Advertisement - story continues below
Processing the Marginalization of Bright into Bleak
I have a couple of quick points to relay concerning Saul Alinsky. Most Americans have at least heard the name of the well-known ideological guru to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the self-proclaimed creator of community organization and Marxist and cultural revolutionary, but I wonder how many truly understand the nature of the man behind the name.
Alinsky is poison. His life’s work was to bring forth the cultural rot that would bring about what Marx’s working masses failed to do. His desire was for the destruction of the American way of life, and he set about seeing that this personal hope was fulfilled even if it was to occur without his presence and without his ability to enjoy what he had wrought. His gift to mankind was the manifestation, through pure hatred, greed and envy, of an evil that survives his grave.
Advertisement - story continues below
That evil was a book, his magnum opus. Rules for Radicals detailed and outlined the machinations and covert manipulations to be used to remove the good and decent intentions of a kind, caring and unsuspecting people and to allow for nothing more than chaos to fill the void. Chaos invokes progress in the Marxist mind, thus chaos is Alinsky’s means to his hypocritical end, that being designed, perpetual chaos.
Alinsky: On Defense
What looked a year ago to be almost a sure thing — a retaking of political ground in the face of the systemic failure of Obama and Co. — has since changed, but not for the better. I now see in place of that loss an opportunity for the Left to win, not just this battle but the entirety of our ideological war.
Advertisement – story continues below
Because of the fractured state of America’s political right wing, Alinsky’s methods of isolation and marginalization can be utilized to set Cruzader against Trumpeteer. Using stealth, treachery and subversion, again in the manner promoted by Alinsky, the possibility is wide open to guide into place, within the chaos and division of the Right’s current struggle for ideological direction and identity, Alinsky’s most satisfying and powerful weapon of political destruction: ridicule.
The strength of this attack would compound exponentially because the attack would appear internalized. The marginalization would apply itself with the innocent Left gladly picking up the pieces of this shattered hope and smirking all the way into the Oval Office. Due to Alinsky’s tenet of the end result having moral authority over the manner which brought it to bear, it should be no less than expected.
If done correctly and with cunning, a good probability exists that the camps supporting GOP nominee Donald Trump and runner-up Sen. Ted Cruz can both be coerced into isolating each other as enemies and provoked or urged, led by a philosophical nose ring, to ridicule harshly and slander one another.
Advertisement - story continues below
This self-inflicted criticism — inflamed through practiced Leftist design with malice toward opposition and contempt for the limitations of the electoral process — could, if successful, remove any prospects for 2016 by utterly removing the entirety of the Right out of the political picture. I’m not talking just this election cycle but possibly long enough for the Left to amend and modify this country’s political apparatus to make recovery impossible.
The current heightened state of turmoil inside the American Right is one primed for just this type of insidious attack. A self-imploded Right, in crisis, ridicules itself out of the political landscape with self-inflicted wounds being more often than not fatal.
There is no one watching our back. While one is fully focused on the “primary” challenge faced directly in front, the opportunity exists for infiltration from the rear of those who have no problem, whatsoever, using you as their means to do their political dirty work. I think they actually get quite a kick out of it, pain being the coin of their realm.
The obliteration of political opposition is the Left’s standardized method for gaining and holding position and power. This new situation is a troubling turn of events. It is a transcendent swing of opportunity, a paradigm shift that needs to be understood as dangerous and a potential game changer and promptly addressed by someone on the Right’s political mainstage. A wake-up call or warning shot, I believe, is drastically needed for our electorate, a not-so-subtle reminder of the sinister nature of the Left that cannot be ignored or simply wished away.
The Left teaches, studies and promotes Alinsky’s evil manipulations at the highest levels of academia, and if … if there is brain one somewhere within their hives of education, this opportunity will be recognized as the perfect time to slink in the back door, enrage this already broiling political climate and bring to its knees in total collapse one-half of our country’s political superstructure.
Ridiculing, endlessly, the self-destruction aspect of the ruins of their political counterbalance will help to secure the time necessary to eliminate any and all means of the Right’s ability to stand against the common enemy. To stand united and defend America and Americans from the domestic cancer already snuggled in comfortably, at home, and well within reach of the absolute lock on the power these pitiful junkies crave. I have zero doubt they are mentally prepared, frothing at their mouths and just waiting to champ at this bit. This is a major opportunity to forward their ends. It must be recognized that it’s all about opportunity. Chaos is opportunity and this is their means and it cannot end. Nothing else matters — not this nation, not fair play, not honor — nothing.
A significant portion of the Right has decided that the only way to defeat the Left is through the use of Saul Alinsky’s Marxist tactics employed by the Left. The Right has a choice to answer in kind and this decision may seem sound tactically and justified, but is it wrong?
We fight fire with fire and do so with success, but then again, fire is not evil. Fire is not driven by human desire and ideological greed. Alinsky’s Marxism is. His methodology for the removal of social and political opposition for ideological supremacy is well known, widely available and easily understood. His how-to manual’s listings, and explanations of the tools and teachings within, the means to the end that I described earlier is the book, was the backdrop around which Hillary Clinton formed her college thesis on social progress. Alinsky teaches the manufacturing of crisis. In crafting her paper she consulted with him personally. Clinton is well versed in their power and usage.
Barack Obama is also a creation of hometown Chicago’s Alinsky. Obama, a community organizer — a position Alinsky created out of whole cloth — is one especially suited for a radicalized, political opportunist with no regard whatsoever for decorum or rules. President Obama is Alinsky’s crowning achievement.
So far, that is.
As to the Right’s incorporation of Alinsky’s destructive modus operandi, this is war. We’re engaged in a full-out culture war that is rifted diametrically at the core of differed understandings of what constitutes the human condition. A type of war in which losers, history has shown, do not fare well, and one that could suddenly go hot at the drop of a hat. Our lessons have taught us that in by far the most cases, a diverse coexistence fails to materialize in the aftermath of these not-so-civil wars, and the second-place finishers … well, unfortunately they simply are progressed beyond and quietly disappear, forgotten into the past.
I think the answer to these questions toward rules of engagement and proportional response may be for each and every one of us to individually decide and address within the limitations of our own conscience when, where and if fooling around in the Devil’s workshop is the proper course of action.
Alinsky the pragmatist would have no trouble whatsoever in this area, and because of that realization alone I find this situation problematic. The stakes couldn’t be any higher and prudence may have to take a backseat for a minute, maybe two. The lessor of two evils is one thing, but “all in” is something altogether different. I just don’t know.
As Ben Carson noted at the Republican convention, Rules for Radicals is dedicated to Lucifer.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website.