Sarah Palin threw her weight behind Steve Pearce Wednesday in a momentous endorsement that is sure to shake up the former Congressman’s quest to win back the New Mexico seat he lost in 2008.
If the name Steve Pearce sounds familiar, that’s probably because HuffPost’s Amanda Terkel reported Wednesday that the GOP candidate recently gave credence, if not outright support, to a questioner who asked him to explain his position on President Obama being a “Kenyan-born, Indonesian Muslim.”
In Pearce’s response, he explained his belief that there were “significant questions” that still needed answer with regards to the Obama birther conspiracy:
PEARCE: You bet. Let’s take it backwards first. My position is that Barack Obama raised the most significant questions himself. He said, after he came to the U.S., that he traveled to Pakistan. Now at the point that he traveled to Pakistan it was not legal to go there with a U.S. passport. And so he, himself, raised the greatest questions. I think that those questions need to be asked.
Now, then, my question would be to you all at what importance, what importance? You can typically fight two or three major battles in a year, major, and for me, if we don’t get our economy going, nothing else works. … I’m content to let the courts handle that and it’s my understanding the Supreme Court is actually looking at this question because I think it’s an important question. But I absolutely believe that Barack Obama raises the most significant questions himself.
Read More: By Nick Wing, The Huffington Post
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore Creative Commons
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Congressional Candidate Steve Pearce Would Support Obama Eligibility Probe In U.S. Senate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB5mytlBm3Y
Obama is not a natural born citizen, but in stead an Illegal president and a non-Christian. A treasonous anti-American. A closet Muslim !!
A thorough investigation might not establish constitutional ineligibility, but would probably elicit considerable information about the recent development and current status of international communism.
If Mr. Obama is proved constitutionally eligible, we can be glad the electorate was not conned into electing a racist, anti-American, communist candidate who was ineligible; instead it was conned into electing a racist, anti-American, communist candidate who was eligible.
BARACK H. OBAMA WAS BORN IN A HOSPITAL IN MOMBASSA KENYA, AFRICA.
HIS STEP-GRANDMOTHER SARA CLEARLY STATED SHE WAS PRESENT THERE WHEN HE WAS BORN!.
THAT IS WHY THIS LYING FRAUD HAS SPENT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BLOCKING THE TRUTH FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THE MONEY HE RECEIVES TO BLOCK THE TRUTH IS BEING PROVIDED BY GEORGE SOROS, AND HIS MUSLIM BENEFACTORS.
THE NEW CONGRESS WHICH WILL BE ELECTED ON NOVEMBER 02, 2010, HAS THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS BY IMPEACHING THIS FRAUD, " FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS"!
HE HAS CLEARLY VIOLATED HIS OATH OF OFFICE, AND HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS "CRIMES".
AS SOON AS HE IS IMPEACHED ANY AND ALL ACTIONS HE HAS TAKEN PART, AND OR SIGNED INTO LAW WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE NULL AND VOID.
THAT IS THE PROPER PROCEDURE OUR REPRESENTATIVES MUST FOLLOW TO BEGIN CORRECTING THE ILLS THIS PRESENT CONGRESS, AND FRAUD PRESIDENT
HAVE CAUSED!
There are questions aplenty about Mr. Obama's citizenship status as it relates to his eligibility to the Office of President as a natural born U.S. citizen under U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 1.
For example, Steve Pearce raises the question of the passport used by Mr. Obama in traveling to Pakistan. He claims that Americans could not then travel to Pakistan on U.S. passports. This has been persuasively debunked, but the debunker carefully avoided disclosing whether IN FACT Mr. Obama traveled on a U.S. passport or the passport of some other nation such as Indonesia. The actual use of another nation's passport, especially a country that has no reciprocal arrangement with the U.S. for dual nationality, may be a disclaimer or renunciation of allegiance to the United States. It may be, therefore, compelling evidence that the passport holder intentionally disclaimer or renounced U.S. citizenship, or confirmed as an adult a suspension of citizenship effected by events during his minority.
This is the kind of misleading spin often seen in the public political forum. An error regarding one proposition – whether one COULD travel to Pakistan on a U.S. passport – is corrected in such manner as to obscure the real question, whether Mr. Obama DID travel to Pakistan on a U.S. passport. The real question remains open, and is unlikely to be resolved without official investigation.
Similarly, the State Department seems to have been evasive in representing that it received no passport application from Barack Hussein Obama, leaving open the question whether it received one from Barry Soetoro, or any application under any of Mr. Obama’s many aliases.
These are a few indications among many that public agencies with subpoena and other official powers and contacts must conduct exhaustive investigations of this crucial constitutional matter.
It seems highly probable that Mr. Obama was a natural born U.S. citizen at the time of his birth (see below) but official intervention is necessary to elicit proof that will establish that status, at that time, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty. Moreover, there is reasonable suspicion that Mr. Obama lost citizenship altogether in the course of his life, which would cost him the status of natural born citizen that was probably acquired at his birth.
On 22 or 27 July 2009, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, issued a statement by which she goes about as close to the brink as she can, without violating her legal obligation to keep the adoption confidential, to tell us that Mr. Obama was adopted. Her statement is quoted in the book "The Manchurian President" on page 76, and below:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai'i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
Dr. Fukino’s statement refers to Mr. Obama's "vital records" in the plural. He was not dead, so she must be referring to two birth certificates, the original that named birth parents and an amended certificate naming adoptive parents.
Moreover, data in the certification of live birth must have been taken from the amended certificate, for Dr. Fukino also says that the records verify that Mr. Obama is a "natural born American citizen." If the original birth certificate showed Obama the Luo to be a birth parent, it would have proved the opposite, that Mr. Obama was not a natural born citizen at the time of his birth.
Dr. Fukino is very clever. She has tipped us to an adoption without explicitly disclosing an adoption, which would be unlawful. She has also let us know that Mr. Obama's birth parents were U.S. citizens, which makes baby Obama a natural born U.S. citizen at birth. (This leaves open the possibility that he lost American citizenship thereafter.)
Mr. Obama’s vital records must be disclosed and his DNA analyzed to confirm the birth parents of Barack Hussein Obama II, and to confirm that Mr. Obama, pretender to the Office of President, is actually the child whose birth was recorded, not a ringer.
The most difficult problem is not about Mr. Obama's birth, but about the possible loss of his U.S. citizenship thereafter by forfeiture, disclaimer, renunciation, sedition, or some combination of the foregoing. The status of natural born U.S. citizen can only be acquired at birth, but it can be lost thereafter, by loss of U.S. citizenship, which seems entirely possible in this case.
Private citizens have gone about as far as they can go in determining Mr. Obama’s constitutional eligibility. It is necessary to invoke public authority. Government officials are required, by their oaths to uphold the Constitution, to conduct thorough inquiries into Mr. Obama’s eligibility to the Office of President, possible fraud or malfeasance or neglect of office in putting him on the ballot, and the need for legislation to prevent such problems in future.
A very interesting approach on the subject, one that I had not heard of nor considered as of yet. The web of deception is indeed intricate and far reaching. The topic itself is for the most part based on speculation and assumption as the President has successfully managed so far to virtually cloak any documents of any sort pertaining to his past.
I myself had surely expected that Barack Hussein Obama would have received the same Congressional scrutiny that was applied to Senator McCain. I was incorrect in that expectation.
America Rising. The Constitution Stands.
"Government is not the solution, government is the problem" – President Ronald Reagan.
Surely you can understand upon further study and reflection:
- that you have not heard of or considered the "very interesting approach" because you have not moved in circles with my analytical powers. I graduated from Mr. Obama's law school when it was graduating lawyers instead of community organizers, though it has long had a penchant for producing communist subversives.
- that you must sometimes fight fire with fire, and you must sometimes fight government with government, as Ronald Reagan and the founders of the Republic did.
- that while the courts, probably twice shy from criticism of Bush v. Gore, have run away from discovering the crucial evidence, viz., Hawai'i's vital records on Obama and the relevant DNA, there is more than one way to skin a cat. Fifty state governments and a federal government, all with powerful investigative powers, offer fifty-one alternatives and supplements, each and every one of which should be enlisted. Both legislative and prosecutorial agencies have good cause to mount exhaustive investigations.
- there are better than even odds that the evidence will show the hypothetical scenario to be true in every material respect, or otherwise fruitful.
I hope and pray that people and organizations will overcome defeatist apathy and get behind a push to dig out the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. My judgment tells me that a thorough investigation, which does not stop with Mr. Obama's birth but continues to the current day, will be cathartic whatever the conclusion as to Mr. Obama's constitutional eligibility. Mr. Obama is a counter-revolutionary, the referent revolution being the American revolution in political thought and practice that put sovereignty if the people and changed subjects to citizens. My intuition tells me that Mr. Obama is a malevolent agent of international communism, which deserves the very closest examination, like an excised tumor. People today do not realize the power and dimensions of the current counter-revolutionary insurgency. The fate of the Republic hangs in the balance.
Exhaustive investigation is unnecessary. Obama was born of ONE american Parent and ONE foreigner. Where he was born is irrelevant to prove that Obama has never been a "Natural-Born Citizen" of the US. Obama's father was a Brit. Obama,Jr was born a Brit under the British Nationality Act of 1948. Obama has both British and American Jus Sanquinis and either British or American Jus Soli dependent upon where he was actually born. Obama has never BEEN an NBC.
BtW,Obama's Columbia Degree was fraudulently obtained. His Law degree is equally suspect.
Investigators have an obligation to find exonerative evidence, too. As indicated, Dr. Fukino finds from the "vital records" (n.b., plural) that Barry was at birth a natural born U.S. citizen. Hence there must be an original birth certificate identifying U.S. citizen birth parents. This necessarily excludes Obama the Luo as a birth father, because he was alien.
Official action is necessary to procure the vital records and conduct genetic analysis to confirm, if possible, that Barry is indeed the son of the citizen parents identified (by hypothesis) in the original birth certificate.
It's a reasonable speculation that the birth father was Stanley Armour Dunham, who so wanted a son that he named his daughter Stanley. It's also reasonable to infer that the mother was an obliging predominantly Polynesian wahine and, as per Dr, Fukino, page 76 of "The Manchurian President" an American citizen. Barry might get his warm mahogany complexion from a native Hawai'ian mother instead of an alien black Luo father. Google Liliuokalani, Hawai'i's last Queen, for a picture; she's no blue-eyed blond. Maybe Barry is royal Hawai'ian.
There is ample ground to mount official investigations as to whether Barry thereafter lost U.S. citizenship altogether by forfeiture, disclaimer, renunciation, sedition or some combination of the foregoing. Exhaustive official investigations are required to elicit documents, DNA and testimony, not only as to eligibility directly, but also to determine whether the course of justice has been obstructed by the destruction, concealment, or alteration of official records, perhaps aided and abetted by bribery – especially in the case of Indonesia, where it has been estimated that around 20% of the GNP is graft.
We will not know who "Barry Dunham" really is until such an investigation occurs. We may never know. However,based on what he claimed himself,working with the facts that are available,Obama is NOT a "Natural-Born" American. The requirement involves status at BIRTH and not any subsequent machinations which involve "Forfeiture…".
Obama,if he had two American citizen parents and was born on US Soil would have been an NBC. Since,the circumstances,by his own admission,indicate that he had a British father,he does not meet both Jus Sanquinis and Jus Soli requirements that would entitle him to be POTUS. "Exonerative evidence"? We been giving Obama very ample opportunity to proffer such information. He,instead,continues to pay his attorneys and issue executive orders so that,that information will not be made available without court action to compel discovery of it. It is noteworthy that you mentioned that Obama may be a "Royal Hawaiian". One of my pet claims is that Hawaii has never BEEN a State (PL103-150) and that Hawaii is still a Sovereign Nation. Cases seeking Certiorari from SCOTUS to decide the issue are currently in the works.
Part 2,
Fukino or other state officials do not define what an NBC is. That is up to congress.
Yes,Congress. Congress has the power to "Define and punish…offenses of the law of nations". The "Law of Nations" defines what a natural-born citizen means. It is obvious that the incorporation of and reference to the "law of nations" makes Congress responsible for defining and punishing offenses thereof. The LON defines Natural Born Citizens as those having two citizen parents of a country and who are born in that country. An exhaustive investigation such as you refer to can go on during and after the ARREST of Barack Obama for fraud and treason. I reiterate that an investigation to
prove that Obama is not a NBC is unnecessary. His status of having been a Brit at birth,given the facts at hand illustrate,prima facia,that Obama is disqualified to be POTUS. These facts are mutable because of Obama's reticence in being open about his records. A right ,to such discovery,"We the People" are entitled to and that we demand.
Thanks for interesting and informative, if flawed, comments.
Is it not vitally important that investigations sufficient to ascertain Barry's identity and birth parents be conducted as soon as possible? Dr. Fukino's statement, page 76 of "The Manchurian Candidate" tips us to the probability that the COLB abstracts parental information from the amended birth certificate naming adoptive parents, and that one of the "vital records" is an original birth certificate showing that both parents were U.S. citizens.
I suggest that Dr. Fukino agrees that both parents must be U.S. citizens and says the vital records contain proof of precisely that, not that she deems Barry natural born with an alien father. If I'm wrong and they show Obama the Luo as a birth father, fine. That should prove ineligibility. I'm just afraid that skeptics will be unpleasantly surprised by a finding of natural born U.S. citizen status early on, meeting the skeptics' every criterion, and people will jump to the conclusion that the issue is resolved, and insist the investigation end.
In addition, genetic analysis can ascertain whether Barry is really the child of those birth parents, or a ringer who has assumed that child's identity. If two U.S. citizen birth parents can never be found for him, eligibility can not be proved.
I reckon it a 70% chance the vital records show two U.S. citizen parents, maybe a 15% chance Barry is a ringer.
Vegas book-makers should figure the odds and take bets on the birth and adoptive parents, winnings to go to the Negro College Fund as reparations for Barry's long minstrel show.
The statehood status of Hawai'i can and should be taken into account by legislatures and prosecutors while adjudication of that issue is under way. I have assumed that Hawai'i was part of the U.S. by right of conquest, but I thought the 16th Amendment was ratified, too; now I'm not so sure. If the "vital records" include an original birth certificate showing two genetically verifiable U.S. citizen birth parents, Barry's natural born status vel non at birth might depend on Hawai'i's status. Maybe King of Hawai'i would be a good consolation prize for Barry. Hawai'i could apply for membership in the American Commonwealth of Liberty.
If it's determined on all grounds that Barry was a natural born citizen at birth, investigation should not stop there. This status can be lost. It can not be gained after birth, but it can be lost after birth, by loss of citizenship.
The term "natural born citizen" subsumes "citizen". You can not be a natural born citizen if you're not a citizen at all, even if you were a natural born citizen at birth. Hence the very real possibility that Barry lost U.S. citizenship by forfeiture, disclaimer, renunciation, sedition, or some combination of the foregoing, or otherwise, must also be investigated exhaustively. Violation of Barry's privacy? It's nothing compared to the regime he is trying to inflict on us.
For your information, the states decide presidential eligibility in the course of their function under Article II Section 1 of the Constitution, which provides that presidential electors are to be appointed by each state as its legislature may determine. Each state decides who is eligible to go on its ballot. Congress may legislate regarding its chief executive officer, but the states have primary, exclusive, non-delegable jurisdiction over election to the Office of President. See Bush v. Gore. The states need not and should not wait for Congress on the issue of Barry’s eligibility and what to do to assure eligible candidates for President and Vice President.
Whatever the determination of Barry's constitutional eligibility, an exhaustive official investigation could yield important collateral benefits, such as proof that Barry is not the son of a black, putting the lie to his racist appeal for votes and his denigration of opponents as racists. Also, it might yield a great deal of information about the international communist conspiracy, which did not end with the collapse of the Soviet Union. It appears that Barry has quietly taken the role of its front and mouthpiece.
Will you support state investigations into Barry’s eligibility, with a view to determining whether states that appointed electors pledged to Barry in 2008 should rescind the appointments, and keep him off the ballot in 2012?
My analysis is not flawed. The COLB that Obama proffered was accepted. The facts on that document claim that Obama,Sr. was Juniors father. That disqualied Junior,onit's face. Obama was born a Brit. A BC naming two american parents has not been forthcoming. Based on what Obama proferred,he is NOT an NBC. He has not proferred anything else. If Obama has two american parents and was born in the USA,he would not be disqualified.
"If two us citizen birth parents can never be found for him" he is disqualified.
Chance percentages of what may or may not be factual is irrelevant and immaterial. If Obama had two american citizen parents,he would have had also to be born on US soil. Hawaii as a State would make him an NBC. Hawaii as a Sovereign nation would require naturalization. As the facts are in evidence now,absent any conjecture,Obama was a Brit at birth. The status of Obama's citizenship,at birth,is controlling. One must meet the NBC requirement first off.
If one loses one's citizenship through renouncement at age 21 or it changes in any way as to effect one's Natural-Born Status,then one is disqualified to be POTUS.
Obama is required to prove that he is qualifiued constitutionally to be POTUS. Privacy is not an issue. Since Obama was never a NBC he could not lose that status by renunciation or any other way. Obama was born a Brit,based on the evidence Obama proferred. If he wants to prove otherwise,ythe onus is on him. The states must perform their duty with regard to ensuring the eligibility of candidates for POTUS. The states were given fraudulent information by Nancy Pelosi who is complicit in Obama's fraud and treason. Insofar as this issue is of grave national security,a federal INJUNCTION should be issued against Obama running in the 2011 election until such time as he proves a "Natural-Born"American status as per the definition defined in the "Law of Nations"…two citizen parents born in the parents country".Jus Soli AND Jus Sanquinis.
An NBC requires that one have two parents BOTH of whom are citizens of the country one is born in.
BTW,Obama is encumbered and prohibited from holding "Any office under the USA". Obama is a traitor:
18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUaGe63Aqv4 http://americangrandjury.org/public/
You raise a good argument that Obama may indeed be a ‘natural born American citizen”. you do not however mention who’s name it there as the Father of this child. As if indeed his father is Barack Hussein Obama, a Kenyan, which at the time was a British colony making Mr. Barack Obama Sr. a British subject and therefore Not a natural born American Citizen. You opened a door but fail to go thru it to the deeper part of the conspiracy to hide his true Identity.
I guessPalin is trying to redeem herself for dismissing the issue during the 2008 elections.Her and McCain took a dive in 2008 and we ended up with a usurper in the Oval office: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-n… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QkXR0Ex2bY
I voted for her and McCain in 2008. I won't do so again. They had every opportunity to expose Obama for the felonious fraud that he is,the traitor that he is and McCain/Palin downplayed the issue to the detriment of our national security. McCain and Palin are complicit with treason in that respect,misprisioners of felonious fraud.
Remember Palin had to follow McCain's lead. She did not have any say in demanding Obama show his birth certificate.
I do not hear her pressing it NOW. Your argument is impotent.
There are millions of us who doubt he is legal to be President of the United States.
I,for ONE,KNOW that he is not "President": http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-n…
I myself had surely expected that Barack Hussein Obama would have received the same Congressional scrutiny that was applied to Senator McCain. I was incorrect in that expectation.
America Rising. The Constitution Stands.
"Government is not the solution, government is the problem" – President Ronald Reagan.
It is my hope that Congressional Candidate Steve Pierce wins his seat back in New mexico since he does support investigations into Obama's legitimacy to serve as President. Additionally this issue is gaining momentum with numerous members of Congress. This in my opinion is but the begining of the end for Obama. A tsunami is coming in November for the Obama Administration!
Nice response! I love that he puts the blame for the questions right where it belongs – with President Obama.