Supremes Punt On Obama Eligibility Again

The U.S. Supreme Court announced today it would not hear Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve in the Oval Office.

The case is the latest in a lengthy series of cases in which U.S courts have refused to hear any arguments about Mr. Obama’s eligibility.

The court effectively killed the Kerchner case with one terse statement: “The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.”

 Supremes punt on Obama eligibility again

“I don’t think the court helped heal the country,” said Mario Apuzzo, the New Jersey attorney who argued the case on behalf of retired Navy CDR Charles Kerchner. “We still don’t know Mr. Obama’s status. … The court is supposed to take cases that are important, and I can’t imagine a case more important than this one.”

“You need justice to resolve conflicts between people, and when justice is denied people continue to go after each other in a savage way. We did not get justice, ” Apuzzo told WND. “For the court to deny our justice sets the country back terribly.”

“This decision did not help Mr. Obama,” Apuzzo added. “It did not bring legitimacy to his office. Mr. Obama does not have legitimacy of office by the court or by the consensus of the nation, because many people question whether he is a natural born citizen. How does our nation go forward with this kind of result?”

“This matter should have been addressed by the media and political parties early in the spring of 2008 during the primaries. It wasn’t,” wrote Kerchner Monday morning. “Congress should have addressed this when asked and when constitutionally it was required to. It didn’t. The courts should have addressed the merits of the questions when appealed to early on. They didn’t. Everyone in our system of government chose appeasement over confrontation and punted the ball to someone else.”

“Now it is far worse,” Kerchner continued. “The Supreme Court has chosen appeasement and inaction over action and dealing with the issue and questions openly in a court of law under the rules of evidence and law. Our constitutional republic and legal system is now compromised and broken.”

Read More: By Brian Fitzpatrick, WorldNetDaily

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. William Morgan says:

    IT APPEARS TO ME THAT WE HAVE A BUNCH OF GUTLESS WEINIES ON THE SUPREME COURT.
    THERE OUGHT TO BE SOME WAY TO IMPEACH EVERY ONE OF THEM ALONG WITH OUR
    IMPOSTOR IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

    • And there ought to be a way to get Leprechauns to come shovel all the snow that's piling up outside my door. Unfortunately I live in the real world.

      • Sometimes I wonder about that. Also what you are teaching to our children that we pay money to get them educated. I hope you leave your politics at the front door. They need to be educated and then determine their own views. My Daughter is her last year of her undergrad studies and the week this guy was elected president she told me that her Art History Associate Professor spent the whole week on Obama, which in my judgment is a real piece of art. That is being as polite as I can about this President.

        • My students know my politics–and the politics of my best friend in the department, a conservative Southern Baptist. I don't believe there's any such thing as an unbiased teacher, reporter or historian, so I make my biases known.

          At the same time, in class (unlike here), I do try to fairly present both (or all three) sides of a potential issue, and for my media criticism class, I also choose as a TA the student from the semester before who disagreed with me most often. So my next TA, for example, will be a Evangelical Christian who just took the exam to be a state highway patrolman.

          Most of my students are conservative Christians when they arrive here and still conservative Christians when they graduate. I am consistently surprised at how little credit some conservatives give their own college-age children for being rational adults, influenced far more by their upbringing than by anything that they encounter in college. Sometimes I wish I had as much power as some conservatives seem to think I do. :-)

    • Clois Beckwith says:

      The Senate with 2/3rds votes are the only ones that can initiate Impeachment Hearings. If they don't initiate, then the only thing for the American public is outright Revolution and blood in the streets. And right now I don't think the American Public has the stomach to go "Make Government" responsible by removal at gunpoint. The obama traitors that he nominated and the congress put into the supreme court didn't even recuse themselves from the Kerchner vote like they are suppose to, total abuse of power. But folks, until the people (You and me) decide to take up arms, we are stuck on the down hill slide, unless the senate acts. Obama and the split house, are not going to get this country back to it's conservative roots and in line with Spending and Taxes because of the split house. I am involved, I voted, but in the end, we have to take the appropriate actions, The congress, the justices and the decisions of all involved havescrewed this country over, and they know it and are thumbing their noses at the American People, just like they have tor two years….May God give the American people the wisdom and courage to act, otherwise, it will NEVER be the same USA I have fought for for years in the military…my allegiance is to the "Constitution" and defending it against all enemies, foreign and domestic. That is part of the "Oath" every military soldier, member of congress is sworn to uphold. There it is in a "Nutshell". You decide, "give me liberty or give me death".

      • "The Senate with 2/3rds votes are the only ones that can initiate Impeachment Hearings."

        Wrong. Only House, with a mere majority, can impeach a president (as happened with Clinton). But it does take a two-thirds vote of the House to remove him from office.

        "I don't think the American Public has the stomach to go 'Make Government' responsible by removal at gunpoint"

        Nor do the majority have any desire to do so. Most would rather obey the law.

        "he obama traitors that he nominated and the congress put into the supreme court…"

        Most of the Court was appointed by Republican presidents.

        "until the people (You and me) decide to take up arms"

        Nice call for insurrection. I assume you're organizing your own militia now?

        • "Wrong. Only House, with a mere majority, can impeach a president (as happened with Clinton). But it does take a two-thirds vote of the House to remove him from office."

          Actually I didn't finish my statement, on page 16, Article 1, section 3 "the Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments."

          The states already have "Militia" power, it is called the people of the United States… and the constitution calls under Amendment II the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

          Just fixing my quotation and in-accuracies. Thanks

    • Old Ed of the Delta says:

      I didn't think it could happen here in the USA. Maybe at one time in the USSR. These are things that can bring rebellion when people are denied access in the courts to redress their grievances. This is the underpinning of our form of freedom and democracy . The Court is on a very slippery slope when they issue such a terse opinion. It appears that Obama or his handlers have the Supremes wired too. Be ready for civil unrest in this country on a significant scale.

  2. Allen Lough says:

    Is anyone really surprised by the Supreme Court's decision? After all, these 9 judges are nothing more than glorified government employees. Big government has "co-opted" all three branches into one giant ruling class. Each one "protects and defends" the other two. There is no longer any allegiance to the Constitution, or to the American citizenry. The "servants" of the people have become the ruling elite. They have usurped power from We the People, and they will never give it up willingly. Lord Acton was absolutely right about power corrupting, and absolute power corrupting absolutely. The Federal Government now has absolute power. The result is a foregone conclusion: absolute and total corruption.

    • Alan has verbalized it gut wrenchingly well.,..God have mercy on us.

    • Well said, Allen. I've lost any shred of respect in the Court, the media, the unprincipled politicians and the talking heads of all political persuasions who continue to wantonly violate public trust. We've a lot of work before us if we are to pull this country out of the muck and mire of corruption this slime calls home.

  3. If this case doesn't meet the standards.. nor have the needed merit, I don't know what would. Perhaps kagan representing obama on this issue in the past was an attributing factor!

    Check out these examples: http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm>

    • The Aqua Buddha says:

      Except that Justice Kagan recused herself from all proceedings de3aling with this issue BECAUSE of her former involvement with the cases in question. OOPS!

  4. Well, here is the rational as to why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court…. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
    Acting in the capacity of Solicitor General she represented zero as the attorney of record in suits filed against him, in the Supreme Court, demanding he show proof of his natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no right to even be there. Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
    You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!!

    • Is Elana Kagen from Kenya too? Heaven help us if she is! All my life during grade school through high school and college there was a Constitution that was abide by. When did the USA put it on the back burner?? I don't know of anyone that knows what it is now. I want to go back to the old way where everyone was nice to each other. It doesn't seem that way anymore. I think all the judges and everyone in DC be canned.

      • "I want to go back to the old way where everyone was nice to each other."

        Especially to Blacks in parts of the South (except for that whole lynching thing), people of other faiths (the current alliances among Catholics, Jews and Protestants are fairly recent); unwed mothers and their children, migrant workers, labor activists, etc. Yep, Disneyland was a damn nice place!

    • "guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!!"

      Duh. Guess what? That's the Solicitor General's job–to represent the U.S. government and its leadership in lawsuits against the government.

  5. Why did the Supreme Court decide not to hear the case ?? Don't they have to state their reasons ?
    Isn't the court obligated to hear and rule on cases that are alleged to be unconstitutional ?????

    • "Don't they have to state their reasons ?"

      No, they rarely do–nor could they, with the thousands of cases they are asked to hear.

      "Isn't the court obligated to hear and rule on cases that are alleged to be unconstitutional ?????"

      No, they don't hear most cases where someone makes such a claim–nor could they, with the thousands of cases they are asked to hear. Most they simply reject quickly and routinely, as they did this one. During the Justices' regular conference, the Justices discuss the petitions, and grant certiorari in less than five percent of the cases filed.

      "In fact, the Court accepts between 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year." http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/Cons

  6. I SAY. DISSOLVE THE SO CALLED "SUPREME" COURT. NOTHING BUT POLITICAL. THEY ,(THE JUDGES) think they are our god, and are ridiculous in their findings. IT'S SO OBVIOUS THAT THEY VOTE POLITICALLY, INSTEAD OF REGARDING THE CONSTITUTION.

    • anonymous says:

      Go s little further … they have betrayed their Oaths, the Constitution, THE PEOPLE, and the Country … their act is simply, Treason; the penalty for Treason is hanging by the neck until dead. A Military Team under the Admiralty should round up all the Justices that voted to deny the Cert and hang them in front of the Washington Monument. And that should just be a start. Obama next and anybody associated with covering up his usurpation. Justice is served.

  7. Michael Kauppi says:

    I had it in my gut that the Supreme Court would side-step this issue. This country is simply going to have to endure the "Impostor in Chief" for the next 2 years, and then vote the worthless SOB out of office. The only way any of this would have half a chance of succeeding is if Republicans had control of both houses of Congress with a significant majority in each. With the Republicans holding the House, and the Democrats in charge in the Senate, absolutely nothing is going to happen. The whole system is corrupt, and the American people as a whole, don't have the intelligence to recognize it.

  8. If Obama does not have to obey the LAW, then neither do the rest of us.

    • You are right. This imposter thinks he is ABOVE the law. As a second rate person, who is not a legal citizen of the United States of America, he should be tried for treason, and shot be a firing squad, which is thecorrect and only punishment for someone of his stature.

    • Robert Laity says:

      Obama will not escape unscathed. God is watching. One surrounded by Criminals must still himself obey the law or we become lawless.

    • In the book The West and The Rest… Roger Scruton wrote "Laws to which the citizen cannot consent are illegitimate, and the state must therefore be maintained in a constant state of vigilance, lest it lose the consent of the citizen and the right to command him."
      Based on what our government is now doing to us… I too will become a law breaker!

  9. The issue is that obama is a "Prince hall mason", and the supreme court judges are mason sworn to protect each other even when one is a criminal,
    that's how "Jack the Ripper", got off scott free, he was a mason and memeber of the royal family,
    obama has already visited the judges, and had a chance to flash his masonic ring 32% or 33%,
    so instead of requsing themselves and stepping down, they protected obama by not hearing the case.
    This is why the masons were run out of Italy, secret deals and govenment jobs and coruption.

  10. THE SADDEST THING OF ALL IS THAT AT LEAST 60% OF ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE THE OCCUPANT OF THE OVAL OFFICE IS AN ILLEGAL ALIEN AND NOT ONE – NOT ONE, SO-CALLED MEDIA REPRESENTATIVE (INCLUDING FOX) IS REPORTING THIS TRAVESTY BY SCOTUS NOR THE BUTCHER OF LTC TERRENCE LAKIN. I BELIEVE WE SHOULD ALL GET OUR AFFAIRS IN ORDER BECAUSE OUR FREEDOMS AND LIVES ARE ON THE LINE IF WE DON'T SUCCUMB TO THIS TRAITOROUS ADMINISTRATION.

  11. THE SUPREMES ARE ALL PUPPETS OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, GEORGE SOROS, THE BILDERBURGS, AND THE ISRAELI'S. NO B IG SURPRISE THE DONT WONT THEIR CHOSEN ONE IMPEACHED. THE COURT HAS REACHED A POINT IN HISTORY WHERE IT IS CORRUPT AND NO LONGER NEEDED, JUST LIKE CONGRESS.

  12. The courts and the administration is going to push the people until they decide to Load,Lock, Rock and Roll… If they do not have to obey the laws then why should the people obey the laws of the land.. Evict them by force if necessary…..

    • Rob Waldrip says:

      It's time for the good, honest, law abiding American citizens to have a 5 million man/woman march on capital hill. It should be done with no violence, but the only way our voice will be heard is to demand that our congress and senate listen to the citizens who hired them.

      Congress and Senate should have term limits, if you elect a bad batch they will be gone in 6 years and maybe get a decent batch re-elected.

      • anonymous says:

        NOOOO. It should be a 5 million man ARMED MARCH with brutal violence for the Traitors and the Usurper!!

        • "5 million man ARMED MARCH with brutal violence"

          Even assuming you got together all those on this site who agree with you–and even assuming you could get them to stop hiding behind anonymous names and actually come out in the open–you probably still need to recruit another 4,999,975 people. Good luck with that.

    • Just about time for another million man march, but not a racial one. Everyone wouid be armed in this one and a lot of tar and feathers too

  13. What else would you expect from a bunch of LEFTWING ASSHOLES and TWO DYKES put there by the Imposter we are trying to get thrown out of office. Naturally they are going to favor him, since he kissed their asses and got them appointed to the office they are holding, and don't deserve to be there anymore than he deserves to be setting in OUR WHITE HOUSE. Yes, we sure have a bunch of weinies setting on the Supreme Court. Maybe we should build a bonfire and have a giant WENIE ROAST ! ! !

  14. This is a slap to the face of the American public. This guy must be the anti-christ because everyone in government is deathly afraid to make him prove that he is legal to be Commander-in-Chief. When the Supreme Court won't follow through with a decision then, they shouldn't be mystified when there's a breakdown in law and order. This is a sad day for America.

  15. The only way that Obama is able to continue to hold the office of POTUS is because of gutless judges who refuse to even hear the cases pending against Obama! He has had collaborators from Pelosi and Reid to the Supreme ****ing Court!! He is at best a dual citizen of the US and at worst a British citizen from his father (Kenya was a British territory). Will we ever be able to make this poser prove anything??!!!!

  16. huckingfarley says:

    The United States Supreme Court has been compromised by having judges seated that have no moral authority to pronounce anything just or unjust . A majority of them are nothing more than social engineers for the worldwide progressive movement , they hold the United States Constitution they are sworn to uphold in contempt and should themselves be convicted of sedition .

  17. This IS a sad day for America! My question is why were his two appointees to the court allowed to rule, for if he is illegal, so is their appointment, so is health care!!! I'm glad I'm not the only one out there that sees this as a nightmare and sees our country completely broken. I'm not as confident as Glenn Beck.I don't think we can turn this around, not even with prayer, for God has given us over to our own devices! We must still pray and trust Him, but its not going to be in the America we once knew. Welcome to Obamera… the land of the fee and the home of the slave!

    • P.s. One of the comments was that our leader is the anti-christ. I don't think he fits the biblical conditions to be that person, but he is definitely leading the world into a one-world government, religion, and monetary system, which will be headed by the anti-christ. This is actually what the Bible says will happen before Christ returns. His coming is soon!! Make sure you are ready!
      Admit you are a sinner.
      Believe Jesus is God's son, was born, lived, died, and rose again.
      Confess your sin and ask for God's cleansing and salvation.
      Payment for sin is death, but God gives us eternal life when we admit, believe, and confess Jesus as Lord. (see Romans 6:23).

      • To all,

        JESUS said to him,"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the FATHER except through Me"
        JOHN 14:6
        Are you listening all false Religions

  18. Phyllisofical says:

    The Obama eligibility case was a tremendous opportunity for the highest court in the land to unite the American people, at least on this one issue. The President's "reign" is suffering under a cloud of illegitimacy which causes the American people to discount what he says and who he is. It also causes great anger to arise when he does things that seem to be at odds with deeply held American values. The Supreme Court had a chance to put to bed the fears America had about its leader but they chose the politically correct, and possibly even cowardly, route. Unfortunately, the American people will have to seek their answers in other ways – hopefully without violence. You failed us, Supremes. But then, you're in office for life, so why should any of you really care about what the rank and file of America is going through?

  19. Dwight Mann says:

    .Time to start electing Judges, and subjecting them to term limits. This ruling from the bench needs to stop. When you do not defend and protect the Law of the land, the Constitution, that is treasonous. . .

  20. Absolutely Stunned says:

    . "Our constitutional republic and legal system is now compromised and broken" I am crushed, truly chrushed, to see such an important issue so easily just dismissed, that there is no man on earth who can stop this injustice, this insult to our system itself. So disappointed. If any American, even one, has a doubt about the elidgability of the POTUS, how could it be completly ignored, not even considerded or given the most remote possibility of such a question having any truth, the appropriatness of the question doesn't matter, the question remains! HOW? I still am hoping at least the next election will remove any possibility of this question coming up again. I 'll never believe this in a million years.

    • Absolutely Stunned says:

      and to think… all 192 Airlines will be actively obtaining personal information from every American to foward to the justice Department to investigate for ny connections to terrorism, we are all atoumatically guilty while Obama makes a BIG EFFIN JOKE out of us all and laughs his behind off!!! This is SOOOOOOOOO wrong!!!!

  21. I wonder if this uproar about Obama not being an legitimate President is an example of what Glenn Beck has been talking about. TOP DOWN- BOTTOM UP -TURN INSIDE OUT. From the "top down"…Obama deliberately not opening his records to cause and keep going a big disturbance in the country (which it certainly has) and then from the "bottom up"… some folks over react and along with radicals cause chaos in the street (there's talk about 'revolting') and those who are caught in the middle ( trying to solve the problem peacefully) become fearful and are turned " inside out" ask the "top" (government) to come in and make things settle down. Which they are just waiting to do … more government control. I'm not a conspiracy nut but this just seem to fit what Van Jones is teaching and what Glenn Beck is exposing. Take a look at this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,602342,00.htm

    • Beck says, "Birthers are nuts."

    • Nice try, Vickie. But, it doesn't wash. It's a conspiracy of silence and benign neglect perpetrated by jurists, politicians, talking heads and the media to prevent public upheavel should Barack be exposed as the ursurper he most likely is. As they say, we are entitled to our opinions, but not to our own facts. A little objective research into this subject clearly demonstrates that there is sufficient credible evidence to strongly suggest Barack is, in fact and under the law, ineligible. The people deserve a ruling as to the meaning of "natural-born citizen" per the Presidential Clause, failing which we are nothing more than a nation of men and not of laws. No one should be above legal scrutiny. And that includes the Prez and the cowards who fail to objectively address this issue head on.

      • I agree with you that there is enough evidence to suggest BO is not eligible to be president but I doubt that the motive of the media and some talking heads is to prevent public upheavel. If they had wanted to do that, they would have vetted him before he was sworn into office when there was an outcry about it already going on. I will agree that is probably the reasoning of juristices and maybe some politicians. I've wondered about what would take place at this point should he be exposed as ineligible after he is out of office. Will the legislation he signed be void or will it stand without a president's signature because it was passed by both houses? Will the executive orders he signed that congress didn't vote on stand or be revoked?

        • If found ineligible after he leaves office, heads will roll big time. No doubt, it would be a serious constitutional crisis, but something we as a nation could weather. Unfortunately, there wasn't sufficient public attention on the eligibility issue during the campaign, and, of course, with no statute requiring that he prove his eligibility and the various secretaries of state cluelessly rubber stamping his eligibility, in the eyes of most at that time there simply was no crisis. However, after the fact, much more came to light and now there is a sizeable portion of the population which is deeply distrustful and cynical. But, I still believe a certain part of the population would literally go bonkers if we managed to toss Obama out on his ear. For the life of me, I simply cannot fathom any other reasons for this conspiracy of silence, cover-up and betrayal. The fear of upheavel is the only think that rings true.

  22. Is the Supreme Court now a part of the conspiracy to protect an imposter against the need to have a just and constitutional society. They should have provided a reason for the denial. This is indeed a dark day.

    Its the Courts duty to render a just decision based on the Constitution not deny justice based on perceived political necessity. A wound doesnt heal when covered under fetid bandages, but only when exposed to the light of day and truth.

    The Supreme Court dishonored itself today as cowards.

  23. Congress should hold Obumma eligibility trial, not the supreme court. The demorats did not properly vet this idiot . The people hve been cheated and the "people'e house" should do what their membership did not do. I do not know whether BO is a naturalized American or not, nor do I care. But I think we are entilled to KNOW. It is going to go down worse when we do find out the truth. Consealing .his records alone tells you something is amiss. Congress is not doing its duty. Eagle

    • Just to gently clarify: the question is whether or not he is a "natural-born citizen" per the Presidential Clause and per Vattel's and the Founders' understanding of that term.

    • Integrity1st says:

      This is true but it seems that everyone currently in congress is working for Obama. What about the
      Czars, the Shadow Government, what are they really doing, what are they paid, how did we let t his happen. It appears that things are lined up really good to take away the powers from the people and remove the congress in some "big emergency" or martial law, and have the people that this president want in power. I believe that our congress right now is just a pawn in a very big game plan to take away all power from the people and give it to a few. Also, what is the deal with Huffington Post showing that Sarah Palin is also connected to Soros through one of her advisors. If this is really true, who can we trust?

  24. F-ing COWARDS

  25. Well folks I guess we are going to have to live with the mystery man a while longer…now wouldn't all of us like to know just who this masked man really is and just whay he has the office of POTUS, how in the hell did he do that?

    Is the SCOTUS under siege, can we the not get the answer to the simple question as to why this man who has not been qualified or vetted legally to be the Prez can hold office and recind his legal restraint in order to find out who, what and why this Un-Credentialed Dude is in office?

    What the hell is wrong with you court activist, do you need to be kicked out too?

  26. I personally would not want to be a supreme court judge,God will not be silent forever when justice is denied. What a sad day this is for our country.Maybe its time for a name change, something like,Lack Of Justice System.

  27. The Supreme court has just taken an axe to the Constitution. The very Constitution they take an oath to uphold.

  28. Who voted yes and who voted no? The people deserve to know how our supreme court decided

  29. If the Supreme Court is not going to do the job that they were sent to do, then I think that more and more of our military personel should start doing what LtCol Larkin did, Refuse to take ordes from an Illegal Imposter, because any orders he gives are as illegal as he is and it is against the Military Code of Justice for any soldier to carry out any unlawful assignment. This imposter is not a legal Commander-In-Chief, he is a Communist Dicktaster in Charge. Thus, any order given by him holds as much water as a bucket with the bottom cut out of it.

  30. Heartbreaking news…..NEXT?

  31. HAVE FAITH!!!
    I think it could be for the better that the Supreme Court avoided the birther case because it would very likely be more pro Obama rather than pro constitution. Have no fear folks, I really think after the new Congress gets going in Jan 2011 we will see the House get subpoena power to get the discovery needed on Obama's citizen status. We now have a clear GOP majority there. Also, the Senate has only a very slight Dem majority and it is very reasonable that a handful of them would go along with an impeachment procedure with the GOP once the House gets the goods on Obama.
    Remember that Watergate took over two years from occurrence to the impeachment of Nixon and history can repeat itself if we help it along with our feed back to our Congress members starting in Jan 2011.

    • I hope you right, Ernesto. You sure have more faith in our politicians than I do.

    • integrity1st says:

      I really hope that you are RIGHT, but, the more I watch the votes from the Right, I see that they are really Left. Left is never Right. In our State District there are more Rhino's in the Republican Party than there are conservatives. I think the Rights need to invade the Left, but of course, it is hard to fake being a Left because their values are so Liberal. I really see that this is a War between those who hold truth to Christ and those who are Anti-Christ in their belief systems. They want to save the earth and kill the babies. This is an upside down philosophy and moves quickly from social justice or socialism to communism, where they get rid of their opponents, not just vote them out.

    • "it is very reasonable that a handful of them would go along with an impeachment procedure"

      It would take a two-thirds vote, and no Dem–let alone close to 20 of them–is likely to vote against the president from his own party. Besides, I'll bet it never comes to a vote even in the House.

      And by the way, Nixon was never impeached (though by the time he resigned, it looked like he would be). Clinton was impeached by the House, but not removed by the Senate.

      • "no Dem–let alone close to 20 of them–is likely to vote against the president from his own party"
        That is an incredibly cynical statement to make! Do you really mean that even if the House votes for impeachment and very convincing evidence is presented at a Senate impeachment trial, "no Dem" would vote to convict? Even if the trial evidence is overwealming and the majority of the people are persuaded?

        • Those are some giant "ifs." I didn't say it wouldn't happen–I said it wasn't likely. And like I said, I'd bet it won't even come to a House vote. You'd be better off spending your time to find a credible candidate to run against him in 2012.

  32. Hmmmmmmmmmm, wonder who's going to pay their salaries to sit there and do nothing in the future?

  33. 'Tis a sad day for America when the Supreme Court can no longer do it's job. What do you mean " many people question whether he is a natural born citizen" ?? We know he is not a natural born citizen because his father was British. The Supreme Court knows this too. The truth is that they are bowing down to Soros and the globalists (Communists) to bring the country down.

  34. Anonymous says:

    Absolutely CORRECT!!

  35. Victor Barney says:

    Men: Remember the story of Eve almost 6,000 years ago? I'm saying this because if you belong to the seed of Joseph(real Israel) not Judah(Gen. 48:16), and you are a male, you are the enemy of this world's leader, Lucifer, unless you are called out of it! You will realize this be 2013! Watch!

  36. I have read most of these comments and agree with them to the extent that I find it difficult to add anything… except I would like to see someone in our new Republican/Conservative House of Representatives invite Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia to Congress and ask them to justify their decision to the American People!

  37. angela saviano says:

    In plain, everyday language, on what grounds do the supremes deny their obligations to the people of the U S?

  38. kissinger said bho was primed to create nwo…

  39. In what has become a nation ruled by men rather than by laws, could any of us have objectively and honestly expected a different result? Of course not.

    Doesn't look like the issue will be properly addressed until after Barack is out of office. The judiciary is intimidated by the issue. Why? My guess is that the specter of massive public upheavel should SCOTUS actually muster the courage and integrity to hear the case and to render Barack ineligible is more than SCOTUS can bear. Thus, their kicking the can down the road was entirely predictable and, sadly, grossly irresponsible and deeply offensive to all who cherish the Constitution.

    And on the horizon, we have Gov. Bobby Jindal, a possible presidential candidate, but a child born on US soil (jus soli) to immigrant parents–not US citizens. Will that ineligibility be conveniently overlooked as well by the left? Not on your life. They'll go after him as ruthlessly as they did John McCain.

    What an insidious web our politicians and jurists have weaved. The Constitution and public trust be damned.

  40. John Wayne says:

    I knew damn well they "court" wouldn't hear it. Gutless wimps!

  41. Catherine says:

    What else could we possibly expect from the Supreme Court? I truly thought these men and women had more legal intelligence than they have shown by deciding to do nothing on this issue. It is such a shame that the people of American now have to put up with pansies in the one place that is supposed to be part of the checks and balances of our government. They too can blame themselves for the destruction of our American values and freedoms!!!

  42. OUR SUPREME COURT IS USELESS JUST LIKE THE UN ( UNITED NOTHING ) AMERICA IS GOING TO BE A WELFARE COUNTRY WITH A DICTATOR IN THE FUTURE

  43. Well, That was expected wasn't it? The Supremes are in Obamas pocket as are all Federal judges. We don't stand a chance with him in office and 5 out of 9 judges being liberal activist judges. Kisck the SOB out in 2012 with the rest of the incumbents in both House and Senate. It is time for a Revolution (before the UN takes our guns away). Why do you think BHO wants a National Police force stronger than our military? He wants to turn this country into another Russia or another 1939 Germany. Wake up America!

  44. There might be a way to force this piece of crap to produce his records. That being a subpoena issued by Congress to show his records. Of course the filthy pig would ignore that too, I suppose.

  45. William W. Lee says:

    Consider the consequences. If they had go on to hear the evidence all of the material Obama is hiding would have brought out. Then upon the determination that he was not legally President, every piece of legislation that he signed into law would be invalidated! What would be the consequences of throwing out all of those bills.

    • Answer: Manageable transitory pandemonium, but a sharp return to Constitutional order.

      I think we can and should be willing to handle those "consequences". Without Constitutional order, a much higher price would be paid by us all, that being the eventual dissolution of our constitutional Republic. So, I opt for the less painful and transitory confusion which may results from our return to the rule of law and rule of the people. Should be a slamdunk easy choice for any American.

  46. WHY oh why is this mad-man being protected by OUR Courts ?? We need the truth and then PUNISH him to the maximum.

  47. "Ain't nobody here but us chickens…"

  48. William L. Sasman says:

    We live in a world where there is no justic. With the obama goverment control in all branches of the goverment we can expect nothing. Even in our courts across this land. All we can expect from now on is the shaft.

    • "With the obama goverment control in all branches of the goverment"

      You do realize that most of the Supreme Court was appointed by Republicans, and that the GOP now has a majority in the House and in most states, right?

      Obama has control of exactly ONE of the three branches of government–the executive branch.

    • When 2012 comes we need to vote him out.Im sorry hes Muslim and hes acting like 1.Every time he fails with his policies its a victory for him.Hes out to destroy us.

  49. Donnamohler says:

    Evidently they are in on it too,. This mass coverup of his eligibility…What we need to do is ask ourselves WHY. I remember the news in 61. There is a news reel somewhere that will prove his lack of eligibility. Did george soros's money keeep this hidden too? I think George Soros needs to go back where he came from! in 61 there were only 3 television stations-4-6-10. one of them have that news reel! Why didn't wiki leaks leak THAT TOO?? Respect for these judges? GONE!!!!!

  50. Integrity1st says:

    It appears to me that this is the single MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE that faces the American people. This president or any future presidents needs to be verififed and qualified before even running for any position in the government. They should be scrutinized more than a regular employee applying for hire. If this one important issue about Obama was addressed "honestly" our country could get behind him but it appears that this country is not about honesty, but about taking this country down a slipery path to something other than Republic for the People and by the People.

  51. There are three women on the Supreme Court. Or are you saying that only two of the three are "bitches"?

  52. paddy0071946 says:

    I keep asking? how can the daily crap continue to occur and nothing happens? It is apparent Obammy boy and his crew of crooked czras have a headlock on every dept. in our Gov't and they continue to ruin the great US of America. I have read how Hitler took over Europrean countries while the people just stood by watching it happen. Is this what is happening in America? Everything I read everyday, people are saying the same things and they all want Obammy boy out of the USA or to have him impeached or try him for treason convicted and shot by firing squad. Yet more crap everyday, whats going on, or should I say, when will someone start the process to rid of us this dreadfull disease?

  53. Maybe that's because elena kagan is on the supreme court and obumma apointed her or he
    had paid off the supreme court.

  54. Wordwaryor says:

    Gone are the days of honest responsible men (and women) judges who upheld the law and the Constitution for and against all comers. Gone are the days when we stand equal under the Constitution ! Alas……. Alas……. They are gone….. until we ressurect them by complete turn over of the Political and Judicial system at the voting booths.

  55. asianlady says:

    The U.S. Supreme Court is NOT any different from the other Courts who refused to hear the case pertaining to Obama's eligiblty to be the U.S. Preisdent because, as I have always said", the ramification of finding out the truth about Obama's true birth place is HORRENDOUS". THE COUNTRY WILL BE IN HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE TURMOIL. SO RATHER THAN EXPOSE THE TRUTH THE WHOLE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, CHOSE TO REFUSE TO BRING THE TRUTH TO LIGHT!!!! WHAT HAS BECOME OF THIS COUNTRY? ALL U.S. CITIZENS SHOULD PERSIST IN KNOWING THE TRUTH. LET'S FLOOD THE U.S. SUPREME COURT WITH THE MESSAGE THAT WE WANT THE TRUTH BE KNOWN.

  56. When our current faux pres. met with the Supremes prior to his inaugration we were puzzled. Noiw that the petition for a writ of certiorari re: eligibility for office is denied, our not so Supreme Court gives one pause for conderation of corruption at the highest court.

  57. Gerald Mann says:

    The Court is afraid of Obama too , I watched Justce Allieo sit there and mouth he's a lier at one of Obamas speaches and I thought that he at least would be eager to get Obama on the carpet on his actions. The problem is what power does this illeagle allien have that he scares the hell out of American Justice..

  58. al dutton says:

    this is a disgrace to the constitution…they should be removed or impeached themselves…

  59. UGACracker says:

    This is an unconscionable abdication of judicial responsibility over an issue that has Constitutional ramifications. The Court has used one feeble excuse after another to avoid making a decision on this question, which is clearly within their scope. In the face of every other avenue for relief being denied to a substantial number of people, it's shocking that SCOTUS continues to use flimsy procedural grounds to prevent the question of presidential eligibility from being properly addressed. Alas, the Supreme Court, the People's last, best hope for fair and just treatment, has failed us, too.

  60. How does Obama get away with everything.What is he pulling.They need to go after him like they go after everybody else.It isnt fair.

  61. Im not predgudous but the manoritys have more rights than American Citizens.WE cant say Merry Xmas We cant say God,Im just sick of it.Its only going to get worse.

  62. carolinmd says:

    Unbelievable how Obama always has someone covering for him, now even the Supreme Court stands aside and denies the United States citizens the justice they seek in this massive cover-up..
    All the evidence is stacked against this impostor and the powers that be refuse to acknowledge there is any problem. It's like the whole government is corrupt, and the people are powerless to stop it.
    Hopefully, now that the GOP has the house, it will be run differently, and we can get the answers we deserve as citizens of this country.

  63. Ron Hudson says:

    I cannot imagine the Supreme Court ducked this important issue. The Constitution of The USA has been violated and trampled on and the justices of the supreme court are now part of the conspiracy. There is an evil force running through the veins of our government with unknown forces of evil gathered together hellbent on bringing this country to its knees. Many people are beginning to speak in hushed tones about their view of this government and its leaders fearing Big Brother may be listening. This is not the America I grew up in and it saddens me to reflect on where we are headed.
    If we as a people don't wake up to this threat we will someday wake up and find ourselves…You fill in the blanks.

  64. Ron Hudson says:

    I cannot imagine the Supreme Court ducked this important issue. The Constitution of The USA has been violated and trampled on and the justices of the supreme court are now part of the conspiracy. There is an evil force running through the veins of our government with unknown forces of evil gathered together hellbent on bringing this country to its knees. Many people are beginning to speak in hushed tones about their view of this government and its leaders fearing Big Brother may be listening. This is not the America I grew up in and it saddens me to reflect on where we are headed.

  65. Charlotte says:

    If or should I say since Barack Hussein Obama spent close to 2 million dollars to hide his total identity, who's to say that some of the money didn't go to the Supreme Court?

  66. Pat Foust says:

    Can't judges be removed?

    Exactly what would it take to remove a judge?

  67. I imagine a Cairo march would either bring SOMETHING out or put SOMEBODY out.

  68. Do you realize you're complaining about a court that is currently controlled by five activist conservative justices? Any one of them could have yanked the case to them if it had any merit at all. When five right-wingers skip a chance to embarrass themselves trying to make this pig fly and get rid of Obama, you know it's full of s***.

  69. Not only has Obama broken the laws. But the Supreme Court Justices are going to make sure he gets away with it. Remove the bastards!

  70. The reasons they denied certiorary are simple: 1. The Supreme Court is afraid of the consequences both to themselves and to the country if they take the case and apply the Constitution and rule the first black Marxist president ineligible.2. The Supreme Court is an old elite group that, with the exception of Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Samuel A. Alito, believes the People are uneducated. 3. The Supreme Court, except for the exceptions mentioned above, believes that Truth has no meaning, that might makes right, and that the founding fathers are irrelevant. Personally, as an attorney, I despise them and I am ashamed of my profession. What a bunch of cowards: Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen G. Breyer, Elena Kagan, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg

  71. Well, there’s a big surprise, damn the torpedos – full speed ahead!, into the fallicy of truth and justice! The POS, POTUS is a phony, and every one knows or at least suspects it! Why?,oh why, are the facts being ignored? Who is this guy that he is soooo far above the law that he can do or say anything he wants to without question or reason? Why are ALL the courts failing to do their duty? What the hell is going on in this counrty?! Doesn’t anyone in authority see that we, the people who are supposed to decide the fate of our lives and futures, have absolutely no say in anything anymore?! WTF! Wake up!!! Please WAKE UP!!!

Trackbacks

  1. [...] the Supreme Court’s failure to uphold the Constitution on November 23, 2010,  the failure of the military to uphold its chain of command in protecting the rights of  LTC [...]

Speak Your Mind