You can count on Barack Obama having a clear vision of how the United States should look, entering into (what we think is) his final term. The narcissistic perception of success will obviously be antipodal to the conservative, clear-thinking American; but he is hell-bent on turning this country into a socialist cesspool nevertheless.
Indeed, we are stuck with the Kenyan-in-Chief for another term, thanks to liberal ignorance, a cold and calculating anti-American mainstream media, and a pinch of voter fraud for good measure.
Advertisement-content continues below
This is not hyperbole — the damages that we have seen and continue to see in the wake of this administration is unfathomable and certainly threaten our children’s future, so take note.
The best opportunity to slow Obama’s destruction is an impeachment process, which clearly is in order even if you base it solely on the Fast and Furious atrocity (let alone the latest Benghazi cataclysm, which incidentally went largely unnoticed thanks to the Lame Stream Media.) Obama’s deluge of treasonous policies are far-reaching and will only increase now that he has more “flexibility” to execute them.
We can only pray the Republican party will suddenly grow the kahunas needed to take Barry to task, but I have serious doubts — there’s simply not the leadership in place to take down this Terrorist-in-Chief and his gang of ruffian handlers. The fact remains we are now staring back at the contemptuous aftermath of Obama’s bellicose policies and looking forward to the future that looks even bleaker and more tyrannical.
Advertisement-content continues below
Obama’s past Marxist-influenced policies, including Obamacare, incessant entitlement programs, historical debt levels, classless economics, and now the contemptible “Fiscal Cliff” plan (or lack thereof) have weighed heavily on an already distressed economy.
We can calibrate the damage and possibly even counter imminent future vexatious policies if we understand his philosophies and framework from which he draws from — at the risk of sounding obstinate and callous, we must know the enemy. He has clearly displayed to the American people over the past four years that he is indeed the “enemy within.”
So what critical information can we glean from history? What philosophies has he leaned on to deliver assault after assault on the U.S. economy and foreign policies? Can we counter and even circumvent any of his future stratagem? This blogger thinks so and will attempt to lay out this Marxist-in-Chief foundation and principles.
Influencers — The Early Years and Beyond
Obama’s early years were strongly influenced by a number of certified nut jobs. Many of his so-called mentors instilled a strong sense of racial bigotry and anti-colonialism, including his own father, Barack Obama Sr., and communist extraordinaire Frank Marshall Davis. In fact, the characters Obama has been palling around with throughout his career have been nothing short of astonishing, including the anti-American domestic terrorist-turned university professor confidant Bill Ayers, the “audacity to hope” hate monger Jeremiah Wright, slum-lord Tony Ruzko, and much more. The list is endless and staggering.
Do liberals really believe these facts and relationships do not exist or never occurred? Do liberals really believe Obama does not act on the very principles that got him there in the first place? Please, somebody wake me up from this bad dream!
Marxism — The Adaption
One of the predominant theologies that Obama aligned himself with early on was Marxism, where he embraced the classless society theorem.
Marxism: the political, economic, and social principles and policies promoted by Karl Marx, esp: a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society” – Marxist.
Obama’s early years were also earmarked by extreme anti-American principles, including his anthropologist mother who despised her country so much, she enlisted him to Frank Marshall Davis’ tutelage.
Even though Obama had his fill of anarchistic preaching, let’s not forget his other lost treasure, such as being purported of Muslim faith. Maybe this is the explanation for his abhorrent sensitivity of sorts, bowing to Muslim kings, apologizing to the Islamic terrorists that killed four Americans, and other kiss-ass exploits, all made to look America weak. This “apology tour” has made a percentage of Americans very ignominious to this administration, and rightfully so.
One could easily draw the conclusion that the “education” and exposure he received throughout his life makes him ideally suited to take on the socialist underpinnings.
My personal belief is one of Obama being a relativist and Atheist, holding Christianity in contempt, taking on a Chameleon appearance and personality when the need or situation arises, with the unrelenting long-term pursuit of making himself the “center of the universe.” This appeasement-at-will personality was never more obvious after watching Obama’s 2007 Divisive Race Speech — but I assure you there’s more where that came from. No matter how you slice or dice it, Obama has clearly hoodwinked a majority of this country (52% to be exact) and has been deemed Entitlement Messiah and rightly so — Obama is the chosen one to carry the progressive torch.
Alinsky — The Breakout
From all indications, Obama’s policies his first four years had been likened to a radical framework using very calculated means to accomplish end goals. The characteristics include a gaping shift in ideology and a sharp divide among society, culture, and politics, all practiced with calculus longanimity. This ideology can be traced back to none other than Saul Alinsky — not exactly a chap you would bring home to meet Mom and Dad, unless of course they were Madonna and Sean Penn.
Alinsky is best known for his 1971 book “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals.” The premise of the book and teachings are intended to instill radical change in American culture and economics through public discontent and moral confusion. Alinsky developed these strategies to achieve power through mass organization. If this sounds manipulatory, well, it is. This radical style is coming through loud and clear in many of Obama’s philosophies and policies.
According to the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” — a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted.
Alinsky’s infamous rules of ethics draws a considerable level of similarity to how Sharia and the Islamic code is spread to western culture, as well as a haunting semblance to what we’ve seen from Alinsky-in-Chief himself. Remember, it was during Obama’s formative years he learned the “outside looking in” adaption to take advantage of any situation and “get what you want.” Obama has obviously gained a thorough grasp of it based on the lies and deceit he has sown — birds of a feather flock together.
By most conservative standards, Obama has failed Alinsky’s Rule #12 of Tactics, one that puts him at odds with a certain policy failure and obvious fiscal irresponsibility.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy — The Perfect Complement
Then came the Cloward-Piven Strategy, which naturally complements the Alinksy method: a call to overload the welfare system in order to initiate a crisis that requires government intervention. This same strategy has also been well-documented as an Obama staple.
“The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward (1926–2001) and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.” —Wikipedia
Essentially, the strategy forces radical political change through orchestrated crisis — this is Obama’s nexus.
Many of Obama’s policies and strategies draw a distinct similarity to the Cloward-Piven strategy. It’s not far-reaching to prove Obama’s despisement of our beloved free market system driven by the private sector. In fact, he despises American capitalism as much as we despise him. If that sounds foreign to you, well, consider the fact that this Socialist-in-Chief has never held a real job in the private sector and is very careful to to appoint cabinet members with the same credentials. After all, birds of a feather…
“If this strategy were implemented, a political crisis would result that could lead to legislation for a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty. It seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”
Doesn’t it seem odd that this president has gone out of his way to avoid what’s necessary to get this country out of the abyss (that is, cost-cutting)? Did I say benefit?
A surge of continuous regulations will help support and further entrench a national socialism framework, inevitably causing the cancer of capitalism to metastasize until all Americans are utterly dependent on the government to run their lives. It’s not far fetched at all; in fact, we are very close to this hypothesis becoming reality.
So there you have it, Obama’s foundation of principles with an abbreviated look at the direction he’s taking to dismantle this country.
Connecting the dots from Obama’s past all the way up to the present gives us a clear road map to accomplish America’s demise under the American president’s guise. He will continue to impose relentless and extreme-left socialist standards onto this country, breaking her down economically and then piling on regulations and policies to slowly snatch power away from the people and into the hands of the government. That’s his plan anyway. It’s up to us to take that plan away from him.
It’s time to reflect but not lament — follow this bit of anecdotal and slightly modified advice to take back America. I will not tip my hat to the new Constitution, nor will I take a bow for the new revolution. Instead, I’ll get on my knees to pray and hope we the people don’t get fooled again.
Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.