Satan And Santorum: Perspective From Reagan’s Evil Empire Speech

rick santorum7388 300x168 Satan and Santorum: Perspective From Reagan’s Evil Empire Speech

Editor’s note: A longer version of this article first appeared at The American Spectator.

The secular world today trembles and shudders at the sight of Rick Santorum speaking on good and evil at Ave Maria University in Florida in 2008. Santorum’s statement came 25 years after another much-maligned social conservative, Ronald Reagan, delivered a similarly fiery speech in Florida in 1983. In both cases, the secular left recoiled in horror, mortified that any American other than Barack Obama or Jimmy Carter might dare remark on matters of faith and state, of the temporal and eternal.

I caught excerpts of Santorum’s speech for the first time yesterday, when America’s omnipresent force—Matt Drudge—posted a link under the grim, black-and-white headline, “SANTORUM’S SATAN WARNING.” Immediately, the remainder of the natural universe leapt in knee-jerk hysteria, and soon Santorum’s warnings of the Evil One were the talk of a stunned nation.

As I digested the speech, I was struck at how so many of Santorum’s themes and words echoed those expressed in Ronald Reagan’s historic Evil Empire speech. Santorum ruminated on evil, spiritual warfare, truth, vanity, sensuality, temptation, pride, education, abortion. Like Reagan, he fears that the “great political conflict” in America “is not a political war at all, or a cultural war—it is a spiritual war.” In that war, “the father of lies” has “set his sights” on America.

And then, like Reagan, Santorum finished with a message of faith-based optimism for the faithful: “My message to you today is that you will lose, you will lose battle after battle; you will become frustrated, but do not lose hope. God will be faithful, if you are.”

As for Ronald Reagan’s Evil Empire speech, it was many things. It is remembered as a bold, long-overdue utterance of searing truth about the USSR, which Reagan described as “the focus of evil in the modern world.” But the speech was much more. It looked inward at the sins and evils at work in America—as did Santorum’s speech. It was first and foremost a speech about evil generally, theological as much as political—like Santorum’s speech. As Reagan himself put it, “We know that living in this world means dealing with what philosophers would call the phenomenology of evil or, as theologians would put it, the doctrine of sin.” Reagan dared to use the “J” word: “There is sin and evil in the world, and we’re enjoined by Scripture and the Lord Jesus to oppose it with all our might.”

Reagan spoke on March 8, 1983 at the Orlando Sheraton. The audience was the National Association of Evangelicals. He began by thanking those present for their prayers. He cited his favorite quote from Lincoln, about being driven to his knees by the “overwhelming conviction” that he had nowhere else to go. He commended the crucial role of faith in democracy. “Freedom prospers only where the blessings of God are avidly sought and humbly accepted,” Reagan maintained. “The American experiment in democracy rests on this insight.” He said the discovery of that insight was the “great triumph” of the Founders. Indeed it was.

Characteristically, Reagan cited George Washington on the indispensability of religion and morality to “political prosperity.” Reagan bemoaned the “modern-day secularism” that had discarded the “tried and time-tested values” upon which American civilization was based. He expressed deep concern over rising illegitimate births and abortions. He pushed for prayer in public schools.

Reagan then underscored the evils pervading American life. “Our nation, too, has a legacy of evil with which it must deal,” said Reagan, pointing to the “long struggle of minority citizens for equal rights.” He insisted: “There is no room for racism, anti-Semitism, or other forms of ethnic and racial hatred in this country.”

Like Santorum, Reagan essentially agreed that America, too, had been victimized by Satan. Racism and slavery were among the Devil’s vicious victories.

Reagan cast America’s struggle as spiritual: “The real crisis we face today is a spiritual one; at root, it is a test of moral will and faith.” He referred to Marxism-Leninism as “the second oldest faith, first proclaimed in the Garden of Eden with the words of temptation, ‘Ye shall be as gods.’’’

Alas, Reagan finished with a burst of faith-based optimism, quoting Isaiah: “He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might He increased strength…. But they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary.”

Of course, in reaction to Reagan’s speech, the press went nuts, much like the reaction to Santorum’s remarks.

Oh, well. To borrow from Reagan: There they go again.

Hang in there, Rick. Be not afraid.

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. Rush Limbaugh and at least 90 other conservative leaders from across America are already strongly supporting Rick – Santorum for President this November to the rescuing of the American way of life!

  2. There is a difference between calling out a nation or organization for its strong arm tactics which deny individuals of liberty, and the personification of evil as a fallen angel once named Lucifer.
    This is why Reagan’s speech was so powerful in a political sense while Santorum’s speech came off as his attempt at being a preacher.
    Pulling a nation back to its moral roots can only succeed if it isn’t marred by specific doctrine. Granted, Santorum was speaking to a particular group who would accept his speech accordingy, but on a wider scale, it doesn’t work.
    Santorum’s words also do not match his actions. He voted against the Right to Work bill for his state. Granted, he had to act for his constituency, but he then showed us that he will bend his beliefs in order to satisfy those who elected him. If he was a leader, he would have voted for the legislation then explained to his constituency why he did.
    He also voted to raise the debt cieling five times. Is that the act of a conservative politician , or a preacher who cites ‘Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar…’?
    Santorum wants to legislate morality which is exactly what Sharia law does to muslims. I do not want to live in a theocracy of any kind and I’m sure many others don’t want to, either. How I worship is personal, between me and God, but by what Santorum’s says it sound to me as if he would try to legislate that away.
    And that is what the bottom line here is about. Santorum said that ‘Freedom isn’t absolute’. Excuse me? God gave me Free Will do do whatever I please. If I break a Commandment, there are man-made laws that will deal with me, and God’s laws that will deal with me later on. But that is my choice. Legislation will not change what’s in a person’s heart, only a relationship with God can do that and forcing a particular view of God onto people will not change anything except probabaly create resentment.
    America is no longer a nation composed solely of Christians yet even secularists can agree with the Golden Rule. ‘Do no harm’ is a moral rule everyone does agree with. Injecting specific tenets into the poltical vernacular will only cause a rift and any message, no matter how true, will be lost on many.

  3. This comment is mainly for freenotdumb. Santorum would not like to make a theocracy. That is brought up by liberals all the time anytime someone trys to communicate moral absolutes. Furthermore, every law ever made is based on a certain set of morals. Take a proposed law to outlaw abortion for example. Liberals would be quick to use that argument because liberal laws are commonly excepted. In other words, regarding abortion, right now liberal morals values are being pushed on us and many do not object maybe because they don’t want to upset the apple cart and go against what “seems” popular. Fact is nowdays however, the population is at least 50% pro-life. To have a pro-life law or to talk about justice and protection of the preborn is not any more of creating a theocracy as a everyday law of murder. Romney’s cult on the other hand, I’ve heard wants to grab the presidency to create a Mormon theocracy which is unlike our Christian tradition and heritage. That being said, I wish this artilcle mentioned more of what Santorum actually said as that is the news and then drew a parallel to what Reagan said in 83. If it’s true that Satan has effectively attacked this country with the slow errossion of traditional values, free market capitalism, morals, etc., then a reponsible leader has to say so.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] “Warns”Congress The National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 (NDAA) is making…Satan And Santorum:Perspective From Reagan’s Evil Empire Speech Editor’s note: A longer version of this article first appeared [...]

Speak Your Mind