Was Navy Seal Team 6 Set Up For Sacrifice?

“Before there was Benghazi, there was Extortion 17.”  These are the chilling opening words spoken by Billy Vaughn, the broken-hearted father of Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn.  Aaron was one of 17 Navy SEALs, almost 30 American servicemen in total, killed when their antiquated Chinook helicopter was shot down during a raging battle in Afghanistan on August 6, 2011.  To have lost their sons in war is tragic enough; but as they discovered the very dubious circumstances surrounding the operation and the subsequent deception and cover-up by the military under the Obama administration, a truly gut-wrenching and highly suspicious picture emerged.  Several families of the fallen, military experts, elected representatives, and concerned others held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on May 9th, 2013.

Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, calls Extortion 17 “perhaps the biggest disaster since 9-11 as far as Naval and Special Ops operations.”  Before the dust had even settled on the operation that killed Osama bin Laden, President Obama and Vice President Biden revealed the classified identities of SEAL Team 6 and other servicemen; and as a result, these men “literally had targets on their backs.”  Three months later, these men and others were sent in on archaic outdated equipment without support and ambushed.

“We demand to know who sent our sons into hostile territory where evidence proves a shoot-down attempt had been in full force for weeks, in less than adequate, antiquated airframes documented to be in very poor condition,” declares Karen Vaughn, Aaron’s mother. “We also demand to know who made the call to mix conventional aircraft and forces with Special Warfare Operations.”

Charles Strange, father of fallen Navy SEAL Michael Strange, says, “Michael knew what he was getting into.  Michael knew what he was fighting for.  Michael knew that someday he might have to give the ultimate sacrifice.  But not like this.  To put my son and the most elite SEAL team in the world in a Chinook helicopter over an active battle that’s going on for three and a half hours?  Unacceptable! Somebody has to answer for this.”

Here are the heart-wrenching details of the labyrinth that is Extortion 17:

  • The servicemen were put in a slow helicopter that is never used for combat operations, built in the early 1960s and last retrofitted in 1985, with no answer as to who made that decision.
  • The helicopters they would normally have used and that they had trained with their entire careers were not available because under Obama, the pace of Special Operations aviation climbed from an average of 56 per month in 2009 to a break-neck 334 per month in 2011.
  • The mission was considered to be so dangerous that the decision had to be made from a commander out of theater.  Yet still it is not known, even after an investigation that yielded a 1200 page report, what commander made the call or why.
  • The Tangeen Valley in Afghanistan was known to be a hotbed of insurgent forces, and U.S. Intelligence knew that there were one hundred or more enemy forces gathering there that night intending to shoot down American forces.  As early as May 11, they knew that SEAL Team 6 was going to be targeted, but did not share this information with the appropriate people.
  • The flight manifest was changed at the last minute, removing seven Afghani security force members who had been slated to fly.  In fact, there is still some uncertainty as to who was on the flight.
  • The men were flown in unescorted and dropped into a battle that had already been going on for over three hours, without any suppressive fire support.
  • Even in the pitch black, General Colt told the families they could see two men on the rooftop.  “They call up the Afghan administration to find out at two o’clock in the morning what these guys are doing on the building,” Charles Strange explains.  “You know what they told them?  ‘They’re hanging crops.’” At 2am on a rooftop?
  • The Chinook was shot down by Afghanis who were waiting for it in the perfect position and at the perfect time to strike when the aircraft was its most vulnerable, during landing.
  • “Perhaps the most disturbing piece of evidence that Billy and I came across in our search for truth was uncovering the fact that the Afghan National Army, the Afghan National Police, and the Afghan Security Ministry have been and still are involved in the planning of every single stage of every single Special Operation that takes place in that country.  And yes, these plans include flight routes and landing zones,” says Karen Vaughn.
  • The “eye-in-the-sky” predator feed over the area was turned off.  It took the military ten minutes to figure out which aircraft had been shot down.
  • American forces were not permitted to take out the attackers.  The families were told that new Rules of Engagement dictated that we couldn’t shoot down any attacker even after being attacked because, as one high-ranking admiral put it to Billy Vaughn, “We want to win their hearts and minds.”  Karen says, “We were recently told by a Special Forces operator that under the current ROE’s if the enemy fires on you, then runs back behind a rock, when he pops his head up from behind the rock you’re not allowed to engage him unless you can verify that he has not laid his gun down.  In other words, you must be fired on twice now or your actions will be questioned by your government when you try to defend yourself or the lives of your teammates.”
  • To add desecration to injury, the standard ramp ceremony at Bagram Air Base was presided over by an imam who gave a prayer damning the fallen to hell before their remains were sent home.  No priest, pastor, or rabbi gave any prayer or said any words.  Klayman says, “The funeral that was held in Kabul where you couldn’t even mention the name of our lord and savior Jesus Christ, but yet a Muslim cleric gets up and damns these fallen heroes to hell as infidels.  Unbelievable that our military brass would allow this to happen!”  And whereas it is standard practice that all parents of the fallen are given a transcript from the military of that ceremony, the families of Extortion 17 were not.
  • In classified meetings, elected officials were lied to about Extortion 17 by top military brass.  The families were lied to by these and other military officials.  “When we were first visited by one of the highest level admirals in our nation [Admiral William McCraven] on January 4th…the most shocking thing we experienced is that he lied to us so continuously that if we had not studied our documentation and known the truth he would have made a mockery of everything our sons died to represent.  It got to be actually embarrassing.”
  • The families were told that the chopper’s “black box” was “blown away in the flood” and was supposedly never recovered.  A flood? “In Afghanistan?” Charles Strange asks, exasperated.
  • “They told me my son had to be cremated, everybody had to be cremated,” Charles says, weeping.  “I called the commander: ‘Why did you cremate my son?  My son didn’t want to be cremated!  I’ve got pictures of him.  When I asked for the autopsy report from Dover they sent me a disc with pictures.  He’s sitting there fighting! ‘Everybody was burned beyond recognition.’  No, everybody wasn’t burned beyond recognition!  Another lie!”
  • No Afghani officials were involved in the investigation of the shoot-down, even though they are involved in the planning of every mission and were consulted during the mission.
  • When asked how they assessed the crash, our military revealed that all sorts of support materialized.  They told the families, “We had 30 planes to assess the crash.  We had Black Hawks, we had Pathfinders, we had 140 men go in.”  Yet there had been no air or other support for the men as they flew in.

“As we searched we became tragically aware that perhaps the cruelest, most deceitful acts of this administration have been perpetrated against the very ones fighting and dying to protect and defend it,” Karen says. 

Charles recalls the day Obama greeted the families at Dover where the remains of the fallen were brought home.  “He went to give me a hug and I whispered in his ear, ‘Mr. President, is there going to be a congressional inquiry?’ And Mr. President whispered in my ear, he said, ‘Mr. Strange, we’re gonna look into this very, very, very deep.’  Well, I haven’t heard nothing.”  It is now nearly two years since Extortion 17.

Watch the video of the press conference below, and please share it with others. Each unanswered question, each deception that was revealed, and each reckless – if not outright sinister – decision that was uncovered is a stab in the heart for these families.  They deserve answers.

But more, we should take each as a stab to our own hearts and demand those answers as if these sons were our very own.  Indeed, they are America’s brave sons.  If Benghazi and Extortion 17 are any indication, our servicemen today face just as much treachery from the Obama administration and our military under his command as from America’s enemies on the battlefields in faraway countries.  In Benghazi, our personnel’s pleas for support while under attack went deliberately unheeded; and then the truth was and continues to be covered up.  In Extortion 17, our servicemen were sent into a battle not to win, but to be deliberately sacrificed to our enemies.  These words of Karen’s should serve as a dire warning: “The hearts and minds of the enemy are more important to this government than my son’s blood.”

Doug Hamburger, father of fallen SEAL Patrick Hamburger, says, “It’s a shame that we have to ask for a congressional investigation to find out answers…We’re pleading with the American people to put the pressure on your congressmen and senators to make sure that that investigation does get started up and we do get some answers as to what was going on – not so much that we can do anything for our families or our boys.  But we want to make sure that our military is taken care of in the future.  We love our military…We want to make sure that their sons and daughters are protected and allowed to fight at the top of their abilities.”

These are more than just scandals; they are high treason.  Nothing like Benghazi or Extortion 17 has happened in America’s history, military or otherwise; but we’re seeing that atrocities like these are common for the Obama administration.  Treachery doesn’t begin to cover it.  This is a betrayal of the highest order.  It is a betrayal of our brave servicemen who gave everything for America, the very men who killed Osama bin Laden.  It is a betrayal of America’s sons and daughters fighting for her today, and of their families who raised these heroic warriors and who now survive them as parents should never survive their children.

In the words of Billy Vaughn, “We must change the hearts and minds of the leaders in Washington and the high-ups in the military, or we must see that they are removed.  Those responsible must be brought to justice.”

 

Read more by Jude Eden.

Allen West Talks Possible Obama Impeachment

Nice to see him talking this way…

Hypocrisy Alert: Allen West

Allen West Hypocrisy Alert: Allen West

Newsmax.com is reporting that former Florida Rep. Allen West will join Fox News as a contributor. Apparently the news channel made the announcement yesterday.

“Representative West’s congressional and military experience along with his fearless approach to voicing key issues will provide a valuable point of view to the Fox News lineup,” Bill Shine, the network’s executive vice president of programming, said in a statement.

Interestingly, he is cited as being brought on board Fox News for his “fearless approach to voicing key issues.” In reality, Mike Zullo, lead investigator of the Sheriff Joe Arpaio Cold Case Posse and Carl Gallups, founder of PPSIMMONS News and Ministry and host ofFreedom Friday With Carl Gallups radio found a very different Allen West when they spoke with him at this year’s CPAC just outside Washington D.C.

Read more at PP Simmons.

One Hundred Articles Of Impeachment Against Obama

Barack Obama 5 SC One Hundred Articles of Impeachment Against Obama

There is a growing groundswell within American Republican and Tea Party ranks that impeachment proceedings should be initiated against President Obama on a whole list of violations of the Constitution and the War Powers Act. ~ Peter Paton

Congressmen Allen West of Florida (R-Florida) and Darrell Issa (R- California) have consistently and loudly criticized the president for overstepping the political mark and bypassing Congress’s approval on a whole range of dubious policies and issues: and the recent Obama attack on the Supreme Court of Justice and the Russian ” Open Mic ” gaffe on National Security, leads to one question…

Is Barack Obama making his own case for impeachment? Obama did not become the Democratic nominee for President without the help of several leaders of the Democratic Party who knew that he was not eligible for office

Listed below are the One Hundred Articles of Impeachment.

1. Appointment of a “shadow government” of some 35+ individuals termed “czars” who are not confirmed by the Senate and respond only to the president, yet have overarching regulatory powers – a clear violation of the separation of powers concept. Obama bypassed the Senate with many of his appointments of over 35 “czars.”

Read more at knowthelies.com .

Outing Congressmen That Have No Spine For The Truth

Pastor Carl Gallups says that while several “high-profile V.I.P.s” in the Halls of Congress have agreed to join the effort to bring this case into a court of law, others (particularly former Republican Col. Allen West) have shown “political cowardice” – deciding that their political careers are more important than saving the Republic from an undocumented usurper.

 

Source: http://bobpowell.blogspot.com/2013/05/political-cowardice-outing-congressmen.html

Obama Birth Certificate Story Not Going Away

mike zullo 300x219 Obama Birth Certificate Story Not Going Away

According to lead Obama investigator Mike Zullo, fear of ridicule is the number one reason authorities are not acting on the mountain of verifiable evidence of document fraud concerning Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Appearing on the Carl Gallups, Freedom Friday call-in show, Zullo said, “We are dealing with a fraudulent document that would never survive scrutiny of the judicial process.”

Disinformation and the intentional dissemination of false information to protect Obama, will not survive in the face of what Zullo is calling a 100% fabricated document. He listed the following tactics used to discredit the research of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse: media black outs; ridicule of opponents; infiltration and domination of message boards; setting up straw men to create an argument to chip away at the truth and simply ignoring the facts. “All we ask [is that Obama] bring forward the real original document,” said Zullo.

Ridicule is among the most effective of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. The godfather of community organizers, Alinsky said: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. Since this tactic is almost impossible to counteract, the opposition becomes infuriated and then reacts to your advantage.” Though frustrated himself, Zullo assures listeners that the truth will come out. Speaking directly to those who have been “chasing this longer than I,” Zullo says the truth will eventually be known and will vindicate those who have worked to reveal the ”greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.” (3) A Rule of Law investigator, the detective continued: “The Obama Document Fraud attacks our core principles; we are a nation of Laws, not of Men.”

But Zullo grew pensive when he spoke about the reception that he and radio host Gallups received at the recent C-PAC event. “People are afraid,” he said. Gallups pointed out the Allen West betrayal as being just one of many examples of VIPs who backed out of a promise to support the Document Fraud investigation. “We Don’t Remember Making that Promise,” one politician said. The internet spins round and round with stories of deaths of key witnesses, friends, acquaintances who suddenly died, were shot, or even had to leave the country, as occurred in one instance. The secretive nature of events, threats, and disinformation are all more obstacles the Cold Case Posse have encountered as they try to find out who in the White House constructed the fraudulent Obama birth certificate released on-line in 2011.

As the long call-in show began to wind down, both Zullo and host Gallups remained optimistic that a breakthrough in this case is coming within the next three to six months. But the most poignant moment came at the end when they described their visit to the grounds of Mount Vernon, George Washington’s home. “Barack Obama is the only president in U.S. history who has never set foot on Mount Vernon property,” an old caretaker told them. Obama also is the only American president to spend millions of dollars to hide who he really is from the American people!

Allen West Won’t Help Expose Obama’s Ineligibility

Allen West 2 SC Allen West Wont Help Expose Obamas Ineligibility
STEADFAST and LOYAL?  We think not.Dear readers, I have been asked many times about our encounter with Lt. Col. Allen West at CPAC. I have been asked if he really declined to help Lt. Zullo and I move this criminal investigation forward. Yes, that is true. That was his response, and of course, he was free to make that response. I still hold out some hope that he might change his mind. I am not holding my breath in the matter, however.

Following is my account of what happened with Lt. Col. Allen West at CPAC.  (MAKE CERTAIN you see the hypocrisy, in light of this article, which appears on Col. West’s website below!)

Lt. Mike Zullo and I spoke to Allen West  the first night on the evening before CPAC. We were at dinner and Col. West walked right by our table. He had a small group with him. He stopped to talk to someone at the table next to us. After he finished, we introduced ourselves. He said he knew of the Arpaio investigation and Lt. Zullo and would be glad to meet with us for a few moments to discuss the evidence we had. His secretary, who was with him, gave us an email and told us to remind her and she would set an appointment time. We sent the email. The appointment from Col. West’s office was never made.
By the next evening we had still not heard back from him. That night, I approached him at a CPAC VIP dinner. He was preparing to be seated just a few tables from us. I politely reminded him of his promise to us. I told him that we had not heard from him yet. He told me that we should “stop by his display table tomorrow.” I felt then that he had no intention of meeting us privately.
The next day, Lt. Zullo was able to find Col. West in the crowd. Lt. Zullo asked Col. West to give him five minutes of his time. Col. West gave it to him. Lt. Zullo told him of the 100% solid evidence he had of a forged and fabricated document and the legal ramifications and possible national security issues of the matter. The bottom line of that conversation was that West told Lt. Zullo (after hearing and acknowledging the evidence of the case) that he couldn’t get involved in it because he might have future political aspirations - he couldn’t afford to be associated with the case. Lt. Zullo assured him this was NOT a birther issue – this was a proven criminal forgery and fabrication of identifying document issue. He assured Col. West that he would be backed up by a full and professional criminal investigation. Lt. Zullo asked Col. West if he could at least help us to open other doors with other VIPS.  Col. West reaffirmed that he had no interest in helping us.
I still hold out hope that Col. West might jump on board if this thing goes public in the near future. We have the promises of other VIPS that they will help us to bring it public, perhaps within the next few months at the most. However, I know how politics work. I am not naive. We may wind up with many on board with us – or we might wind up with everyone of them backing out on us.
I’ve never seen anything like this in all my previous years in law enforcement. I have never heard of congressmen, courts, or federal law enforcement officials completely ignoring, refusing to investigate, or even look at the evidence that another law enforcement agency has investigated concerning possible criminal activity coming directly out of the White House. Remember Watergate? Remember Monica? This situation and the possible implications and ramifications of it,  pales in comparison to Watergate and Monica. This situation goes directly to the Constitution and the real identity of the Commander in Chief  – yet few who are constitutionally responsible for examining the evidence will even do so…for fear of future political aspirations.
I will say it again, as I have said many times before, all I want is the truth. That is all for which I have ever asked since day one of my involvement in this matter some five years ago.  All I desire is for our Constitution and our Republic to be preserved. I do not want us to operate like a Banana Republic. When a duly sworn law enforcement agency spends 15 months on a case with the aide of 6-8 criminal investigators, digital document experts, and an expert digital document examiner who is certified to testify in federal courts signs off on the investigation – and no one will even look at it – something bad is wrong. Can you imagine if something like this had been gathered on President Bush?
At any rate – if we were to discover that everything about Obama’s documents had  perfectly legal explanations and nothing was fabricated, I would walk away from this tomorrow and announce to the world the truth of the matter. In the meantime – I am not going away and this investigation isn’t going away until America knows about it somehow- so that America can hold its congress and courts and federal law enforcement accountable for the possible constitutional crime that was allowed to continue… seemingly, for the sake of political expedience alone. God help us.
Visit pastor Carl’s website - http://www.carlgallups.com

HYPOCRISY UPDATE! - In light of the above post – check out the below plea for funds on the Allen  West website. Unbelievable!   See our highlights in bold – especially.

Allen West Guardian Fund

Dear Fellow Patriot,

I hope others are as disturbed as I am that President Obama
displayed more competence in filling out a March Madness NCAA
bracket last week than he did articulating his foreign policy on
a visit to Israel.

Here in the South, we call leading from behind following.  And
that’s why we’ve launched the Allen West Guardian Fund – to elect
principled leaders who will guard our constitutional Republic and
fight for our conservative values.  We can’t afford any more
politicians who bow to foreign leaders and place political
expediency ahead of their country.

The Allen West Guardian Fund will lead the way to elect twelve
hard-charging constitutional conservatives to the U.S. Congress
in 2014, who are either veterans or minorities, to ensure this
nation remains the land of the free and home of the brave.

However, to be successful, we must raise $250,000 before the
March 31st Federal Election Commission fundraising deadline.  Can
we count on your donation of $25, $50, $100 or more today?

You see, the left-wing media and the Democratic attack machine
want nothing more than for us to fail to meet our fundraising
goals.  They will be quick to pronounce our new venture a failure
and then proceed to disparage the Tea Party, conservatives,
Republicans and anyone else who stands up to them.

That’s why your immediate contribution of $25, $50 or even $100
is so important.

Steadfast and loyal,

Lt. Col. Allen B. West, USA (ret)
U.S. Congressman (2011-2013)
Paid for by the Allen West Guardian Fund
allenwestguardianfund.com

CPAC 2013 – Lt. Col. Allen West

Here is Allen West’s speech at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference:

Lloyd Marcus: Free Man

lloydmarcus Lloyd Marcus: Free Man

I’ve followed Lloyd Marcus’ career for the past few years with great interest.

Whenever an American Black separates himself from suntanned socialism throttling our community, it’s worth noting.

He’s a speaker and troubadour spreading a conservative message far and wide. With a smile no less.

American Blacks need counterpoints like Lloyd Marcus as alternatives to incessant Marxist militancy-making them liberal budget items and headlines to extort more tax dollars from frightened stakeholders.

He grew up in the ubiquitous Hood. Unlike equally ubiquitous thugs I call chocolate Klansmen, he didn’t use this as an excuse to wage war on society.

Critics attack everything about this American brother: his tone, mannerisms company kept (the Tea Party Express) and positions supported.

I wonder why suntanned socialists want only one way of thinking, sounding, and being? Why does the mere sight of Lloyd Marcus drive them to apoplexy?

Individualism.

A Black community defining itself as individuals, instead of cogs in a collectivist machine, doesn’t so easily inhale the Demo-crack pipe.

A Black community more like Lloyd Marcus, Allen West, or even (now) Cornel West would have critically called Obama on many bluffs that went unchallenged these past two election cycles.

We can’t re-create African tribalism here in America- the results are too disastrous. Blindly following a chieftain in defiance of centuries of constitutional struggle is madness.

That’s why I took time today to write about this upbeat dissident in America’s Black body politic. His individualism offers an antidote to the Obama Zombie plague that has eaten most American Black minds it encounters.

Lloyd Marcus is a free man, at a time when numerous Americans resembling him (or not) rejected freedom for unquestioning obedience to a distant ruler.

How many more free men and women does America have left?

 

Donate/Stop Socialist Hate: http://www.gofundme.com/197xk8

 

The “Electability” Myth

 

Karl Rove SC The “Electability” Myth

Much has been said and written regarding Karl Rove and the Republican Party establishment’s latest plan to go harder after conservatives than they ever would Democrats. And I’ve had much to say about it myself.

But I’ve yet to see anyone question the premise of the phony argument Rove is hiding behind to justify his crusade to purge the GOP of anybody who won’t grovel at the feet of the ruling class (which is what Rove’s pro-establishment Jihad is really all about). See, in Rove’s world, if you actually have principles and want to defeat Democrats and not just negotiate the terms of liberty’s surrender, you’re a “nutcase.”

Rove claims he’s out to find “electable” candidates. Well, who isn’t? Of course, all of us want to win elections. The candidate you’re supporting doesn’t get to act on any of the principles he’s running on if he doesn’t win. Nothing in politics is more crushing than losing on election night when you’ve spent your time, talent, and treasure on behalf of a candidate who’s a champion of your principles. So for Rove and the establishment to claim they’re the only ones concerned about “electability” is patronizing at best and disingenuous at worst.

Besides, how do we define “electability?” Furthermore, how come we allow the very people who oppose our ideas and principles to define who is and who isn’t “electable?” Should the General Manager of the Boston Red Sox consult with the New York Yankees front office on personnel decisions? Maybe Auburn’s new football coach should call Alabama’s Nick Saban and get his take on whom to recruit?

“Electability” is a ruling class fallacy, both on the right and the left. It’s essentially the political equivalent to Jim Crow laws, aimed at stifling the potential for upward mobility of those in the grassroots who would challenge the ruling class’ status quo. Despite all their public hand-wringing and pandering, they don’t really reach out to minorities for all the same reasons they don’t really reach out to their own base. They are adherents to the “Golden Rule,” which is he who has the gold gets to make all the rules. They may speak of a “big tent”; but really, they crave the small tent where they remain in charge of their own little fiefdom, crumbling infrastructure and all. Ironically, it’s been we in the base they hate that has diversified the GOP. Where did Ted Cruz, Allen West, and Tim Scott (just to name a few) come from?

Rove and his cronies are like modern day “old money” blue-bloods, condescendingly peering down their noses at the emerging “new money” entrepreneurs who weren’t born into the aristocracy as they were. That’s why they go after us harder than they go after them. We are a threat to their power base in a way they aren’t because we actually want to topple a spoils system both sides of the ruling class are profiteering from. The only argument Rove and his Boss Tweed-wannabes have with the Left is who the check with the people’s money gets written out to. They don’t see this as a clash of worldviews with the very survival of the Constitutional Republic at stake. They see this merely as a battle of dueling self-interests.

Thus, to allow Rove and those supporting his efforts by funding them or providing a platform for them to determine who is and who isn’t “electable” isn’t just dangerous; it’s also as foolish as allowing the liberal media to do it. In fact, you’ll notice that Rove and his cabal often draw the same conclusions about “electability” as the liberal media.

That’s not a coincidence.

Both sides have a mutual interest in not challenging the status quo. Both sides range from skeptical to hostile to our moral viewpoint. Then there’s simple economics. The media has lots of unsold ad inventory nowadays, and Rove and his kind of candidates can provide the revenue to purchase it. In this last election cycle, Rove’s cabal spent over $100 million on various establishment candidates, with just a 1% success rate. That means Rove and his acolytes are the perfect clientele for the liberal media. They help sell out their spot blocks and lose elections to Democrats at the same time.

The late P.T. Barnum would have a word for Rove and (especially) those underwriting his failed efforts—suckers.

I remember sharing a green room with Rick Santorum at the National Federation of Republican Assemblies conference about six weeks before the 2012 Iowa Caucuses. As we were each waiting for our opportunity to speak, Santorum shared with me his lament that his former employer, Fox News, didn’t think he was electable enough to send a reporter to cover his campaign. At that point, Santorum was mired in the low single digits in the polls.

Six weeks later, Santorum won the Iowa Caucuses and then went on to win 11 states during the 2012 Republican presidential primary campaign.

Again, who gets to determine who is and who isn’t “electable?” Is there an objective standard for “electability” as there is for many of the principles and causes we believe in? The answer is no, which is why Rove and the establishment like that subjective standard. It’s a moving target they can alter at their whim, aided and abetted by liberals who for different reasons want us defeated as well.

You can friend “Steve Deace” on Facebook or follow him on Twitter @SteveDeaceShow. 

Photo credit: National Constitution Center (Creative Commons)