Although the Republican Party is often too complicit or cowardly to hold President Obama accountable for his actions, it is finally showing some tenacity in investigating Obama’s “apparent crime” of partisan fundraising inside the White House. On Monday, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus wrote a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder “to request a Department of Justice investigation into an apparent crime committed by President Barack Obama.” In late June, Obama recorded the “Dinner with Barack and Joe” video, asking Democratic donors to enter a raffle to win dinner with the president and vice president, in the White House Map Room.
The Hatch Act makes it illegal to “solicit…a donation of money or other thing of value in connection with a Federal, State, or local election, while in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties.”
Priebus wrote, “The Map Room has been used for a myriad of official duties, including the administration of the oath of office to President Obama by Chief Justice Roberts and the launch of ‘The Campaign to Cut Waste.’”
“If President Obama recorded the video in the Map Room, then it appears he has committed a crime under federal law.”
Priebus noted in the letter he could have called for the appointment of a special prosecutor but reconsidered because of the public expense — a consideration never afforded the public by the Democratic Party. However, he rightly judged he stands little chance of receiving a just investigation from Eric Holder. “Under your leadership,” he wrote, “the Department of Justice has consistently ignored the law in order to protect the President politically.” He cited Holder’s refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in federal law and his dismissal of the Black Panther voter intimidation case.
The Republican chairman’s letter follows an inquiry from Congressman Darrell Issa, which alleges a wide-ranging effort to use federal offices to fill Democratic coffers while systematically depriving Republicans of campaign funds.
The Democratic Party defended itself by accusing the Republicans of greater violations — and, incredibly, insisting Barack Obama has been the most transparent president in history. “This is a disgraceful, desperate and politically-motivated attempt at getting headlines by a Republican Party awash in special interest cash which is fighting to preserve tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires at the expense of seniors,” said Democratic National Committee spokesman Brad Woodhouse. He called Priebus’ letter “an effort to distract from the fact that the President has run the most open and transparent White House and campaign ever.”
The allegation is ironic indeed. Polito‘s own Jim VandeHei reported that Obama officials met with lobbyists across the street from the White House to avoid transparency. In March, Darrell Issa accused the administration of punishing Homeland Security whistleblower Catherine Papoi. The allegation came on the same day Obama was to receive an award for transparency.
Although this author would have preferred the Republicans chose to stand their ground on the Libyan war, the ever-expanding Czardoms, or closing the door to unilateral schemes to raise the debt limit, it seems conservatives have to take our victories where we can get them.
Photo Credit: Dustin C. Oliver Creative Commons
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
Although I admire the RNC Chair, respectfully, Obama has "NEVER" answered for any of the countless number of questionable acts not limited to actions of legal but also illegal actions all aimed at the one goal he has been true to; fundamentally changing the United States.
Priebus should have hired a Special Prosecutor to investigate this. The American people would not mind spending the money because the money would have been well spent! Seems like a lot of games are being played here with both the Progressives and Republicans involved.
@Michael…and furthermore, Holder will NEVER do his job to investigate Obama's crimes. Never. Just like he did NOTHING about the Black Panthers!
I agree it time he was looked at closer .GUNRUNNER action too,
Do you really expect to get a response from Eric Holder. He does not work for we the peolpe, he works for BO and the far left goons. Why doesn't Reince write a letter to Holder regarding the birth certificate that is a fraud? Is anyone in Washington up to the task of starting an investigation into the illegal man who sits in the white house? Someone, please.
The Hatch Act explicitly exlucdes the President and Vice-President from the regulation. This is a waste of time because Obama is exempt from the Hatch Act.
Sure, that is like asking Holder to investigate the Black Panthers and voter intimidation. RIght, they dropped the charges. How about the judge that told the B.O to cease his healthcare plan and he continues in violation of a judges order, where are the contempt of court charges? There is only one way to stop this bully and that is to lock him up…. Would be nice to see someone throw him under the bus like he has others….
Barack Obama says there is no money for social security for seniors and no money for disabled veterans but he can send our tax dollars overseas to rebuild mosques in countries who don't even like America. Thank you Mr. President !
http://www.wsbtv.com/video/25764282/index.html
WHY call this obamination 'president?'
QUESTION; DOES ANYTHING HE DOES LEGAL INCLUDING HIM?
OMG*%#@#….like Holder is going to investigate his Best Bro for ANYTHING!!! Who are you kidding? They are cut from the same clothe. Both corrupt, both with an agenda to advance their political agenda. They both hate white people, both defend Muslims over Americans…why don't the GOP guys call for an investigation of the eligibility issue and the forged birth certificate? How about Project Gunrunner/Fast and Furious? How about Libya and the War Powers Act? There is plenty to get these 2 outta there…like the Nike commercial…JUST DO IT!!!!!
I've written to my Senator..twice…no response on THIS issue. A nice, respectful letter too. Told him I understood they were probably afraid of urban, black violence but we could not afford 4 more years. But if he was re-elected they MUST do something.
in your wildest dreams! holder nor the democrats would never investigate this ass hole! they are like the nazi's before WW-2. hear no evil, speak no evil, say no evil, can't say to much about the republicians either! we have to clean out that rats nest as soon as possible!
I remember many years ago, the Internal Revenue Service in Hartford, Connecticut ,solicited funds from employees, for a Jackson- Jefferson Day dinner. My relative, who worked for the IRS at the time, said many employees were called to Boston, to give testimony about whether they were solicited and by whom. Soliciting on Federal property for politics, is banned by the Hatch Act law. I don't know how many heads rolled after the investigation , but I think one or two did. Obama, was a lawyer,and Holder is one, so you would think that two men, with legal political backgrounds, would know that their actions were illegal.
As an example of Obama's "astute" legal knowledge Obama lost his license, so that tells us how smart he is! As for Holder he just follows Obama, so that show us how smart he is!
Obama didn't "lose" his license; he voluntarily surrendered it as it typical for those who don't intend to practice law (and don't want to keep paying for fees, insurance, etc.). If you hope to have credibility, Nonna, it would be best not to simply regurgitate common birther talking points for which the truth is easy to check.
James I don not buy it.
CCB the gay one naturally did not convey all the information!
Read my response to Goldbug36 below for the details that the gay one left out.
James, darling, you must be O's pet monkey; you seem to know every little intimate detail about his non-existent past!
Goldbug36 James is nothing more than a Obot!
A – S.O.B. also!
I will destroy him personally for his comments he directed at me & my deceased husband tonight.
The facts are that Obama along with his wife Michelle surrendered their license in lieu of prosecution for improprieties. Naturally the gay one never tells everything but instead prefers to spin & lie instead of facts.
I made no such comments. For you to associate me with the lying foul-mouthed oldcoyote–with whom I have disagreed about virtually everything for months–is libel. You owe me an apology.
James McPherson you know exactly where you can go to!
You with your aliases & associates such as Ellen, Granite, ireuel, 1oldcoyote2 etc.are fooling no one on this site! As hard as you try you can not mask who you are! How can ireuel or 1oldcoyote2 one moment make post that borders on illiterate to only come back with another well written?
You can not beat me on the issues or even in a general disagreement so you decide to attack me personally instead.I have informed you in the past that you could bring it on as far as attacking me but my family was out of bounds! You crossed the line last night.
I am not oldcoyote (or ireuel, Granite, or Ellen), and have not criticized any serviceman or the family members, living or deceased, with whom I disagree–nor would I. For you to associate me with the lying foul-mouthed oldcoyote–with whom I have disagreed about virtually everything for months–is libel. You owe me an apology.
Please feel free to have your father-in-law or his attorney call me, since you know how to reach me. I'd be happy to chat with them in an attempt to clarify this issue, since I don't know another way to prove to you that you're wrong.
As far as the writing abilities of others, you'll have to bring that up with them.
James no problem! Did i tell you that i was resigning my position with the University Of Miami & moving back to Atlanta, Georgia? Gee it is such a small world! Did you know that my father in-law knows three of the trustees at Whit-
-worth University? In fact he is considering making a substantial donation to the University. Unlikely though that you would ever see any benefit from his donation.
Have a good move–I'm sure your daughter will enjoy being closer to her grandparents. And as a grandfather, I know they'll be happy to have her nearby.
And we'd love to have your father-in-law's donation. Perhaps I'll mention it to the president of the university and his chief of staff when I play basketball with them tomorrow morning. Too bad I didn't know last week, or I could also have mentioned it to the two trustees who join our game when they're in town.
And feel free to have your father-in-law or his attorney give me a call–I'll be happy to connect them with the right people for his donation.
James what a small world we have! My father in-law in fact knows three trustees at Whitworth University. No he would never deal with a lower
level individual such as you. Looking forward to seeing exactly what clout you actually have at Whitworth University ? You have no idea what you have put in motion!
I had nothing to do with the insults you're so fired up about, so the only one putting anything in motion is you, but do tell your father-in-law to tell his trustee friends that I said hello. It's a small world, indeed, and my school is even smaller–I know all of the trustees.
By the way, how typically "conservative" of you to falsely and anonymously accuse someone of wrongdoing despite all evidence being to the contrary, to criticize others for what you think is a lack of money, and then to attack the person you've falsely accused with the threat of someone else's money.
James sorry but i don't buy it!
Yes it is small! Just 3,000 students was what he told me.
No i doubt that you know that many trustees!
No i have it right! No need to accuse you.
I have no idea whether you have a lack of money or not? But on your salary i would say that most likely you do not have a lot?
True my in-laws are loaded & i am not.
"Hell hath no fury as a woman's fury"!
Give me undeniable proof & i will apologize & back off! Without it? "What will be will be" !
James you S.O.B. You will pay for your comments tonight relating to me & my deceased husband! I played along with you & your charade but you crossed the line tonight! You are the most despicable & poor excuse for a man ever. I beat you on the facts & embarrass you in general & like a typical Liberal you resort to trash talk that is nothing more than the filthiest ever on this site. I will ruin you & you know I can. When I do so you will not even know that it is occurring. You have no idea the hell that you have created for yourself tonight!
The facts are Obama surrendered his law license because they were going to disbar him and he did not want that on his record.
James. no professional voluntarily surrenders their license….no one. That is ludicrous. I am a registered nurse. I retired 2 years ago and would never let my license lapse or fail to renew. I have been a registered nurse for 36 years. I know women who have been nurses for 44 years and still maintain their license. One does not put that much time, effort, study and money into acquiring a professional license just to turn around and "surrender" it. This does not pass the smell test.
False. Do some research.
James you need to look on your computer for some other angle! This will just not pass the stink test!
James this won't pass the stink test! go back to your computer program & possibly it will tell you how to spin it better?
WRONG AGAIN MCFEAR OBAMA LOST HIS LICENSE FOR LYING UNDER OATH ABOUT ALIASES
He lost his license because of fraud and perjury. He seemed to have forgotten his alias Barry Soetor. BTY Michellle lost her license also… It was either blackmail or extortion…Nice pair we have in the Oval Office….
False. Neither of them "lost" their licences. If you hope to have credibility, Bob, it would be best not to simply regurgitate common birther talking points for which the truth is easy to check.
They surrendered their licenses and the reason remains why. They were not charged with any crimes at the time so maybe they gave them up to prevent charges against them. Just a mystery but you can read about here James. Just go to truthorfiction.com
Barack and Michelle Obama Law Licenses are Voluntarily Retired and Inactive Status-Truth!
VELON GOOGLE OBAMA'S LAW LICENSE
James! Gay boy! You know they surrendered their license in lieu of prosecution for improprieties. So cut out the bull shit!
You have no idea the hell you will endure for your actions tonight!
Here I go again, James you are correct. There is no documentation to support that he or his wife lost any licenses to practice law. Neither one of them really never did anything great with their law licenses either.
But the whole point of this piece was about the RNC head demands investigation of Barry and Holder. This I think should of happened two years ago when Holder went to selective investigations and letting people that were convicted of Voter intimidation off after conviction. Holder is also still investigating CIA Agents because a couple of terrorists died in our custody. Cry me a river, the same people that lop the head off of the ones the captured died in custody, so f-in what.
Barry and Holder lied and people are dying. They both should be removed from the positions they currently hold. Who care if he lost is licensee to practice law, he stinks at it anyway, he and his wife both were lousing Lawyers.
ireuel,James or whoever or whatever you are? James is wrong! You are wrong! The Obama's did in fact surrender their license! Google it! It is really not very hard to do! Try it!
I am curious! How is it that suddenly as if by some miracle that you can put together a comment which appears to be by someone with a formal education? When in the past your comments or responses appeared to be written by a third or fourth grader?
SIMPLY AMAZING!
Well Alexia, I have lots of formal education and you are the most rude person on this site.
I wrote they did not "Lose " there Licenses and you say they "Surrendered" their licenses. Two different words with two different meanings.
What is it with you are you just angry with everyone whom does not agree with all you say? See your diagnosis that I write at a 3rd or 4th grade level sometimes is just a mean spirited statement, Of course from time to time I do just ramble on, mostly because the misinformation at this site is humorous at time.
I do not have to Google everything to research facts. Goggling will lead to a lot of misinformation and sites like this that spews retreaded misinformation. Google it yourself and tell me how many hit you get. It is in the millions. If in fact they "Surrendered" their Licenses for lying you think that would be posted somewhere else except WND or sites like this that just spread stuff as the foam pours out a rabid dogs mouth. See I do read a lot and I do have LOTS of Formal education and must maintain Continuing education because I work around the Nuclear industry. So in fact you and all of this country better hope I am not stupid as you claim I am. Calling people Stupid does not make your statements factual.
I am not James, and you are rude so I shall respond to YOU in any negative way I choose. James and I disagree on most REAL political issues and both agree that some sites are just spreading fiction that has zero evidences to support it. It is not the sites fault usually, mostly it is reckless individuals that have zero propose in life but to stir the pot. If the shoe fits wear it.
Have a nice day.
ireuel! James! Whoever or whatever you are? Fake!
So glad to hear that you have a formal education.
I do also as well.
No I am not the most rude person on this site!
It is you guys!
Do not spin words with me! You know perfectly well that I have always stated that they surrendered their license to practice law.
So do not even go there!
You will lose!
When people resort to using filthy words & attacking my family you had better believe I am going to be angry & you can expect me to come back at you with a vengeance.!
I have no problem with someone disagreeing with me. Ask
Gary of Colo. We have disagreed in the past & are still very cordial with each other.
The problem as usual with you liberals is when someone begins to prove you wrong you attack them by calling them nasty names.
You do write on a third or fourth grade level at times.
I know why?
You are trying to disguise who you are.
You say i am mean spirited?
Just go back & read the filth you have used when disagreeing with me!
So get over it!
Man up!
Be a man!
Yes I agree you do ramble at times but it is not due to the information at this site being humorous.
They actually call it being slow.
You lie when you say that you do not have to Google anything..
If this site is nothing more than retreaded information as you say?
My question to you is why do you even read it or come to this site?
If you had read enough instead of assuming you would have seen that once a attorney surrenders their license to practice law that it ends any investigations or actions in process pertaining to having their license revoked from them.
If you had read further then you would have read one article after another & yes one as well on WND'S site pertaining to numerous allegations of wrong doing! But because both surrendered their license in lieu of prosecution those records are sealed.
You say sites like this one just spread stuff as foam pours out of a rabid dogs mouth?
Sorry but i disagree!
Some articles are marginal but a majority have merit.
It is easy for you Liberals to attack with insults & lies any one or thing.
I am glad that you read The Huffington Post often.
I am glad that you have a lot of formal education in addition to to having to maintain a continuing education as well.
You most certainly could have fooled me!
Nuclear Industry is just stretching it a bit too much though!
If you are in fact employed in the Nuclear Industry then God help us all!
I agree that calling people stupid does not make it factual.
Trust me I know that it will come as a surprise to you that intelligence is not a inherited trait.
Hopefully with more education & counseling you can still get there though?
Sorry but you have already told me that i was rude.
Exactly what is it that you are having trouble with pertaining to my being rude to you?
You are rude to me.
So i am entitled to reciprocate.
Cut this B.S. about you & James disagreeing on most political issues!
I do agree though that The Huffington Post just spreads fiction with zero facts to support anything they write.
Just biased opinions!
I do agree that we have people like James McPherson & his aliases & team members you included plus 1 oldcoyote2 & Ellen who are absolutely useless in life.
All that any of you do on this site is to spin the truth, lie, insult people & try to spread deception among the conservatives on this site.
Go to bed!
Maybe you can concentrate better tomorrow with a good nights sleep.
WRONG AGAIN MCFEAR NEITHER ONE IS ALLOWED TO PRACTICE LEW BECAUSE THEY LIED UNDER OATH
James you need to check your facts! Simply put you are wrong! They both surrendered their license to practice law!
BobVelon in fact they surrendered their license in lieu of prosecution for improprieties. The Gay one is not telling it all!
Please show the documentation to support this claim. There is none that I can find. If you have a link a document that is real, please provide and I shall change my mind.
ireuel, James McPherson's Alias or Associate?
Not very hard to do! Just Google Obama's surrender their Law License & you can read for hours.
ireuel i would like to compliment you on your overnight ability that you have attained by now being able to put together sentences with no spelling errors!
I would say that it borders on being a phenomenon!
In my best Reagan voice;;; "Well there you go again". I just respond to your Google stuff. Show me a document you found by a jurisdiction that has the proof that he and his wife Lost, surrendered, HERE THE KICKER. "Because they were lying or any other legal matter". There is none and if you have one post the link to support that I will be more than happy to reconsider my position on this matter. PS: Not a link to a website that just repeats rumors.
Have a nice day.
ireuel i guess you are going to waste more of my time?
Go back to my response above & just possibly you will learn something for a change?
Your secret to success is knowing who to blame for all of your failures!
There is more than ONE crime committed by Obama and some for treason…The Congressmen are afraid to impeach him only because Obama is HALF black and they don't want to lose the black votes.
Obama is Mulatto. We could just as easily call him half white. No matter the color a crime is supposed to be punished. For treason the punishment is death.
That's the con–he's not half black….he's half Arab. Obama, Sr was nearly 100% Black Arab. His father was 100% Arab and the mother 1/8 Luo tribe only. Hence the very Arab name Barack Hussein, Just "look" at him….really LOOK at him. If you were looking at BHO for the first time, what ethnicity would you say he was? I'd say he looks Middle Eastern. Doesn't look Mulatto to me.
Just Another Day In Paradise For The Imposter Muslin Pres Obama Breaks Every Rule In The Books And Eric Holder Swears To It, Yikeess Now Eric Holder Investigate Obamas Crimes And At The Same Time Check His ID. God Bless America And Sarah Palin.
Well, what could he expect? Holder is his "henchman", and will ignore his request. Why didn't he ask the House of Representatives to investigate this? They have subpoena power, and could get the job done. Eric Holder is one of his apppointees, what were you thinking!
They also sent emails to millions asking for as little as $5.00 Donations for a chance to win Dinner at the White House With President Obama.I Got One!
HOLDER INVESTIGATE? SURELY YOU JEST!!
James McPherson! Gay Boy! I just wanted to inform you that i have forwarded all of my post to the website manager! Fell free to do so as well!
You S.O.B. you have no idea what is coming!
JCorrection: Feel free to do so as well!ames! Gay boy! You know they surrendered their license in lieu of prosecution for improprieties. So cut out the bull shit!
Correction: Feel free to do so as well!
I have no idea how the above occurred?
U R A S O B James
Alexia you are correct on that. By surrendering their licenses they avoided prosecution. His violation was fraud and perjury. He didn't put down he was also known under another name. How could he forget Barry Soetoro? Michelle's violation was either blackmail or extortion when she was working for a law firm….Two scumbags….. James is an Obot….. Thank you….
BobVelon you are absolutely right! James McPherson, Ellen, Granite, Ireuel ,1oldcoyote2 etc. are all Obots. They or he is fooling no one! You are correct! about their law license being surrendered.
Neweditor/Caleb: I realize that it is a waste of time on this site to bother reporting, but this person keeps threatening me while accusing me of posting comments under another name–which I have never done. You should be able to confirm that and to resolve the issue before more harm arises, but you probably won't.
James you are such a Pussy! As for the apology you want! You can forget it! Trust me when i say you have much bigger problems!
James you are such a pussy! No one can help you now! You crossed the line!
James McPherson your are such a candy! I told you I have already reported to the site manager every comment that i made toward you. If in doubt call them! I gave you their numbers remember.
And as we've repeatedly determined, the site manager here is pretty much useless. I thought calling him out publicly might do what I've been unable to do otherwise.
James i gave you all of their numbers! Gee! Call them!
Alexia; This site if anyone is watching or monitoring it would in fact come to the conclusion you are problem and you insult people more than anyone else at this site and you are the rudest person on this site and you have used more than one user name and yes this is written without the use of proper grammar rules. But I really don't care. I am posting on a website and really don't care if my use of the English language both verbal or written meets your expectations. Thank you very much but do have a nice day.
ireuel get over it! Grow up! Be a man! Man up if you can? The only problem on this site is all of you Liberals! No you jerks are the rudest people on this site not me! Most certainly I was using another name when I began on this site for the first year or two. When I moved to Miami i chose to use my real name since I had to re-register on this site. What is your excuse? ireuel I care less about your grammar! I know it depends on whoever is in the chair as to whether they have good grammar skills or not. You have already stated about the grammar thing & not caring if it meets my expectations so what are you trying to say?
Think positively! You do know the alphabet.
James i gave you all of their numbers! Call them!
James! Call them! I gave you all of their numbers.
James McPherson! Gay Boy! I just wanted to inform you that i have forwarded all of my post to the website manager! Fell free to do so as well!
Correction: Feel free to do so as well!
James / alias 1oldcoyote2 !
I want to leave you with one thought! Money can buy a lot things especially satisfaction. I personally do not have that kind of money but my in-laws do. My deceased husband was a only child. My in-laws would do anything for me that I ask of them if I would move back to Atlanta, Ga. in order to have their only Grandchild closer to them.
You know how to reach me. Please feel free to have your father-in-law or his attorney contact me so that we might straighten this out. Whatever else you may think of me, I would never insult a serviceman who died for his country, nor would I insult the relatives of someone with whom I disagreed.
Yeah sure James! Did i tell you that i am moving back to Atlanta? Did i tell you that my father in-law is considering making a substantial donation to your university?
Have a good move–I'm sure your daughter will enjoy being closer to her grandparents. And as a grandfather, I know they'll be happy to have her nearby.
And we'd love to have your father-in-law's donation. Perhaps I'll mention it to the president of the university when I play basketball with him tomorrow morning.
James i'm impressed! Just possibly he would enjoy discussing it with the three trustees my father in-law knows?
U just have no idea what is coming!
I had nothing to do with the insults you're so fired up about, so the only one putting anything in motion is you, but do tell your father-in-law to tell his trustee friends that I said hello. It's a small world, indeed, and my school is even smaller–I know all of the trustees.
By the way, how typically "conservative" of you to falsely and anonymously accuse someone of wrongdoing despite all evidence being to the contrary, to criticize others for what you think is a lack of money, and then to attack the person you've falsely accused with the threat of someone else's money. I look forward to discussing the issue with your father-in-law, should he choose to get involved.
James 3,000 students is what he told me? Not very large but it is what it is. All evidence points to you James & I am a registered Independent by the way. You have made that error before. I care less whether you have any money or not? I stated that I have no money so that is not a issue. Yes it is nice to know that you have the support financially of your in-laws if needed & especially their influence as well. If my father in-law were to get involved I can assure you that you would never know.
"All evidence points to you"
Huh? What evidence? And why are you the only one who thinks so? It should be obvious even to you–and would be to your father-in-law in three minutes–that oldcoyote and I are not the same person.
"If my father in-law were to get involved I can assure you that you would never know"
Why–what would he be afraid of?
"I am a registered Independent by the way. You have made that error before."
What error? I said "conservative"–which in this country is not a political party. Or are you now saying you're not conservative?
"I care less whether you have any money"
Hence the repeated comments about whether those who disagree with you can afford to belong to a country club?
James give me proof? Such as a address or e:mail address where i can confirm it is in fact 1oldcoyote2. Then i will apologize to you & cause you no problems. I can assure you that my father in-law fears no one. I am neither in my opinion a conservative or liberal.I told you that i had no money. What i said was that they could not afford to belong to my in-laws country club not mine.
If you do not succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
My work address and email address are easy to find. Since I have no idea who 1oldcoyote2 is, of course there's no way for me to know contact information for him/her–and I can''t imagine him/her (or anyone else) giving you that information, anyway, especially based on your actions on this site. Besides, people such as yourself who won't even use their names are unlikely to reveal more personal details.
But I'm confident that any rational person–and I suspect that your father-in-law is such a person–will immediately recognize that 1oldcoyote, ireuel, and I are obviously three separate people. You're the one who is repeatedly libeling me, so I have nothing to prove to you.
In fact, you owe me an apology. But I doubt you have the integrity to apologize, even if your own father-in-law points out to you that oldcoyote is some anti-Semitic jackass that I clearly dislike at least as much as I do you. In the meantime, I've wasted far too much time on you and your false claims.
James I do not need your information*I already have it at my Condo. in Miami*1oldcoyote2 is not my problem*My actions on this site?You have no idea*James Alexia is my real name*As for personal informa-
mation I am sure that right now you are regretting that you did so.*So
you do not prove anything to me*Sorry no apologies coming from me
*I have plenty of integrity*I'm not the one who uses aliases or a Obot with team members who attack people with filthy insults*I thank you
for acknowledging how much you dislike me*The feeling is mutual* Sorry that you wasted so much time*I don't think so James! Tell that line to someone else.
What makes you think it will get anywhere with this guy, he is just as bad as Obama and will cover for him, just a waste of time and money. He will steal this election just like he did the last one.
The impossable dream. To ask Holder to look into Obama would sure be one. Them are too peas in the pod. Its a shame that it is that way. Obama got his folks in the right places to cover his back side.
TOO PEAS SHOULD BE (TWO PEAS)
HOLDER investigate? Throw Holder in jail 1st and then call on an FBI patriot to investigate the whole lot of them. SICK OF THIS BOVINE SCATOLOGY!!!
I have in previous post stated of the intent by the Obama Administration to form a National Police Force.
WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL-Study: U.S. Marshals suited to be 'Stability Police' in U.S.-Suggests beefing up capacity, management for 'civilian tasks'-Posted: July 20, 2011-9:04 pm Eastern-By Bob Unruh-© 2011 WND-Confirmation of plans for operations inside U.S.
A study by the Rand Corp. within months of then-presidential candidate Barack Obama's call for a "national civilian security force" that would be as big and as well-funded as the half-trillion dollar U.S. military confirms that there are several ways to create the suggested "Stability Police Force" so that it legally could operate inside the U.S. borders.One of the top recommendations in the report was that the capacity and management operations of the U.S. Marshals Service be beefed up and handed the assignment."Given that it is unlikely that MPs [Military Police] would be permitted to perform civilian policing tasks in the United States, the Marshals Service, despite its capacity and management shortfalls, is the agency best suited to take on the SPF mission under the assumptions of this study."
What's really happening here? Read about your country in "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto"The study was released in 2009, only months after Obama made his presidential campaign call for a civilian force as big and as costly as the U.S. military.In a speech in Colorado Springs, Obama said, "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we set. We've got have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."WND reported when a copy of Obama's Colorado Springs speech posted online apparently was edited to exclude Obama's specific references to the new force.A video of his statements is posted here:The opening of the Rand report was focused on providing "Stability Police Force" services outside of the U.S. borders. A company spokesman told WND that the report focused exclusively on the idea of a structure that could move into war-torn or riot-damaged cities or nations overseas and restore order.However, a reading of the text of the report makes it clear that similar concerns about the behavior of U.S. residents were being evaluated, too.It noted that the plans for the $1 billion a year effort would have to be structured carefully so as not to infringe on the Posse Comitatus Act ban on U.S. military operations inside the U.S."The discussions … made clear that the MP option would likely not be available for domestic policing. This makes this option [fulltime and reserve, as the hybrid option would not be viable due to the fact that military personnel could not be embedded in civilian domestic law enforcement agencies…] much more expensive."The report discussed the possibility of creating a new agency inside the Department of Defense but noted, "It is unlikely that a military agency would be permitted to perform domestic policing functions … Because of this, the new agency would likely perform SPF functions better than the MP option due to a better ability to create a policing culture, but worse than the Marshals Service option due to the fact that it could not do policing tasks day-to-day."The report said the U.S. Secret Service also could be an option: "Much like the Marshals Service, the Secret Service focuses on law enforcement missions within the United States. When not deployed abroad, an SPF housed in the Secret Service could perform a wide range of domestic functions without running into legal barriers."A company official was unable to explain the study's references to policing in the United States.he Colorado Springs event wasn't the only time Obama preached of his requirement for a "civilian security" force.Radio talk show Mark Levin discussed it in a broadcast:He cited Obama's statement at a dedication ceremony for a facility at the National Defense University.There, Obama said, "American must also balance and integrate all elements of our national power. We cannot continue to push the burden onto our military alone, nor leave dormant any aspect of the full arsenal of American capability. That's why my administration is committed to renewing diplomacy as a tool of American power and to developing our civilian national security capabilities."What? Levin said."What does that mean? … Is he crazy? … He needs a civilian national security force … just as powerful … as our military?""The military has tanks, advanced weapons. What does he mean? … I know what his ideology is. That's why I'm getting nervous…. Will the shirts be brown? Will they be clicking their heels as they walk?"The Rand report also cited the Special Operations Group, which is headquartered at Camp Beauregard, La."It consists of about 100 deputies who respond to emergencies such as natural disasters, civil disturbances, and terrorist incidents and restores order during riots and mob violence. The SOG conducts missions in fugitive apprehension, high-profile prisoner movements, witness security operations, national emergencies and civil disorders.
page 1 of 2
Confirmed. I know people who were there and I have recording.
Gary this is scary stuff!
Alarming! I have in previous post stated of the intent by the Obama Administration to form a National Police Force.
WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Study: U.S. Marshals suited to be 'Stability Police' in U.S.
Suggests beefing up capacity, management for 'civilian tasks'
Posted: July 20, 2011
9:04 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND
Read more: Study: U.S. Marshals suited to be 'Stability Police' in U.S. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=323821#ixzz1SlI0aUI4
Confirmation of plans for operations inside U.S.
Previous stories:
Rangel plan gives prez 'civilian security force'-New law to 'manage' 8 million 'volunteers'-'GIVE' creating youth brigades?-Don't count out 'mandatory' service yet-'Mandatory youth service' bill advances-House adopts plan for uniformed 'volunteer' corps-Civilian security force on agenda again-Emanuel volunteers Americans to do 'a lot'-Web faux pas: Plan leaked for 'civilian security force'?-Dollars lining up for 'civilian national security force'?-Obama's training program described as 'Big Brother'-Obama's 'Big Brother' vanishes from speech-New Yorker reprints discredited Obama Holocaust distortion-Obama: Immigration enforcement equals terror-
Previous columns:
'Civilian national security force' redux-Obama's $439 billion secret-Obama's 'civilian national security force'
Read more: Study: U.S. Marshals suited to be 'Stability Police' in U.S. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=323821#ixzz1SlINXQwU
I am not oldcoyote (or ireuel, Granite, or Ellen), and have not criticized any serviceman or the family members, living or deceased, with whom I disagree–nor would I. For you to associate me with the lying foul-mouthed oldcoyote–with whom I have disagreed about virtually everything for months–is libel. You owe me an apology.
James i do not think if i were you that i would be waiting very long for that apology!
Obama the liar! As I have in previous post stated of Obama lying about his mothers fight with her insurance company Cigna over paying for her treatment for cancer.
Home » Commentary
Brent Bozell: Obama Lies About His Mother and the TV Networks Yawn
Thursday, July 21, 2011
By L. Brent Bozell III
On July 3, 1999, The New York Times exposed Al Gore for lying about his family in a national convention speech as vice president of the United States. In 1996, Gore had moved the Democrats to tears by claiming that when his sister Nancy died of cancer in 1984, he vowed then and there to oppose the tobacco industry. How courageous – and completely untrue.
The Times found Gore campaigned in 1988 boasting of his tobacco-farming prowess. So he lied through his teeth. Network coverage from ABC, CBS, or NBC on this whopper, even as Gore prepared a presidential run? Zero.
On July 13, 2011, this cycle repeated itself, when The New York Times reported on another national Democrat lying about a death in the family in his convention address, presidential debates, just about everywhere. That was Barack Obama in 2008 claiming his mother Ann Dunham died of cancer battling with insurance companies all the way through. Dramatic? Yes. But an utter lie. Network coverage of this new jaw-dropper on ABC, CBS, and NBC? Also zip, zilch, zero.
How pathetic. This is the same set of networks that devote multiple heavy-breathing stories to “correcting” non-candidate Sarah Palin’s historical knowledge of Paul Revere, or Michele Bachmann’s location for the birthplace of John Wayne. But Obama lies about his mother – a shameless, pandering tug using his mother to get socialized health care, and they’re mute!
In a story published on page 16, reporter Kevin Sack explained “The White House on Wednesday declined to challenge an account in a new book” that Obama “mischaracterized a central anecdote about his mother’s deathbed dispute with her insurance company.” The headline said the book “challenges” the Obama story, and in the story they used the word “mischaracterized.” It was a whole lot more than that.
The new book, by Times reporter Janny Scott, is titled “A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother.” Scott quoted from correspondence from Ann Dunham to assert that the 1995 dispute concerned a Cigna disability insurance policy. Her actual health insurer had reimbursed most of her medical expenses without argument. The Times noted that although candidate Obama often suggested that Dunham “was denied health coverage because of a pre-existing condition, it appears from her correspondence that she was only denied disability coverage.”
Obama lied to an entire stadium of supporters in his August 28, 2008 convention speech. "As someone who watched my mother argue with insurance companies while she lay in bed dying of cancer,” he announced, “I will make certain those companies stop discriminating against those who are sick and need care the most.”
The same line was declared in the October 7, 2008 presidential debate, carried by all the networks like the convention speech. "For my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in a hospital room, arguing with insurance companies because they're saying that this may be a preexisting condition and they don't have to pay her treatment, there's something fundamentally wrong about that." (Afterward, the networks brought their outrage to the slight that John McCain had described Obama as “that one.” They put on focus-group liberals who found the remark “picky and childish.”)
Obama also mentioned her in a 2007 campaign TV ad: “In those last painful months, she was more worried about paying her medical bills than getting well. I hear stories like hers every day.”
The Times went to liberal Harvard professor Robert Blendon to pronounce the obvious: if Obama’s phony storyline had been discovered during the 2008 campaign “people would have considered it a significant error.” Or not an error – a lie. Blendon added: “I just took for granted that it was a pre-existing condition health insurance issue.”
So did the entire American news media.
There’s one last interesting tidbit in the Times. Obama’s mother wrote to Cigna after they declined her claims that she had turned the case over to “my son and attorney, Barack Obama.” Scott could not determine from the documents she viewed whether Obama had ever written to Cigna on his mother’s behalf. Isn’t it interesting in all of Obama’s rhetoric about his mother’s insurance battles, he always left himself out of the storyline? Did this lawyer son ever get involved?
In the Bush years, media liberals (and even Joe Scarborough) suggested George W. Bush was dangerously stupid because he was so “intellectually incurious.” Our media are so incurious about the truth behind Obama’s often-mythical life story, one might ask “Are they dangerously stupid?”
Administration to form a National Police Force.
IT IS ABOUT TIME!!!!!