Just Google “Obama Sideshow” this simple phrase “sideshow” gave cover to what has become the single greatest HOAX ever perpetrated on the American people by a sitting president with the sole purpose to place a forged birth certificate on the White House website. I have dubbed it “Operation Sideshow.” My browser showed 5,252,000 hits for this search string, you are welcome to try to ascertain this for yourself.
This is my favorite from the Huffington Post “Carnival Barkers Slam Obama’s ‘Sideshow’ Remark”; posted on April 28, 2011, the day after the release of Obama’s latest birth certificate.
Continued…Part 6:
Hawaii has elected a new Governor, a Democrat
Neil Abercrombie the current Governor of Hawaii assumed office on December 6, 2010. Upon taking office, he vowed to bring transparency to the Obama birth narrative by wanting to release his birth records to the public and end the controversy.
Governor Abercrombie makes these “statements” to Ed Henry Senior White House correspondent on December 27, 2010 on CNN:
Abercrombie, in his first on-camera comments on the matter, said that he has his attorney general and the state’s Health Department director looking at what legal avenues can they follow to release more documentation of Obama’s birth in 1961.
As quick as we can we will,” Abercrombie said. “This is a transparent state in terms of our communication with one another. This is the Aloha State. We care for each other, we look out for each other, we’re family.
This sets the foundation for their knowledge on this matter since governor Abercrombie has stated that he had consulted and brought to the attention of the Attorney General and the Director of the Department of Health on the question of what could be done to release Obama’s records into the public domain. This also starts the timeline for these officials on what will follow between all these parties, all of these officials cannot say they are not aware of the situation and their knowledge of the events on this matter, thanks to the governor.
As far as the media goes this story by CNN is reprehensible; the correspondents use the derogatory “birther” comment throughout the story (4 times in 3:27 minutes) to discredit debate on this subject. This is just another data point, and evidence that that the media in this nation is corrupt. Stories like this look as if they are acting as an organ of the official State Media out of the White House and not serving the public interest. Why is no one surprised by this?
By January 20, 2011, the issue is all but over as Governor Abercrombie hits a brick wall on the release of Obama’s records as shown in this quote from the Daily Mail a United Kingdom newspaper that quoted a Honolulu Star-Advertiser article, as follows:
Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said. However, it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate. And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.
Note: the Daily Mail article was used, as the Honolulu Star-Advertiser article could not be located.
Governor Abercrombie has revealed more than he intended, leave it to a politician to reveal vital state secrets or confidential information with a slip of the tongue. The most interesting part of his statement is the following he made to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser:
‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said. But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.
This is actually good news because what we are beginning to see is what may actually be in the vital statistics vault. Governor Abercrombie’s statements will be contradicted by Dr. Fukino four months later after her discharge on what is actually in Hawaii‘s vital statistics vault, who do we believe? The Governor or Dr. Fukino?
Note: Dr. Fukino’s statement was thoroughly discussed in Part 5.
However, the Director of the Health Department position is not without controversy and is suggestive of larger forces at play within Hawaii‘s state government. Jerome Corsi Senior Correspondent for WND discusses this matter in an “article” on February 25, 2011 with the following charge by Sen. Sam Slom, the sole Republican in Hawaii’s upper house.
Hawaii’s Senate minority leader is accusing Gov. Neil Abercrombie of politicizing the state’s health department by firing his nominee to replace Chiyome Fukino, a woman best known to the nation as Barack Obama’s birth certificate guardian.
Appearing later in the same article:
The latest development comes as well-connected sources in Hawaii are warning that certain government officials in the state have been contemplating releasing fraudulent birth records for Obama in the run-up to the 2012 election. At least 11 states are currently considering legislation that would require future presidential candidates to prove constitutional eligibility by proving they are “natural born citizens.
This part of this story is quite disturbing as it hints at a conspiracy that is being contemplated, the innuendo is less than convincing at the time which is why it was essentially deep-sixed, by the mainstream media probably somewhere off of Oahu in February. However, Operation Sideshow is now fact! Is Neil Abercrombie involved, and who are these well-connected sources? We are not done with Governor Abercrombie his statements will be given further scrutiny after some other facts are developed and examined. However, he has given us an insight into why Obama has sealed his records in Hawaii since it has the possibility to bring his entire claim to citizenship into question.
Minor Officials in Hawaiian Government Continue the Ruse to Obfuscate on the Form of Birth Certificates Available to Hawaiian Born Citizens
Minor officials of Hawaii’s Department of Health have given cover to the story of only giving the “Certification of Live Birth” as the official record from Hawaii this is shown by a story in the Honolulu Star Bulletin dot com dated June 6, 2009 with Janice Okubo speaking on behalf of the State of Hawaii;
No, you can’t obtain a “certificate of live birth” anymore. The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo. The department only issues “certifications” of live births, and that is the “official birth certificate” issued by the state of Hawaii, she said. And, it’s only available in electronic form. Okubo explained that the Health Department went paperless in 2001.
We also have the statements of Joshua Wisch which is made in the same Isikoff article where Dr. Fukino makes here scurrilous and impeached statements on what is in Obama’s records in the bound volume on April 11, 2011;
Joshua Wisch, a spokesman for the Hawaii attorney general’s office, noted that a public index of vital records, available for inspection in a bound volume at the Health Department’s Office of Health Status Monitoring, lists a male child named “Obama II, Barack Hussein” as having been born in the state.
However, Wisch, the representative for the attorney general’s office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose birth it records.
“It’s a Department of Health record and it can’t be released to anybody,” he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorizes such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.
Mr. Wisch had better have a talk with his boss, the attorney general, as he is either mistaken, incompetent or deliberately misleading Mr. Isikoff, take you pick. We have discussed Hawaiian Statue §338-18 and determined that the “registrant” is entitled under current Hawaiian law to be allowed to have and request a copy of his records. Under these statutes, government entities are allowed even greater access than others are. Ms. Fuddy’s letter of April 25, 2011 contradicts all of this, as the “embargo” is only an internal Health Department rule and not law.
Overall, this position is ludicrous and autocratic and I personally wonder why this position is being taken since we also have a portion from Hawaiian Statue §338-18 found in section 13 (e):
(e) The department may permit persons working on genealogy projects access to microfilm or other copies of vital records of events that occurred more than seventy-five years prior to the current year.
Access is granted to person(s) and entities that have a valid reason to do so; one would expect the cooperation of the Department of Health in other matters as well. The reasons are endless on why someone would need access to these records and the statements, actions and position of the State of Hawaii is difficult to explain. Unless the fraudulent birth certificate conspiracy scenario discussed by Dr. Corsi on February 25, 2011 actually exists as is shown with the execution of Operation Sideshow and statements of Hawaii’s government officials. Let’s not forget that someone on Obama’s behalf placed a forged long-form birth certificate on the White House website, so we can now assume that the discussion Jerome Corsi had on January 25, 2011 with his source was indeed the whisperings of an actual cabal.
Part Seven discusses requirements of an Agency of the State of Hawaii that contradicts official statements and the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act of 1955 on what type of birth certificate Obama may actually have.
Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four
Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight
Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten
Loading ...
A Summary Of Recent Developments In ForgeryGate
The latest action by the state of Hawaii in the continuing saga of Barack Obama and his constant evolutionary metamorphosis leaves him a truly transformational figure, as the rest of us mere mortals are simply born, whereas he evolves. When we last left off this sordid tale, we had postulated that Obama had a “certificate of live birth” by affidavit and that no official of the state of Hawaii had made any definitive statements about what his birth records contained from the Operation Sideshow series of articles.
That all changed thanks to Ken Bennett, the Secretary of State for the state of Arizona, when he requested that Hawaii submit verification to his office so that Obama would be placed on the ballot in Arizona. This had come about by a request from the Surprise Arizona Tea Party as these citizens had requested he verify his citizenship and birth in the state of Hawaii. He made his request per Hawaii Statute §338-18, which allows government officials to request verification and complete records of vital events in their official capacity of their office and incumbent duties. Approximately two months ago, Mr. Bennett made this request; Hawaii has dragged their feet on the matter and at first made some noise about him not having any standing and their concern over possible identity theft.
Hawaii does not have the reasoning capacity to understand that Obama is a public figure with a recognizable face and visage, not to mention that he has already placed his so-called certified “certificate of live birth” into the public domain. So, if anyone were to attempt such a crime, it would be self defeating. The objection of the state of Hawaii is frivolous and meritless and was simply ludicrous to stall for time; why is anyone’s guess.
The Hawaii Department of Health in fact produced a document on May 22nd that verifies certain features of the forgeries that Obama has foisted onto the nation and posted on the White House website. First was his COLB and then his LFBC; the first document was immediately declared a forgery by numerous sources. The most notable was by Dr. Ron Polarik PhD., and for the LFBC by Maricopa County Sheriff’s office. This most recent document bears the Seal of Dr. Alvin Onaka, the State Registrar; suffice it to say that we now have a definitive statement. However; the veracity is much the same as we concluded previously; it is questionable.
We are now at a point to discuss Hawaii and their latest foray into the constant evolution that is Obama. How is it that he has the ability to get an entire state government to assist him in his constant artifice about his lineage and birthplace? Let us now turn our attention to the actual document itself, the “Verification of Birth” sent to Ken Bennett on May 22, 2012.
Please open the above link in another tab or window, as we will be referring to this document as we discuss this newest development for Obama. It starts with a reference to Mr. Bennett as the recipient, then the document is pursuant to Hawaii Statute §338-14.3. Lets take a moment and explore this statute:
(Note: the word lieu shown in bold type and underlined is my emphasis and not part of the statute)
We need to first look at the language of the statute and in particular the name of the Statute itself, “Verification in lieu of a certified copy.” This is of particular interest to our hypothesis since this document is not the “best” evidence as shown by the name of the statute itself. The definition of “in lieu” means “instead of”, or is a substitution in this case of inferior quality as the actual “certificate of live birth” as the full document is what we need to compare to what resides on whitehouse.gov. We cannot further our objective with this inferior document.
Section (a) & (b) are of particular interest as well; (a) states “that the applicant provides” and in (b) “A verification shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.”
We can safely assume that a “vital event” did occur as Obama is alive and fulfilling his desire to “fundamentally transform” our nation as he vowed he would; I digress.
In both of these section(s), it is predicated upon the information provided by the “applicant”; in this case, we must assume it would be his Mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, as the LFBC is believed to be based upon her statements and actions of a birth event transpiring. Therefore, until we have the “best evidence”, the actual certificate from Hawaii tendered directly to Mr. Bennett or another trusted source, we simply do not know if the one “claimed” by affirmation of others to Obama and resides on the White House website are actually one, and the same.
(Note: affirmation is underlined as no one has claimed or stated that the “certificate of live birth” that resides on whitehouse.gov is the actual certified copies received by Judith Corley on April 25, 2011 from Loretta Fuddy, the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health and given to Bob Bauer White House Counsel on the 26th)
Hawaii and Obama have not proven themselves trustworthy sources for these so-called facts. This is a crucial point and worth noting for the examination of these events to ascertain truth from fiction by these affiants.
It should be noted that Hawaii chose to send the “verification” versus an actual “certified” document, as if the Secretary of State of Arizona is not a character to be trusted with such a confidential matter. This is ludicrous, as Obama has supposedly released his “true and certified” copy into the public domain, so this is disingenuous hyperbole and obfuscation by the state of Hawaii that they chose this deplorably inferior method of verification.
The next anomaly in the verification document is that it claims a “vital statistic” has occurred and references his name, birthplace, certificate number, time of birth, hospital, age and birthplace of his father, age and birthplace of his mother, date of signature by parent, and date of signature by attendant and local registrar. However, what is completely missing and MIA is Obama’s date of birth! Certainly, a “verification of birth” would include a date of birth since the time could have been any point in history then or now; however, his apparent age today at least gives some clue as to his actual age and approximate birth date. This point alone makes me doubt the veracity of this document as a “legal” verification of Obama’s birth in Hawaii. It is missing a “vital” piece of information for a valid birth certificate verification, a birth date. Furthermore, it has been tendered as an official document by an agency of the state of Hawaii!
Then we have the added statement on the verification that is dubious and specious since it leads one to assume “facts that are not in evidence” with the following statement below line 12:
This statement is superficial since it leads one to assume that the “verification” and the so-called “certificate of live birth” that resides in the public domain are equal. We simply do not know this as Hawaii chose to send a “verification” document versus the best evidence possible (the “certificate” itself.) Furthermore, any copy of the “certificate of live birth” that Mr. Bennett could have sent would have been retrieved on what is assumed to be on whitehouse.gov and has been declared a fraudulent document and forgery by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s deputies; we can only hope they are not the same. Since this means a fraudulent document resides in the records of the office of Vital Statistics vault in a bound volume, Hawaii officials know that it is forgery or has some other legal defect they wish to remain hidden.
Mr. Bennett was also informed of the investigation and much of the evidence that has not been made public on May 15, 2012 in Phoenix by Mike Zullo, the lead investigator for Maricopa County. This information was discussed in an article by Jerome Corsi of WND prior to Mr. Zullo’s trip to Hawaii to investigate Obama’s birth documents and claims of his Hawaiian birth. Therefore, he should have been at least skeptical of the inferior document he was presented by Hawaii; however, he just tucked his tail between his legs, headed for the nearest exit, and declared Obama eligible to be placed on the ballot; so much for the character of Mr. Bennett.
Finally, we are presented with the official seal of Dr. Alvin Onaka with what appears to be the initials “gic” or “gk” to the right of the stamp. This suggests that Dr. Onaka did not affix this seal himself and that another person created this document. Furthermore, we are then led to believe it was made on his behalf; we do not have any evidence that this is so. To the contrary, we are absent any public statements from him on this matter. This is far from settled, as the letter to Bennett was not tendered until the day after Mike Zullo met with officials of the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu. Had he not met with them, would we still be waiting?
In another startling event, Mike Zullo’s request to view the actual record of president Obama was refused, and Dr. Onaka refused to meet with him while he was in their offices in Honolulu. It seems incredulous that he would decline such a request if the records, methods, and information in Hawaii’s vault were not falsified since they would have nothing to hide and should welcome any scrutiny. To quote Obama ,“the only people who do not want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide”; truer words were never spoken. They are even prophetic, especially when we attempt to investigate the facts and circumstances of his birth and birthplace.
For that matter, why are we even going through all this if Obama was “born” in Hawaii and has the supposed bona-fide documents to prove it; why all the subterfuge and false flag operations to conceal the truth? When all he has to do is simply allow Hawaii to open their vault to forensic examiners and put this matter to rest, to do otherwise is simply baffling! We must demand that this matter be investigated by our Congressmen and Senators and that we let this matter play out in the courts as “probable cause” exists for a criminal indictment against Obama, officials in Hawaii, and others yet to be exposed and named.
To allow such a travesty to continue indefinitely is despicable and speaks to how far we have fallen as a constitutional Republic founded on the principle of self-rule and the rule of law. Our legislators’ silence is cowardly by allowing Obama to be above the rule of law, which no man, president or otherwise is accorded under our Constitution. I thought we are all supposedly equal at the bar of justice; apparently some are more than others.
I came across this article on American Thinker by Steve McCann, who came to our shores as a war orphan after WWII; his article should be required reading for every school child in our nation. It is presented here for your consideration of the recently passed Memorial Day. Please take a moment to read and remember our fallen heroes on why we choose to fight for liberty and freedom: “The Distinctive Trait of America.”
Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)