The 2008 donors who haven’t returned to President Obama are disproportionately centrists and very liberal Democrats, while regular Democrats have stuck by the president, according to a new analysis of campaign finance data.
The analysis, by Stanford political scientist Adam Bonica, matches and deepens a BuzzFeed finding that roughly 90% of those who gave more than $200 to Obama haven’t returned, a mark of the disillusionment among some of his early supporters and of his ongoing struggle — despite the advantages of organization and incumbency — to keep even with his 2008 fundraising totals.
“The 2008 donors who were most likely to give again in 2012 are those with ideological scores most similar to Obama’s, whereas moderate-to-conservative donors and those on far left are significantly less likely to re-up,” Bonica said.
Bonica’s model is based on a large swathe of publicly available campaign finance data. He examined all of Obama’s $200-plus individual donors from 2008 and 2012, as reported to the Federal Election Commission. He then gave each contributor an ideological “score” based on his or her past political donations, with -2 being the most liberal and 2 being the most conservative. Once each of Obama’s contributors had an ideological score, Bonica divided them into new, returning, and drop off donors before plotting them on comparative ideological graphs.
The story of Obama’s failure to impress the ideological progressives who had hoped he’d pass single-payer health care and battle Republicans, is a familiar story. But Bonica’s research suggests the degree to which conservative criticism has also eaten into Obama’s core support, leaving the president fighting a two-front battle.
Read More at buzzfeed.com. By Rebecca Elliott.
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism


Money should have nothing to do with a decision to not support this critter in the WH. He is destroying this Country, he has damaged our Constitution, our Military, our Good Name around the World, and he needs to feel the heel of justice. He is criminally liable and his High Crimes are well identified. Anyone in league with Obama are out to destroy our Country. They must be considered enemies of this Country.
You are right. The lying lamestream media is guilty of being in league with Obama. They should be tried for criminal liability along with the treasonous politicians and judges. See website: http://www.haasstrep68.com
The Golfer in the White House is carrying water for George Soros, who in turn is the water boy for the CFR, much the same as Gingrich is. Romney isn’t much better. Talk of criminal liability is rampant, and it is quite probably a provable accusation. However, it doesn’t change the fact that If Romney gets elected we will have another criminal in the White House, doing the bidding of the international bankers. If Romney and Obummer are our only choices, we had better hunker down and get ready for the long haul.
Take a look at Agenda 21 and get to work at the local level to bring about some changes that will put the power back in the hands of the people, where it belongs. Peace, Robert Walker