I’m a Tea Partier! I’m also a lifelong Republican as was my father, a Chicago Packard dealer Service Manager in the Capone Era. We even owned Machine Gun Mike McGurk’s ’29 Packard coupe for a while. Dad said he got to vote against that SOB Roosevelt four times!
I went to Tea Party meetings on three occasions – three different groups. I attended a big rally in Bakersfield, California where John Boehner and my Congressman Kevin McCarthy attended and were denied an opportunity to speak. They never forgave the Tea Party. It was such a stupid move, but that’s history…and I believe we’ve been paying for it with the Establishment ever since – with Karl Rove as the resident strategist. I got to share some thoughts with several gays from the local college who came to protest. We got along fine even if we didn’t agree.
How can I be a Tea Partier if I only went to three meetings and have no serious contact with any “leaders?” Tea Party is a philosophy of governance, not a club or a political party. Tea Partiers sense something drastically wrong with the “progressive” direction the country has been in since Wilson signed the Federal Reserve into law in the dark of night. This created what I call “The Multistory Outhouse” with the mastery of money at the top and a sewer of lost beauty and debt at the bottom. Guess who is in between! The Democratic Party has long abandoned the hard working family man and woman while brainwashing our children.
“Progressives” see the Constitution as a living, breathing document subject to change with the whims of those who make the most noise – classic democracy – not the Republic they hate our kids swearing allegiance to. They believe the Declaration of Independence has no legal tie to the Constitution and is therefore irrelevant. The President sees the Constitution as dead – his oath of office should be interesting, but he could sing “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and it wouldn’t matter to the mainstream media.
Tea Partiers are strong on the Constitution, but not clear on the Declaration of Independence except for its reference to God and the equality of our creation with inalienable rights. They are only slightly aware the bulk of the Declaration of Independence is a litany of history repeated in our time. The Republican Establishment hasn’t the foggiest idea and operates in ways that prove it beyond a doubt.
Contrary to the multistory outhouse, the combination of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution produced history’s greatest secular gift to mankind. I call it “The Fountain of Opportunity and Prosperity,” where money is the medium of exchange and the (profitable) servant of the other eight levels in the structure of society. There is an order of three groups of three priorities in how we think, act and operate. How these are prioritized defines the upside down “progressive” versus the “Beautifully Correct” priorities called “The Political Theory of Relativity.” (I’m willing to share with any who have the intellectual curiosity to inquire!)
We are way past politics as usual and deep into all-out spiritual warfare. We only need to note that attacks on religion, religious freedom and loyalty have accelerated drastically under the current Administration. Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals was dedicated to Lucifer. This is the “bible” of the “progressive” movement, including the teachers union. It is applied with great consistency with significant results against a dumbed down population.
The other horse in the race is the well-entrenched Muslim Brotherhood with a goal of destroying the “Great Satan” and instilling Sharia Law to replace the Constitution – at the cost of American blood and treasure to establish Sharia ruled Middle Eastern countries for starters. In either case, the end game is bloodshed and poverty for the vast majority of the American and world population.
I found the major Tea Party blog groups to be helpful but too buried in choir preaching and fundraising to have a solid effect. They are a necessary element to counter the hundreds of millions of dollars of communist-leaning unions, and Hollywood. And of course George Soros and his lackeys in Academia have poured millions into Luciferian Alinsky and Cloward and Pivens strategies to bring down the Constitution and the economy.
Time for “The whole armor of God!” (Ephesians 6:11-18)
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
I’m gonna try responding a little different this time. I’m gonna take a few statements and make *short* comments on them in separate posts.
You stated, ““Progressives” see the Constitution as a living, breathing document subject to change with the whims of those who make the most noise – classic democracy – not the Republic they hate our kids swearing allegiance to.”
You COMPLETELY fail to see that it was the REPUBLICANS that were the ORIGINAL PROGRESSIVES! It was Abraham Lincoln who was the FIRST president to read the US Constitution who saw and interpreted it as a LIVING, BREATHING document!
And finally, it was the REPUBLICAN PARTY in the 1840s – 1870s that ALLOWED 10s of thousands of RED MARXISTS into their party, ESPECIALLY under Lincoln. This is why the Republican Party is known as the Red Republicans….
Better rewrite your story….
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
Thanks Mike…I truly enjoy your posts. I find if funny that fundamentalists of religion attack fundamentalists of the Constitution. A bit bias i believe.
That’s odd because when I was a kid in the 1960s the Democrats were always represented with red and the Republicans with the modest blue then and that was about a hundred years after Lincoln.
@freedomringsforall
You’re very observant! The colors have indeed reversed. The exact use of this color scheme emerged in the 2000 elections, due more to general agreement among commentators than anything else. Before that time, the color scheme was rversed, where red is the color of the liberals and blue the conservatives. This is also portrayed similar in other countries. Also note in Europe the term “Liberal” actually means conservative to usa citizens and vice versa. This is because the word “conservative” normally means keeping the political structure as is or keeping the status quo, whereas “liberal” meant change.
The united states was known as a conservative government as long as the parties did not support change. Red is the color NORMALLY identified with Marxism, liberalism and Progressive-ism of which the Republican were the original Progressive Party and supported change from their beginnings as a party with Lincoln running as their first candidate for president. Red is a color of change. They were even called the Progressive Party during Teddy Roosevelt’s tenure as president. The following article may help some:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan30.htm
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
Yea here we go with a notation straight out of Wikipedia.
Only using Wikipedia because it is fast and because I know the truth and this is accurate enough.
You can research elsewhere and find out that this is at least a very accurate historic representation if not absolute to the year or day or something.
Origins of the color scheme
Before the 2000 presidential election, the traditional color coding scheme was “Blue for Republican, Red for Democrat,”[2] in line with historical European associations (red was used for left-leaning parties).[3] Traditional political mapmakers, at least throughout the 20th century, have used blue to represent the modern-day Republicans, and the Federalists who preceded them. Perhaps this was a holdover from the days of the Civil War when the predominantly Republican North was “Blue”.[2]
“I went to Tea Party meetings on three occasions – three different groups. I attended a big rally in Bakersfield, California where John Boehner and my Congressman Kevin McCarthy attended and were denied an opportunity to speak.”
I can only speak about Boehner. The reason he wasn’t allowed to speak is because TEA Partiers do NOT consider him one of them. I know I do NOT see *Boner* as anything close to being a TEA Partier and neither do the TEA Party members I know. So there was good reason to shut him out, and what we see coming from Boner now only confirms how out of touch he is with the TEA Party members. Then consider how he shut them out power in the House. So, are you gonna say he done that because of him not being allowed to speak? I will say it is simply because he didn’t like the TEA Party to begin with and is using his denial to speak as an excuse/pretext for his actions now. If this is not true, then he would be more than willing to still try and work with them, simply because his principles would have told him it was the right thing to do. So we can now see Boner also doesn’t really have any principles that are righteous, or very very few at best.
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
Yeah Jimmy I agree with your sentiments there too!
Hey I got your mail. It was very good and I’m still thinking about it. Actually I agree with about all you said. It was in your other writings I thought you came across as atheist, but I do agree with you completely about organized religion. I will respond to you in more detail in a few.
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
So, you went to just three Tea Party meetings and are now an expert?
You think that “Boner” and McCarthy are actual Republicans and their subsequent offenses are attributable to not being permitted to speak at a single Tea Party rally? I think you have confused cause and effect. Note also that McCarthy again voted for Boehner as speaker, while Boner pushed through higher taxes, higher spending, fully funded Obamacare and a host of repressive bills such as NDAA, HR347, “Patriot” Act and more.
As far as “Obama,” or whatever the hell his real legal name is, he’s not even eligible for the office.
That Bakersfield Tea Party seems to be smarter than Congress and the idiots who returned Obama, Biden, Boner, McCarthy, Feinstein and other fools and traitors to office.
@gmiller
That was funny after I got to thinking about what you wrote. I had to laugh, thinking; Jerry Todd is OBVIOUSLY from Illinois, as his dad ran a car lot in Chicago. Then I think, well, Obama and Lincoln both came from Illinois with Chicago being the cesspool of corruption of the entire country. So it all makes sense to me now. Jerry Todd was never taught true history, so he doesn’t know any better. And it is NEVER wise to elect anyone from Illinois for any political office, especially for president of the usa, as they have a perfect track record for corruption, disobeying the US Constitution and sending the usa into civil wars. There may be exception but I’ve learned NEVER trust anyone from Illinois. This is regardless if they call themselves Republicans or Democrats, as the state is a equal opportunity misery maker!
Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
Mike:
LOL!
Don Fredrick is from Chicago, too, but was unaffected. Check out his book “The Obama Timeline.”