Observing those things in public, however inarticulately, does NOT make one a racist. Except, perhaps, in the twisted logic of the hard left and their sycophants in the media.
Bundy’s problem is that he just got done kicking the government’s hind parts, and the libs who write headlines (as well as the chattering politicos) are lusting for his blood. They want to turn him into Nevada flank steak.
Advertisement-content continues below
And they know that when the subject turns to race, even conservative Republicans are largely wusses who will back down faster than Arnold Schwarzenegger faced with an illegitimate child.
It used to be that Social Security was the electrically charged third rail of American politics.
Today, it’s any mention of race.
You disagree with Barack Obama? You’re a racist.
Advertisement-content continues below
Don’t like Obamacare? You’re a racist.
Think that affirmative action is a bad idea? Racist.
But here’s the deal.
While the headline writers at the Las Vegas Review Journal and the New York Times were calling Bundy a racist, the Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) ruled – for the first time – that the voters of a state may bar their public officials from any use of race in admissions to public colleges. They said that a state’s voters can ban “affirmative action”, if they chose to do so.
If Bundy’s poorly articulated point was that government intervention contributes to a lack of freedom, or even that it is a government overreach for a government to ignore the will of its citizens, then it would appear the Court agrees.
Nobody wrote a headline calling the Court a bunch of racists.
But you see, the chattering class doesn’t like Bundy because he represents someone who clings to his guns and his religion (Barack Obama, 2008) and doesn’t fit their mold.
I even watched Bill O’Reilly lambast Bundy for what he said and, in the process, was completely and factually inaccurate about the story, its timeline, and the “taxes” which he said Bundy didn’t pay. Seems Mr. O is now too big to flunk Journalism 101. A “journalist” who is too big to fail. Imagine that.
Cliven Bundy is a hardscrabble rancher. He doesn’t run a corporate feedlot in Illinois from an air conditioned office. He is not Rosa Parks or Martin Luther King. He does not have a PR firm representing him.
But when he had the temerity to challenge the established order (which even the Nevada Cattlemen’s Association didn’t have the cojones to challenge), he won a significant victory.
Granted, he could use a media advisor.
But I’d rather have a rancher who kicks the BLM’s rear end (and Harry Reid’s by proxy) than an East Coast slickie boy who is smart enough to stay away from talking about the third rail of American politics.
Here are some questions I’d like answers to:
- How many snipers did the BLM deploy in their aborted cattle “gather”?
- Is the speculation by former Las Vegas Review Journal Managing Editor Tom Mitchell true that the real reason the BLM quit was that no cattle people would do business with them?
- How many rounds of ammunition does the BLM possess?
- What is the weapons inventory of the BLM?
- How many “law enforcement” officers does the BLM employ in the Western United States? Where are they located?
- What happened to the two clowns who killed 20-year-old D’Andre Berghardt Jr near Las Vegas on February 14?
- Were those two clowns in the group of armed “law enforcement” BLM employees on the Bundy “gather”?
I’ll bet that the honest answers to those questions will scare the crap out of any freedom-loving American a lot more than anything Cliven Bundy has said or will say.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.