MSN: Fox News Obama Birth Certificate Boycott Report

Nice to know some tea party organizations are threatening to boycott Fox News over its failure to cover Forgerygate…

Rush On Viral Letter About Obama’s Natural Born Citizen Status

Nice to see Rush Limbaugh address ForgeryGate…

SCOTUS Schedules Obama Eligibility Case To Be Heard In Conference

I am hoping and praying that the Supreme Court executes swift justice against Barack Hussein Obama…

ForgeryGate: Conspiracy Theory Or Criminal Reality?

A birther challenge that can’t be met by any doubters…

ForgeryGate: Proof Of A Federal Crime In Arizona…

Tom Horne SC ForgeryGate: Proof of a Federal Crime in Arizona...

Dear Mr. (Arizona Attorney General) Horne,

As I recall, you ran [for office] as a solid Conservative. It frankly should not matter, of course, except that true Conservatives believe in both the Constitution and the Rule of Law. Meanwhile, Joe Arpaio, the Sheriff of Maricopa County, the most populous county in your state (as well as the county in which you both work and live) has conducted a now-eleven-month investigation into the eligibility of the most powerful elected official in the country, and has signed an affidavit stating, among other things, that:

My investigators and I believe that President Obama’s long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the “registrar’s stamp” in the computer generated document …may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document [aside from the fact that all that has ever been provided is an electronic document, which would never be considered as acceptable legal proof in the first place] pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as a verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama’s birth. (Emphasis added.)

In other words, Mr. Horne, an eleven-month criminal investigation in your own county, on behalf of the citizens of your state (as well as those of the nation at large) has concluded that there is “probable cause” that a crime of the highest order has been committed, allowing the placement on the ballot in your (our) state a candidate for the highest office in the land who may be Constitutionally ineligible to hold that high office.

Furthermore, you received via registered mail on or about Wednesday, September 12, 2012 (some two weeks ago) a copy of a letter from national Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, to Attorney Robert Bauer, General Counsel to the DNC (Democratic National Committee) in which Mr. Bauer and every other Secretary in the State and State Attorney General in the nation were formally advised that Alvin Onaka of the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) failed to verify the date of Mr. Obama’s birth (legally essential to prove that the candidate meets one of the three stated requirements under Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution).

When specifically asked as well by your own Secretary of State, Mr. Ken Bennett, in his letter of March 30, 2012 to “Additionally, please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the record in your files“, Mr. Onaka did not do so. Instead, on May 22, 2012, he replied as follows: “Additionally, I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.” (Emphasis added.)

Additionally, Mr. Horne, I, along with former Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin, Retired Colonel Lawrence Sellin (U.S. Army Special Forces), Retired Commander Charles Kerchner (U.S. Navy), and Radio Broadcaster/Citizen Journalist Gary Wilmott, sent you a follow-up letter dated September 5, 2012, in which we stated the following:

As the enforcer of the laws of your state, and the legal protector of its people, you are responsible to prosecute any who might violate the laws of your state. An ineligible candidate who illegally seeks to be placed on the state’s ballot, at a minimum commits both perjury and election fraud, and is prosecutable under state and federal law.

“In light of the legal facts and analysis presented in the above-referenced letter from Attorney Klayman, we therefore ask that you inform the officers of both the DNC and your state Democratic Party that the rule of law is taken seriously in your state and that they may be subject to prosecution if they commit perjury and fraud against the people of the state, as well as the U.S. Constitution.

“We also ask that in your role as the chief law enforcement officer in your state you inform your state’s Secretary of State that allowing to be placed on the ballot any candidate, based on a certification that is known to be perjurious (see attached letter), may be judged to be misprision of perjury and conspiracy to commit election fraud, and that both may be subject to prosecution.

Now that you are in receipt of the Official Certificate of Nomination from the DNC, in which they fraudulently certify (under oath) what cannot be legally known according to Attorney Klayman and Hawaii’s own Revised Statues (clearly delineated in his letter to Mr. Bauer and the DNC) without viewing the original birth records for candidate Obama – given the failure of Mr. Onaka and the HDOH to verify the authenticity of both the digital image of his birth certificate posted at whitehouse.gov and the alleged date his birth – you must as the chief law-enforcement officer in the state take legal action against not only the members of the DNC, but against any election official in the state who would knowingly accept such a fraudulent certification – including Secretary of State Ken Bennett, who received both the referenced Klayman-Bauer letter and a follow-up letter from those previously listed herein.

As I stated in the beginning of this letter, Mr. Horne – copied to numerous key state and national officials (including Mr. Klayman, WND, and the Western Center for Journalism) – we are a nation based upon a written Constitution and the Rule of Law. As you must surely be aware, every depiction of Lady Justice shows here to be blindfolded, clearly representative of the fact that “all are equal before the law” and that “no one is above the law.” Those who would thwart both the Constitution and the Rule of Law have sought successfully to make matters of law subject to both politics and the politics of race. Once again, however, justice must be blind to such manufactured considerations and simply apply the law equally.

While elected and appointed officials across this land, in all three branches of government, and at both the state and national level (and in both major political parties) have ignored the clear requirements of the law and made a mockery of the legal process while claiming that the sovereign citizens of this country have “no legal standing” to know if their Commander in Chief is legally authorized to hold office, we pray that you, Mr. Horne, will simply follow the law. You, like all of the aforementioned officials, have sworn an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic, so help [you] God.”

You were elected based upon the trust placed in you by the People that you would honor that oath, Mr. Horne; and both the People of the State of Arizona and those of the Nation will hold you accountable, as will God himself. This is not about politics. It is about the sacred Constitution upon which our once-free nation was founded, by men who were willing to risk their “lives,” their “fortunes,” and their “sacred honor” in support of the cause of freedom. Will you sell your birthright of freedom for fear of falling out of favor with the ruling elites? These are the very enemies of freedom against whom the founders fought. What will you do, Mr. Horne?

We, the free citizens of both your state and the nation, await your answer; but we will not wait patiently while those with whom we have entrusted our authority flagrantly abuse our laws.

In Liberty,

Tom Ballantyne – Author and Arizona/U.S. Citizen

 

Tom is the author of the recently-updated and re-released Oh Really, O’Reilly! – an expose on the cover-up of the greatest fraud in history by the OEM (Obsolete Establishment Media) – Left and “Right”!

Both the complete book and Parts I and II are available at: www.UncommonSenseNow.com

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore (Creative Commons)

ForgeryGate: An Open Letter To The Honorable Arizona Attorney General, Tom Horne

Tom Horne SC ForgeryGate: An open letter to the Honorable Arizona Attorney General, Tom Horne

On March 1, 2012, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office held a formal press conference regarding their investigation into the identification documents of President Barack Hussein Obama II. At the press conference, it was announced that the MCSO had developed sufficient evidence to indicate that Mr. Obama’s Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth and his Selective Service System registration form were criminal forgeries. To say the least, the findings were shocking.

Many citizens contacted Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s office to request that Mr. Obama be kept off the November 6, 2012 ballot as the authenticity and criminality of his identification papers were now in question. At Mr. Bennett’s request, the State of Hawaii sent a “Verification of Birth” notice in May of 2012. Surprisingly, the one most critical piece of information that was conveniently missing was Mr. Obama’s date of birth. Secretary Bennett, apparently satisfied even with the lack of this critical information, notified the public that Mr. Obama would be on the November ballot, assuming the Democratic National Committee provided the proper nomination form.

On September 10, 2012, the Arizona Secretary of State received the DNC presidential nomination paper for Barack Hussein Obama. On the document, Mr. Obama swore or affirmed that he is “a natural born citizen of the United States and [he] is at least thirty-five years of age…..and meet[s] all other constitutional requirements to hold the office of President of the United States.”

The people of Arizona deserve truthful answers to the predicament that we currently find ourselves in. Is Barack Obama eligible to be President? Are his identification documents forgeries? Has a crime been committed in Arizona? And if a crime of fraud and forgery and possible conspiracy have been committed, who would be the one most likely to benefit from such crimes? The answer is obvious.

I think it is time for you, the Arizona Attorney General, to come to the aid of your law enforcement partner, Sheriff Arpaio, and take the MCSO findings to the state grand jury for review. Let’s turn Sheriff Arpaio’s findings over to the people who have been assigned the task of determining whether a crime has been committed, and ultimately, who is the beneficiary of such criminal behavior. Lets take the evidence out of the hands of the politicians and let the citizens in the state grand jury decide the validity of the MCSO findings, prior to the November elections.

Arizona Revised Statute, Chapter 23, Sec. 13-2311 states in part, “…any person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud or deceive, knowingly falsifies, conceals or covers up a material fact by trick, scheme or device or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing such writing or document contains any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry is guilty of a class 5 felony.”

In the words of former President Richard M. Nixon of Watergate fame, “…people have got to know whether their President is a crook.”

Attorney General Horne, please request Sheriff Arpaio’s findings about President Obama’s identification documents and submit them to the state grand jury, and let the jurors decide if Mr. Obama benefits from criminal fraud and forgery and should be kept off the November Arizona 2012 ballot.  The citizens of Arizona have been patient.  Again, we have the right to know the answers to these questions before the November election.  Thank you for your time.

Respectfully,

Brian Reilly

Sun City West, Arizona

 

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore (Creative Commons)

ForgeryGate: An Open Letter To Maricopa County, AZ Attorney Bill Montgomery

Bill Montgomery SC ForgeryGate: An open letter to Maricopa County, AZ Attorney Bill Montgomery

On March 1, 2012, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office held a formal press conference regarding their investigation into the identification documents of President Barack Hussein Obama II. At the press conference, it was announced that the MCSO had developed sufficient evidence to indicate that Mr. Obama’s Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth and his Selective Service System registration form were criminal forgeries. To say the least, the findings were shocking.

Many citizens contacted Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s office to request that Mr. Obama be kept off the November 6, 2012 ballot as the authenticity of his identification papers were now in question. At Mr. Bennett’s request, the State of Hawaii sent a “Verification of Birth” notice in May of 2012. Surprisingly, the one most critical piece of information that was conveniently missing was Mr. Obama’s date of birth. Secretary Bennett, apparently satisfied even with the lack of this critical information, notified the public that Mr. Obama would be on the November ballot (assuming the Democratic National Committee provided the proper nomination form.)

On September 10, 2012, the Arizona Secretary of State received the DNC nomination paper for Barack Hussein Obama. On the document, Mr. Obama swore or affirmed that he is “a natural born citizen of the United States and [he] is at least thirty-five years of age…..and meet[s] all other constitutional requirements to hold the office of President of the United States.”

The people of Arizona deserve truthful answers to the predicament that we currently find ourselves in. Is Barack Obama eligible to be president? Are his identification documents forgeries? Has a crime been committed in Arizona? And if a crime of fraud and forgery and possible conspiracy has been committed, who would be the one to most likely benefit from such crimes? The answer is obvious.

I think it is now time for you, the Maricopa County Attorney, to come to the aid of Sheriff Arpaio and take the MCSO findings to the Maricopa County Grand Jury for review. Let’s turn Sheriff Arpaio’s findings over to the people who have been assigned the task of determining whether a crime has been committed (and ultimately who the beneficiary is of such criminal behavior.) Lets take the evidence out of the hands of the politicians and let the citizens in the Maricopa County Grand Jury decide the validity of the MCSO findings, prior to the November elections.

Arizona Revised Statute, Chapter 23, Sec. 13-2311 states in part, “…any person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud or deceive, knowingly falsifies, conceals or covers up a material fact by trick, scheme or device or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing such writing or document contains any false fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry is guilty of a class 5 felony.”

In the words of former President Richard Nixon of Watergate fame, “people have got to know whether their President is a crook.”

Mr. Montgomery, please request Sheriff Arpaio’s findings about President Obama’s identification documents and submit them to the Maricopa County Grand Jury, and let the jurors decide if Mr. Obama benefits from a criminal scheme and should be kept off the Arizona November 2012 ballot. We have the right to know.

Respectfully,
Brian Reilly
Sun City West, AZ
Photo credit: katerkate (Creative Commons)

How Insane Is All Of This?

Obama Forward SC 690x1024 How Insane Is All Of This?

Our military is being destroyed right in front of our eyes, as is our way of life.  It’s amazing that with all that is going on in the world, Congress will be leaving Washington and not returning until after the presidential election, assuming that there is one and Obama does not declare Martial Law. If he begins to feel that he might not win, that is exactly what I believe he will do to remain in power.

There is not one Senator or Congressman, with all of the overwhelming evidence against Obama, who questions his eligibility to hold office.  Our system needs an overhaul; absolutely any and every candidate for any high level position, especially those running for either president or vice- president, should be required to pass an FBI investigation and also be required to pass a high-level security clearance.  Allowing someone to become either president or vice-president without either of the above requirements is insane.

Needless to say, if an FBI background check were to have been a requirement in the 2008 presidential election, Obama would never have been allowed to become a candidate based on a number of factors. These factors include his close association with radical extremists such as Bill Ayers, his twenty years sitting in Reverend Wrights radical church, his membership in Chicago Gay Clubs, and his failure to produce any documents that verify any of his past.

It is obvious that Obama was not ever vetted properly by Harry Reid and or Nancy Pelosi. How could he have been when none of these critical documents were ever made available?

Our Senators and Congressmen should have jumped all over Obama as soon as he signed his first executive order burying his past.  The only reason anyone would have done something like this is because the documents, if made available, would prove beyond a doubt that he was not (nor presently is) eligible to be in the Oval Office, not even as a custodian.

If Obama is able to either win or steal a second term, I am relatively certain that he will anoint himself as emperor for life, no different than any other country run by a dictator, since that is pretty much how he has ruled thanks to all of his executive orders.

Photo credit: Dave Merrick

ForgeryGate: From Bennett To Bauer…and Back Again!

 

Ballantyne 2 SC ForgeryGate: From Bennett to Bauer...and Back Again!

The following letter was sent to every Secretary of State in the nation as a follow-up to the August 29, 2012, Larry Klayman Letter to Robert Bauer, the General Counsel to the Democratic National Convention.  Each Secretary of State in all fifty states, along with the Attorney General in each State, the State Democratic Party Chair in each state, the members of the Democratic National Committee itself, and the members of the Commission on Presidential Debates were all sent copies of Mr. Klayman’s Letter via Return-Receipt-Requested Mail.

Similar letters to the one reprinted below were sent to each of the above groups by regular mail as well.  The letters to each of the recipient groups were individualized to reflect the specific responsibility of each. Three of the other four letters can be read here.

It will, of course, be said even by many who are in full agreement with our premise that the current Commander-in-Chief  fraudulently obtained his office that the continuing effort to remove him is in vain.  That may well be the case, but it is our duty, nonetheless, to raise the voice of warning to both our fellow citizens and to those elected and appointed officials who have sworn an oath to “support and defend the Constitution…against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

What they will choose to do about it may well be beyond our control as individual citizens, but it is nonetheless imperative that we warn each of those responsible that they will be held responsible before an earthly, as well as a heavenly, tribunal…so help us God! It will be the sad tale of the vast majority of elected Republicans, at both the State and National level (certainly here in my own state of Arizona – without a single exception of which I am aware, even among mere candidates for office at this point), and so-called “Conservative” commentators across the land, that they did nothing to stand against this clear and present danger to not only the United States of America but to the rest of the free world!

And why have they not dared to raise their voices in support of the Constitution and the Rule of Law? Because, in the words of the feckless young Editor at Large of Breitbart.com, Ben Shapiro, “it’s an issue on which people are being marginalized very easily and very quickly at this point.”  So that, my fellow Americans, is what this generation of “Conservative” “leaders” has come to?  While our founders unhesitatingly pledged their “lives…fortunes…and sacred honor” to the cause of freedom, those to whom they ostensibly bequeathed their legacy are now afraid of being “marginalized” – “very easily and very quickly at this point”?

May I simply remind all of them – both elected and unelected government officials and self-proclaimed “spokesmen” for the “Right” – of what Deitrich Bonhoffer so eloquently observed:

Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.

I will also remind us all of the timeless words of one of our nation’s greatest patriots, Patrick Henry.  Because his final proclamation is emblazoned upon the mind of every school child in America (or was at one time, at least), I will refer only to its prelude:

I know not what course others may take….

Nor do we, but as for ourselves, we must each stand for the truth…if we are the only one left on Earth to do so!  And the truth, will no doubt “make [us] free”!

[What each of us can do - and should do - is email our own Secretary of State and Attorney General (get contact info for each here) and demand that he or she not honor a falsified Certificate of Nomination from the State Democratic Party - thereby keeping the uncertified candidate (Barack Obama) off of the ballot!  In Arizona, Secretary of State Ken Bennett's email is:  kbennett@azsos.gov.  A number of us have already begun writing to him.  In short order, he will be inundated with this once more...and he thought he had "washed his hands" of it!  Not so fast, Ken!  There's that "thing" about your sworn oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help [you] God”…and we’ll be watching, Ken!]

 

 

22347 E. Calle de Flores,

Queen Creek, AZ 85142

 

September 5, 2012

The Honorable Ken Bennett

1700 W. Washington Street

Capitol Executive Tower, 7th Floor

Phoenix, AZ 85007

 

Dear  Secretary of State Bennett :

 

We, the undersigned, are writing to inform you and your fellow Secretaries of State in all fifty states (along with their respective Attorneys General) of important developments that may have an impact on your role as Secretary of State.  You, along with the others referenced above, recently received via registered mail a letter from Attorney Larry Klayman to Bob Bauer, the attorney for the Democratic National Committee, or DNC, dated August 29, 2012.  In the letter, Mr. Klayman represents that Hawaii registrar Alvin Onaka’s official “verification” to Arizona Secretary of State, Ken Bennett, is indicative that the Hawaii birth certificate for Barack Obama is not legally valid.

 

As the public official responsible for administering election ballots in your state, you are the final authority in certifying the eligibility of each candidate whose name is placed on any official state ballot.  As you know, any ineligible candidate who illegally seeks to be placed on the state’s ballot, at a minimum commits both perjury and election fraud, and is prosecutable under state and federal law.

 

In light of the legal facts and analysis presented in the above-referenced letter from Attorney Klayman, we ask that you, along with the state Attorney General, inform the officers of both the DNC and your state Democratic Party that the rule of law is taken seriously in your state and that they may be subject to prosecution if they commit perjury and fraud against the people of the state, as well as the U.S. Constitution.

 

We also ask that in your role as the chief elections officer in your state you do not allow to be placed on the ballot in your state any candidate, based on a certification that is known to be perjurious (see attached letter), as doing so may itself be judged to be misprision of perjury and election fraud, and may be subject to prosecution.

 

Thank you for your diligent attention to these timely and critical matters, in order to preserve the sanctity of the ballot in your state – as well as the nation – and in enforcing the rule of law.

 

Sincerely,

 

Tom Ballantyne – Author/Activist/Citizen Journalist

 

Terrence Lakin, DO, MPH – Author and Former Lieutenant-Colonel, U.S. Army

 

/s/ COL Lawrence Sellin, U.S. Army Special Forces (Ret.)

/s/ CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.)

/s/ Gary Wilmott – Radio Broadcaster/Activist/Citizen Journalist

 

Tom Ballantyne is the author of three previous books.  His  last one, Oh Really, O’Reilly!, recently updated and re-released, is a biting but frolicking expose of the Establishment Media (Left and Right) and its unmitigated complicity in the biggest scandal in American History!

“In his excellent book, Tom takes on many in the Conservative Establishment Media for their failure to speak out on this important and clear-cut issue.  While his criticism of those who should know better is biting, this is a witty, sometimes humorous, and fast-paced book, well researched and thoroughly documented. All who read my book on this subject will enjoy O’Reilly!”

Dr. Jerome Corsi – Author of Where’s The Birth Certificate?

Each of Tom’s recent books can be purchased at:

https://www.createspace.com/3673914  or www.UncommonSenseNow.com

Dems Warned Against Certifying Obama Eligible For White House

Barack Obama between flags SC Dems warned against certifying Obama eligible for White House

Attorney Larry Klayman has warned Robert Bauer, the General Council to the Democrat National Committee, that members of the “Democrat Party or state elections officials certifying Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election could become the targets of election-fraud charges.”

Klayman–the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch–bases his warning on the fact that Hawaii State Registrar Alvin Onaka refused to verify to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett “the birth facts for Barack Hussein Obama that are claimed on the birth certificate posted on the White House website…”  In addition, Onaka “undeniably failed to verify that the [birth certificate] image posted at whitehouse.gov ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files.’”

On March 30th, Secretary Bennett filled out a standard request form, asking that Onaka “verify as true” that Barack Hussein Obama was born on August 4th, 1961; that he was born in Honolulu, Oahu; that his mother was Stanley Ann Dunham and his father Barack Hussein Obama. Two months later, Onaka wrote back that “a birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.” But the Secretary refused to verify the date of birth, the name of the mother or father, or even the gender of the baby!

Why would Onaka admit that a birth certificate is indeed on file, yet refuse to verify much of the information that certificate ostensibly contains? According to Klayman, “…the only legal reason for Onaka to not verify those facts is if he can’t legally do so.” That is, “… the record itself must not have ‘probative value.’”

And as for the long-form posted on the White House website, Klayman says, “…the only legal reason for not verifying that the posted long-form ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files’ is if it is not.” “There is no other plausible explanation.”

What does all of this mean? Klayman explains that “the only Hawaii statute rendering completed (and therefore numbered) birth certificates to be non-legally binding…applies to ALTERED or LATE birth certificates.” According to Onaka’s written response to Bennett, Obama’s birth certificate is indeed numbered. Therefore, as Onaka refused to legally verify the “facts” contained in the certificate or verify that the long-form “is a true and accurate representation of the original record,” it can only mean the Obama birth certificate is either altered or late, as defined by Hawaii statute.

Altered or late birth certificates cannot “stand on their own” as evidence of anything! They have no legally probative value and can therefore not be used as proof even of an individual’s age, never mind the natural born citizen status of a candidate for the nation’s highest office!  Moreover, altered and late Hawaii birth certificates and copies have the word ALTERED or LATE prominently stamped on them. It’s altogether possible that Obama “created” his birth certificate online in order to hide such an obvious and troublesome imprint from the American public.

According to Hawaii statue, Obama could only correct the situation by presenting the totality of his birth records along with all existing corroboration to a proper judicial or administrative body. Such a body would then weigh all existing evidence according to “legal evidentiary standards.” Needless to say, Obama has no intention of following such a procedure.

Four years ago, the Democrat National Committee refused to certify that Barack Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” This year, Larry Klayman is strongly advising Democrat attorneys to disavow Obama altogether! It will be interesting to see what Robert Bauer and Co decide.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach