Pages: 1 2

Facing mounting pressure from Republican Establishment leaders and Mitt Romney supporters to withdraw from the presidential race, Rick Santorum ended his campaign for the presidency this week. Now, it seems almost inevitable that yet another Republican Establishment favorite, Mitt Romney, will be the Republican nominee for President this year.

In the post-Reagan period of American politics, conservatives repeatedly have failed to nominate one of our own for President and been forced to choose between “the lesser of two evils” in the general election. It looks like 2012 will be another case of “here we go again” as the Republicans rally around (what we used to call in the old days) a “Rockefeller Republican” with no real ties to movement conservatives.


Advertisement-content continues below


Now that Rick Santorum is out of the race, the calls will mount for Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul to stand down as well and throw their support to Mitt Romney. Let me raise my voice as a longtime conservative, who was part of the “Reagan Revolution”, to encourage Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul to stay the course and continue their presidential campaigns until the Republican convention in Tampa.

One can agree or disagree with these two men on specific issues- and I have policy differences with both. Yet, the fact remains that Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul have engaged in policy-driven campaigns in this election cycle rather than simply rejuvenate the same old buzz words and talking point clichés that certain Republican politicians spout at the behest of their highly paid “hired guns.”

Newt, for example, has been very eloquent in making the case that we ignore the cultural crisis facing America at our peril. I agree strongly with Newt when he points out that, no matter what we do to address the serious economic and foreign policy problems facing our nation, we have to fix the culture, or everything will be for naught. We have gone from a nation founded on a belief in God to one which the secular fundamentalists wants to change in order to completely separate God from the public square. Newt Gingrich is an important voice in challenging the assumptions of the secular left. Unlike Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich is not afraid to take on the “Hollywood Culture” that routinely bashes Christians and the principles of our faith.

In a similar vein, Congressman Ron Paul has been an often lonely voice in warning of the flawed monetary policies of Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke at the Federal Reserve Board which kept interest rates artificially low and fueled the credit excesses which ultimately led to the bursting of the bubble and our economic crisis of 2008. A consistent advocate of the principles of limited government, Ron Paul has not hesitated to criticize Republican administrations when they defend “big government” so long as Republicans are in charge. They call that “big government conservatism.” From my perspective, big government conservatism is little more than a watered down version of the big government liberalism. Ron Paul has not been afraid to say “the emperor has no clothes” even when Republicans are in charge as he did when he vigorously opposed the taxpayer bailout of the “too big to fail” financial institutions engineered by President Bush’s Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson in 2008. (By the way, Mitt Romney supported the bailout.)

Pages: 1 2

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.


Don't Miss Out. Subscribe By Email Or Facebook

Email

Facebook