Stunner! Supremes To Give Eligibility Case Another Look

In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another “conference” on a legal challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.

The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.

 Stunner! Supremes to give eligibility case another look

It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.

At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the “motion for recusal” but it changed it on official docketing pages to a “request.” And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.

Hemenway then submitted a request for a rehearing, pointing out that the situation appeared to be violating the rules of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Read More: By Bob Unruh, WND

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. "Hemenway then submitted a request for a rehearing, pointing out that the situation appeared to be violating the rules of the U.S. Supreme Court."

    Yep. So they'll have another conference to make sure they use the right wording and reject it again. And the participation of Sotomayor and Kagen at this point is meaningless, since it only takes four justices to vote to hear the case, and they couldn't even get that last time.

    • You're absolutely right! The Justices HAVE to have heard the American people are DEMANDING To know the truth! Isn't it their job to appease the people they work for? From the moment that 'man' took office, there's been NUMEROUS cases filed demanding proof of Obama's eligibility and all have been thrown out or ignored. What's up with the Supreme Court? Maybe we need a law that Justices can ONLY serve 4 years!

      • "Isn't it their job to appease the people they work for?"

        No, not even close. Their job is to interpret and apply the Constitution, somehing most of "the people" know little about.

        "all have been thrown out or ignored. What's up with the Supreme Court?"

        Except for this one, those cases have been thrown out by lower courts, not the Supremes.

        "Maybe we need a law that Justices can ONLY serve 4 years!"

        Yeah, 'cuz that's working so well with the other branches of government. You want to change the Constitution to make the court MORE political? (And I say that as someone who hates the makeup of the current court.)

        • UGACracker says:

          I agree it's their job to interpret the Constitution. Unrelated to Obama's eligibility, or lack thereof, perhaps they should start doing just that. That would mean re-visiting Roe v. Wade, in which the Supremes overstepped their authority and CREATED constitutional law. They correctly left application of the death penalty to the states, but screwed the pooch by hijacking application of abortion laws from them. And maybe they can take another look at the 1st Amendment; that codicil states specifically that "CONGRESS (my emphasis) shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…" The Court's previous decisions have made a shambles out of that portion of the amendment.

          As far as eligibility for the office of President, those standards are explicitly laid out in the Constitution. It is well within their authority, and responsibility, to address any confusion or questions arising from them. And since there apparently IS some concern as to what "natural born" defines, it would behoove them to clarify sooner rather than later what that definition entails.

        • dean choate says:

          then why james do they continue to do a sloppy see through job , i know that you disagree but then again youcontinue to completely ignore this ignoramus

      • Gerald Treffinger says:

        Actually , no . The job of the Supreme Court is to pass on the Constitutionality of laws passed by Congress , not to appease the public . However , I agree that if the public is in an uproar they shouls look at it . I DO wonder if they are taking into account the probable reaction of the 90% of black voters who voted FOR Obama should he be declared ineligible . THAT could be interesting , to say the least . GHT

    • The Supreme Court has already used the correct wording: DENIED.

      • Nellie Austin says:

        Dear Joseph, The only problem is: God is not finished!!! Barack Hussein Soreoto Obama has something to hide, but God is ALL POWERFUL, ALL KNOWING, AND ALL PRESENT which means, Joseph, that He is in Control–NOT the Supreme Court. As Dr. Charles Stanley says, "Sometimes the Lord even uses EVIL to accomplish His Holy Perfect Plan and Will in someones life–here it is probably our Nation's situation. There's going to be some very, very embarrassed people when the TRUTH does come out and when the Sovereign Lord does take over and allow us to know–I'm not talking about the Rapture and the End Times: I'm talking about Barack Hussein Soreoto Obama and his shanaghans!!! In Christ Jesus and For His Holy Namesake, Nellie Austin

  2. Interesting, but I really don't think they will really do this. The only way he is leaving the White House is with the vote in 2012. As much as I would like to see this and close this issue, it isn't going to happen.

    • I pray that you are wrong! (about not getting him out). There are rumblings of something "big" around the White House…(according to an anonymous 'insider') – that may be the eligibility (according to this same 'insider'. –
      He's shaking up the whole cadre of "close associates – and don't be too surprised if the one who's really running the White House, Valerie Jarrett, ends up out, too! Lots of backstabbing – an 'uncomfortable' atmosphere going on in our once-loved White House….

      The BEST thing that could happen in this country is to have this come true…EVERYTHING he has signed, all his "executive orders" , all appointments, would be null and void – IF he is found by the SCOTUS – to be ineligible…this is a MASSIVE fraud upon the American people and the Constitution! If found guilty, he and his whole group of thugs should be imprisoned for LIFE!

      • Yeah, sure. And how do you know this rumbling insider?

        • Well the only insiders in this White house is the AFLCIO Union Boss, 46 visits to the White House and talks to someone everyday from the White house. I don't remember that being any of the branches of the Government. He has not even talk to 6 of his cabinet secretaries in two years. He does have photo opt of them all seat around a table to appease the masses, but no one on one talks with a Cabinet secretary in two years? So the rumbling may be the people he appointed to do a job and they now see him for what he is. A liar. Yes I said it and the true liar in the last two year of the Bush Administration was Barry running for President with lies and half truths.

          Wait a minute I need a distraction here I goooooo: "Birth Certificate" . Trillion dollars gone thanks for looking at the distraction.

    • Sadly you're right. Even if they find him ineligible he is the CEO of the United States , A Corporation . The Justices are there fore deciding on matters of a Corporation and not on the Constitution. Rumblings in the White House ? I personally know two that worked (past tense) in the Gray House in high up positions and are still very much in the know but nothing has come up as far as they are aware of.

  3. If Obama is found to be ineligible wouldn't the Speaker of the House become President in this case? The current VP, Joe Biden, would normally become President but he is an Obama man and with Obama ineligible anyone he appoints is also invalid. John Boehner would then by default (second in line) be President.

  4. reagangrad says:

    Hey, where's Ellen/Elena? I thought she was like the Jeopardy computer programmed to respond to all these articles.

    Not that I miss her repetitive spew.

  5. Marvin Zeichner says:

    How can Obama's two appointees on the Supreme court hear the challenge, since if Obama is proven unqualified for office, their appoin tments would be null and void. I'll believe it when I see it. Everytime his eligibility comes into question, it's dismissed for one reason.or another. I think the whole system is corrupt including Fox News.

    • The participation of Sotomayor and Kagen at this point is meaningless, since it only takes four justices to vote to hear the case, and they couldn't even get that last time.

      • It takes four (4) justices to "agree" to take the case, but all nine (9) justices participate in the final vote. The two "freaky mammas" should recuse themselves. Elena Kagan represented Obama in eligibility cases and has been his puppet lawyer for some time.

        • There is no need for them to recuse themselves unless the justices actually decide to hear the case (and probably not then, esp. w/Sotomayor–after all, Justice Thomas has been shown to have much bigger conflicts in the past couple of weeks), though they may choose to recuse themselves from the discussion of whether to take the case (and maybe you think they're too persuasive or the other justices are too wimpy to take a stand otherwise).

          The fact is, though, that they're votes didn't matter. Though the proceedings are secret, based on previous courts, with each case brought for consideration, Roberts will bring up the case and ask if anyone things it's worth hearing.

          If anyone does, they'll discuss it and then see if there are four votes for it. I'd be willing to bet not one of them even thought it worth hearing–obviously even four most conservative justices didn't.

      • WRONG AGAIN STUPID

    • Donnamohler says:

      I think they are all corrupt too. But then againMy Mothers words at the time of his birth was:: "EVen IF he was born in Hawaii,thats one kid that will never be president because Hawaii STILL ISN't a STATE. ( I REMEMBER THE NEWS IN 1961!)

    • I agree. I am a Fox listener but it appears even those I thought were reliable are scared stiff to tell the truth. They are all COWARDS, as far as I am concern. That include GlennBeck and Bill O'Reilly.

    • Marvin Zeichner, you are so correct. Fox News, especially Bill O'Reilly is complacent in the coverup of Obama's eligibility because Bill insists Obama is eligible to be president because when his people contacted them they told his people Obama was born in Hawaii. However, Hawaii or Obama has never produced a BC as proof. O'Reilly has been snookered by the Democrats in Hawaii government. When will the system correct itself? Probably never, because our socialist education system is producing people who toe the liberal/socialist line.

    • Marvin, I tried to post a reply to your comments earlier, but the "Administrator" had to approve it first. Do not know what was so controversial about my earlier comments, but something got their aire up. Anyway, this is my second attempt to agree with your comments. Especially about Fox News and Bill O'Reilly. Bill believes the lies that everyone is telling him about the eligibility of Obama to be president. At least he believes the Democrat government in Hawaii when they told him Obama had a birth certificate issued from Hawaii and it proves Obama was born there. No one has ever seen this BC, but Bill O'Reilly believes one exists. Can you say, Bill must be an Obama supporter?

  6. Marvin Zeichner says:

    Excellent point!

  7. I THINK CONGRESS WOULD APPOINT SOMEONE TO SERVE UNTIL ANOTHER ELECTION COULD TAKE PLACE

  8. Wrong, Steve (& Jim). Biden wasn't appointed–like Obama, he was elected. So the only way Obama can be removed is through impeachment (which won't happen). And if he is removed, Biden becomes president and then appoints a new VP (probably Hillary).

    • commiehunter says:

      I'm no expert but obama/biden ran on ONE ticket as all Presidential hopefulls do. Biden wins ONLY if obama wins. Voter's vote for the TICKET. Again, I'm no expert, but the President and Vice president are ELECTED not appointed. If obama is found to be a fraud then so is Biden and also ineligible to be president. 'Biden was elected but obama was appointed' is that what you really meant to say? If so WHO "appointed" obama to be President? Why have an election? If the Suprem Court finds obama to be a fraud he is arrested not impeached.

      • The Twelfth Amendment specifies that each Elector in the Electoral College (which actually elects the President) gets two ballots: on one they vote for President, on the other they vote for Vice President. Therefore, the Vice President is elected separately. That means, under the U.S. Constitution, if Obama is removed for ineligibility, Biden would be come President. See: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am12

        • While under normal circumstances Biden would become President, but I feel he is guilty of a crime also. Biden, Nancy, and Harry all knew that Obama was a fraud, doesn't that make them guilty of covering up a crime? I say all three should be brought up on charges if it is proven Obama is a fraud. Notice I said proven, I definitely believe he is not eligible to be POTUS!!

    • Wrong James; if he is proved to be ineligible by knowingly gaining the Office of President by fraud (which he did), impeachment would not apply. He would be arrested, indicted, tried and .. let's see .. oh, yeah, let's send him to Gitmo and waterboard him! Ha!

      • Sorry, you're wrong–the only one who can try the president is the Senate, with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding. And that can only happen if the House impeaches him. None of that will happen, and wishing won't make it so.

    • Carol Gerber says:

      Hay Hay ACLU Teachers-Azz James Bond McPheww George Soros Look Alike Has Spoken So We Are Stuck With The Manchurian Muslim Pres Obama Until 2012 Yikeess, Now If We Could Get That Chinese Credit Card And Air Force #1 Grounded, Yippee God Bless America And Lt Col Terry Lakin

    • YOU ARE4 TALKING STUPID AGAIN IF HE IS FOUND TO BE ILLEGALLY IN OFFICE HE ISW REMOVED FROM OFFICE NO IMPEACHMENT NECESSARY

      • Wrong again. But just out of curiousity, Jim, who do you expect to do the "removing" from office?

        • Impeachment by the House and judged by trial by Senate overseen by Chief Justice. You are correct sir.

          As they did with Slick Willy whom lied to a grand jury, just about the same as charge as they brought to Scooter Libby. I know poor Scooter wasn't impeached. Both had the same outcome though, due to if your a elected official you get a get out of jail free card. Separate and not equal is the Washington way, We are lawmakers and the laws we make are not necessarily related to our own actions. I don't think the founding fathers had this in mind when starting a "All men are created equal country". We have lost our way. It seems both political parties are corrupt and it will not correct themselves until we the citizens vote a very strong third party in charge of either the White House, Senate or the House. This has been always been impossible due to both political parties have rigged the system to prevent this. Just about the only thing they have ever done together. It a shame and it will probably lead to the end of the greatest country that has ever been recorded in history all for a political power struggle of two very corrupt political parties.

          • "It seems both political parties are corrupt"

            On that we agree. As for the third-party idea, I also tend to agree, though for good arguments on both sides this debate is worth checking out: http://www.bloomberg.com/video/66953764/

            "will probably lead to the end of the greatest country that has ever been recorded in history"

            On that we disagree. Taking a historical view and considering tthat we've survived–among other things–the Civil War, the Gilded Age, the Great Depression, World Wars, the tumult of the 1960s, and the various corrupt administrations of both sides throughout our history, I suspect we're strong enough survive this, as well.

            Libby wasn't elected, of course; he was appointed before he became the highest-ranking White House official convicted in a government scandal since John Poindexter, the national security adviser to President Reagan. Libby paid a big fine, did community service, and was disbarred. Bush communuted Libby's prison sentence–but as one more little indication that these folks ultimately care about the country–Bush didn't pardon him.

        • well james we know it won't be you

    • BIDEN WAS SELECTED BY OBUMMER TO BE HIS RUNNING MATE THERE WAS NO SEPARATE ELECTION FOR V.P.

    • WRONG BIDEN WAS SELECTED BY THE USURPER TO BE HIS RUNNING MATE

      • Yes, and McCain selected Sarah Palin. But the selection of the running mate does not affect the fact that there was an election in which BOTH Obama and Biden were separately elected by the Electoral College.

        Obama is not an usurper. He is a Natural Born Citizen due to his birth in Hawaii. ALL US citizens who were born in the country are Natural Born citizens. Only naturalized citizens are not Natural Born Citizens. That is why Obama's election was confirmed by the US Congress UNANIMOUSLY. Not one single member in the 535 thinks that Obama was either born outside of the USA or that the citizenship of Obama's father affects Obama's Natural Born Citizen status.

  9. The Supreme Court should "DEMAND" proof that Obama and "ALL" potential presidential candidates are USA born!!!!!!!

    • Norman Wand says:

      I agree, that Biden would be out is correct, as this is unusual in that the choice of VP as well as that of Supreme Justices are invalid by someone who knowingly, as evidenced by his refusal to provide transparency on his past, committed the fraud prior to being elected as the facts we know despite this will show. Nancy Pelosi who swore to his validity in notification to Hawaii is also subject to removal from office. The remaining states were given no such assurance of Obama's validity in the sworn statement sent them by Pelosi. since only Hawaii insisted on this statement as the Democrats have avoided statement on validity since since Gore's nomination. No matter where he was born, he was born with British citizenship and unable to obtain citizenship through his mother according to even the current US Code which is relaxed. At one time natural birth required being the offspring of 2 US citizens. How indigenous or "natural" can he be if he is or admits to being the son of a foreigner. Even Pres. Chester Arthur's father became a US citizen shortly after his son's birth.

      • Re: "How indigenous or "natural" can he be if he is or admits to being the son of a foreigner."

        Answer: The citizenship of one or even two parents has no effect on the Natural Born Citizenship status of a US citizen who was born on US territory.

        “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President …"—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

        “Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

        “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)–Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

        "Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

        "Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

        • Still do not agree, Senate hearings, book written, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.] guides and anything else do not change Supreme Court ruling, Amendments or The Constitution. So If one of the Undocumented workers in this county ran across the border and had a baby, that baby could be eligible to be President? I think we really are due for a Supreme court ruling on this. None of this you reference is but interpretation and views expressed by their authors. Plus throwing the "Well Known Conservative thing at me is useless dribble. I do not vote straight party line and have not since the 60's. Which really stinks because most states have laws not allowing people like me in the Primary part. None of your FACTS are relevant they are just Books, opinion and are not supported by a Amendment or Supreme court ruling. the last line in your post is the most revealing::–William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829).

          VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION. Views are not settled law.
          Have a nice day

          • PS; That it that what your calling Facts.

          • You asked: "So If one of the Undocumented workers in this county ran across the border and had a baby, that baby could be eligible to be President? "

            Answer: Yes. YES.

            Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):

            “Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”

            The relevant US Supreme Court Ruling is the Wong Kim Ark case, which ruled six to two (one not voting) that EVERY child born in the USA is Natural Born. When a person is both Natural Born and a US citizen, she or he is, duh, a Natural Born citizen.

            The actual words of the ruling were:

            "It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

            III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established."

            As you can see EVERY CHILD.

    • Gerald Treffinger says:

      That's the job of the Citizens , and THAT includes the PRESS ( Media ) . WE were busy leading our lives and didn't pay enough attention and the Media were busy hoisting Obama to their shoulders and running him across the finish line . I read , somewhere, that " the man who pays no attention to politics , will end up being RULED by his inferiors ". Any questions ? GHT

  10. Norman Wand says:

    I agree, that is correct, as this is unusual in that the choice of VP as well as that of Supreme Justices are invalid by someone who knowingly, as evidenced by his refusal to provide transparency on his past, committed the fraud prior to being elected as the facts we know despite this will show. Nancy Pelosi who swore to his validity in notification to Hawaii is also subject to removal from office. The remaining states were given no such assurance of Obama's validity in the sworn statement sent them by Pelosi. since only Hawaii insisted on this statement as the Democrats have avoided statement on validity since since Gore's nomination.

  11. PrisJunggren says:

    This should have been done the first time it was presented. Think of the money and grief that we would have saved. We also don't want to set a precident. We could end up with Putin or Chavez or God knows who!

  12. Joseph McLeland says:

    Obama has perpetrated a fraud on the American public. He did not supply the FEC with a ceriified long form birth sertificate because he knew he could not show thereby he was an American citizen.

    Why the FEC allowed him to get away with that "oversight" simply points to collusion on its part.

    • Nancy Pelosi is complicit in his crimes, because she prepared and signed two different certifications of eligibility, proving that she knew there was a problem and was covering it up.

  13. The fact that Obama was adopted by Indonesian Lolo Soetoro in the 1970s, and his name was legally changed to Barry Soetoro at that time, is most likely the reason he is spending millions of dollars to hide his birth certificate. He never filed the papers to change his name back to “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr

    U.S. Supreme Court YOU HAVE SWORN TO UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…
    Fulfill your Oath of Office, or resign! Who is Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama?

    Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

    • And he never reapplied for American citizenship. He is an illegal alien. He became and Indonesian citizen when Soetoro adopted him.

      • You are correct! The whole birth in Hawaii or birth in Kenya is a red herring designed to keep us from the real issue—–that he is Indonesian and hasn't changed his name back to Obama or been naturalized as a US citizen. All of his records are suspect. Dishonest campaign workers dummied up a Selective Service application for him; his Social Security Number was stolen from a resident of Connecticut; his application for a law license looks like it was done with a crayon! He had so much help making him look like a success story e.g. Bill Ayres writing his biographies, someone very rich buying him a spot at Harvard and then as a "lecturer" at the University of Chicago. Wait till the whole story is known; it's coming!

    • Obama was neither adopted in Indonesia (nor in Hawaii, for that matter). Nor did he become a citizen of Indonesia. Both can be confirmed by simply calling the Indonesian Embassy in Washington. Also, he never legally changed his name to Soetoro, so he did not have to change it back.

      Also, there was never a lawsuit against Obama just for his birth certificate, so he has not spent any money on hiding it. In fact, he has shown the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and THREE Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on it.

      This is what the Wall Street Journal said about the "Why has he spent $X myth:

      "“Why has Obama spent X dollars defending himself against lawsuits when he could just produce the original birth certificate and make the whole thing go away?” X varies, just in our emails of the past 24 hours, from “thousands” to “almost a million”; one reader set the amount at “$950,000.” As far as we know, all these estimates have a common source: thin air.

      In any case, while this question sounds eminently reasonable, in fact it betrays a complete lack of understanding of the legal process. The “defense” against these frivolous lawsuits has consisted of filing a motion for summary judgment, which in every case has been granted."

  14. Pass ths On to the Supreme Court;
    Obama has spent millions to seal all of his records, to include, birth and school. I believe the Supreme Court couild demand to see them. I heard that as a child, his step-father took him and his mother to Indonesia, where he attended a school there, eligibility to attend., you had to be a citizen of Indonesia. Year later he returned to the states on an immigrant school grant, during this period, he traveled overseas, to areas where a U.S. Passport was not recognized, what passport did he use? It is possible that his records have him as Barry Soetero.

    • Any Nancy Drew could plainly see that if you spend millions to hide your past you gots a helluva skeleton in the closet! It is amazing that even O'Reilly has become a media spin-head on this. It for sure is an officially spiked story as for sure they are smart enough to know.

    • Yes, he went to Indonesia. No, there was no Indonesian law that said you had to be an Indonesian citizen to attend public (or other) school there. You can check this by simply calling the Indonesian Embassy and simply asking. And, while you are at it, also ask whether he became an Indonesian citizen or was adopted–neither happened.

      Re the claim that he traveled to areas where the US passport was not recognized. This is based on his trip to Pakistan in 1981, which certainly DID RECOGNIZE the US passport, and desired it because it wanted US tourists to visit.

      He used a US passport. It can be shown that he had a US passport since at least the time that he returned from Indonesia to attend high school in Hawaii because (1) he traveled alone, and (2) if he had used any passport other than a US passport in that trip, he would have needed a US visa on that passport, and there has been no evidence that he applied for a US visa in Jakarta.

  15. It's about time! Roberts was given a docket – with lots of convincing evidence….before this impostor was even elected! How can we stand as a Free Republic if we don't stand for the strict obedience to the very Constitution which has made us so strong? We can't!

  16. HE NEEDS TO BE ARRESTED NOW-WHERE ARE THE US MARSHALS AND JOINT CHIEFS? FOR THE BIGGEST CRIME EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. iT WILL BE TO LATE SOON AND THE SCOTUS WILL HAVE ALOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO-

  17. Another look? We need to start impeachment preceding against him and demand proof of eligibility. In Az he will have to show proof if HE wants on the AZ ballot for 2012..BUT Obama will call it' racism. and use the obamanoids/media to make THAT statement , Supreme court needs to read the constitution, He either shows proof or impeach, simple as that…. Then charge him with the 100's of crimes he has committed. If a 12 year old can read the constitution, then whats their problem. does someone need to draw pictures for them??? Ps Hilliary would step in as acting prez., """IF he was removed"""".

    • No, Speaker of the House would become prsident as the V.P. would have to go also! That would be a republican president! Woohoo!

      • Sec. of State is on the 'your fired' list also! Hillary is a progessive anyway so 'o's agenda would continue with anothe 'cliton' in office!

      • Wrong. If the president were impeached and the Senate removes him (the only way he can be pushed out, and it won't happen), Biden–who was elected separately–would take over. Of course then you folks could start arguing that Pennsylvania (where Biden was born) isn't really a state. :-)

    • Arizona will simply require the official birth certificate if it requires anything at all. Reason is that every state must accept the official birth certificate of another state under the US Constitution's Full Faith and Credit clause.

      Obama has already shown the official birth certificate of Hawaii and the facts on it were confirmed by THREE Republican officials in Hawaii.

      Since neither the Republican speaker of the house nor the Republican majority leader believe that Obama was born anywhere else than Hawaii, and since Obama's election was confirmed by the US Congress UNANIMOUSLY, the chance of his being impeached is quite tiny.

  18. My guess is that it wil go nowhere fast.

    What genuinely pains me about this entire issue is that bright, well-intentioned folks on both sides of the issue simply DO NOT KNOW the truth. We can all intelligently speculate as to the truth, but the terrible truth is that none of us genuinely knows that the truth about Obama is.

    Unprecedented in the annals of American history. And that simply cannot be good for the country.

    • ALL of these things would have had to have happened for the Kenya story or the born-outside-the USA story to be true. ALL of them.

      1) Obama’s mother would have had to have taken a long (no direct flights, no ships), VERY expensive and highly risky (stillbirths, Yellow Fever) trip to Kenya late in pregnancy (some variations on this for other countries);

      2) She would have had to have given birth there and the Kenyan government since then seized and sealed all the files of the birth and of her arrival at Kenyan airports (and that it has been successful in hiding the story that it seized files from everyone except, oddly, WND);

      3) The Obama family would have had to have carried the child home despite either not having a visa or a change to a US passport, or that it has somehow not been found. I am referring to the application for the visa or for the change to the birth certificate, which would be filed under applications for visas or for changes to passports in Kenya in 1961;

      4) The parents or other relatives would have to lie about the birth in Kenya to the officials in Hawaii, which is illegal, risky (Obama’s father could lose his student visa) and completely unnecessary. Why unnecessary? Because you would get Obama all the benefits of citizenship if he were born overseas simply by having him naturalized.

      5) They would have to be successful in the lie, claiming that Obama was born outside of a hospital, when there is evidence that this is impossible because a person who did the research has shown that that Hawaii did not all “walk in” birth registrations but demanded witness statements whenever there was a claim of birth outside of a hospital;

      6) A witness who said that she was told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii in 1961 and wrote home about it would have to be lying
      http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495

      7) The THREE officials who have stated that the documents in Obama’s file show that he was born in Hawaii would have to be lying (actually, there would have had to have been four lying, including the clerk who filled in the form that generated the Certification);

      8) The Kenyan grandmother who said that the first that her family had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter from Hawaii http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/world/chi… would have to be lying.

      ALL that would have to happen, all eight points. The trip to Kenya would have been Enormously expensive, some estimates say $20,000 in 2011 dollars for two round trip. It is absurd to think that they even did that. So what are the odds of all eight things happening?

  19. Thank God Almighty. My hope is that they will tell the truth about Obama and expell him and all his progressive socialist ideas along with those who had a hand in any of his decisions that hurt the American people and our countries strength in the world. I pray that THIS event will be the very thing that upsets our political way of doing things and returns it back to a government that runs on the Constitution and the REAL rule of law. The majority of Americans do NOT believe he is legal to hold the office of President. He should be executed for this brazen lie and to set an example to future politicians. As far as throwing a race card. I'm white so, I believe I'm of color too so, he can't play that. He's made a fool of all of us.

  20. Nellie Austin says:

    Good! Legal Work! Keep up the good work! I tried to send you a document today, "Clearing the Smoke". I hope you got it because anyone that reads that and can say that Barack Hussein Soreoto Obama was born in Hawaii–which he claims is his birthplace–is absolutely clueless! He is NOT–I repeat–NOT AN AMERICAN-BORN CITIZEN! as he claims to have been born in Hawaii. Check the Constitution, too, about "an American-born citizen". Continued below…Nellie Austin

    • Combat Vet Korea'50 says:

      Tim Adams, a former senior elections clerk for Honolulu, has said there "definitely" are problems with Obama's Hawaii birth story.

      "As of the time I was in Hawaii working in the elections office we had many people who were asking about the eligibility of Senator Obama to be president. I was told at the time there is no long-form birth record, which would have been the case if President Obama was born in [a] hospital in Honolulu. There is no such form in Hawaii," he said.

      • Combat Vet Korea'50 says:

        "Since then, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the head of that agency, has made public statements on the subject, but has refused all requests for copies of the actual records in the department's custody. Recently, a former Hawaii elections clerk has come forward saying that he was told that the department's records showed Obama was NOT born in Hawaii," the organization said.

        However, no news release from the state of Hawaii identified the birth location as Kapi'olani. And Lingle's statement also was contradicted by Fukino, who reported, "No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii.

        • Combat Vet Korea'50 says:

          Certificate of Birth No.. 12018 from COAST PROVINCE GENERAL HOSPITAL, Mombasa, Kenya follows: Child bearing name of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA Sex: M:Full name of Mother: STANLEY ANN OBAMA, Maiden Surname: DUNHAM, Date of Birth:
          11/29/1942. Full name of Father: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Date of Birth: 1936. on this 4th day of August, 1961 at 7:24 PM. Weight of Child at Birth: 7 pounds one ounce, Length: 18 inches, Width between shoulders: 6 inches. Residence of Mother; HONOLULU, HAWAII, UNITED STATES. Birth Place of MOTHER; WITCHITA, KANSAS, UNITED STATES. Birth Place of Father; Kanyaihiang Village, Nyanza. Occupation of Father: STUDENT.Occupation of Mother; STUDENT. Name of attending Doctor: JAMES G. W. ANG'AWA, Signature of attending Doctor:_________. Date:8/5/1961. Superintendent of Obstretrics: JOHN KWAME ODONGO, Signature: _____. Date: 8/7/1961, Copy of Right foot stamped in Bottom Left Corner.

          • Combat Vet Korea'50 says:

            Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court, Representatives, and Senators all know Obama is an illegal Islam Muslim alien and he is holding every one in the country hostage.

          • Combat Vet Korea'50 says:

            Don't believe Barack Obama's grandmother? Don't believe the ambassador to Kenya? How about Barack Obama's own Cabinet member? That's right, former presidential candidate and Obama's choice for secretary of commerce, Gov. Bill Richardson, slipped up. In an effort to reach out to the Hispanic community, he admitted what Barack Obama has been trying to hide all these months: "Barack Obama is an immigrant." See it for yourself: You don't need a translator to understand what Richardson admitted: Barack Obama is NOT a natural born citizen. That means we have a guy who's planning to take over the White House who is in direct violation of the Constitution. And his own Cabinet member says so. That's pretty big news, one would think. But the media has refused to cover it with anything more than a blurb laced with a "this is ridiculous" tone. It is ridiculous ?quot; ridiculous that the Constitution means so little that we can't even ensure that it's being followed. It's ridiculous that the story of the century is being ignored by those whose job it is to report it.

          • "See it for yourself:

            Where? You're usually so quick to post inane links, so how about providing one here to back up your claim?

          • "Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court, Representatives, and Senators all know Obama is an illegal Islam Muslim"

            That's no more true than that phony birth certificate you keep pimping. What happened to you in Korea? Or is it just age?

          • What is your MOTIVE in continuing to post a reference to a "Kenyan birth certificate" that has been proven to be a forgery? http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pag

  21. Loren M. Jenks says:

    The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable. Obama DID NOT meet the citizenship and residency requirements as set forth in the Constitution. I have furnished copies of the Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth (this IS NOT the long form Hawaiian birth certificate) and copies of the true Kenya Birth Certificate to members of Congress. Every official in Hawaii knows that Obama was not born in the Aloha State. Obama has lived a lie and conceded on several public ocassions that he was born in Kenya to a Muslim father. I have complete and detailed records. The Supreme Court doesn't have to get involved. This man is NOT PRESIDENT of the U.S. and should be incarcerated for his criminal activities or promptly deported to Kenya.

    • Loren,
      Thanks for your efforts to inform our Congressmen. They need to be bombarded with this information. May I call your attention to a website, http://www.RevoltAgainstMarxism.com to see valuable Obama information including a copy of the Mombasa, Kenya birth certificate.

    • You will likely get a reply from James McPhereson saying you can't produce any of Obama's statements and no Illinois paper can be found online to that effect. You will also soon gain the attention of cut and paste from my media matters talking points folder Ellen that will have a bevy of online claims the left has manufactured as truths. The contention is that all Obama had to do was provide a COLB that said he was born in HI and voila he was a NBC.

      There is an informative part of immigration law regarding what shall be a defense against being charged with fraudulently claiming citizenship in order to vote. It requires you prove both parents were citizens. Look it up @ TITLE 18 Part1 Chapter47 S1015 (f) If Obama was charged with voter fraud he would be prosected quite easily.

      • "you can't produce any of Obama's statements and no Illinois paper can be found online to that effect"

        Thanks for pointing that out, although "online" isn't the key point. It's easy to go to newspapers and check their archives. You forgot to mention that the birth certificate is a phony, discounted even by leading birther site WorldNutsDaily (and even you don't believe it's real, I'll bet).

        • Like the Annenberg lice would print anything bad about their investment. Besides, since when is the media judge and jury over what the law states? The issue isn't a popularity contest but a factual one that will eventually have to be decided in a court. What's really fascinating is all the wild lies piling up trying to obscure one tiny little fact, Obama does have a long form BC, he admits it and refuses to defend himself with it. That's not a Harvard lawyer acting in his own best interests is it James? He is claiming the fifth before even being drug into court. LOL. So, did you read TITLE 18 Part1 Chapter47 S1015 (f) and come to any conclusions yet?

          • "since when is the media judge and jury over what the law states? "

            No one claimed they were. YOU were the one who made the specious claim (on another post) about how Obama was supposedly presented as a Muslim while running for the Senate, and now you're apparently trying to back away from that obviously false insinuation.

            "So, did you read TITLE 18 Part1 Chapter47 S1015 (f) and come to any conclusions yet?"

            Yes, I read it. My conclusion is that it's irrelevant.

    • ALL of these things would have had to have happened for the Kenya story or the born-outside-the USA story to be true. ALL of them.

      1) Obama’s mother would have had to have taken a long (no direct flights, no ships), VERY expensive and highly risky (stillbirths, Yellow Fever) trip to Kenya late in pregnancy (some variations on this for other countries);

      2) She would have had to have given birth there and the Kenyan government since then seized and sealed all the files of the birth and of her arrival at Kenyan airports (and that it has been successful in hiding the story that it seized files from everyone except, oddly, WND);

      3) The Obama family would have had to have carried the child home despite either not having a visa or a change to a US passport, or that it has somehow not been found. I am referring to the application for the visa or for the change to the birth certificate, which would be filed under applications for visas or for changes to passports in Kenya in 1961;

      4) The parents or other relatives would have to lie about the birth in Kenya to the officials in Hawaii, which is illegal, risky (Obama’s father could lose his student visa) and completely unnecessary. Why unnecessary? Because you would get Obama all the benefits of citizenship if he were born overseas simply by having him naturalized.

      5) They would have to be successful in the lie, claiming that Obama was born outside of a hospital, when there is evidence that this is impossible because a person who did the research has shown that that Hawaii did not all “walk in” birth registrations but demanded witness statements whenever there was a claim of birth outside of a hospital;

      6) A witness who said that she was told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii in 1961 and wrote home about it would have to be lying
      http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495

      7) The THREE officials who have stated that the documents in Obama’s file show that he was born in Hawaii would have to be lying (actually, there would have had to have been four lying, including the clerk who filled in the form that generated the Certification);

      8) The Kenyan grandmother who said that the first that her family had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter from Hawaii http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/world/chi… would have to be lying.

      ALL that would have to happen, all eight points. The trip to Kenya would have been Enormously expensive, some estimates say $20,000 in 2011 dollars for two round trip. It is absurd to think that they even did that. So what are the odds of all eight things happening?

  22. Thomas Paine says:

    Dear Americans, those who believe the Constitution is something alive that our veterans DIED for !, Eligibility for Obama must, I repeat, MUST, be proven or what we have is mob rule.
    The Mombasa Birth Certificate, if it is anywhere close to the real thing, has a footprint on it. I cry for a copy of Obama's footprint for comparison. The US Senate and House should call for OVERSIGHT COMMITTEES to get to the bottom of this. The American people have a right to know if he used fraud to enter the Oval Office. If he did, he needs to vacate ASAP and let's get this behind us.

  23. winsomeways says:

    If he's a natural -born citizen then I'm Lady Ga Ga. However, I don't expect this new development to go anywhere but out the back door. Cynical? Yep, but after two years of Barack bin al Obama, one tends to get that way.

  24. Larry Templeton says:

    If the two Obama appointees are not recused then a fair and impartial hearing and decision on elligibility of the president would not be possible.

    • There is no need for them to recuse themselves unless the justices actually decide to hear the case (and probably not then, esp. w/Sotomayor–after all, Justice Thomas has been shown to have much bigger conflicts in the past couple of weeks), though they may choose to recuse themselves from the discussion of whether to take the case (and maybe you think they're too persuasive or the other justices are too wimpy to take a stand otherwise).

      The fact is, though, that their votes didn't matter. Though the proceedings are secret, based on previous courts, with each case brought for consideration, Roberts will bring up the case and ask if anyone things it's worth hearing.

      If anyone does, they'll discuss it and then see if there are four votes for it. I'd be willing to bet not one of them even thought it worth hearing–obviously even four most conservative justices didn't.

  25. My first post I guess I used a word that someone felt wasn't deemed socially appropriate. Okay no problem. Here's what I said without that one word. I hope that the Supreme Court does in fact find out the truth and reveals it to the American people. I worry that they will find out Obama isn;t legal but, won't disclose the truth for fear of someone trying to use the race card. I'm white so, that means I'm of color too. I hope this shakes up the political system and returns it to the real rule of law. Most importantly I hope that the government starts to follow the real Constitution and stops twisting it to support their own agenda. Americans need to show alittle more courage and stand up to what we see as the removal of our Constitution. Replacing it with Communist Socialism won't work for a free America.

    • American should be protesting right now outside of our WH. This is a national emergency.
      If this usurper is indeed an imposter, arrest, convict and imprison him for life. The rest of his
      flock right behind. Not being our true president, how can we impeach? Convict the corrupt
      socialistic criminal now.

      • You have every right to go to the White House with a sign and protest. This is one of the rights that I would fight to the death to support.

        But no one will pay much notice because the facts on the Hawaii official birth certificate were confirmed by THREE Republican officials in Hawaii and because every US citizen who was born in the USA (as Obama was) is a Natural Born Citizen regardless of the citizenship of his parents.

  26. Carol Gerber says:

    Stunner Would Be If The Judges Take Off Those Rose Colored Glasses And Follow The Constitution And Stop The Biggest Sham President Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama In His Tracks, Yippee, Plus Remember The Kangaroo Court Martial Of Lt Col Terrence Lakin A Real American Hero Serving Time At Ft Leavenworth Without A Trial And Without Discovery, Because The Military Judge Did Not Want To Embarrass Pres Obama, Yikkeess, God Bless America And The Tea Party Patriots Help!!

  27. GO TO IT IN FULL FORCE AND DON'T STOP UNTIL THERE IS A COMPLETE HEARING!

  28. Now for a comparison to prove what happens when you take the word of an interested party that their candidate meets all the qualifications. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti

    • Are you saying that in the cited case the candidate DIDN'T meet the qualificatons? I see no such claim in the article. In fact, the piece seems to not about fraud but a commentary on an ignorant and apathetic electorate–which actually is an apt comparison.

      • A dog hardly qualifies as a candidate in any election. It ought to be obvious on it's face. Apparently not though apathy and ignorance were not the immediate cause, the failure of the people to investigate the nomination did. Trust but verify is the lesson. That verification has been successfully blocked by obviously untrustworthy people to the extent that even getting heard in a court has become a test of will is pathetic. Citing privacy rights is rediculous as the rights of an entire nation outweigh the the right of an individual to seek what is not a right but a duty.

        I have an Obama quote, out of context but it is a self supporting statement as he is describing Harold Washington, who he wished to follow and improve upon his administartion. He is describing how he thinks ethnic social equality is arrived at when assimilating is seen as racist by the black community. "The only principle that came through was 'getting our fair share,' and this runs itself out rather quickly if you don't make it concrete." http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/what-makes-o

  29. Folks, if Obama were charged with voter fraud his defense that he is even a citizen would go to trial. Check out why @ TITLE 18 Part1 Chapter47 S1015 (f)

    • Though I'm not an attorney or legal scholar–and people who are legal scholars have been disagreeing about the issue since Nixon– I find that unlikely that the president could be put to trial anywhere other than via impeachment proceedings, as that would create a separation of powers problem. And I suspect that Obama wll be long out of office before the courts reach a conclusion on the issue, if they ever do.

      Face it, you're stuck with Obama until at least 2013, probably 2017.

    • He can't be charged with voter fraud unless he is first proved to not have the right to vote based on his citizenship so it comes back to his being vetted. If the Supreme Court decides he is not a natural born citizen then Congress would have to do their duty, even if they go kicking and screaming about it, and impeach him.

  30. It's my belief BHO is inelegible. Why has he concealed all of his records??? That is huge in itself. I can't believe that o one would even question that move. He's paid millions of dollars to have them concealed.
    So it's been said. Why has no one come forward and said he was a class mate in college? Why?????
    Do you know anyone who has. I haven't heard of anyone and I watch the news very, very close. The supreme court needs to take a very close look and investigate this fraud of a man. He is methodically destroing our country. I will pray for the justices.

  31. ROBERT FRANK says:

    THIS IS A QUESTION I HAVE HAD SINCE THIS SUBJECT CAME UP. —WHAT FEDERAL DEPARTMENT AND WHO SERVES IN IT WOULD REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS OF ANYONE WHO WANTS TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT (POSSIBLY ALL FEDERAL OFFICES) AND VERIFIES THAT "AGE" AND "BIRTH PLACE" CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS DEFINED MANY YEARS AGO? SHOULDN'T THIS DOCUMENT BE AVAILABLE, FOR ANYONE TO REVIEW WHICH WOULD PROVIDE OFFICALLY APPROVAL (OR DISAPPROVAL) FOR THE PERSON IN QUESTION?

  32. Demoncrat Exorcist says:

    When the Constitution was written, the term “Natural Born” meant an American citizen whose parents were both American citizens, and that differentiates a Natural Born citizen from a native born citizen. The intent of our founders in requiring future presidents to be the children of American citizens was to ensure loyalty to America by eliminating foreign influence either through foreign birthright or parental influence. http://www.petition2congress.com/2349/petition-to
    The petition above provides a free service to petition your representatives via email.. For a fee, they will print and hand deliver the petition to your reps.

    • Re: "When the Constitution was written, the term “Natural Born” meant an American citizen whose parents were both American citizens, and that differentiates a Natural Born citizen from a native born citizen. "

      Answer: Who told you this? It is wrong. In America (not Switzerland) at the time that the Constitution was written, the phrase Natural Born was with minor exceptions a synonym for native born, which was not a popular phrase at the time. Natural Born was used very frequently, and it ALWAYS was used in America to refer to citizenship due to the PLACE of birth. It never referred to parents at all.

      “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President …"—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

      “Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

      “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)–Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

      "Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

      "Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

      • SumerianMan says:

        Instead of quoting someone's view of the tenets in the Constitution, why not just quote the Articles themselves? They are short and quite to the point. Now I don't know who Rawle is or was but I do know I didn't see his name as one of the signatories.

        • The article you are referring to says:

          "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

          And the meaning of Natural Born in America (not Switzerland) at the time that the Constitution was written referred only to the place of birth, citizenship due to being born in the country–not to the parents of the citizen. Not one single writer of the Constitution or any other American leaders at the time including Hamilton and Jay and Adams ever used the phrase Natural Born to refer to the parents. They only used it in the same sense that it was used in the common law–to refer to citizenship due to the place of birth.

          "Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

          “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President …"—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

  33. "Appears to be?" Civility can be so damned frustrating at times…stop screwing around the people in this country have every frigging right to know if this guy is breaking the law.

  34. Jo Jo DuPree says:

    How can Liberals look at themselves in the mirror in the morning. How can we have enough ignorant people in the United States of America, that Obama could win a second term. Wake the f*5#%&&% up you ILLITERATE BUNCH OF IDIOTS. YOU CAN'T BE. God tell me you liberals are not this stupid. It has me worried that that many people can be so DEAD WRONG; CANT HAVE THIS OBAMA,EVIL ,EVIL , EVIL NOTHING IN OUR COUNTRY ANYLONGER. WAKE up Liberals of make sure your prepared for you SALVATION. JESUS CHRIST IS ON THE WAY TO US. I'M SAVED , I'M READY, ARE YOU???? MAKE SURE IT "YOUR" SALVATION. WAKE UP IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU NOT ME, YOU.GOD BLESS SHALOM

    • Nice use of invective and capital letters, cloaked in phony Christianity, JoJo. Next time perhaps God will tell you where to find a fact that backs up your rhetoric. Who knows–if you listen closely, he might even tell you that the best way to reach people is not to insult them.

      Or maybe that's Satan you're hearing–how can you be sure? After all, he seems exactly like the sort who who make someone call others "illiterate" in a brief comment that, despite being less than eight lines long, has A DOZEN grammar, spelling and punctuation errors.

  35. Thelma Trippe says:

    In hopes the Supreme Court will rule by way of Constitution and declare Obama and his socialist allies all illegal. We want our country back. I plead with all Americans to contact your senators and representatives to open this case up and throw them all out.

  36. Donnamohler says:

    They will find some reason to reject it!

  37. chris farrell says:

    Part One by C.T. Farrell: May We the People , ( if it is true that 'In God We Trust'), do just that and trust in God, the Creator from whom we receive our unalienable rights, and concur with God's instruction where It is written in the book of Titus concerning the task of choosing Servants within His Fold for if a man or woman is not qualified to serve in such an humble position within the Body of Christ he is hardly qualified for a leadership position in any governing body. Those same minimum qualifications for servanthood in the Church ascribed by God would be a good place to start in the search for all of our political servants.

  38. chris farrell says:

    Part Two by c.t.f.: George Washington is quoted in my United States Passport as having said, "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair." Shall we not today strive to wisely and honestly repair unto such a standard as is enumerated in the Constitution of the United States of America and too the Declaration of Independence wherein it is written,

    "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

  39. chris farrell says:

    Had it ever occurred to any of you that the original Boston Tea Party was in actuality a commando raid conducted by a contingent of volunteer citizen patriot soldiers organized into a military unit who risked their life and liberty? In light of that historical fact I would like to communicate to the troops in today's Tea Party the following:
    ATTENTION ALL UNITS…BE ADVISED:
    Though truly not a pure socialist; the criminal, the fraud, the liar Barry Soteoro (spelling?), a.k.a. Barry or Barak Obama, is striving to CHANGE our American REPUBLIC unto a socialist state because the cult of Islam's historic strategy of DHIMMITUDE has proven itself most successful at conquering socialistically inclined societies such as France which, like Egypt, is also poised to fall to the enemy of the free world – the murderous cult of Islam.

    • The Tea Parties as a whole (a few exceptions) are avoiding the eligibility and identity theft issues. We may need to start something like the "Nevada Birthers" (replace your state's name with Nevada) which I termed in my state and protest in front of our congress members offices and in public places to do their job and stop their betrayal of their oath of office and impeach Obama. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W-Im2Ul3qI

  40. chris farrell says:

    Part Threee

  41. chris farrell says:

    The National Born Citizen of the then British Protectorate of Kenya is unconstitutionally – that is to say dishonestly and illegally – occupying the office of the President of the United States of America and fraudulently usurping the military rank of Commander in Chief in time of war against the explicitly clear law in the United States Constitution, the highest law of our land.
    His crime against the highest law of the land defines this foreign national's crime as a "HIGH CRIME" and his support of the cult of Islam's Muslim Brotherhood qualifies his crime as TREASON.
    The ‘MANCHURIAN’ MUSLIM in the White House is attempting to move the United States off of her solid foundation on the CREATOR, THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. You may have witnessed his aversion to even recognizing that same Creator mentioned in our Declaration of Independence and from Whom we receive our unalienable rights.

    • Obama was not born in Kenya, and ALL US citizens who were born in the USA are Natural Born Citizens.

      “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President …"—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

      “Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

      “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)–Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

      "Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

      "Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

  42. chris farrell says:

    ParThe MUSLIM LIAR’s ultimate goal is to move America unto an easily defeatable SOCIALIST stance! He has defined himself as a domestic enemy of the United States and everything we stand for.
    Our foreign enemy, Islam, perceives the criminal occupying the office of the President of the United States of America as a god-send from their demonic moon-god, Allah; a veritable Muslim messiah! The imposter in the Oval Office inspires the enemy greatly against We the People and our deeply held beliefs. Beliefs held so deeply that We consider them ‘self-evident‘. Even now Islam is establishing a population 'Beach-Head' of Muslims in America for the Islamic strategy of DHIMMITUDE to proceed just as it has each and every time – each and every place – Muslims have spread in the past twelve-hundred year recorded history of the murderous cult.
    Why should Americans believe that the increase in the population of Muslims in our midst will proceed any differently than such infectious spreading has proceeded every where else Islam has spread like a disease throughout its history?
    t Four:

  43. chris farrell says:

    Part Five: We the people must bring Barry Soteoro or Barak Hussein Obama or whatever his actual given, legal name – the one written on his original Birth Certificate – reads, to justice.
    When found guilty he should face very serious sentencing for fraudulently deceiving the American voters into believing that he was truthfully a natural born citizen of this land of freedom or possibly even more serious sentencing under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for illegally misrepresenting himself and usurping the military rank and authority of Commander in Chief during a time of war.
    The election of the criminal in the White House must be abrogated now!
    No impeachment would suffice for to impeach the imposter one must first recognize his legitimate occupation of the office which is not now and never has been the case.
    We the People have the right of redress of grievances in the Constitution too!

  44. chris farrell says:

    Part Six: Until such time as our country once again has a legitimate President in office and honor is restored to the office of the President of the United States of America I maintain that it is the duty of every American who would defend the Constitution to fly their American Standard at half-staff in protest of the deplorable unconstitutional circumstance presently dishonoring that office and offending the American People, We the People.
    I for one…“… pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands; one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
    God Bless America,
    Christopher T. Farrell
    031-54-0532

  45. chris farrell says:

    Part Three: Had it ever occurred to any of you that the original Boston Tea Party was in actuality a commando raid conducted by a contingent of volunteer citizen patriot soldiers organized into a military unit who risked their life and liberty? In light of that historical fact I would like to communicate to the troops in today's Tea Party the following:
    ATTENTION ALL UNITS…BE ADVISED:
    Though truly not a pure socialist; the criminal, the fraud, the liar Barry Soteoro (spelling?), a.k.a. Barry or Barak Obama, is striving to CHANGE our American REPUBLIC unto a socialist state because the cult of Islam's historic strategy of DHIMMITUDE has proven itself most successful at conquering socialistically inclined societies such as France which, like Egypt, is also poised to fall to the enemy of the free world – the murderous cult of Islam.

  46. I bet that will come to pass again as everybody is scared of the ramification of the truth- Obama IS NOT
    a natural born American citizen. What an embarassment to the whole world should the truth come out.
    The issue should have been investigated "PRIOR" to his nomination, NOT AFTER HE IS SEATED AS
    THE PREISDENT OF THE U.S. Common sense!!!

    • The reason that the US Congress voted to confirm Obama's election UNANIMOUSLY is that not one of the 535 members believed either that Obama was born outside the USA or that the citizenship of Obama's father has any effect on Natural Born Citizen status. Palin and Huckabee and the Republican Speaker of the House and the Republican majority leader have all said that Obama was born in the USA, and Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck.

  47. To all the “Chicken Littles” or should I say “Chicken Hawks” that keep saying that the sky is falling, and the Unites States will fail, never bet against the United States of America, we are coming back and you and the rest of you phonies are wrong!

    The Birthers just HATE and can’t debate, where is there proof you might asked? Up where the sun don’t shine, HA, HA, show some proof birthers or people will continue to see you as dumb, stupid or racist, maybe all three. Can you blame them?

    • Your name calling is your only ammunition since you have no facts. i am proud to be called a "Birther" and will defend my stance before anyone with facts and law besides my sarcasm that can really do some damage when I let- er- rip. I am taking it easy on you because you are just a tadpole in the pond although I have to admit, I myself have not turned into a frog yet either.

  48. What is the retired Col's standing in the case??

  49. I really don't expect it but if so James is correct. If we need a Gerard Ford moment at this time, that is what we would get . I would rather just get him voted out next year. That sounded and felt good, let me say it again. Voted out Next year. I think the damage done would be less at this point. The turmoil in Washington and this country would be a very bad thing for all of us if he were Impeached. That is why I would prefer a peaceful transition of government and void all his business wreaking regulations. We were able to come back after the 4 years of Jimmy and all that Billy beer drank in the 70's. Some will get the last remark others can search for it.

    • This is a sensible position. You have every right to vote against Obama and to organize against him.

      You can vote against him for any reason you want, even the fantasy that he was born in Kenya (but he wasn't. He was born in Hawaii).

      And others will join you to vote against him on matters of policy, which they have every right to do. And Obama may not win in 2012, but that does not change the fact that he is, right now, the President of the USA, born in the USA and a Natural Born Citizen due to his birth in the USA.

  50. Bravo White Falcon says:

    Steve with so many that have signed off and have allowed this sham to continue, it would take a special election to sort it all out. All those who's watch this happened on and they allowed it to happen should be tried for Treason against Our Country and All Americans.

  51. This will be stonewalled for sure!

  52. Kagan and Sotomayer are two votes for o.

  53. I applied for a job as a janitor at the VA Hospital and they wanted my birthcertificate DD214 Military Discharge Background check Yet Hussien Obama Barry Sortero gets to seal his. What wrong with this picture

  54. ProundPatriotToo says:

    Wrong. Biden would have to fill in until the November 2012 election. Speaker of the house comes third, unless something happens to the walking frontal lobotomy bite me Biden. You can control that stooge, because he can't play the race card. Its all about race until the Anti-Christ comes out of the white wood shed for good.

  55. Its about time some positive action is taken on this issue.All the evidence that has appeared and no-one will step forward and author a Bill to bring to the floor of Congress; at the same time the Supremes Court should take action also.

  56. The SCOTUS has been derelict in the implementation of their duty, to defend the constitution. They should have taken on all of these case first and foremost, as it affects each and every American in a very personal and palpable manner. I am really disappointed in the jobs these crooks have been doing. They should be digging ditches for a while and learn what it feels like to live from week to week, on a daily basis. . .
    The SCOTUS IS COMPLICIT IN THIS NATIONAL TRAGEDY !

  57. This USURPING MORON is ILLEGALLY in OUR White House! The idiot has submitted not one; but three phony birth certificates! All of them, supposedly PROVEN to be forgeries! How many B/C's does a person need? His own grandmother has stated that she was at his birth in Kenya! Why would a grandma lie about her grandson's birth? I know this is an old subject; but this isn't bullshit! Why won't this USURPING MORON allow his passport, school and other records to be reviewed by Congress and the American people? What is he hiding? He is hiding his "INELIGIBILITY" to be in OUR White House, that IS what the USURPER is hiding!

  58. Perhaps this was planned all along. There is the video clip around a year ago where Justice Clarence Thomas says that the Supreme Court is not taking up the eligibility issue "at this time". Could this be because the powers that be already have a new Dem candidate to run instead of Obama because he is doing so bad and probably won't step down on his own from running? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W-Im2Ul3qI

  59. ROBERT AUGERI says:

    THESE JUSTICES SHOULD DO THEIR JOB AND HEAR THE CASE BROUGHT FORTH. THEY ARE SUPPOSE TO RULE ON CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES. I DON'T KNOW WHY THIS EVEN TOOK SO LONG FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER THIS. ALSO ALONG WITH OUR POLITICAL LEADERS WHO TOOK AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION. GOD HELP AMERICA FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUPPOSEDLY REPRESENTING US.

Speak Your Mind