Photo Credit: erjkprunczyk Creative Commons

We’ve known that Russian troops have been in America for some time, allegedly being trained by American troops. Now it appears that FEMA has entered into an agreement with the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry. The reason is ostensibly to “provide security at mass events in the United States.”

Remember all those articles on the Obama Administration questioning whether or not military commanders would be willing to use live ammunition to fire on American citizens on American soil? You also probably remember the articles about Sheriffs throughout the United States who have publicly stated that they would not support any laws they believe are unconstitutional, especially where the 2nd Amendment is concerned. This places them in direct opposition to the federal government.

What we are now hearing about may well be the Obama Administration’s response to these issues. It is to use Russian troops instead of American law enforcement personnel. Russians have no loyalty to Americans or America. If used, their job would be to simply follow orders without questioning them, just like paid mercenaries. Because of this, they would be able to remain aloof to things like the U.S. Constitution (and specifically to those pesky 2nd and 4th Amendments.)

The Russian press release states: “The Russian Emergency Situations Ministry and the USA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) are going to exchange experts during joint rescue operations in major disasters. This is provided by a protocol of the fourth meeting of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission Working Group on Emergency Situations and seventeenth meeting of Joint U.S.-Russia Cooperation Committee on Emergency Situations, which took place in Washington on 25 June.” Note that the verbiage states that the experts will be used in joint rescue operations during major disasters.

Who knows what the truth is here? The Russian press release only states that “experts” will be used during major disasters. Yet, others claim that the use of these troops will occur during protests (and even security for things like the Half-Time Superbowl Show.) A number of these reports also reference State Department publication 7277, “which is a blueprint for the harmonization of US and Russian forces under a framework of United Nations-led global government.”

Numerous people have talked about this particular State Department document, including Daniel Estulin in his book The True Story of the Bilderberg Group. Estulin notes that since 1940, the State Department has been staffed by people who belonged to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a group that is under the auspices of the Bilderbergers, the main cabal of the Global Elite. Estulin also notes that the beginnings of CFR actually date back to 1921 with Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson’s chief advisor. House was also known to be a Marxist and used numerous ideas from Karl Marx (like the graduated income tax, which was built into the 16th Amendment). Folks, are we beginning to see how deep the rabbit hole goes? None of this started yesterday.

People also point to Posse Comitatus, which became law in June of 1878 and was intended to “limit the powers of Federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce the State laws.” The term “posse comitatus” literally means, “an armed body of men at the disposal of the King for the purposes of keeping the peace.” The issue is whether or not the military or foreign troops can legally be used against Americans on American soil.

Unfortunately for American citizens, when Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law on December 31, 2011, it gave the federal government the right to use military personnel to arrest and keep American citizens in “indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history.” The NDAA is at odds with the Posse Comitatus Act and, in essence, overrules it. Even though the ACLU and other groups are very concerned of the NDAA’s ramifications, that doesn’t amount to much when American citizens can be held without charge or trial.

Is it illegal to have military troops on the ground in America dealing with American citizens? Not according to the NDAA. And we saw this during the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing when troops, along with SWAT and other law enforcement personnel, went door to door, illegally searching persons and homes for the two Chechen suspects. How did people react? Most weren’t the slightest bit bothered if “it keeps them safe.”

If military personnel can now be utilized by the feds because of the NDAA, there is no reason why Russian troops (or other foreign military personnel) cannot be used. It seems as though this will ultimately become reality.

One of the main objectives of the Global Elite is to disarm all national armies in favor of one giant army under the auspices of the United Nations. Russian troops on the ground in America dealing with American citizens may be the first big step in that direction. Time will tell, but things appear to be ramping up very quickly. I hope you’re prepared.

Photo Credit: erjkprunczyk (Creative Commons)

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

Get the news the mainstream media doesn't report. Sign up to get our daily newsletter and like us on Facebook