Featured Stories Opinion


A Summary Of Recent Developments In ForgeryGate


The latest action by the state of Hawaii in the continuing saga of Barack Obama and his constant evolutionary metamorphosis leaves him a truly transformational figure, as the rest of us mere mortals are simply born, whereas he evolves.  When we last left off this sordid tale, we had postulated that Obama had a “certificate of live birth” by affidavit and that no official of the state of Hawaii had made any definitive statements about what his birth records contained from the Operation Sideshow series of articles.

That all changed thanks to Ken Bennett, the Secretary of State for the state of Arizona, when he requested that Hawaii submit verification to his office so that Obama would be placed on the ballot in Arizona.  This had come about by a request from the Surprise Arizona Tea Party as these citizens had requested he verify his citizenship and birth in the state of Hawaii.  He made his request per Hawaii Statute §338-18, which allows government officials to request verification and complete records of vital events in their official capacity of their office and incumbent duties.  Approximately two months ago, Mr. Bennett made this request; Hawaii has dragged their feet on the matter and at first made some noise about him not having any standing and their concern over possible identity theft.

Hawaii does not have the reasoning capacity to understand that Obama is a public figure with a recognizable face and visage, not to mention that he has already placed his so-called certified “certificate of live birth” into the public domain.  So, if anyone were to attempt such a crime, it would be self defeating. The objection of the state of Hawaii is frivolous and meritless and was simply ludicrous to stall for time; why is anyone’s guess.

The Hawaii Department of Health in fact produced a document on May 22nd that verifies certain features of the forgeries that Obama has foisted onto the nation and posted on the White House website.  First was his COLB and then his LFBC; the first document was immediately declared a forgery by numerous sources. The most notable was by Dr. Ron Polarik PhD., and for the LFBC by Maricopa County Sheriff’s office.  This most recent document bears the Seal of Dr. Alvin Onaka, the State Registrar; suffice it to say that we now have a definitive statement. However; the veracity is much the same as we concluded previously; it is questionable.

We are now at a point to discuss Hawaii and their latest foray into the constant evolution that is Obama.  How is it that he has the ability to get an entire state government to assist him in his constant artifice about his lineage and birthplace?  Let us now turn our attention to the actual document itself, the “Verification of Birth” sent to Ken Bennett on May 22, 2012.

Please open the above link in another tab or window, as we will be referring to this document as we discuss this newest development for Obama.  It starts with a reference to Mr. Bennett as the recipient, then the document is pursuant to Hawaii Statute §338-14.3. Lets take a moment and explore this statute:

§338-14.3  Verification in lieu of a certified copy.

(a)  Subject to the requirements of section 338-18, the department of health, upon request, shall furnish to any applicant, in lieu of the issuance of a certified copy, a verification of the existence of a certificate and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event that pertains to the certificate.

(b)  A verification shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.

 (c)  Verification may be made in written, electronic, or other form approved by the director of health.

(d)  The fee for a verification in lieu of a certified copy shall be a maximum of one half of the fee established in section 338-14.5 for the first certified copy of a certificate issued.

(e) Fees received for verifications in lieu of certified copies shall be remitted, and one half of the fee shall be deposited to the credit of the vital statistics improvement special fund in section 338-14.6 and the remainder of the fee shall be deposited to the credit of the state general fund. [L 2001, c 246, §1; am L 2010, c 55, §1]

(Note: the word lieu shown in bold type and underlined is my emphasis and not part of the statute)

We need to first look at the language of the statute and in particular the name of the Statute itself, “Verification in lieu of a certified copy.” This is of particular interest to our hypothesis since this document is not the “best” evidence as shown by the name of the statute itself.  The definition of “in lieu” means “instead of”, or is a substitution in this case of inferior quality as the actual “certificate of live birth” as the full document is what we need to compare to what resides on whitehouse.gov.  We cannot further our objective with this inferior document.

Section (a) & (b) are of particular interest as well; (a) states “that the applicant provides” and in (b) “A verification shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.” 

We can safely assume that a “vital event” did occur as Obama is alive and fulfilling his desire to “fundamentally transform” our nation as he vowed he would; I digress.

In both of these section(s), it is predicated upon the information provided by the “applicant”; in this case, we must assume it would be his Mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, as the LFBC is believed to be based upon her statements and actions of a birth event transpiring. Therefore, until we have the “best evidence”, the actual certificate from Hawaii tendered directly to Mr. Bennett or another trusted source, we simply do not know if the one “claimed” by affirmation of others to Obama and resides on the White House website are actually one, and the same.

(Note: affirmation is underlined as no one has claimed or stated that the “certificate of live birth” that resides on whitehouse.gov is the actual certified copies received by Judith Corley on April 25, 2011 from Loretta Fuddy, the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health and given to Bob Bauer White House Counsel on the 26th)

Hawaii and Obama have not proven themselves trustworthy sources for these so-called facts.  This is a crucial point and worth noting for the examination of these events to ascertain truth from fiction by these affiants.

It should be noted that Hawaii chose to send the “verification” versus an actual “certified” document, as if the Secretary of State of Arizona is not a character to be trusted with such a confidential matter.  This is ludicrous, as Obama has supposedly released his “true and certified” copy into the public domain, so this is disingenuous hyperbole and obfuscation by the state of Hawaii that they chose this deplorably inferior method of verification.

The next anomaly in the verification document is that it claims a “vital statistic” has occurred and references his name, birthplace, certificate number, time of birth, hospital, age and birthplace of his father, age and birthplace of his mother, date of signature by parent, and date of signature by attendant and local registrar.  However, what is completely missing and MIA is Obama’s date of birth!  Certainly, a “verification of birth” would include a date of birth since the time could have been any point in history then or now; however, his apparent age today at least gives some clue as to his actual age and approximate birth date.  This point alone makes me doubt the veracity of this document as a “legal” verification of Obama’s birth in Hawaii.  It is missing a “vital” piece of information for a valid birth certificate verification, a birth date.   Furthermore, it has been tendered as an official document by an agency of the state of Hawaii!

Then we have the added statement on the verification that is dubious and specious since it leads one to assume “facts that are not in evidence” with the following statement below line 12:

“Additionally, I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached to your request matches the original record in our files.”

This statement is superficial since it leads one to assume that the “verification” and the so-called “certificate of live birth” that resides in the public domain are equal.  We simply do not know this as Hawaii chose to send a “verification” document versus the best evidence possible (the “certificate” itself.)  Furthermore, any copy of the “certificate of live birth” that Mr. Bennett could have sent would have been retrieved on what is assumed to be on whitehouse.gov and has been declared a fraudulent document and forgery by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s deputies; we can only hope they are not the same.  Since this means a fraudulent document resides in the records of the office of Vital Statistics vault in a bound volume, Hawaii officials know that it is forgery or has some other legal defect they wish to remain hidden.

Mr. Bennett was also informed of the investigation and much of the evidence that has not been made public on May 15, 2012 in Phoenix by Mike Zullo, the lead investigator for Maricopa County.  This information was discussed in an article by Jerome Corsi of WND prior to Mr. Zullo’s trip to Hawaii to investigate Obama’s birth documents and claims of his Hawaiian birth. Therefore, he should have been at least skeptical of the inferior document he was presented by Hawaii; however, he just tucked his tail between his legs, headed for the nearest exit, and declared Obama eligible to be placed on the ballot; so much for the character of Mr. Bennett.

Finally, we are presented with the official seal of Dr. Alvin Onaka with what appears to be the initials “gic” or “gk” to the right of the stamp.  This suggests that Dr. Onaka did not affix this seal himself and that another person created this document.  Furthermore, we are then led to believe it was made on his behalf; we do not have any evidence that this is so. To the contrary, we are absent any public statements from him on this matter.  This is far from settled, as the letter to Bennett was not tendered until the day after Mike Zullo met with officials of the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu.  Had he not met with them, would we still be waiting?

In another startling event, Mike Zullo’s request to view the actual record of president Obama was refused, and Dr. Onaka refused to meet with him while he was in their offices in Honolulu.  It seems incredulous that he would decline such a request if the records, methods, and information in Hawaii’s vault were not falsified since they would have nothing to hide and should welcome any scrutiny.  To quote Obama ,“the only people who do not want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide”; truer words were never spoken. They are even prophetic, especially when we attempt to investigate the facts and circumstances of his birth and birthplace.

For that matter, why are we even going through all this if Obama was “born” in Hawaii and has the supposed bona-fide documents to prove it; why all the subterfuge and false flag operations to conceal the truth?  When all he has to do is simply allow Hawaii to open their vault to forensic examiners and put this matter to rest, to do otherwise is simply baffling!  We must demand that this matter be investigated by our Congressmen and Senators and that we let this matter play out in the courts as “probable cause” exists for a criminal indictment against Obama, officials in Hawaii, and others yet to be exposed and named.

To allow such a travesty to continue indefinitely is despicable and speaks to how far we have fallen as a constitutional Republic founded on the principle of self-rule and the rule of law.  Our legislators’ silence is cowardly by allowing Obama to be above the rule of law, which no man, president or otherwise is accorded under our Constitution. I thought we are all supposedly equal at the bar of justice; apparently some are  more than others.

I came across this article on American Thinker by Steve McCann, who came to our shores as a war orphan after WWII; his article should be required reading for every school child in our nation.  It is presented here for your consideration of the recently passed Memorial Day.  Please take a moment to read and remember our fallen heroes on why we choose to fight for liberty and freedom: The Distinctive Trait of America.”

Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)


The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.


Let us know what you think!