If this woman was not armed, she along with her twin children might very well have been murdered.
I still have not heard ONE person tell the public how gun control will stop mass murder or bring crime rate down. Never has..never will!!!
A weapon, arm, or armament is a tool or instrument used in order to inflict damage, harm or death to enemies or other living beings, structures, or systems. Weapons are used to increase the efficacy and efficiency of activities such as hunting, crime, law enforcement, and warfare. In a broader context, weapons may be construed to include anything used to gain a strategic, material or mental advantage over an adversary. Any instrument/object when used to cause bodily harm is an assault weapon. Water, sound, electricity can be also used as a weapon to assault.
There were weapons, murders and killings long before there were guns.
A person could take 3 guns that hold only six rounds each and take out up to 18 people. How does banning assault weapons stop people from killing? It DOESN’T!!! All it does is cause a person to come up with another plan.
Do people really think that banning what will be determined as assault weapons would have stopped the killers from accomplishing their task or obtaining a gun on the black market? Banning assault weapons will make the price go up on the black market. There are people who cannot buy a gun legally yet they still have then m or know how to purchase one.
Realize how many of these mass killing are done by the mentally unstable, a person on drugs and end up killing themselves after their killing spree. So we blame the gun not the medication. Why not ban drugs that alter a person thought patterns.
They have our kids on drugs, because there are people who cannot handle the trials and tribulations that go with parenting now that you are not allowed to disipline their children.
I think every US citizen should have a gun and law enforcement classes to teach people how to use them.
If the every teacher at the school had a gun and knew how to use them there would have been less people killed, because someone could have taken him out. If a person got the idea to go to a school and shoot people and he knew every teacher had a gun and was trained on how to use them I am sure he would pick another place where no one had a gun.
Some say have an armed guard at every school. The guard cannot be at more than one place at a time. If the guard is at the front of the school and the shooter enters from the back or side door the guard cannot get to where the shooter is in time to stop him. Yes his being there will mean less children likked., but we 0 children killed. If you rely on law enforcement it takes them a certain amount of time to get to the crime scene.
People ask the question: Why does a person need these type of guns. They have them because they want them and have the right to own them. Just because they own them does not mean they are going to go out and kill people.
If assault weapons were were banned it would not have stopped him. Maybe slowed him down. A person does not need an assault weapon to commit mass murder!
To say banning assault weapons will stop mass murders or stopping a person from killing is ridiculous!!!
So the guy wevil they will do evil with whatever method they can get their hands on. That is the reality of it.
Do some people really believe if there were no, what is determined an assault weapon these sickos would not have killed people.
BTW, did you know the ACLU prevented his mother from institutionalizing him.
A Connecticut mental health bill was recently defeated, because the ACLU said the bill would infringe on patients’ privacy rights.
That bill was defeated by the same vermin on the left who are trying to take your guns away.
I do have to agree the mother knowing her son should be institutionalized should have not left her guns where Adam had access to them.
There have been over 12 shootings within the past 4 years. Why all of a sudden is the number of shootings on the increase and the time frame getting closer together? Could it be these shooters were hypnotized, put into a trance or programmed to do what they did and to kill themselves after they accomplished the act.
They were able to to capture Holmes.
I still want some one to explain how gun control will stop mass murder or bring crime rate down. YOU CAN’T!!!! Nor can I find anywhere stating a sane gun owner went on a killing spree. I take that back. Janet Reno came to mind.
Bobmann101, I made a video on that exact topic, I posted it on YouTube, the title is Hey Joe, Here Is A Little Tip. The gun problem in America is both gang and drug related. It all comes back to Obama, he relaxed the immigration policies and in 2011 he closed down a government agency that focused on gangs and gangs are the number one reason for so many gun related deaths throughout America. I just heard that Chicago is breaking all previous records for murder in 2013, and most if not all are drug and gang related. The problem is not guns in the hands of honest people, the problem is Obama and his gun running and open border policies. If you like check out my video under Gabe Zolna on YouTube.
You are absolutely right, as you already know. The unfortunate fact of the matter is that the gun control bs has nothing to do with stopping “mass-murder,” lowering the crime rate, accidental shooting, nor anything else. It is about people control. Government is a living organism fighting for it’s security and expansion. The founders recognized this and wrote the Constitution in an effort to keep government under control and make it a useful tool of the people. Unfortunately the natural tendency and will of government has overcome the Constitution and it has become not a tool of the people, it is now the master of the people and the only hope now is the will of the people, which as Karl Marx pointed out, is the actual controller of everything, thus the trickery required to turn it in adverse directions, as the commielibs have accomplished throughout most of the world, and now here in America.
Mass murder—333,000 in 2012–plan parenthood
Thanks so much Gabe. Always enjoy your videos and your insite. Hang in there and don’t let them discourage us.
Gun control is people control. It is nation control. It is an act of war. It is in no way able to stop or even control crime. The criminal will find a way to obtain a gun. The law abiding citizen will obey the law if gun control is imposed, and that citizen will not be able to defend himself. Every sane, and rational American Citizen knows this is true. Marxists don’t think this way.
This whole gun debate is nothing more than a diversion, to distract and to deceive the American people. The vast majority of gun related murders are committed not by AR-15, nor by rifles, they are committed by unregistered stolen or illegal handguns. That is a statistical fact and the majority of murders can be traced back to both gangs and drugs.
The Administration is doing what it does best to distract the American people from what they should all be focused on, which is Benghazi, that my friends is the key that can end this nightmare. The Administration must be made to answer a number of simple questions, why was there a Predator overhead at the facility that evening? What happened to the 20 plus American’s that were saved based on the actions of Woods and Doherty? Why were stand down orders given to Woods, Doherty and General Ham? Why did the Administration try to cover the events up with the phony trailer story?
The answers are all relatively simple and will prove that the Administration had planned to have the Ambassador kidnaped so he could be traded for the Blind Sheikh,and Obama would have been a hero to the American people by having saved the Ambassadors life.
The plan feel apart when Woods and Doherty refused to obey the Commander in Chief’s stand down order’s, the pieces of the puzzle all fit together perfectly. Wake up America, DEMAND that your Congressional Representatives start earning their money and expose this criminal for what he and his Administration really is.
Time is running out for our country, and it will soon be too late if it is not to late already.
I am posting this link on every blog I come to. I hope youwill do the same. I doubt it will do any good, but I have to try!
Thanks Gabe for that story. Fortunately, I did hear it in various places, none of them the (so-called) major networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, or CNN. But, then again, I don’t watch those far-left liberal agenda-based “news” organizations. I just want to say one thing, though, regarding your story. My opinion of Diane Feinstein is that she probably wouldn’t have cared if the woman and her two children had been killed (and fortunately they weren’t). She would, I believe, still be hell-bent on grabbing guns without regard to the family. Even as it turned out, I’m quite sure she won’t change her mind. I know I won’t be changing mine!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Speaking with characteristic clarity, Ronald Reagan summed up talking to ...