The hacker known as Guccifer first came to prominence in February after breaching the AOL email account of Dorothy Bush Koch, the sister of George W. Bush. Guccifer released photos of Bush’s amateurish oil paintings and details regarding the ailing elder Bush. The mainstream media idiotically focused on Bush’s prowess as an artist rather than the fact that the public was being offered a glimpse into the secret world of the elite that pull the levers in American society and the world.

Guccifer’s real treasure, however, came in the form of a series of emails hacked from the AOL account of former Bill Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The emails are significant because there is one dated September 12, 2012, which of course was the day after the attack on the Benghazi consulate. Blumenthal cites a number of what can only be called spies throughout the world in order to supply Clinton with a clear picture of current events.

Some jaw-dropping revelations are revealed in the September 12 email, involving the Muslim Brotherhood and the CIA.

First, on the day of the attack on the Benghazi consulate, Libyan President  Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf summoned his advisors to discuss the attack, among them members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Per the email:

During the afternoon of September 11, 2012 new interim President of Libya Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf spoke in private with senior advisors, including the members of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, to discuss the attacks by demonstrators on U.S. missions in Tripoli and Benghazi.

Second, the attack on the Benghazi consulate was in part due to revenge for the CIA supporting the Qaddafi regime.

Third, when Qaddafi was overthrown, the rebels found a treasure trove of documents linking the CIA to the Qaddafi regime.

Again, continuing with the September 12, 2012 email:

At the same time, this individual noted that several of el Magariaf’s advisors share his concerns in this matter, pointing out that the return of Qaddafi’s intelligence chief Abdullah al-Senoussi for trial in Libya has heightened public interest in the liaison relationships conducted by the CIA and British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) with Qaddafi’s intelligence and security services. These same individuals note that they believe Islamist militia forces under the command of General Abdelhakim Belhaj captured files and documents describing this relationship from Qaddafi’s offices in Tripoli.

By February 13, 2013, Blumenthal had discounted the ludicrous “protest turned violent” story regarding the attack on the Benghazi consulate. It was clear according to his sources that it was a terrorist attack by the group Ansar al-Sharia, of which Hillary Clinton early on publicly stated was untrue, despite the al-Qaeda-linked group taking credit for the attack, and despite the fact that this information was sent to the White House Situation Room hours after the attack on the consulate.

According to Blumenthal’s February 16, 2013 email to Clinton, the Benghazi attack was well-planned and well-funded by Saudi billionaires:

The attack…originated with wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia. During July and August 2012 these financiers provided funds to AQIM [Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb] contacts in Southern Europe, who in turn passed the money onto AQIM operatives in Mauritania. These funds were eventually provided to Ansar al Sharia and its allied militias in the Benghazi region in support of their attack on the U.S. consulate.

Blumenthal’s email correlates with information revealed in the recently published book Benghazi: The Definitive Report, in which it is reported that the Benghazi attack was in retaliation for the CIA’s secret war—led by John Brennan, now CIA chief— against Ansar al-Sharia and other terrorist groups in North Africa.

The question becomes: if the CIA was backing Qaddafi, why then did NATO, with Obama at the helm, decide to topple the Qaddafi regime? Why is the Obama administration now backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt? The answer may lie in the fact that Obama is largely aligned with globalists, and the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal is a global, totalitarian caliphate. Globalists tend to be uber-secularists, eschewing all forms of religion or morality, whereas the Muslim Brotherhood calls for a theocratic police state mandating strict adherence to morality through sharia. But as Jim Marrs points out in his extensively researched book The Rise of the Fourth Reich, the globalists often create artificial conflicts in order to make money and to further their goal of a totalitarian utopia.

Regardless, it is clear from Libyan President Magariaf’s close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood that the Obama administration decided to switch sides from Qaddafi to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Further, it is no secret that Obama called for the removal of long-time U.S. and Israel ally Egyptian President Hosni Muburak and is now backing Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi. Additionally, the Obama administration has extensive ties with Muslim Brotherhood front groups, including the so-called “outreach” groups CAIR and ISNA, both designated as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation terrorist-funding trial—organizations that the Obama administration has admitted to having literally hundreds of meetings with.

Another Blumenthal email from March 13 of this year states that even though the Obama administration knew that Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi had instituted de facto martial law, the U.S. was still planning on providing up to one billion dollars in aid, along with supporting $4.5 billion from the IMF.

The Muslim Brotherhood is an organization that has vowed to destroy the United States, with the stated goal of subsuming the world under the thumb of a global, Islamic totalitarian government.

Why then are Obama and his rogue CIA chief John Brennan backing the Muslim Brotherhood?

A better question might be: Why has Congress not charged Obama and John Brennan with treason?