Barack Hussein Obama And The Muslim Brotherhood

Muslim Brotherhood 2 SC Barack Hussein Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood

It is surprising to me that an American President would cater to the Muslim Brotherhood as Barack Hussein Obama does. Let’s just cover a few points, shall we?

Obama injected himself directly into the Arab spring under the guise of helping to spread Democracy.

Obama has constantly apologized to the Muslims for American policies.

Obama has encouraged immigration to the US from the Gaza strip, most of whom are Hamas sympathizers.

Obama continues to funnel billions of dollars of American taxpayer money into the Middle East and has given American arms to those who seek to destroy us.

Obama was too busy campaigning while our Middle East embassies were being over run by jihadists.

The ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens was sodomized and murdered.

American flags were removed and burned  at our embassies and replaced with al-Qaeda flags.

Obama has dismantled NASA’s space program and turned it into a Muslim outreach center.

Obama and his regime have appointed Muslims to top level security positions in our government. An example of this is Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, Huma Abedin.

Army officer Nidel Hassan, a known Muslim jihadist, turned his weapon on American troops at Fort Hood and Obama and his regime deemed it as “workplace violence.”

Obama’s top advisor and closest friend is Valarie Jarret,who was Iranian-born and never had to undergo a vetting by the US Congress.

Obama, by his own admission, is a Muslim and says that the Muslim call to prayer “is the greatest sound on earth”.

Obama fails to have any communication with Israel concerning the fact that Iran is soon to have nuclear weapons and has threatened to wipe Israel off of the map.

From what I can see here, these are not the actions of a pro-American, pro-Isreali President. We were warned months ago by an article published in the Canada Free Press that the U.S. has been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood at the highest levels. Based on what we have all seen through the past four years of this regime, is it possible that Barack Hussein Obama is also part of and working for the Muslim Brotherhood? The facts would appear to support this theory.

As always, America, stay safe and be aware of your surroundings.

Photo Credit: forwardstl (Creative Commons)

 

Is The Muslim Brotherhood Paying For Huma Abedin’s Swanky Park Avenue Apartment?

When it was reported that Huma Abedin and her Congressman-turned-Twitter pornographer husband Anthony Weiner had moved into a swanky $144,000 a year Park Avenue apartment, it was asked how a civil servant—albeit a highly paid civil servant—was able to afford living the high life, not to mention her penchant for designer clothes and diamond earrings.

Since the $3.3 million apartment was owned by Bill Clinton laptop and Obama bundler (to the tune of $500,000) Jack Rosen of Rosen Partners LLC, the question was asked: was he paying for the cushy quarters?

Hillary Clinton, the paragon of propriety, stated absolutely that Jack Rosen—one of the evil “corporate jet owners” blathered about by our Community-Organizer-in-Chief—absolutely was not paying for the swanky quarters and reported soirees.

When Hillary Clinton stated that Jack Rosen wasn’t paying for the apartment and that the Abedins (or should we say the Weiners) were paying for it themselves, no one asked— how?

You see, it isn’t just a matter for the gossipy New York Post selling copies, but a matter of federal law. Federal law prohibits civil servants from receiving large gifts in order to prevent such things as quid pro quos.

Such things as gifts from the Muslim Brotherhood in order to ingratiate Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Obama administration to the Muslim Brotherhood’s “moderate” mask.

Upon ascending to the throne, the president of Egypt, Mohammed Morsi, shut down anti-Muslim Brotherhood media, dismantled the Mubarak-era military (the only thing checking the Brothers’ power), and called for the Egyptian people to drive the Jews out of Israel—Jihad in a word.

And still, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama embrace the Muslim Brotherhood?

I smell a rat.

A rat that has infiltrated our own government and is influencing the Obama administration towards a pro-Muslim Brotherhood stance.

When Michele Bachman called for an investigation into Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood ties, the word “McCarthyism” was bandied about, not only by the left but by our RINO-in-Chief John McCain.

Except it was soon reported that literally the entire family of Abedin had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, Abedin herself serving on the board of the terrorist-linked Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs. The only “McCarthy” around was Andrew McCarthy, author of The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, in which he details not only that the Muslim Brotherhood has influenced American policy, but has written it.

Step one should be to demand to see who is paying for Huma Abedin’s apartment, and step two should be to find out how much the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated our government, from Park Avenue to the President.

America’s Worst Enemy

flag day America’s worst enemy

“We have met the enemy… and he is us” …Walt Kelly

America’s greatest enemy is willful ignorance; or is that willful political correctness?

On November 5, 2009, Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan, an American Muslim of Palestinian descent, opened fire on unarmed soldiers and their families at the Fort Hood Soldier’s Readiness Processing Center. They were there to receive routine medical treatment immediately prior to and on return from deployments. The Major, who was wounded during the action, became paralyzed from a gunshot wound. He is currently awaiting trial by court-martial for 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder. His trial date is August 20.  An additional count of murder of unborn child under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act and Article 119a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice has not been filed at this time. We can only suspect why.

Political correctness

A report released by former FBI Director William Webster blames the FBI for not acting on information about an Army officer having regular communication with known terrorists. Webster reported that the FBI looked away from a genuine threat to fellow soldiers.  Did the FBI fail to act in a professional manner because they didn’t want to be seen as targeting an American Muslim?

The FBI and the Army had all of the indicators that Maj. Hasan was a ticking time bomb but did not act because of political correctness. Because of their fecklessness, people got killed. When you are afraid to point out the enemy, you become the enemy. Far too often, political correctness is willful ignorance. The White House classifying this terrorist act as “workplace violence” comes to mind.

Hillary Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, has an interesting family history. Her late father, mother, and brother had and still have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood; yet it seems that by being close to Hilary, Miss Abedin (aka Mrs. Anthony Weiner) had no problem getting a security clearance in spite of her family connections. There is a legitimate concern that Huma may have influenced State Department policy concerning the Brotherhood led revolts in Egypt, Libya, and Syria.

Five members of Congress lead by Michele Bachmann (R-MN) have called on the Inspectors General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Department of State to investigate the possible involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. Government. Rep. Bachmann must be over the target because she is catching flak from the Kool-aid drinkers sipping from the well of political correctness. What the politicians don’t have the courage to say is that if the CIA had someone similar to Huma’s position within the Russian Foreign Ministry, they would call her a well-placed spy.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach

Our Money, Mr. Obama, NOT Yours!

Barack Obama 6 SC Our Money, Mr. Obama, NOT Yours!

Mr. Obama, apparently you and your SOCIALIST minions think that the money earned by American taxpayers is yours to do with as you please. You want to take from those who have worked hard, earned their way, and have paid more than their fair share to governments (local, state, and federal.) In fact, they have all paid MORE than their fair share when you consider, which you won’t of course, that God Himself only asks for 10%!

Citizens are required to pay ONLY for those services that are required by our Constitution. Things like the estate or “death tax” are not only unfair; they are IMMORAL. The people who have left estates to their children or whomever already paid their share of taxes to the government and owe you NOTHING!  Yes, wealth should be allowed to be passed on without further penalty of taxes, Comrades. Someone EARNED that wealth, and what they do with it (short of trying to subvert the United States) is NONE of the government’s business!

I heard former Congressman Anthony Weiner tell Megan Kelly of Fox News, when she asked Weiner if the “death tax” wasn’t unfair, “you’re dead; you’re not paying the tax.” So in other words, you really don’t own your money? How arrogant and condescending is that statement? You see, those who are wealthy, unless they believe in the PROGRESSIVE agenda, should not be allowed to give that money to their own family but to the government so that it is spent on the “left” kind of programs!

Josephine Sixpack (Joe Sixpacks’ wife) takes some of her after-tax money and invests it into stocks as a retirement fund. She is paid interest called dividends on the money that she invested if the companies that her money went into do well! If not, she will lose her money. The government then taxes the dividends again when she takes the money out to live on. The current rate is 15%, but Obama wants to almost TRIPLE that rate to 43.3%! Why should you be double-taxed on money that you were smart enough to invest in order to live in retirement?

You want to be “fair”, Mr. Obama? Then make the 50% of the people who pay no federal tax at all pay at LEAST a token amount for the services that they receive. It is NOT the duty of taxpayers to supply you with a never-ending supply of their hard-earned income. It is the obligation of the government to live within the limits of the money that it takes to run the essential government, not the utopian nightmare envisioned by the PROGRESSIVE zombies. God Himself said in the Bible that “a man who fails to take care of his own family is worse than an infidel.” How are people supposed to do that if the government continually takes the money needed for a man to do just that?

Obama passes the largest tax increase in history through his Obamacare law, and NOW he wants to raise taxes on the rich to bring even more money into the government for them to waste. The Democrats have presented NO budget for over three years for a reason. If they put in writing what they want to do with your money, they know that there would be a midnight “tar and feather” party, standing outside the gates of the White House and the Capital Building. Transparency is just one of the many lies that this administration uttered to get elected.

Our money DOES NOT belong to you and your comrades, Mr. Obama, no matter how you package it. ( Oh, it’s for the children’s education. Oh, it’s for clean air and water. Oh, it’s to save the endangered moderate democrat, yada, yada, yada!) If you need money so badly, then why not go to your Socialist master George Soros and his buddies and ask them for some of their offshore billions?

Capital gains taxes, dividend taxes, and estate taxes, charged to whatever economic class of people, are WRONG. These taxes are nothing more than double-taxing citizens; yet, you want more? Your reckless spending needs to stop NOW! More taxes won’t make you happy, but they will drive wealthy Americans offshore to more tax-friendly countries. Is that what you and your zombies really want, Mr. Obama? Please tell us when the wealthy are all gone where you plan on getting the money to replace theirs! You people never think that far ahead, which is really scary! Think about this real hard this November, people.

One more thing. The Obama campaign has slammed Mitt Romney for being an “outsourcer of jobs.” I find that hilarious, considering that Obama’s buddy, General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt shipped the entire x-ray machine division of G.E. to China!  Oh yeah, I forgot, when your people do it, Mr. Obama, it doesn’t count! Yeah, that’s fair…..RIGHT!

 

 

How Soviet Immigrants Made Fools Out Of Communist Democrats

obama flag democrat How Soviet Immigrants Made Fools Out Of Communist Democrats

The day after Barack Obama’s election, a physical therapist from the old Soviet union, who came to Staten Island to live in freedom, got a call from her best friend (a fellow Soviet immigrant who lives in the Russian section of Brooklyn.) The caller got one word out before they both started to cry for three minutes. Then the caller speaking Russian said, “We came here to escape them. Where do we go now?” Both women knew the “Them” were Communists, and both saw Democrats as no different from Communists.

To those who don’t live in either the Brooklyn or Staten Island portions of New York City, Republican Bob Turner’s victory in a special election to fill Anthony Weiner’s vacant Congressional seat is a fluke caused by public disgust at Weiner’s antics. That explanation is foolishness supported by stunned Democrats and their cheerleaders in the media. It was a result of a big Russian immigrant turnout.

A year earlier in a Congressional district comprised of Staten Island and the Russian sections of Brooklyn, Republican Michael Grimm, a political newcomer, defeated a well- financed Democrat who had the endorsement of every union in the City.

This spring, another completely unknown Republican candidate won another special election against another well-known, well-financed, and widely-endorsed Democrat.

All three of these victories were delivered by immigrants from the old Soviet Union who hate communism and see America’s Democrats as new communist threats to the liberties they have come halfway around the world to enjoy.

Using voter registration to fool Democrats

The always-suspicious-of-government Soviets don’t universally register as Republicans. Many see registering Democrat as a way to keep in the good graces of the Democrat-controlled City Council. It doesn’t stop them from voting Republican, but it fools gullible Democrats (who cannot believe there is an immigrant group they can’t buy with a few extra services) into sending more and more goodies.

In 2008, they voted in landslide proportion for John McCain and will continue voting against the Democrats they recognize as their natural enemies, the same enemies they have lots of experience dealing with. For these Soviet immigrants, the difference between life here and life there is that they can vote to fight back – they do, and they will in November.

The really fun part of this is that gullible Democrats will “help” the Democrat-registered Soviet immigrants to vote by sending cars to take them to the polls where they will promptly vote Republican!

Obama Still Has A Lot Of Explaining To Do

16 Obama Still Has A Lot Of Explaining To Do

He was born in Honolulu, but there is great controversy over the authenticity of his birth certificate. He went to school at Occidental, Columbia University, and Harvard; however, hardly anyone has stepped forward with any memories of him.  There is a claim that Barack Obama, Sr. is his father, but many speculate that perhaps this isn’t so-a justification for not revealing his actual birth certificate.  Barack took the name of his step-father and was known as Barry Soetoro for a period of time.  He attended Besuki Public School and St. Francis of Assisi School in Jakarta but no former teachers or former classmates have come forward to brag about chumming with the President of the United States during their childhood.

Facebook is a modern marvel.  I grew up in Meadville, a small town in northwestern Pennsylvania but I’ve lived most of my adult life in Columbus, Georgia.  I  attended Neason Hill Elementary School in Meadville 45 years ago.  I remember all of my teacher’s names from first through sixth grade and most of my classmates.  Recently, I logged into the ‘Meadville’ Facebook page and reconnected with many grade school friends.  I wrote to one in particular and began my notification like this, “I know you probably don’t remember me but…”  He wrote back and said, “Oh yes, of course I remember you…” We both had a clear remembrance of each other from 45 years ago.

Why hasn’t anyone from Besuki or St. Francis of Assisi School stepped forward to tell tales of their relationship with Barry Soetoro? Barack attended Punahou School, a college preparatory school in 1971.  No one seems to have remembered him.  Obama openly admits that he used tobacco, alcohol, and cocaine to “push questions of who I was out of my mind” (Boston  Globe, Nov.  2007.)  If Obama took drugs to forget who he was, did all of his friends take drugs to forget who he was also?  No one, NO ONE, remembers him.

We know so much about our presidents. We collect facts and trivia about them. We are fascinated when we find common facts about extraordinary men.  We know that Abraham Lincoln was 6’4”. We know that James Madison was only 5’4”. We know that George Washington wore dentures made of animal teeth.  We know that a 332 pound Howard Taft got stuck in the White House bath tub the first time he used it.  Very few people even know the 21st president named Chester A. Arthur.  He once declared, “I may be President of the United States, but my private life is my own d_____  business.”  This seems to be the ongoing motto of Barack Obama. We know so little about him that it ceases to be simply unusual; it borders on being just plain weird.

If you look hard enough, you will find a picture of Michelle and Barack’s wedding. But you won’t find any male friends accompanying the groom. His best man was Malik Obama, a half-brother from Kenya.  Why are there no pictures or recollections of male buddies at his wedding?  Did he have any friends?

Having attended Occidental, Columbia University, and Harvard, why are there no professors stepping forward to reminisce about having Barack in class? The Wall Street Journal reported that  “Fox News contacted some 400 of his classmates and found no one who remembered him” (WSJ, Obama’s Lost Years, Sept. 11, 2008.) Matt Welch of Reason.com  interviewed Wayne Allyn Root, a former ‘classmate’ of Obama at Columbia University back in the 1980’s:

Welch: “So tell us what we should know about Barack Obama that we don’t?”

Root: “I think the most dangerous thing you should know about Barack Obama is that I don’t know a single person at Columbia that knows him, and they all know me. I don’t have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever!”

Obama has spent nearly $2 million to cover up records from his past. We have no birth certificate, no grades from colleges and universities attended, no papers written, no speeches given. What is he trying so hard to cover up? Did his papers indicate his true colors? Was he aligned with Black Panther-like radicals? Would his papers reveal anti-Americanism or a radicalism that would categorize him more in line with a die-hard communist rather than simply a socialist? Is he hiding these things because he is an extremely private person and doesn’t care for the limelight (I can’t even keep a straight face while writing those words), or does Barack Obama have a background that must be hidden from the American people in order to fulfill the necessary deception to get him elected and probably re-elected?

There is a mystery surrounding the law licenses of both Barack and Michelle Obama. Were they revoked? Did they voluntarily submit for the suspension of their licenses? Does a lawyer volunteer their license shortly before they are about to be accused of wrong doing?  Is it like a coach resigning from his team just hours before he knows he is about to be fired? Did they request their licenses be made inactive only to be activated at a later date or did they surrender their licenses permanently?

Jack Caskill writes for World Net Daily. He has written a book entitled “Deconstructing Obama.”  Caskill was flummoxed by the reports of a bogus social security number used by Barack Obama between 1977 and 1979 (Another Look at Obama’s Social Security Number, WND, March 17, 2011). The number was issued in Connecticut. Obama has never lived there, nor has any family member. Why would he get a social security card from Connecticut?

Caskill contacted Susan Daniels, a licensed investigator from Ohio who is very well qualified to research assets for law firms. She lives in the world of databases and has access to many records that public commoners have no access to. Daniels began her own investigation of Barack Obama in 2009 and discovered the dilemma regarding his social security number. “All I can say,” says Daniels of 042-68-4425, “is that it’s phony and [Obama] has been using it with it first appearing on his selective service document in 1980.” Daniels discovered that the applicant for 042-68-4424, Thomas Wood,  died at age 19 and lived in Connecticut. Barack Obama applied for 042-68-4425 when he was sixteen years of age living in Hawaii. Why won’t Barack Obama step forward and explain this mystery?

Alan Keyes expressed his concern about this issue:  “Is it incompetence? Is it cowardice?” he asks rhetorically. “Is it just indifference and nonchalance of this elite in the courts and in politics, in the Congress and elsewhere?” (“Obama Social Security Number to become issue in 2012 race?”, Joe Kovacs, WND, 8/11/2011)

Politicians are vulnerable when it comes to the women they have dated or even had casual contact with over the years; just ask Bill Clinton, Herman Cain, or Anthony Weiner. But where are the girlfriends of Barack Obama? Is there not one single female in his past who would step forward and claim to have dated him or at least known him in even a superficially intimate way? None. Not a single female claims to have known him in that way. Barack was 31 years old when he married. He attended several colleges and universities. He lived in many different parts of the country. Not a single female has stepped forward saying, “Oh yes, I knew Barack. We dated for a while.”

Herman Cain said that the American people are “sick and tired of the deception coming from this president and this administration.” Paul told the Corinthians, “Don’t let anyone deceive you” (1 Corinthians 15:33). Thomas Gray wrote in his poem, Ode to a Distant Prospect of Eton College,  “Where ignorance is bliss, ’tis folly to be wise.” Are Americans tired of being deceived, or are they satisfied in their ignorance? We will find out on November 6, 2012.

Not Just Barney: Eight Veteran House Dems Retiring

barneyfrank4741 241x300 Not Just Barney: Eight Veteran House Dems Retiring

Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) caused a bit of a stir when he announced he was not seeking re-election. Frank, a high-visibility member of Congress for more than 30 years, is in one of the safest Democratic districts in the nation. Yet he is not alone: there are several other Barney Franks fleeing the 112th Congress. Eight other veteran House Democrats who reside in safe congressional seats are throwing in the towel.

The problem isn’t merely in the House. Just this week, U.S. Senator Ben Nelson from Nebraska announced he won’t seek re-election this coming November. Nelson is one of seven Senate Democrats who have decided to “voluntarily” retire ahead of the 2012 elections. This is a repeat of the 2010 elections when a flood of Democrats decided to retire rather than face certain defeat.

The retirement of rank-and-file Democrats is an especially bad sign for the Democrats if they have any hope of retaking the U.S. House. The nine House retirements are even more notable because each ranks high in seniority for key House committees — if the House returned to Democratic rule, they would be in line to assume chairmanships. Chairmanships are great perks, offering hideaway offices in the Capitol building and less restrained power and authority. Voluntarily walking away from Hill leadership is uncommon: House members can sit for twenty years on the Hill and never get close to a chairmanship.

To Democratic Party faithful, the nine retiring congressmen present a dramatic picture of the hostile environment Democrats are facing as the 2012 election begins. Some of the retirees had easily won re-election with 60-70% majorities. Their stampede for the exit is yet another admission that the Democrats face a potential “wave” election, and of course, it portends considerable trouble for Barack Obama.

The accelerating House retirements come on the heels of last September’s special election in New York, where an unknown Republican defeated a popular Queens Democrat to take Anthony Weiner’s seat. The New York congressional district was Democratic for 80 years — registered Democrats outnumbered registered Republicans by a three-to-one margin.

Read More at PJ Media By Richard Pollock, PJ Media

Bozell Column: 2012, A Year Of Media Savagery

BarbaraWalters4833 300x208 Bozell Column: 2012, A Year of Media Savagery

For those Republican presidential candidates who eventually conclude there is no path to the nomination, there is consolation in the notion that they won’t be the ones to face the brutal onslaught being prepared for the GOP king of the mountain by Team Obama and their army of “objective” media allies.

This time around, the Obama machine cannot run on the fairy dust of Hope and Change. They cannot suggest after four years of dreadful executive-branch performance, the Promised One is on the horizon. Their only path to victory is the one that finds their opponents even more disliked. So it can be guaranteed that whoever wins the Republican contest will face one of the most scorching personal assaults the country has ever witnessed.

Occasionally, the old-style thrill-up-my-leg-over-Obama quote still emerges. The Media Research Center’s “Best of Notable Quotables” winners for 2011 provides examples. Stephen Marche of Esquire magazine won over judges of the “Obamagasm Award” by energetically asking “can we just take a month or two to contemplate him the way we might contemplate a painting by Vermeer or a guitar lick by the early-seventies Rolling Stones or a Peyton Manning pass or any other astounding, ecstatic human achievement?” At least when they said this in 2008, it hadn’t been completely disproved. Marche reminds us of Baghdad Bob, the ridiculous propagandist for Saddam, proclaiming the defeat of allied troops while they emerged around the corner.

Marche actually claimed we will look back decades from now and see “a glorious idyll in American politics, with a confident, intelligent, fascinating president riding the surge of his prodigious talents from triumph to triumph.” Someone hearing Marche declare this might rush him to an emergency-room for signs of dementia.

The winner of MRC’s “Media Hero Award” came forward as the congressional career of Anthony Weiner was about to end after having demonstrated his contempt for his wife by showing off his body parts all over Twitter (and actually tweet-exchanging with high school
girls).

Read More at Newsbusters By Brent Bozell, Newsbusters

Bob Turner Defeats Obama

by Kevin “Coach” Collins

420x316 alg bob turner rockaway point Bob Turner Defeats Obama

Let us all salute Bob Turner, an American patriot who endured everything the Democrats could throw at him and won!

Last night, the national Democrats met the Ghost of Election Night Future. Their noses were rubbed in the dirt Barack Obama has dropped all over their party.

No matter how their sycophants in the media try to spin it, Republican Bob Turner’s stunning upset victory over Democrat David Weprin in a Congressional district in which Democrats outnumber Republicans three-to-one is an ominous sign for Barack Obama and the hundreds of down-ballot victims he will drag to defeat next year.

All last week’s attempts to explain away Weprin’s sinking poll numbers have been wiped away in the clash of a landslide. The Democrats have lost a seat they had held since 1923. Turner’s victory is on the order of Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts. There is no upside for Obama and his party in this loss. There are no plausible explanation that does not include his repudiation.

Nonetheless, the media repeat empty claims that the district has been “trending Republican.” The reason Republicans show any signs of life in NY-9 is the recent legacy of Anthony Weiner. Last year his obnoxious behavior chased the district’s small number of Republicans to the polls to vote against him. While they were there, they voted for McCain, which is the reason Obama “only” carried the district by a 55-45 margin. Weiner built the foundation; Obama insults to the district’s Jewish and blue collar Democratic voters completed the edifice.

Turner’s victory was a foreseeable byproduct of the smug arrogance of liberal Democrats, especially those who run America’s big cities. When Weiner imploded and was forced to resign, the party selected a candidate who does not even live in the district. This contemptuous attitude backfired because, until yesterday, national Democrats had been deluding themselves about how much damage Barack Obama has done to their party.

The Democrats’ “Chickens Have Come Home to Roost.”

One can only laugh at talk of Barack Obama being in a “close” race next year. The Democrats will face a much harder time even fielding candidates in many parts of the country.

What incentive will Democrats offer challengers to incumbent House and Senate Republicans to make candidates willing to put up at least $100,000 of their own money – much more in some big market districts – to run with Barack Obama hanging around their necks? In competitive races across the country in 2012, Democrats will have to settle for second- and third-tier candidates, up-and-comers, and “also rans,” whose lack of appeal will destroy those below them on ballots across the country.

In the words of Barack Hussein Obama’s spiritual adviser, the Democrats’ “chickens have come home to roost.” Electing him was the worst mistake the Democrats have made in a very long time. Bob Turner’s victory yesterday was one reminder. We will send another next year.

Use this site to contact your Congressional representative:

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

This article originally appeared on CoachIsRight.com and is reprinted with permission.

Weiner’s NY District Elects Republican Turner In Special Election

New York state SC Weiners NY District elects Republican Turner in special election

It is time for Democrats across the United States to panic, as a Congressional district that has not elected a Republican in almost 90 years handed an easy victory to the GOP candidate. The victor Bob Turner cast his effort as a referendum on President Obama, a chance to send a message to Washington. As the Washington Post put it, “President Obama suffered a sharp rebuke Tuesday when voters in New York elected a conservative Republican to represent a Democratic district that has not been in GOP hands since the 1920.

In 2010, Anthony Weiner won the district by almost 20 points, while Turner’s margin is 8 points, so a 27% reduction in the Democrat’s vote share has happened. Every Democrat in the House of Representatives and Senate (not mention at the state and local level) has to be doing the mental math, and wondering if they will looking for work as a lobbyist in 2013.

Richard Baehr notes: “Dems outspent the GOP in New York 9 by almost 10 to 1. Not much to show for it. The Republican Jewish Committee spent some money, but the GOP House committee did not. SEIU was out in force yesterday as well as teacher union people. All to no avail. It looks like Turner won the Jewish vote.”

Of course, Democrats are lamely attempting to spin. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, chair of the DNC: It’s a very difficult district for Democrats,” said Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, noting its Democratic margins there tend to be the second lowest of all the districts in New York City.

It’s so difficult for Democrats that in a bad year for Democrats (2010), the Democrat only won by 20 points. I would love to hear what DWS hears from her House colleagues who won by less than 20 points in 2010.

Read More at American Thinker By Thomas Lifson, American Thinker