Dr. Jim Garrow was recently contacted by a high ranking military official who implored him to reveal the truth about a “litmus test” that is being proposed by the Obama administration to the military, asking the question “will you shoot Americans if they won’t give you their guns?”
“Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., a third-term congressman and a co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. On the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights page on his House website, Ellison notes that he is ‘proud to be vice-chair of the Congressional Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Caucus.’” – ThinkProgress
This last week, the radical Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison, was again proud to be named the vice-chairman of the Congressional LGBT Caucus.
Outside of the fact that Rep. Ellison, the first Muslim in the U.S. House (who was sworn into office with his hand upon the Quran) feels safe enough to take shots at me on a one-sided national platform (to the “Daily Beast,” Keith stated that the American people “may not know how extreme this guy [Bradlee Dean] is”), what is interesting here is the fact that we cannot get Keith on LIVE radio to confront my “extremism” on an open platform. Keith likes straining at the gnat while he swallows the camel! So, Keith, let’s go to the extreme and show America how extreme YOU really are! Now it is my turn.
Listen up, America.
If you remember right, in September of 2012, after the Democrats took heat for removing and then reasserting God into their party platform, “lawmaker” Keith Ellison attacked the GOP for banning Shariah Law. He stated, “Why do they want to become the party of hate? They are demonstrating hatred toward Muslims. They’re the party that’s basically the bigoted party.”
One might think that would have come straight out of the mouth of a radical homosexual, rather than a radical Muslim.
Or maybe not!
Friends, you are dealing with a form of totalitarianism. They love to pull your hair, smack your face, and then cry the victim. When in fact, they are the ones attempting to perpetuate their crimes against the laws of our constitutional republic, only to attempt to establish their lawlessness.
Act For America’s Brigitte Gabriel said during an interview in a video called “Stealth Jihadie” that “Muslims can lie and the lie is permissible as long as the lie basically prepares the way for Islam to be either victorious or to win an argument against an enemy.”
Gabriel goes on to say that during Keith Ellison’s victory party, Allah Akbar (“God is greatest” – “Allah is greater”) were the words that were shouted. Those who perpetrated the downing of the twin towers in New York City on 9/11 said these same words.
Yet, the radical homosexuals will attack anyone who stands up against their abominable lifestyles by warning them of their sins before a just and holy God in preservation of their life and their souls (Ezekiel 3:18). Just ask Rachel Maddow, who attacks my ministry for warning the homosexuals that the radical Muslims are calling for their executions.
One might want to take the time and ask Keith Ellison how he reconciles his radical ideology with that of our Founding Fathers:
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people (under the umbrella of Christianity). It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”– John Adams, second president of the United States
Taking it another step, look at who President Barack Hussein Obama and this current administration have appointed to key positions in government–over 225 homosexuals. Talk about discrimination towards heterosexuals.
This president not only entertains Muslims in the White House, but also advocates Shariah Law through his support of the Muslim Brotherhood, America’s sworn enemies.
And remember that another Muslim Brotherhood supporter was recently promoted within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
So, how extreme am I?
According to Keith Ellison’s accusations, it is extreme to stand up for our posterity (future generations), to protect the family, and to enforce the laws of our land. If this is extreme, then so be it. I rest my case. Keith Ellison is right. But let me reassure you, it is the “extreme” that America is calling for – extreme in not tolerating any more corruption from its representatives!
The right time to do the right thing is right now, and America is waiting. It is time for the re-establishing of who we are as a “republic,” “one nation under God” (the Christian religion), “indivisible” (undividable, unbreakable) with “liberty” (freedom to do the things that we ought to do) and “justice” (according to the Moses, whose image is part of our Supreme Court Building) for “all” (even people of other faiths such as Keith Ellison so long as they abide by the laws of OUR land).
How extreme am I?
Martin Luther King Jr. said, “I must admit that I was initially disappointed in being so categorized (as an extremist). But as I continued to think about the matter, I gradually gained a bit of satisfaction from being considered an extremist. … [Was not] Abraham Lincoln [an extremist]: ‘This nation cannot survive half slave half free.’ [Was not] Thomas Jefferson [an extremist]: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’ So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists will we be. … Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or [will we be extremists] for the extension of justice?”
America, you decide.
Think the Zimmerman set-up was was bad? You should see what MSNBC and Rachel Maddow did to Bradlee Dean. Help in his lawsuit against them. Stand for America and get your free gift.
While obviously an infraction of the law, motorists rarely consider the possibility of jail time when rolling through a stop sign. For a resident of Richland Hills, Texas, however, that is exactly where she ended up.
When Sarah Boaz received a traffic citation for failure to stop at an intersection in August, she apparently let the responsibility lapse and did not pay the associated fines. She was surprised, however, when a city marshal showed up at her house Wednesday with a warrant for her arrest.
Claiming she lost the original ticket, Baoz admits she was negligent. Her treatment as a result, though, has struck many as a major overreaction.
“I guess it was just frustrating to me,” she explained, “that a bill that I pay a month late I end up in jail for.”
Expressing her view that “nobody puts out a bench warrant after 60 days,” Boaz said the harsh conduct began in earnest when she was booked into jail.
Boaz recalled authorities telling her, “‘I’m going to need you to undress. I’m going to need you to stand against the wall,’” and acting “aggressive toward me.”
A local lawyer, Jason Smith, commented on the matter. Explaining that, while ordinances allow for the arrest and strip search of someone in Boaz’s position, authorities rarely impose such punishments.
“The constitution doesn’t keep the government or government officials from using common sense,” he explained. “Unfortunately, some police officers, some governments get overly aggressive because they want that ticket revenue.”
Law enforcement officers have an unquestionably stressful job and cannot be expected to act perfectly in every circumstance. Handling a traffic offense in such a draconian manner, however, illustrates what some see as an uncomfortable rise in police overreach.
Considering the Department of Homeland Security recently announced it would spend $80 million to hire federal armed guards to patrol the streets, wariness regarding an encroaching police state might justified.
–Western Journalism staff writer
Have an idea for a story? Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Garrow revealed earlier this year that Obama was giving General officers in the United States military a “litmus test,” a loyalty test, asking if they would fire on American citizens. Over thirty high-ranking Admirals and Generals have been removed from duty in the past year, including two Three-star generals in charge of nuclear weapons in just the past few days.
On Friday, the Air Force fired Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, who was in charge of its nuclear missiles., citing “alcohol abuse.” Two days earlier, the Navy deep-sixed Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, SAC’s second-in-command. The reasons given for his dismissals was “gambling.”
As the weekend-long protest known as “Truckers for the Constitution” gets under way, one organizer has released the movement’s list of demands.
The strike is designed to curtail economic activity by halting the delivery of goods via independent truckers. All citizens are encouraged to support the effort by not engaging in any financial transactions until Monday.
Friday’s circulation of a demand list represents a new layer of activism by the strike’s organizers. A central theme is Barack Obama’s perceived presidential ineligibility.
According to the document, which is reportedly being delivered to at least one House Republican, there were a number of efforts prior to 2008 “attempting to change Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution … to make it possible for Barack Obama to meet the eligibility requirements for the office of president.”
Furthermore, the release states that “a legal investigation has proven that his documents provided are forgeries, which is a felony offense.”
In a broader sense, the protesters decry the current administration’s “tyrannical, abusive form of government.”
The ultimate motive for the protest, it explains, is “to breathe life back into our Constitution” and “declare our independence.”
Finally, strikers chastise the federal government for a litany of overreaches — including ObamaCare — and says the Obama regime is guilty of violating a number of federal laws.
Addressing the Department of Homeland Security, the letter alleges that the “non-military security force” is “violating the Constitution by using tax money to build a standing army, on American soil, training to engage with the American People.”
The list’s author also suggests that the administration is in violation of the War Powers Act, in part by “exposing, and administering experimental, psychotropic, mind-altering drugs for control over soldiers during secret, clandestine operations.”
Though participants were caught in traffic on their way to Washington, D.C. and were not able to arrive in time to meet with representatives as the World War II memorial as planned, the strike continues as more and more truckers converge on the nation’s capital.
While the arrival of countless big rigs will obviously make a statement in and of itself, the true potential impact of this strike will come from everyday citizens taking a stand. By refusing to take part in the nation’s economic system for one weekend, everyone upset with this nation’s current trajectory can work together to make a difference.
When our words are ignored or mocked by the leftists in charge, we can let money — or the lack thereof — do our talking for us.
–Western Journalism staff writer
Have an idea for a story? Email us at email@example.com
Don’t want to become a lifelong statistic of the Democrat Party’s Affordable Care Act? The Citizen’s Council for Health Freedom (CCHF) has created an ObamaCare Exchange Opt-Out form which can be emailed directly to the federal Healthcare.gov website.
“I declare that I am opting out of any and all participation in the national Obamacare Exchange system.”
And the stated reasons should cause every American to question both the legitimacy of the Affordable Care Act and the true intent of its authors.
It begins with the question of privacy:
“Without my consent, the Exchange will gather significant private data about my family and I, “under penalty of perjury,” and share that data online through the ‘Federal Data Services Hub’ with federal agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS), Dept. of Health & Human Services (HHS), and Social Services Administration (SSA).”
What possible, legitimate use could the Department of Homeland Security have for the personal medical records of the American people?
“Thanks to the collection and distribution of personal data to the IRS, ObamaCare Exchanges …will…compel individuals and employers to purchase only government-approved insurance.”
Subsidies and tax credits will be issued only by the IRS and be made available only to those who enroll in ObamaCare through an ObamaCare exchange. Such an arrangement makes the competitive pricing of private healthcare insurance impossible. CCHF describes this as “…a ‘Coercive Attack on Free Market Medical Care’: Using the bait of federal subsidies and Medicaid, the Exchange is designed to entrap individuals in the Exchange and never let them out!”
The Opt-Out form concludes with:
“The national Exchange system is not a “marketplace” to buy health insurance. It is a federal command and control center that employs the states to abuse individual privacy and economic freedom with the false promise of government provided “health care.”
“Therefore, I am opting out of the PPACA’s intrusive government-run Exchange.”
The link to the Citizen’s Council for Health Freedom, Opt-Out form is at the bottom of this page.
Thus far, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has refused to release the number of individuals who have enrolled in ObamaCare since the “opening day” of October 1st. This can only mean the numbers are too high to easily track, or are an embarrassment for the Obama Regime. Let’s keep them an embarrassment and defeat ObamaCare by Opting Out.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) has sent a letter to Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano that reveals the Obama administration policy of asylum overwhelms the ability to enforce laws. This comes in the wake of a Breitbart News story about the sudden surge of “credible fear” requests at Mexico/U.S. border crossings.
The letter begins by referencing the story that Breitbart News brought to national prominence:
Dear Secretary Napolitano,
I write regarding the recent surge in foreign nationals, largely from Mexico, claiming asylum at U.S. ports of entry. This surge has been overwhelming Border Patrol agents in San Diego, California. Border Patrol agents reported that in one day 200 aliens came through the Otay Mesa, San Diego port of entry while as many as 550 overflowed the processing center there and in nearby San Ysidro claiming a “credible fear” of the drug cartels in Mexico.
Rep. Goodlatte then lays out the concern that another Breitbart News story pointed out—that the asylum process is being exploited by Mexican nationals—and highlights the surge in such claims since 2009:
Such claims have increased from 5,222 in 2009 to 23,408 in just the first three quarters of 2013. According to the most recent data available, DHS is permitting 92% of these claimants to move forward to further proceedings, despite the fact that press reports indicate that up to 91% of these claimants from Mexico are ultimately denied. In addition, most are likely being released into the U.S. pending further proceedings before Immigration Judges as opposed to being detained as required by law.
Read More at Breitbart.com . By Lee Stranahan.
Syria is the new training ground for al Qaeda. Barack Obama was quick to take credit for the killing of Osama Bin Laden as he declared that the terrorist organization had been “decimated” and was “on the path to defeat.” He knows damned well that the main force of the Syrian opposition fighters are being augmented by al Qaeda-linked groups, and that their supporters are waging jihad. The Free Syrian Army are employing the jihadists against pro-Assad forces and Syrian Christians. Obama does NOT have al Qaeda on the run. And his covert arming of the rebels is most likely providing arms to al Qaeda forces.
According to current intelligence estimates, there are around 6,000 foreign terrorists fighting in Syria. Most are Sunni Muslims opposing the Shiites and Iranian Republican Guards fighting for the Assad regime. Chechen fighters are there as well. The jihadists enter Syria from Turkey. If they were on the run, then why is Syria becoming the new training ground for al Qaeda? Not only are these jihadists fighting the pro Assad forces; they are killing Syrian Christians for sport. Not too much objective reporting is being done concerning Syria as the low information, Obama acolytes aren’t interested. The Free Syrian Army isn’t interested in the Christian population; and by swearing an oath to al Qaeda, they are not secular as the Obama White House prefers to label them.
Weapons are flowing into Syria faster than the Department of Homeland Security can buy ammo. Russia is supplying pro Assad forces while France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and the Obama Administration are arming the al Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood-financed Syrian rebels. Reports are that rebel forces have been using shoulder-launched SA-7/SA-16 anti-aircraft missiles. These weapons are easy to use and can be smuggled out and fired against the commercial aircraft of western nations.
So, Al Qaeda is on the run, Mr. President? Not hardly. They are regrouping and re-training in Syria. The West will regret their support for the al Qaeda-led rebels when the weapons they have supplied them are used against unarmed populations in the West’s own homelands.
Photo credit: terrellaftermath