Sen. Rand Paul unveils plan to stop assault on 2nd Amendment on Fox News’ Hannity…
I hope that the Senate kicks out Obama’s teeth!
I’d settle for sending the Socialist Kenyan back to Kenya at this point…Let those whom He’s perpetrated war crimes against under the “guise” of The American President pick His ass up there…
Not a king – but Supreme Caliph. That’s what the Pakistani Minister of Industry said Obama would become. Haven’t we been spending American blood and treasure for years putting Sharia Law into the constitutions of the countries we’ve “liberated?” That includes Iraq, Afghanistan and Egypt, BTW.
I’m kind of partial to the philosophy and moral structure the Declaration o Independence gives our Constitution and Bill of Rights as a Republic. Sharia ia a two class theocracy. The folks on top really live high. Te rest are ignorant and even if female, punished for getting an education.
If the NOW girls didn’t hate the USA so much, they’d be all over the Sharia promoters from obama down… but oh well.
Gerald Todd, I couldn’t agree more!!!! I read both of Obama’s books, and his leanings were perfeclty apparent at that time. My opinon of him has not changed one bit. You are so right about our having placed Shari’a law in the constitutions of the countries we have liberated, and everytime a regime fell starting with Libya, my one thought was here is another country that will fall to Islam. That thought has not been wrong. Dictator are never a good thing, but the dictators in those countries like LIbya, Egypt, and Iraq were the only thign that kept radical Islam from overrunning the countries and oppressing everyone.
I have asked friends, family and on line forums many times why NOW has not spoken up loudly for women’s rights which are trampled in horrible ways by Islam. NOW is a false organization for women, otherwise they would DEMAND freedom for Islamic women.
Surpeme Caliph is an apt phrase for what this president wants to be. I truly believe he is in the process of helping Islam to overthrow our government.
Why doesn’t Rand Paul insist that Obama be properly vetted? Why doesn’t he stand with Sheriff Joe Arpaio and demand a congressional investigation?
The fight to defend the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution has been undermined by Republican representatives’ refusal to honor their oaths of office and defend Article II of the very same Constitution!
In light of the fact that Chief Justice Roberts has referred the case (12A606) “Edward Noonan et al., v The Calif. Sec. of State, Deborah Bowen” to the full conference to be held on February 15th in which evidence of Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency shall finally be looked at by the Supreme Court, we now have the perfect opportunity to defeat the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s assault on the 2nd Amendment—‘The best defense is a good offense!’—by pressuring the Supreme Court to retro-actively abrogate the illegal election of a constitutionally ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself as eligible to be president, and even now proceeds in a cover-up of unparalleled magnitude forging official documents and paying law firms millions of dollars to keep his true background hidden.
Consider the following:
Could Chief Justice Roberts have been defensively posturing for the blow-back, “black-lash” if you please, of a decision he may have realized would be necessary to make on Mr. Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility when he ruled so surprisingly on Obamacare?
Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the Hell out of the world and rule against Obama as being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15th?
In the hope that this albeit far-fetched scenario is a possibility, is the NRA making any effort to promote such a decision which would be the best outcome in defense of the Second Amendment?
Might not the Chief Justice have been positioning himself and the Supreme Court as apparently not being unfavorably inclined towards Mr. Obama so as to insulate them both from certain to arise liberal charges of racism should a decision need to be rendered by the court on the issue of constitutional eligibility which would pronounce that Mr. Obama is not now and never has been eligible to be president?
If, after considering the evidence submitted to the Supreme Court in multiple cases which the court has turned down, the Chief Justice found it necessary to consider various paths that the Supreme Court eventually might have to take in defense of the Constitution, could the Chief Justice have strategically planned to first rule in favor of Obamacare—as a tax—knowing that such a ruling would theatrically demonstrate an apparent support for Obama—or, at the very least, demonstrate no antagonism towards the man—while still leaving Obamacare open to state by state dismantling until such time as a ruling on Mr. Obama’s eligibility would remove the law retro-actively as having been passed while Mr. Obama was in the commission of crimes and, most importantly, act as the perfect disclaimer to angry liberal entities which would scream “Racism!”as they rallied liberal-socialist Obama supporters to advance ‘Forward!’ towards anything but “civil” disobedience should the Supreme Court retro-actively abrogate the illegal election of the constitutionally ineligible fraud and forger, Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack ‘King Hussein’ Obama Jr., the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, a.k.a. Soebarkha, a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel?
Will the Chief Justice permit the two Supreme Court Justices appointed by Mr. Obama, (or whatever his legal name, the name written on his original long form birth certificate—not to be confused with the electronic file released by the White House in 2011 which has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt to be a poorly constructed forgery), to participate in hearing the case surrounding the issue of eligibility when their conflict of interest could not be greater? Their very appointments would too necessarily have to also be retro-actively abrogated—effectively annulled—as they were made while Mr. Obama was in the commission of the criminal usurpation of the office of the president of the United States concomitant with the military rank and authority of commander-in-chief.
The Republican Party is so far removed from where it should stand in defense of our Article II of our Constitution that on Jan. 16th Senator Marco Rubio said, “President Obama’s frustration with our republic and the way it works doesn’t give him license to ignore the Constitution.” This comment by a man who himself is constitutionally ineligible to be president or vice-president–not being a natural-born citizen as required by the Constitution—yet he made a clear and concerted effort to be the V.P. running mate for Republican nominee Mitt Romney in 2012—licentiously ignoring the Constitution—and is even now touted by many within the Republican Party as a potential presidential candidate in 2016! If they won’t defend Article II how can the NRA expect them to defend the Second Amendment? Perhaps the NRA and the Republican Party should come out with an itemized list of those parts of the Constitution they deem worthy of defending and those parts that they do not.
Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency is the most horrendous crime committed against the American people and our experiment in ‘government of the People, by the People, and for the People’ in our nation’s history. All those complicit in Mr. Obama’s crimes must be brought to justice if liberty is to be preserved.
At this point in time, the question of whether or not Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency shall be addressed by the proper authorities is completely in the hands of God and Chief Justice Roberts. ‘In God we trust.’
Obama is pulling the same crap as King George of England did in the 1700s. But, Obama is illegally and unconstitutionally making himself King. And this bit about it being racial is nothing but a bunch of BS!!! These gun-control freaks we are dealing with are not reasonable people. They do not have common sense. They are just greedy and power-hungry and do not care about anyone but themselves.
In case no one noticed, this isn’t about politics – it’s all out spiritual warfare.
With regard to gun control: Jesus’ admonition in Matthew
12:29 and Mark 9:40:
“How can anyone enter a strong man’s house and make off
with his property unless he first ties him securely? Only then can he rob his house. He who is not with me is against me…” Newtown was robbed of its greatest treasure.
“As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord…” Joshua 24:15
patti’s notes: he’s had a king attitude since 2008 !!!! pl,orl,fla
The US Govt wants you as a subject. No rights or freedom.
Dems AND Repubs…Hope We’re a lot smarter come 2016 and vote for a Third Party Candidate (Libertarian) like Jesse Ventura instead of “the better of two evils”…
Okay Senator Rand, we all know that Obama has a “KING” complex, the question is what are you and Congress going to do about it? Up to this point, no one has done anything to protect the American people from this usurper, as he methodically goes around destroying our country.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
For liberals, facts are never really important. “Truth” to liberals ...