we need.

Filed Under: Commentary, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , ,