In Case Capitol Hill Burns To The Ground…

Congress In Case Capitol Hill Burns to the Ground...

The historian Suetonius wrote that Emperor Nero was responsible for the fire that devastated Rome in 64 AD. Suetonius claimed that Nero watched the fires from a tower as he played an instrument and sang of the devastation of Troy. The story is immortalized in the phrase “fiddling while Rome burns.”

I often think of this phrase when I contemplate the U.S. Congress. They ignore real problems while they focus on self-serving tasks like globe-trotting. And trust me… there’s no shortage of trotting going on.

In 2012, 172 House members visited over 90 countries and every continent except Antarctica. Because the finances of these trips are closely-guarded secrets, it’s nearly impossible to know how much taxpayer money was spent.

What we DO know is that congressmen often travel by military aircraft, and these flights can cost the taxpayers as much as $10,000 per hour to operate.

So even though congressmen like to complain about being underpaid (their average salary is $174,000 a year – much higher than the median American household income of $50,000), they never count the tax-free perks.

Wouldn’t you love to ring the Pentagon and have them fire up one of the 300-plus VIP jets they own? It gives new meaning to the world of private air travel… and the bill goes elsewhere!

Some Generous Perks

In 2012, France, Ireland, and Spain were among the five most frequently reported destinations for U.S. House of Representatives members. 73 members enjoyed the fine hotels of one of those countries, while none reported visiting Iraq.

Other locations visited include the sun-drenched Mediterranean island Malta, as well as the exclusive enclave of the rich and famous, Monaco, on the French Riviera. We’re sure that nothing but business happened in either of these famous ports of call.

According to an investigative report by Jeremy Wallace of the Herald-Tribune in Sarasota, Florida:

• Former Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) was the most traveled, spending 58 days overseas and visiting at least 18 countries at a minimum cost of $67,000 to taxpayers.

• A month after returning from Monaco, Democrat Dennis Cardoza, also of California – who announced in 2011 he was leaving Congress – spent seven days in Ireland, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Portugal, then abruptly quit the House just three days after returning to the U.S.

• California Republican Dana Rohrabacher billed the government for the single most expensive trip, a seven-day excursion to Germany in January 2012 that cost taxpayers $38,382.

But not all of our representatives are bad apples. One of my favorites in Congress, Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina, has bravely spoken out against the travel perks. He has repeatedly introduced a bill to restrict foreign travel for only the most crucial trips. But the bill would restrict travel in ways other members abhor, so this important bill nearly always dies the day it’s introduced.

A Hidden Agenda

We can all agree that lavish vacations are great. But you may wonder why members love to travel abroad SO often.

Well, it’s likely that they’re fishing for clients. You see, the vast majority of former members of the U.S. Congress become lobbyists. Their goal is to land the most lucrative of lobbying positions… foreign registered agent.

As a foreign registered agent, you get to travel abroad at the taxpayers’ expense. Then you meet some top government officials from the countries you visit, hit it off, strike a deal, and you’re set for life.

slew of former Congress members incur generous compensation from countries and special interests around the globe. Global special interests have a lot of money to spend.

In addition, foreign contacts can also result in big dollar donations. Last year, registered foreign agents reported giving $4.3 million in political donations. And they even admitted giving almost $2 million to congressional campaigns alone.

It’s a complete racket, but it’s being perpetrated by the very people who have the power to stop it. To Congress, foreign travel is as American as apple pie. So much for promises of reform.

 

This article originally appeared at CapitolHillDaily.com and is reprinted here with permission. 

Photo credit: Jessie Owen (Creative Commons)

Congressman Demands Probe Of Alleged Audits

Build It IRS Will Come SC Congressman Demands probe of alleged audits

WASHINGTON – Congressman Steve Stockman Tuesday asked two House chairmen to investigate allegations individuals reported to a White House email address for criticizing Obama’s health care reforms were targeted with Internal Revenue Service audits.

During the debate over adopting ObamaCare the White House encouraged liberal activists to report Obama’s critics to a “Flag@WhiteHouse.gov” email address.  At least one of those reported tells RedState.com editor Erick Erickson he was then targeted with audits.  “Remember that website Obama set up to report neighbors who opposed Obamacare? A friend reported himself and got audited shortly thereafter,” Erickson tweeted May 13.

“We need to know if there were any others.  This certainly fits the rapidly-expanding pattern of people who criticize Obama suddenly finding themselves targeted by the IRS,” said Stockman.  “Obama’s IRS scandal is spreading like a cancer.”

“Government reforms adopted after Watergate prohibit the White House from coordinating with the IRS to target citizens.  We know White House critics were targeted by the IRS.  We know the White House maintained an active enemies list throughFlag@WhiteHouse.gov.  Investigators must find out how targets were picked and what, if any, White House personnel knew about it,” said Stockman.

Stockman has asked the House Ways and Means, and Government Reform and Oversight, Committees to seek answers to three questions:

1)   Were any individuals or groups reported to Flag@WhiteHouse.gov later subjected to IRS audits?

2)   If so, were the audits politically motivated?

3)   If the audits were politically motivated, did the White House violate federal laws prohibiting such coordination?

“Obama’s Nixonian demand that his followers provide him with an enemies list is even more disturbing in light of the IRS’ admitted wrongdoing,” said Stockman.

The IRS admits targeting conservative groups with harassment, a practice which has since been revealed to be far more widespread than previously admitted.  Officials in the Washington, D.C. and California offices also admit targeting conservative groups.

Jewish organizations also report IRS harassment after criticizing the President, and a St. Louis reporter has also come forward to allege he was also targeted by the IRS after asking Obama tough questions.

The text of the letter follows:

 

May 14, 2013

 

 

 

The Honorable Darrell Issa

Chairman, House Government Oversight and Reform Committee

2157 Rayburn HOB

Washington, D.C. 20515

 

The Honorable Dave Camp

Chairman, House Ways and Means Committee

1102 Longworth HOB

Washington, D.C. 20515

 

Esteemed Chairmen:

 

As you recall, during the congressional deliberations over ObamaCare the White House urged liberal activists to report the President’s critics to Flag@WhitHouse.gov.

The recent admission, and new revelations, the Internal Revenue Service engaged in politically-motivated harassment of conservative groups shines a disturbing new light on this and other White House efforts to target private citizens who question Barack Obama’s policies.

Since the these revelations of IRS wrongdoing several individuals and groups have claimed they were audited by the IRS after being reported to the White House’s “Flag” email address.

As the scope of the IRS scandal expands on what seems to be an hourly basis, both the Ways & Means and Government Oversight & Reform Committees should seek answers to three important questions.

1)   Were any individuals or groups reported to Flag@WhiteHouse.gov later subjected to IRS audits?

2)   If so, were the audits politically motivated?

3)   If the audits were politically motivated, did the White House violate federal laws prohibiting such coordination?

Citizens deserve to know just how far the IRS went in trying to silence critics of the President, and just who directed the abuses.

I trust your Committee will seek thorough answers to these questions and expose any and all wrongdoing and abuses of power, no matter how high they reach.

Warmest wishes,

 

 

 

STEVE STOCKMAN

Member of Congress

 

Donny Ferguson

Senior Communications Adviser

U.S. Representative Steve Stockman (TX-36)

202-225-1555

 

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Banned From Washington, DC

Congress Banned From Washington, DC

I haven’t seen or spoken to my former husband in 35 years. He’s a Senior Executive Officer at the National Security Agency at Fort Meade. He’s one of the senior Russian analysts for the FBI. Impressed? Don’t be. He left me with our five-year-old daughter when he was a graduate student in the Russian Department at UC Davis and never came back.

The whole “Russian thing” started when he was in the Navy Security Agency. We were married at the Defense Language School in Monterey, California, overlooking the sea. It was the most romantic place on earth; but unfortunately, the romance left the marriage about a week later.

We were driving to Goodfellow Air Force Base in San Angelo, Texas, where he would spend the next year training in signals intelligence. He started yelling at me and told me to “shut up” because it was a very long drive, and he was a man of very few words. No sense of humor at all. After about 1000 miles of riding with a chain-smoking alcoholic, I was ready to call the whole thing off.

I stayed because I had religious and moral principles. And every day, he would apologize, and cry, and promise to change. That went on for eight years, right up until I caught him cheating.

I found out how much he actually drank when he insisted on spending his first paycheck at the liquor store. He would always follow it up with “Don’t tell anybody that I have a drinking problem, or I’ll lose my clearance.”

I don’t know what he was worried about because they were all drinking. I didn’t drink, so he and his friends would meet at some bar and laugh about how important they were. The catch phrase for this adventure was “If I tell you, I have to kill you.” As if what they did was of such vital importance to national security that they would have to get rid of anyone who exposed any element of truth.

And that is exactly what I did. I exposed the truth about the alcoholics (and conspirators) at the National Security Agency. I’m not just any whistleblower. I’m a civilian. I never signed up to guard the national security of the United States. I was dragged into the plot to overthrow the government by my ex-husband.

In fact, I was standing right there when the KGB made the offer. When I told him to report it to the Navy, he told me to shut up and mind my own business. Which begs the question, “why are you telling me then?”

I went to the Navy command to report it myself; but when I reached the Navy command, I wasn’t sure who to trust. It appeared to me that they were all in on it. A few of his friends came over while he was out and suggested that I go back to the United States and get a divorce. They told me he was a bad guy, but I really didn’t believe he could be that bad.

Well, I’m here to tell you, he really can be that bad. When I threatened to go to Washington, DC in person, he took out a restraining order and banned me from that place. He told my attorney that he would drop the restraining order if I agreed to play ball with the NSA. I was supposed to sign an agreement never to talk to anybody in Washington, DC, especially the CIA.

I told him to take his restraining order and his agreement and shove it you know where. He’s still working for the Obama administration. So I know there’s a plot to overthrow the United States. I sat for two hours with investigators from the Defense Department, explaining what he did. They laughed, and then they ran. Never heard from them again.

The FBI came over to pay me a visit and told me to shut up and stop reporting him. I wrote a dozen letters to the Attorney General’s office and the Pentagon. Not a single reply.

Just judging from the lack of positive response, I would say that we are in this thing deeper than you ever imagined. I suppose we’ll wake up someday to a Banana Republic. They always stage these coups in the early morning, so be vigilant, America.

Photo credit: Jessie Owen (Creative Commons)

One Hundred Articles Of Impeachment Against Obama

Barack Obama 5 SC One Hundred Articles of Impeachment Against Obama

There is a growing groundswell within American Republican and Tea Party ranks that impeachment proceedings should be initiated against President Obama on a whole list of violations of the Constitution and the War Powers Act. ~ Peter Paton

Congressmen Allen West of Florida (R-Florida) and Darrell Issa (R- California) have consistently and loudly criticized the president for overstepping the political mark and bypassing Congress’s approval on a whole range of dubious policies and issues: and the recent Obama attack on the Supreme Court of Justice and the Russian ” Open Mic ” gaffe on National Security, leads to one question…

Is Barack Obama making his own case for impeachment? Obama did not become the Democratic nominee for President without the help of several leaders of the Democratic Party who knew that he was not eligible for office

Listed below are the One Hundred Articles of Impeachment.

1. Appointment of a “shadow government” of some 35+ individuals termed “czars” who are not confirmed by the Senate and respond only to the president, yet have overarching regulatory powers – a clear violation of the separation of powers concept. Obama bypassed the Senate with many of his appointments of over 35 “czars.”

Read more at knowthelies.com .

COVERUP: Benghazi Testimony Contradicts Obama And Clinton

Benghazi Memory Hole Hillary SC COVERUP: Benghazi testimony contradicts Obama and Clinton

Thanks to the record, the testimony, and the expert witnesses yesterday at the Benghazi hearings, we know with confidence that:

• State department officials, including Ambassador Stevens, made numerous requests for increased security to protect our people in Benghazi.

• Those requests went to individuals at the highest levels of our government.

• Those requests were systematically denied.

• Indeed, security protections were reduced, the exact opposite of recommendations coming from experts on the ground.

• American government officials at the highest levels were warned about terrorist aggression in Benghazi, and the likelihood an attack was imminent.

• Ambassador Stevens traveled from Tripoli to Benghazi in September of 2012 in order to forward the cause of formalizing and stabilizing the diplomatic mission in Libya, according to orders from Sec. Clinton.

• Government officials at the highest levels knew within hours that the 9/11/12 attack was perpetrated by identifiable terrorists. Yet those officials purposefully lied to the American people, blaming the attack on a protest that got out of hand, based on rage over an offensive video. Even the Libyan president confirmed the attack was terrorist-inspired, planned, and executed; and it had nothing to do with an offensive video.

• The terrorism response team was not even activated.

• Four Americans died trying to defend themselves and fellow Americans doing legitimate work in Benghazi. They called for help. Help was denied by government officials at the highest levels, even though resources were available.

• Upwards of 30 other Americans who survived have been locked down, sequestered, and silenced for eight months.

• Thanks to remarks by American government officials at the highest levels, the Libyans were not cooperative in the immediate post-attack period, delaying FBI ability to visit and secure the crime scene for almost three weeks.

• State department personnel wanted to come to the rescue of Americans under attack in Benghazi. But the military was ordered to stand down for no apparent reason, at least not one that has been articulated thus far by the Administration.

• House oversight officials, including Chairman Darrell Issa, tried numerous times to invite the cooperation of the Obama Administration in the effort to investigate and determine the truth. Chairman Issa reports that the Administration did not cooperate; but indeed, the Administration stonewalled.

• Whistleblowers who gave testimony yesterday contradicted the Obama Administration’s version of events. These are credible witnesses, career State Department officials with no political agenda. They testify further that when they tried to speak the truth about these matters, they were met with very negative reactions from Administration authorities and superiors who obviously wanted to silence and discredit them.

• The President knew almost immediately that the attack was perpetrated by terrorists; yet he misrepresented the cause for weeks after the event, blaming the video. The President never spoke to Hillary Clinton the night of the attack. Instead, he had dinner and prepared for a campaign trip. We still don’t know who actually issued the stand-down order.

• Hillary Clinton must have known about the serious security threat in Benghazi as well as the requests for improvements in security but denied that knowledge during her testimony, shirking responsibility and hiding behind subordinates, blaming them.

• At least two parents of sons lost in Benghazi place the blame for their deaths squarely on the shoulders of the President and the Secretary of State at the time.

• The President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the Vice President promised the parents of the slain that there would be full disclosure. That was eight months ago. The parents are still waiting for that promise to be kept.

All this points to one inescapable conclusion: from the President on down, there was and is a concerted effort to cover up certain details about this tragedy. And those details are so terrible that the Administration is willing to lie and threaten victims and whistleblowers to hide the truth from the American people.

 

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Twelve years ago he started a training and recruitment company. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is the author of the book “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom. To contact him, email: allanlerickson@gmail.com

 

 

They Destroyed Our Country

Democrats Despise Taxpayers SC They destroyed our country

They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they promoted him.  They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they made him president, to the great injury of America and the world.  They understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)

We are talking about the Clintons, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Frank, Wasserman-Schultz, Biden, Leahy, Durbin, Murray, Kennedy, Hagel, Kerry, Dodd, Hoyer, Baucus, and many others.

They all knew Obama was an empty suit; yet for private gain and personal advancement, they trampled on the flag, betraying the very people they claim to serve, preferring Party to principle.  During the 2008 campaign, they said he was unqualified, ill-prepared, and unsuited for the office. Yet when his crooked ways carved out primary victory, they jumped on board the Ship of Fools, stoking his engine with lies, deception, and propaganda.  Hillary knew he stole victory; but like a good Party operative, she buttoned her lip and took orders, submitting to authority and covering criminality.

The Ship of Fools also carried members of the ‘progressive’ propaganda press, people who made it a full time job to promote the Democrat agenda and the joke called the Obama Administration: Chris Matthews, Rather, Maddow, Schultz, Olbermann, Moyers, Sullivan, Friedman, Huffington, Sharpton, and Krugman and legions of others.

They banded together with the likes of Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, George Soros, Saul Alinsky, Khalid Al-Mansour,  Rashid Khalidi, and legions of other radical Islamists, communists, and assorted America-haters.   Embarrassingly, many Republicans and so-called conservatives either helped the farce along or were used as pawns in the promotion of the hoax.  But the greatest disgrace of all were evangelicals.  Through sloth or ignorance, they either voted for the poser or stayed at home on election day.

And what progress have the “progressives” delivered?

  • A ruined economy.
  • Insurmountable debt.
  • Bankruptcy.
  • Record numbers on disability and food stamps, a dependency class mushrooming out of control.
  • Federal despotism.
  • Domestic chaos, violence, and deepening divisions.
  • Systemic demoralization.
  • Emboldened enemies.
  • Erosion of constitutional protections.
  • Looming tyranny.
  • Loss of global standing.

Now, with whistleblowers finally getting an ear on The Hill and in the media, we are learning the truth about Benghazi. We are seeing the end of Obama as a consequence; but, even if he exits, the disease remains.

They knew he was a catastrophe.  They knew ObamaCare was a train wreck.  They knew.  Yet they proceeded, and they may have destroyed our country.  For that, they can never be forgiven.

_______

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Twelve years ago he started a training and recruitment company. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is the author of the book “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012, and his columns appear in www.ClashDaily.com and www.WesternJournalism.com. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom.  To contact him, email:  allanlerickson@gmail.com

 

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Private Police Forces?

Police SC Private Police Forces?

Since the 1820s, America’s police have protected everyone, whether they were rich or poor. Of course, the wealthy got the best of what their police forces offered; but the poor got reasonable services as well.

Nevertheless, police services are changing, and not in a way everyone will like.

The NRA rejoinder “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away” is becoming more of a reality by the day. Years of being bogged down with ancillary activities and continuing budget cuts are taking their toll on what we think police should be doing.

For the “stretched to the limits” police forces around the country, something has got to change; and that “something” now means withdrawal of services in specified circumstances. When services are withdrawn in earnest, they will not be made in poor neighborhoods (read: minorities) where crime is committed; they will be made in more affluent (read: white) neighborhoods where victims live. Victims are an “accepted” byproduct of managing dwindling police resources.

The supine majority have always just “grinned and accepted” being victims, but this is beginning to change. The purpose of police protection is beginning to turn back to its original, pre-1820s mission, which was protecting and serving the wealthy.

Wealthy people are not going to hide in their basements when their town’s police stop driving by their homes.  They will, and have already started to, hire private police to protect them. This may be just the beginning, but it will undoubtedly come to parallel the gap between the average public school and the average private school.

Eventually, the big cities will not get the best applicants to join their police forces. Becoming a big city cop will mean an entire career of always working in dangerous high crime areas. Every call will be fraught with danger; and eventually, the private police will get and keep the best applicants.

Private police are already patrolling some parts of Houston, Texas and Stockton, California. It won’t be long before other cities see them on their streets as well.

Those who understand how much they have to lose based on how America is changing will not roll over and accept what the system dishes out. When private police become the norm, America’s “civil divorce” will proceed at full speed. Those who can’t/won’t pay for enhanced police protection won’t get it. Those who can pay will get it.

Photo credit: coleyboley (Creative Commons)            

 

Self Governance Or Tyranny

Obama Crotch Salute 300x198 Self Governance or Tyranny

Consider what Obama told the graduating class at Ohio State on May 5, pretending he is a reincarnation of JFK.  Obama proclaimed:

“ . . . as citizens, we understand that it’s not about what America can do for us, it’s about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but absolutely necessary work of self-government.”

He has spent four years and several trillions of dollars taking government out of the hands of citizens!  Now, we are expected to believe him when he says he is the champion of self-governance?

Here is a partial list of Obama’s achievements pursued in the name of ‘self-governance:’

>ObamaCare: the first step toward a complete government takeover of healthcare, opposed by a substantial majority of Americans from day one.  This is self-government?

>Public funding of abortion: government spending taxpayer money to kill babies in the womb, despite large majorities standing opposed?

>Efforts toward gun control: again, opposed by the vast majority, yet Obama pushes for destruction of the 2nd Amendment, and he is the champion of self-government?

>Record entitlement spending creating citizen dependency, hardly the work of one interested in promoting self-government.

>Serial moves to override states’ rights, contrary to the 10th Amendment, centralizing power in D.C., a complete contradiction of the constitutional principle of separation of powers, a pillar of self-government.

>Forcing a homosexual agenda in civilian and military life against the will of the majority.

>Criminalizing faith traditions embraced by the majority, either by marginalizing commonly held beliefs or prosecuting those who hold them, all in the name of confronting hate crimes or preserving ‘religious tolerance.’

>Preferring minorities over majorities at every turn, an executive most interested in the politics of division and revenge and retribution.

>Serial violations of the Constitution, a demonstration of disrespect for the document most successful in establishing and preserving self-government.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/14/trashing-the-constitution/?page=all

Mr. Obama’s policies have nothing to do with preserving self-governance.  Indeed, his work is focused on dismantling self-government.

Can anyone with a shred of sense suggest Mr. Obama has anything in common with the Founders, men who promoted limited government as a prerequisite to liberty, insisting self-government depends on the consent of the governed?

Further, the President told the students to fear and reject anyone who warns about tyranny.  Of course.  Why would he want them to understand his affections?  Is there anything more American that fighting tyranny in the name of preserving liberty?

“Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems. Some of these same voices also do their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices. Because what they suggest is that our brave, and creative, and unique experiment in self-rule is somehow just a sham with which we can’t be trusted.”

1. No one in the conservative movement claims government has no role.

2.The only accusation of late implying sinister motives rightly identifies Obama as the ‘root of problems.’

3.If it is true complete government control (i.e. tyranny) is the fruit of Obama’s presidency, isn’t it right to resist, oppose and attempt to ‘gum up the works?’

4.Didn’t the Founders constantly warn about the ever-lurking threat of tyranny?  Didn’t they always encourage us to remain vigilant?

5.When did any conservative ever suggest that self-rule is a sham?  Obama has made a sham of  the idea of self-government, obviously, by excluding citizens and giving total power to bureaucrats, special interests and politicians committed to a ‘fundamental transformation’ of our republic, a republic dedicated to self-government and foundation of liberty, now attacked by Obama.

These presidential edicts are nothing more than twisted words from a twisted mind.

Obama is an odd combination of liar and self-deceived egomaniac.  He really seems to believe his own BS, and expects the rest of us to believe it too, despite the clear evidence.  In any case, he is now seen by the majority as not only weak and ineffectual.  He is rightly perceived the deceiver.  Perhaps the good news is Ohio State students and others will finally see Obama for what he is: an anti-American liar unworthy of anyone’s trust.

Fighting Obama is fighting tyranny, and nothing could be more American.

 

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is also the author of “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012. Available for speaking engagements.  allanlerickson@gmail.com

The Lies Go Deeper Than You Ever Imagined

Team Obama Squad Liberal Media SC The Lies Go Deeper Than You Ever Imagined

If you read the newspapers and listen to the perpetual happy talk out of D.C., you might become convinced that the economy is improving.

For example, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is supposed to tell us the unemployment rate; and currently, it says the rate is 7.6%. But in reality, we’re being misled.

It’s understandable… we all want to believe the best. And most likely, you feel a little better off than you did four years ago. You can probably look around your neighborhood and see some people doing just fine.

But the sinister truth is that we’re being lied to. The government is sponsoring a campaign of misinformation, and we’re all the victims of a mass hypnosis.

It leads us to think – falsely – that all’s well in the U.S. of A.

A Stark Contrast

I just spent four days on the beautiful Island of Coronado. I was at a board meeting at a 125-year-old resort, the Hotel Del Coronado. All seemed like a fairy tale. I drove into the city of San Diego and had dinner at a lovely Zagat-rated restaurant. I met a group of friends in a skybox, complete with a buffet line, to watch the Padres beat up on one of their rivals.

But that’s where the fairy tale ends.

I also took the time to visit the community of El Centro, California. It’s down Interstate 8 from San Diego. In that town, headline unemployment is nearly 23%. Coming upon a church, I saw a line, winding around the block, of people simply wanting a hot meal.

This is the part of America the media is hiding. They don’t want to blemish President Obama. He feels people’s pain, so he can’t be responsible… right?

But the reality is that every Coronado, America has at least one El Centro.

If you dig deeper and calculate unemployment, adding those people standing in the food line who are unemployed, discouraged, and dropping out of the job search, the unemployment rate is 14.3%.

Economist John Williams counts those discouraged workers, and he says that national unemployment is 23%.

If this is the actual measure for all of America, we can only imagine what the true unemployment rate is in El Centro.

Digging Into the Numbers

Here are some different ways to look at it. The phony “official” unemployment rate peaked at 8.3%, and that was a 31-year high. It remained over 8% for 41 months, the worst record since the Great Depression.

There were 12.8 million people out of work at the peak of the Great Depression. There are currently 12.3 million out of work today. And only 58% of the population is working, the lowest since 1983. That means a record 100 million working-age Americans are unemployed.

Put differently, the actual rate of unemployment is two to three times the Bureau of Labor’s bullsh… I mean, statistics.

And the same is true about prices. The CPI is a crock of foul-smelling bologna.

John Williams believes that the manipulated rate of consumer inflation (CPI) – supposedly 1.6% – is actually 9.2%, as calculated by the official U.S. government methodology of 1990.

Why the disparity in the numbers? Put simply, the official methodology for calculating inflation has been manipulated.

The Cruel Reality

If I’ve learned one lesson in my 30 years of political activity and reporting, it’s that the government lies. A lot. Both parties are equally guilty, too.

And the bigger the lie, the more likely people are to believe it. Today’s economic situation is no different.

With that in mind, I assure you this isn’t the last time I’m going to talk numbers. In fact, this is just the tip of the economic iceberg. So stay tuned.

 

This article originally appeared at CapitolHillDaily.com and is reprinted here with permission. 

Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Husband Wins CA Rail Contract

Dianne Feinstein SC Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband wins CA rail contract

U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum won the first-phase construction contract for California’s high-speed rail.

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you.

If I didn’t witness the insanity and corruption in politics every day, I wouldn’t have believed this.

“The Perini-Zachary-Parsons bid was the lowest received from the five consortia participating in the bidding process, but “low” is a relative term,” the Laer Pearce, author of Crazifornia wrote. ”The firms bid $985,142,530 to build the wildly anticipated first section of high speed rail track that will tie the megopolis of Madera to the global finance center of Fresno. Do the division, and you find that the low bid came in at a mere $35 million per mile.”

Read More at CA Political Review . By Katy Grimes.