Those furloughed Federal Workers will be getting their back pay plus 1% to make them feel good about themselves. Immigration reform protestors were on hand in Phoenix to prevent I.C.E. Buses from deporting any illegals, but the office was closed for Columbus Day. And Anthony Weiner had some shocking, but not surprising, comments in his GQ magazine interview. Check out these stories and more on WesternJournalism.com
In a profanity-laced interview with GQ magazine, disgraced politician Anthony Weiner discussed the scandal for which he is best known. The Democrat, a former congressman and New York City mayoral candidate, infamously sent explicit and sexual messages to women over a number of years.
The controversy forced his resignation from the U.S. House in 2011; and during his mayoral campaign earlier this year, revelations surfaced that his lewd behavior continued in intervening years.
Dismissing his actions as “meaningless,” Weiner described sending the pornographic content as “almost like a video game you played.”
Though he apparently has no qualms with a married man showing countless women photos of his genitals, Weiner conceded that his wife, Huma Abedin, does.
Saying his transgression was “not very significant to me,” he noted that “it’s significant to Huma.”
Showing the love and compassion any woman would want in a mate, he concluded that the emotional turmoil he has caused his wife “kinda matters.”
At some point, he said he realized that his reprehensible actions were actually not “like playing an online role-playing game” after all.
His utter disconnect with reality is evident in his correlation of such immoral behavior with a harmless video game. On the other hand, this could be just his latest ploy to deflect attention away from his own outrageous behavior.
Leftists facing a scandal will typically resort to any conceivable measure in their effort to shirk responsibility.
Weiner also stuck to the progressive playbook by steering the interview towards his own aggrandizement. Though he was all but tarred and feathered as he exited his position in the House, Weiner played up the notion he is simply above it all.
“Congress just isn’t a good job anymore,” he complained, claiming he was “a pretty important member of Congress” and had “figured out the outside game pretty well.”
Another reason for his purported success in politics, he added, is the fact that he is a “good talker about stuff.” Apparently, that quality was temporarily suspended as he made the comment.
He made his final proclamation — one that his detractors will actually agree with — by declaring himself a “soulless vessel.”
–Western Journalism staff writer
Have an idea for a story? Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Bill de Blasio, the Obama-backed Democrat “progressive” poised to become New York City’s mayor, is under attack by “Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid empire,” his supporters are charging. It’s a reference to the New York Post examining the candidate’s ties to the Nicaraguan Solidarity Network, a Communist-front organization that still supports the Marxist regime in Nicaragua headed by Communist Sandinista Daniel Ortega.
In fact, however, it was The New York Times that originally disclosed de Blasio’s fondness for the “foreign revolution” in Nicaragua, in a major piece that shocked even some liberals. The Times article revealed de Blasio’s pro-communist activities and his prediction back in 1991 that Islam would become a major political force.
Combined with de Blasio’s anti-police views, including his announced desire to can the tough New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, the revelations are worrying New Yorkers concerned about terrorism coming back to the city in a major way. The September 11, 2001 Islamic terrorist attacks in the city killed nearly 3,000 people. Years before that, the Cuban-backed Puerto Rican terrorist group, the FALN, carried out numerous terrorist bombings in the city, including an attack on Fraunces Tavern in 1975, which killed four people.
De Blasio’s comrades in the Communist Nicaraguan Sandinista movement were praised by Libya’s lunatic leader Muammar Gaddafi as having the will to “fight America on its own ground,” and they promised a “revolution beyond our borders” in Nicaragua. The Sandinistas, who were backed by the Soviet Union and Castro’s Cuba, seized power in Nicaragua in 1979 and fought in the Middle East with the PLO. In 2012, Sandinista leader and Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega hosted former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a guest of honor.
The Nicaraguan Solidarity Network, which still exists, has run an item, “Nicaragua Solidarity Back in the News,” noting the media focus on its former comrade de Blasio. It points out that he not only visited Nicaragua, in order to support the regime, but went on a “honeymoon” to Castro’s Cuba. The nature of this “honeymoon” has never been fully explained, and the New York media don’t seem particularly interested in this aspect of his background. He is married to a former lesbian who joined what would become the Combahee River Collective, described by The New York Times as “an influential collection of black feminist intellectuals.”
Castro’s Cuba protects several fugitives from American justice, including FALN leader William Morales and convicted cop-killer and Black Liberation Army terrorist Joanne Chesimard.
We conducted our own inquiry into the nature of de Blasio’s “solidarity” activity by taking a look at the records of the U.S. Peace Council, housed in the “Peace Collection” at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania. The U.S. Peace Council was a Communist Party-dominated organization associated with the World Peace Council, a Soviet front. It played a mostly behind-the-scenes role in “peace” activities throughout the 1980s, although Congress and the FBI did probe its Communist ties in various hearings and investigations.
One of the documents identified the U.S. Peace Council as having helped “initiate” the Nicaraguan Solidarity Network. One of the Peace Council officials, Robert Cohen, a member of the National Lawyers Guild, played the role in starting up the pro-Sandinista organization. “We are doing the same with El Salvador now,” said the document, alluding to the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador, also known as CISPES.
These activities took place during the late 1970s and ‘80s when communists were threatening a complete takeover of Central America and the Caribbean. President Ronald Reagan liberated the island of Grenada in 1983 from a Communist seizure of power and supported anti-Sandinista freedom fighters and the pro-American government of El Salvador. Eventually, the Sandinistas were forced under U.S. military pressure to hold free elections, and the Communist terrorists in El Salvador made a peace deal with the government.
De Blasio, who captured the Democratic nomination for mayor of New York City on September 10, is running against Republican Joe Lhota in the general election on November 5. De Blasio’s Marxist views were largely ignored during the campaign because of the media interest in another Democratic primary candidate, sex pervert and former congressman Anthony Weiner.
But after de Blasio won the nomination, The New York Times apparently thought his background deserved some attention, and the story about his pro-Sandinista activities was published. The paper sent a reporter to examine the records of the Nicaragua Solidarity Network of Greater New York, which included incriminating documents about de Blasio.
After these revelations, De Blasio was even asked about the influence of Marxism on his current views, a question he dismissed as antiquated. Still, he has not disavowed previous statements in support of “liberation theology” and “democratic socialism.”
He was an aide to former New York City Mayor David Dinkins, who was closely associated with the Democratic Socialists of America.
Curiously, it also turns out that de Blasio has had three different names; but he refuses to talk about that in any depth, either.
Now that de Blasio is positioned to crush Lhota, in a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans by six to one, some media attention is being paid to his far-left views; and it appears that de Blasio’s Marxist supporters are starting to get worried. Hence, their attacks on the “Murdoch Empire” and the New York Post, the paper following up on de Blasio’s extreme views.
The Nicaragua Solidarity Network is advising its activists to write a letter to the editor of the New York Post protesting the paper’s scrutiny of de Blasio.
The national office of the group says, “Former Nicaragua solidarity activist Bill de Blasio is the frontrunner in the NYC mayoral election. The right-wing is pulling out all the old lies against Nicaragua from Reagan’s dirty war against the Sandinistas in order to tar de Blasio. While the Nicaragua Network/Alliance for Global Justice has no position for or against any candidate for political office in New York or anywhere else, we do have an interest in countering the current slanders against Nicaragua.”
The Alliance for Global Justice, the parent organization, is funded by billionaire leftist George Soros and provides money and support for such organizations as Occupy Wall Street and the Bradley Manning Support Network, named for the Army traitor. Soros has personally endorsed de Blasio for mayor.
As we noted in a previous article, beneficiaries of largesse from the Alliance for Global Justice have also included Code Pink, the Venezuela Solidarity Network, and ANSWER—the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism group.
Code Pink is the hard-left organization that includes luminaries such as Medea Benjamin and Jodie Evans, a fundraiser for Obama. When they are not protesting U.S. foreign policy, they are working to undermine Israel.
De Blasio is their candidate in New York City.
This commentary originally appeared at AIM.org and is reprinted here with permission.
Photo credit: azipaybarah (Creative Commons)
Former mistress and current sex advice columnist Gennifer Flowers recently sat down for an interview during which she revealed many insights into the Clinton clan. In addition to recounting her affair with a pre-presidential Bill Clinton, she candidly offered knowledge of Hillary’s sexuality.
Though rumors have long swirled regarding the 2016 presidential hopeful’s homosexuality, Flowers said her former lover confirmed those suspicions.
Saying she “never considered theirs a traditional marriage,” Flowers explained that Bill Clinton offered a characteristically unrefined critique of his wife’s extramarital exploits.
“He said Hillary had eaten more p***y than he had,” she recalled.
According to Flowers, rumors of a romantic relationship between Hillary and Huma Abedin was not surprising. Married to disgraced politician Anthony Weiner, Abedin also stood by her husband throughout a prolonged sex scandal.
Flowers said she could offer only speculation into that issue, though, and based her comments only on direct conversations with Bill Clinton.
“I don’t know Huma or the Weiners,” she said. “I just know what Bill told me and that was that he was aware that Hillary was bisexual and he didn’t care.”
Flowers said she applauds Hillary for standing by her man despite his public infidelity, though she concluded that her faithfulness was due in large part to her own political aspirations.
“Absolutely that was her reason for sticking by him,” she added, “and he’s going to stick by her because he owes her that.”
Recalling her own relationship with the former president, Flowers said she feels the two would have eventually ended up together had it not been for the arrival of the Clintons’ only child.
He was “able to have it all” prior to 1980, she said, noting that “when they had Chelsea and he became governor, the stakes became higher.”
Hillary’s political supporters will surely argue that, even if true, the secretive nature of illicit sexual activity has no bearing on how an individual can govern. Considering the implosion caused during the last half of Bill Clinton’s second term due to the Monica Lewinsky scandal, however, one can certainly make the argument that a president is more effective without the additional baggage.
With the campaign in the home stretch, you might think the national media spotlight would fall on Bill de Blasio, who polls show to be in a commanding position to become New York’s next mayor.
Or perhaps the national press might be taking a closer look at his nearest rivals, Bill Thompson and Christine Quinn.
Nuh uh. It’s still all about Anthony Weiner.
Guess who was on Meet the Press yesterday? Someone who might actually be moving into Gracie Mansion? Nope, Anthony Weiner.
And what did Weiner do to deserve this? He went on a rant after some moron started heckling him at a Jewish bakery in Brooklyn about being “married to an Arab.”
Read More at Fox News . By Howard Kurtz.
With Barack Obama dogged by multiple scandals – from Benghazi to NSA surveillance to rampant IRS abuses – many Americans are asking whether he can make it through his second term.
Likewise, with sex scandals in the news – from ex-congressman Anthony Weiner to former New York governor Eliot Spitzer to San Diego Mayor Bob Filner – many are asking how such disgraced leaders can possibly believe they can re-assume positions of power and public trust.
The approaching anniversary of one of the most extraordinary presidential scandals in history may well hold the answer to both questions.
Fifteen years ago, perhaps the most serious allegation ever levied against a sitting U.S. president – a nationally televised accusation of forcible rape, widely regarded by the public as credible – came to light. Yet Bill Clinton not only survived the allegation, he also survived an impeachment that included other sexually lurid charges and went on to become the beloved elder statesman of the Democratic Party.
‘I told him no’
It was Juanita Broaddrick who in 1998 first went public with the story of alleged rape two decades earlier, reportedly on April 25, 1978. In February 1999, she told her story to a national TV audience on “Dateline NBC” to Emmy-winning reporter Lisa Myers.
Read More at WND . By Gina Loudon.
Huma Abedin — wife of candidate for New York City mayor and disgraced former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y. — is confounding political analysts.
Why, after her husband recently admitted on the campaign trail he had continued his sexting exploits subsequent to resigning from office in 2011, would she continue to stand by her man? There may be something much more valued to Abedin than a psychotic husband causing her to do so.
If one drew lines from opposite ends of a graph to illustrate U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East under U.S. President Barack Obama and Abedin’s increasing influence with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, convergence occurs with a major change in such policy. An earlier effort to explore Abedin’s influence was curbed by supporters waving the flag of political correctness, suggesting that her ties to Islam and certain questionable organizations remained off limits for discussion.
It is important to understand Abedin’s “bloodline.” While it shouldn’t be taken as an indictment of her beliefs, it does reflect possible influences at an early age molding her core belief system. It is the direction she chose to go once emancipated, however, that is telling about the impact family influences may have had in honing her core beliefs.
A July 24 National Review article addresses this bloodline.
To understand it, we begin with Abdullah Omar Naseef, a Saudi supporter of the late Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida.
A staunch Islamic extremist, Naseef founded a think tank, the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, in 1978. He recruited Abedin’s father, Zyed Abedin, an educator born in India and living in the United States, to assist in the effort in Saudi Arabia.
As reported by investigative journalist Andrew McCarthy, even today, IMMA’s focus remains on promoting the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs’ foreign policy “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.”
Naseef also co-founded the Rabita Trust, established in 1988, allegedly for charitable purposes but later found to be funding terrorist groups. The United States designated Rabita a foreign terrorist organization, freezing its assets in 2001.
IMMA later published a journal, for which Zyed Abedin was editor. Although Zyed Abedin ran JMMA, Naseef influenced it via his relationship with the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, “a virulently anti-Semitic and Shariah-supremacist organization” that managed the publication. When Zyed Abedin died in 1993, his Pakistani wife and Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, took control.
Saleha Abedin is a promoter of the Muslim Brotherhood and violent jihad. She directs an organization — the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child linked to the Union for Good — also an FTO. The union is headed by Muslim Brotherhood’s Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi who, during the U.S. occupation of Iraq, ordered fatwas against U.S. troops. Allegedly a women’s rights activist, Saleha Abedin promotes those “rights” as defined by Shariah law, thus justifying the abuse of wives, female genital mutilation, and other repressive horrors.
Born in the United States, Huma Abedin was raised Muslim in Saudi Arabia. She returned to the United States to attend college at George Washington University in 1994. There, she became an executive board member of the Muslim Student Association, a national organization and foundation of Muslim Brotherhood’s U.S. network. The MSA has an indoctrination program “designed to ensure with absolute certainty that there is conformity to the movement’s ideology and a clear adherence to its leadership’s authority.”
Of note too is that in early 2001, the late American-born terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki became GWU’s MSA spiritual guide, while simultaneously counseling some of the 9/11 terrorists.
McCarthy notes, “MSA gave birth to the Islamic Society of North America, the largest Islamist organization in the U.S. Indeed the MSA and ISNA consider themselves the same organization. Because of its support for Hamas (a designated terrorist organization that is the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch), ISNA was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, in which several Hamas operatives were convicted of providing the terrorist organization with lavish financing.”
In 1996, Huma Abedin became a White House intern working for first lady Hillary Clinton. They formed a close bond resulting in Abedin becoming Clinton’s chief of staff during her 2008 presidential campaign run and her top staffer and adviser when Clinton became secretary of State in 2009.
Having ties to Islamic extremist influences, Abedin should have been thoroughly investigated for a position requiring a high-level security clearance. But, again, inexplicably, she was cleared with minimal vetting.
Abedin married Weiner, who is a Jew, in July 2010. Interestingly, while Islam permits Muslim men to take non-Muslim spouses, it prohibits Muslim women from doing so. Thus, such a union should have generated outrage from a Muslim world prone to lash out over anything. But strangely, nothing was heard — not even from Abedin’s Islamist mother.
Two years after the Clinton-Abedin team took office, the United States made a major change in its foreign policy toward the Muslim Brotherhood. In June 2011, it threw its ally (Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak) under the bus, embracing the Muslim Brotherhood — with whom all communication had previously been suspended due to its suspected terrorist activities — and several of its positions contrary to U.S. interests.
With Clinton’s departure from State, Abedin may only temporarily be out of the classified information loop. Standing by her man may well be driven by her desire to get back into it, hitching a ride either on Clinton’s 2016 presidential bid train or the constantly derailing Weiner train she still hopes may lead to higher office.
But that desire may well be Muslim Brotherhood-driven.
This article originally appeared at AIM.org and is reprinted here with permission.
Photo credit: azipaybarah (Creative Commons)
The Muslim Brotherhood in the White House! Did the White House tours compromise their free run of the place?!
-Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
-Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser
-Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Islamic Conference
-Salam al-Marayati – Obama Adviser – founder Muslim Public Affairs Council and its current executive director
-Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar – Islamic Society of North America
-Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships
Some of these radical Muslim sympathizers go back to the first month of BHO’s first administration.
For example, Cass Sunstein’s wife Samantha Power is now Ambassador to the UN – with an 87-10 approval of the Senate. Power, who married the atheist Sunstein in a Catholic Church in Ireland, would, in my opinion, not make it as Ambassador to the Vatican. Her seemingly mixed approaches to the value of human life and sympathy for Islam are dubious at best. Former UN Ambassador John Bolton opposed her nomination.
Her pressure to depose the Libyan ruler Khadafy only opened the door for mass persecution of Christians, just as is happening in Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Sudan, and (in the hopes of the Administration and the MSM) in Syria. I discern this is a widespread effort to destroy Western Culture, of which the Catholic Church in particular and Christianity in general is key.
Then there’s Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, who is reported to be the real brains in the White House – much to the detriment of Constitutional government of the people and by the people
And let’s not forget Hillary’s significant other in the State Department – Huma Abedin and her ties to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, where Christians are being persecuted, raped, and murdered.
A friend sent this excerpt from a Godfather Politics article to my attention. It sums up what a number of people suspect about Huma Abedin.
Huma Abedin is a devout Muslim from a powerful Muslim family. Her mother is Saleha Mahmoud Abedin, a professor and dean at Dar El-Hekma College in Saudi Arabia. She is also a prominent official in the Muslim Sisterhood, the female counterpart to the Muslim Brotherhood. Although Huma married a Jew, a mortal enemy of all Muslims, she is still accepted by her Muslim family and friends. Normally her marriage would have constituted her being disowned by the family and subjected to an honor killing.
So one has to beg the question why she had been allowed to marry a Jew and not face disgrace from her family and fellow Muslims?
I believe the answer can be found in a Muslim word ‘Muruna’. There are times when Muslim leadership believe it is more important to plant a spy to gain valuable information than it is for that spy to follow all Muslim law. It is not uncommon for Muslim leadership to push a woman into a relationship with a non-Muslim in order to gain the confidence and trust of an infidel. Once that trust has been gained, the Muslim woman can begin to exert some influence into the dealings of her husband and in the process learn important secrets that she can pass on to her Muslim handlers back home.
I believe Huma Abedin is a Muruna and that her marriage to the Rep. Anthony Weiner was planned and sanctioned by the Muslim Brotherhood. At the time, Weiner had high expectations of furthering his political career, possibly a run for senate seat once held by Hillary Clinton or even higher. Having a husband in the US Congress would be a great asset to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Then Weiner was disgraced and ended up resigning from Congress. If that was the end of his political career, it would seem that a divorce would have been proper, but for some reason, it wasn’t to be. This makes me wonder if Weiner’s run for mayor could have been prompted by the strong encouragement of his wife, Huma. The Muslim Brotherhood has invested too much into Abedin’s marriage with Weiner to throw it down the tubes so soon, so he is being advised or pressured to run for office again.
If Weiner loses the mayoral election, then perhaps the Muslim Brotherhood will advise her to get a divorce and concentrate on her position as an advisor to the State Department. Abedin will still be a valuable asset to the Muslim Brotherhood, even without Weiner because of her relationship with Hillary Clinton. She was Clinton’s number one confidant while she was Secretary of State. If Hillary manages to win the presidential election in 2016, you can bet your bottom dollar that Abedin will be by her side in some key role, enabling her to pass many state secrets back to her Muslim Brotherhood family.
In my opinion, Huma Abedin is a dangerous enemy of the United States and should be treated as such.
Muslim writers say: “When the locust swarms darken vast countries, they bear on their wings these Arabic words, ‘We are God’s host, each of us has 99 eggs, and if we had 100, we should lay waste to the world and all that is in it.’”
I used to think that Iran getting a nuclear weapon was the “100th egg.” Today, I’m almost convinced that the “100th egg” is the United States of America under Islamic rule. What other nation in the hands of evil men and women could lay waste to the world?
Photo credit: zennie62 (Creative Commons)
Morally destitute politicians are hardly a recent development; however, recent behavior by some elected officials reveals an audacity almost beyond belief.
San Diego Mayor Bob Filner, who is currently undergoing therapy amid calls for his resignation for repeated sexual harassment, is such an individual. One of several women who have come forward to accuse Filner in recent weeks has a unique perspective and agreed to detail her experience in a timely and candid interview.
Morgan Rose, a school psychologist and mental health expert, said she first met Filner in May 2009, and his inappropriate advances soon followed. Under the guise of discussing a program designed to address violence within the homes of American soldiers, Rose said that Filner called her directly to set up a meeting.
“I could understand why he wanted to vet me,” she said, “to verify my credentials prior to taking the campaign to the Obamas.”
She recalled initial excitement to meet with the mayor, replaced by disgust as “his eyes turn creepy right before he said, ‘Your eyes have bewitched me.’”
At that point, she said he trapped her behind a table and would not budge despite her insistence that he let her leave.
“When I asked he return to his side of the table or let me out, each time he told me he would if I would kiss him,” she explained. “His phone finally rang after four attempts to kiss me and he took the call, then left.”
Rose did not come forward immediately and was the third alleged victim to publicly accuse Filner of abuse.
“I thought more victims would come forward with stories more recent,” she noted, “stories about his abuse as mayor. When that didn’t happen, I contacted attorney Cory Briggs, who represents several anonymous victims.”
After working with a legal team for about a week, she said she released her initial statement and plans to remain an advocate for victimized women in the future.
In addition to a possible lawsuit, Rose said she wants to share her story in a forthcoming book “to speak for those too afraid of him to speak for themselves.”
Through her unique training and experience, she has pinpointed what she believes is the driving force behind Filner’s in appropriate behavior.
His actions both during and after abusing multiple women is evidence of “an extreme narcissistic personality,” Rose contends, adding that Filner “has arranged his life to maintain power and control. His refusal to step down supports that obsession.”
By going public with her experience, she hopes to accomplish two goals.
“One is for women to know such behavior is the fault of the perpetrator, not the victim, [and] that they can stand strong as they speak out when it happens,” she said.
Additionally, she wants to foster unity among “the sisterhood of women.”
In the end, Rose calls the prospect of redemption for the troubled mayor “impossible,” based on both his age and brazen disregard for societal norms.
“For him to ever recognize he needs redemption from his victims is not possible for his pathology,” she said, “especially at the age of 70 and [with] his level of disconnect from rational thought and behavior.”
Certainly, abusive actions toward women transcends party lines and political affiliations. When one looks at the behavior of prominent Democrats such as Filner, Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner, and others, though, it becomes apparent that they feel entitled to act in any way they desire. When faced with irrefutable proof of harassment, these leftist politicians dig in and refuse to step down or accept any actual responsibility.
Too many who falsely accuse Republicans of waging a war on women are themselves fighting on its front lines.
Remember back in 2012, when the DNC marched out Sandra Fluke in order to officially declare that the Republican party had declared a war on women? The so-called college student expected the American taxpayer to fund the contraception for her sexual escapades. They also thought they could put an end to Rush Limbaugh’s career at the same time because of his comments on the little floozy. Well, let’s take a look at what our Liberal/Communist friends in government have been up to.
We will start with San Diego mayor Bob Filner. This deranged individual can’t seem to keep his hands or anything else to himself. He has forcibly French-kissed women on his staff and has asked them on many occasions NOT to bother wearing underpants to work. Now that he is facing sexual harassment lawsuits due to his “value system”, he expects the San Diego taxpayers to provide the money for his defense. You can’t make this stuff up.
Now onto the trilogy of corruption in New York. Vito Lopez, who is running for New York City council, was forced to resign from the Assembly due to several charges of sexual harassment. Two victims were paid to keep their mouths shut using New York taxpayer money to the tune of $106,000 dollars, authorized by Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver. Silver currently holds onto his position of power and has not been sanctioned in any way for his abuse of said power.
Now, of course, we have Anthony Weiner, husband to Muslim Brotherhood operative Huma Abedin. Weiner has not touched any women that we know of but sure can’t keep his hands off of himself while sending lewd cellphone pictures across the internet to women other than his wife. Weiner was forced to resign from the United States Congress for these very infractions and is currently running for New York City MAYOR. It has been revealed recently that he has continued this type of behavior.
Now, third in this trilogy is no other than Elliot Spitzer, the disgraced former New York governor who is now running for New York City Comptroller. Mr Spitzer was forced to resign after it was revealed that he was soliciting high-priced call girls, in which he earned the name “client number nine.” He went from an Attorney General who broke up and prosecuted prostitution rings to a Governor who supported them and participated in them as well. Spitzer shouldn’t be running for anything other than spokesperson for his CELL BLOCK.
Now, for the final example who needs no introduction: the Democrat Liberal/Communist rock star, Bill “slick Willie” Clinton. Once impeached for sexual impropriety in the White House with Monica Lewinski, with a laundry list of names of women that he has had relations with while married to Hillary, he continues to be the IDOL of Liberal/Communist men. If slick Willie can do it and get away with it, then it must be okay.
It would appear that the Liberal/Communist view of women is that they are nothing more than objects to be enjoyed and then thrown away. If nothing else, this explains why Liberals/ Communists are so willing to embrace the belief system of their Muslim counterparts. They share the same basic views of how to treat a women. As always, stay safe and be aware of your surroundings.