Piers Morgan, the “man without a country,” as there is a petition to deport him back to the UK and a petition in the UK to keep him out of the UK, is at it again, attacking not only our Constitution but the Bible as well!
How did Piers Morgan get so smart. He thinks he knows everything and wants to change everything in the U.S. to suit himself.
Just ask him. He really is the one who is flawed.
All I can say to that is ” HA—Piers Morgan’s DNA is Inherently FLAWED. ” How could someone Sooo Mentally FLAWED, be Allowed to even WORK in this country, unless he was a Politician. Look what we have for ” Politicians “. 200 Years ago, these people would have been left beside a Tree to fend for them selves, which normally meant they got Eaten by a Wolf or a Bear. WHY Can’t we go Back to that? No Offence to the Children’s Rights people, but our world would be much better off without all those like Piers Morgan.
Hmmmmm? I wonder what limb of the Morgan Family TREE he is sitting on? Hmmmmm?
You meant to say “hanging from” instead of “sitting on”, right? Cause Morgan bears a striking resemblance to Monkey Boy Imenajihad whenever he opens that nasty mouth of his.
I heard a Country Music Song that pretty well sums up my opinion. I believe it’s called on the front porch. But the part I’m talking about, is Just A Swangin.
The third one from the bottom. He is the one with his tail wrapped around the branch and swinging by it.
If Piers Morgasm is not a legal US Citizen, why is he allowed to exercise the first amendment?
YOUR RIGHT, But the same GOES FOR BARACK OBAMA and look at his address,
WE cannot depend on OUR POLITITIONS to protect our COMSTITUTION when they set back and let this WHOLE regime TRY to change them and do NOTHING but write articles and ask for money to do something they are already being paid to do.
I am SO INSULTED that they THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE AS STUPID AS BARACK TELLS OTHER COUNTRIES WE ARE. WERE not all STUPID, JUST THE ONES THAT VOTED FOR HIM FIT THAT BILL.
WHEN he will find out when the PEOPLE START A REVOLUTION AGAINST THEM, and Hang them for TREASON.
And I feel sorry for the SO MANY OF THE SECURITY that some of them will lose there lives to TRY to save HIS.WHAT IS SAD ,HE IS NOT WORTH IT.AS the old saying there not worth the lead and powder to blow them up.
MAYBE some one know where we can get it whole sale.
I mispelled CONSTITUTION. Sorry.If I haden’t some one would be real quick to tell me it was me Barack was talking about. (HA)
you not only misspelled constitution you also misspelled misspelled, you’re, politician, we’re and someone is one word not two. i guess those politicians were right about at least one american being stupid.
So another one swatting at nats and swallowing camels. You all do seem to have come from from the same DNA. It is time to see that you are part of the evil good Americans are fighting.
This has nothing to do with swatting camels. Piers Morgan has become a Prik in the side of Mother Britania, and here in America he is just a Mindless Prick
Most of us type faster than we think at times. Not to worry. We all know what you mean, anyway.
It is not the constitution that is “Inherently Flawed”. It is man.
If the Constitution is “Perfect”, why are there amendments to it?
Oh, because it isn’t perfect, that’s why….
It is better than that of any other country. If not why are people packing into our country? They get here and want to bring their country with them, all except the lack of freedom part they left in the first place. There is no room for other countries here. They all can go home or assimilate.
Sheesh. Didn’t we beat the British once before? He just may be holding onto some anyomosity (anger) from his elders? A pity so many have to play the race card. See what we did to the British soooooooo many years ago? I guess they all believe it’s “payback” time. The best way to shut him up is shut him out. Don’t listen to his rubbish, and soon, he’ll have no sponsors, and no show. Good riddance to bad rubbish!
He’s not on FAUX News, I doubt your boycotting his show would do anything other than keep you in your bubble of la-la land…
The Truthiness? There is but one Truth and it cannot be divided into Truthiness. That indicates sort of Truth, around Truth, some Truth. Truth cannot be divided. Either it is Truth or a lie.
He needs to be sent packing, but the UK does not want him. He is a louse. As soon as we get that bunch in D.C. straigtened out as to who the public servants are, we will send his azz packing just like the rest of those who will not keep their mouths shut off our Bible and Constitution.
Oops! I forgot to add my question to Piers. Is the reason your in America have anything to do with Great Britain being taken over by the Muslims and Sharia Law? Just wondering!
Maybe we should petetion to have him deported to Syria, so he can be a Real Reporter
Since when did we lose Free Speech?
“You can safely assume that you’ve created God in your own image, when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.”
What kind of silliness is this? What Bible have you been reading from?
This is what happens to us when we try to be nice and leave our borders open.
Things have changed sense we started open up our borders to people like the OBAMAS the PIERS MORGANS,THE SOROS , THE AXELRODS,THE ACORNS,
Where taking other countries TRASH and believe me the old saying about PEOPLE DON’T CHANGE WHAT THEY BELIEVE and ATTITUDES because the go to Another country.
They get thrown out of their homelands and just keep going until they will NOT be WELCOMED ANY PLACE.
They will be people with out a COUNTRY. But you know what I am past 60 and can tell you what I have learn about this subject, When you get kicked out of your home land ,before you show an act of Kindness ,Check out WHY they were thrown OUT. may want to close our door to them, Use SOROS and Barack as an example.
I SAY START EXTERMANITION AT ONCE before they can contaminate any thing else.
That is a bit harsh, is it not? Extermination? Lets just throw them out, jail them, fine them for money stolen and used unlawfully and that should put a damper on their bad habits.
The attempts at leaving the borders open is to allow those squatters to come into this country and assist in the breaking the back of America financially. The free education, the free staples of life and illegal voting. The division of ethnics, all the benefits and more than citizens have to enrage the citizenry. Obama is using this to destroy America along with his other anti-American policies. He cares nothing for the foreigners and illegals but is using the influx of these people to further indebt this country. It is financial ruin and poverty from lack of jobs Obama is after. It is part of a plan perpetrated upon the American people by him and other enemies of this country. It is part of a multifacited agenda when combined with other disasterous policies initiated by Obama and it is being is having a huge negative effect upon the wealth of this nation.
Have you been a bigot and racist all of your 60+ years? This is how your parents raised you? To hate everyone who’s different?
No wonder so many people think Americans are a-holes
And what are you? An American or just the “other”? If your an Nobama lover, I think you have the wrong website. And who made you the administrator of GOD? You do not seem very Christian by the way you respond to others. Must be a closet Muslim, hey?
Most of us hate vipers. Different? If poison is different. Yes, I personally hate it.
If you think Ameicans are such A-holes why are you hanging around? Did we buy your computer and your electricity to run it? Who are you getting your money from if you are working? Americans must not be thought to be A-holes but babies to take candy from and people are coming into this country to droves to get the free goodies. Well, If I though people were such A-holes I would find my azz another place to park.
I’m surprised that Piers Morgan let him off so easily. There are so many better examples of the idiocy of biblical scripture like the penalties for wearing two different kinds of material, working on the sabbath, children should be stoned if they don’t behave, the eating of shellfish, etc etc etc. It is a bronze age book written by people who would consider a wheelbarrow a break through technology. It’s time to do away with these ancient myths and let them go the way of all other myths that came before it.
Taken out of context? What Bible are you reading? Jesus Christ freed us from the law of the Old Testament because us Gentiles were not raised as Jews who did, in fact live by the Old Testament Laws. Jesus asked us to keep the Laws of the land (the Constitution) where are just and good according to God. Also no one is able to do the animal and bird sacrifices in modern times, so we are to be saved by Grace which is to say kindness and patience whenever possible, with understanding. We must first accept Christ as our Savior before our hearts will allow grace or even understand it. When Christ is asked for salvation, His spirit enters into your heart and you become knowlegable of grace. Without it you are subjecting yourself to the Laws of the Old Testament and no one is able to go by all that, especially gentiles (non-Jews) who were not raised as the Jews to obey the Old Testament laws. God gave us Christ because we are so prone to disobedience, and the Spirit Jesus left here after his acention to Heaven is enough to save us through grace and knowlege of being who we should be. You then have a father to pray to for strength and forgiveness.
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17). i’m not sure what bible you’re reading from. is it one of these new age feel good bibles? also, does it mention the constitution in your bible because if it does then i have some land in arizona you might be interested in.
You are swatting at nats and swallowing camels with your ‘out of context’ Bible reading.
You are putting your faith in people instead of the most Holy God who created people? The Bible says you are a fool.
Piers, you got punked on your own show you raving moron. It’s YOU that’s flawed. The Holy Bible is witnessing in Revelations EXCTLY what Piers, and this Muslim ‘president’ and his silent society media and administration are doing and will do. ALSO you old fart w/ no nation to call home-YOU will spend eternity with the fallen angel, have fun loser!!! So sick of this twit.
There is a hell that awaits those who mock and scoff. It is enlarging itself as we speak.
This country is like a large house with family organized and run by a set of laws (the Constitution.) Along come the squaters, uninvited and want the house. They nudge, push, shove spread lies and gossip to turn family members (the country) against one another. They impress with things that are not conventional and deceive to say it is better until one by one family members stray long enough to listen and are replaced in their own homes by the usurper. Before the original members know it they are out in the cold and the home is being run by someone they do not recognize or can even relate to.
what in the world are you talking about? you do realize that this country was full of people who had lived here for thousands of years before we arrived? so if anyone is a squatter it’s us. everyone single one of us.
One of the things that the Bible teaches is that there are differences between a God Ordained Government and an Evil Government. And we are to Reverence Gods Ordained Government, but the Evil Government we do not have to follow when it is Contrary to Gods Laws and Statutes. Gods Laws take Presedence over Mans Laws, ALWAYS.
Name chapter and verse that specifically talks about “god ordained governements” and “evil governments”. Your god seems to have a lot of rules about how best to rape a woman, pillage towns, and enslave people than it does about good governance which is why the founding fathers created a secular document rather than a religious one.
“As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you”-(Deuteronomy 20:10-14)
and another: “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl’s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment.”-Exodus 21:7-11
Well, I haveto say, you have at least read some of the Bible. It seems to me you are a bit selective and take many things out of context. However, Thanks to Kerby Anderson, the following information is Spot On as for basic Christians beliefs.
Christian View of Government
Government affects our lives daily. It tells us how fast to drive. It regulates our commerce. It protects us from foreign and domestic strife. Yet we rarely take time to consider its basic function. What is a biblical view of government? Why do we have government? What kind of government does the Bible allow?
Developing a Christian view of government is difficult since the Bible does not provide an exhaustive treatment of government. This itself is perhaps instructive and provides some latitude for these institutions to reflect the needs and demands of particular cultural situations. Because the Bible does not speak directly to every area of political discussion, Christians often hold different views on particular political issues. However, Christians are not free to believe whatever they want. Christians should not abandon the Bible when they begin to think about these issues because there is a great deal of biblical material that can be used to judge particular political options.
The Old Testament teaches that God established government after the flood (Gen. 9:6). And the Old Testament provides clear guidelines for the development of a theocracy in which God was the head of government. These guidelines, however, were written for particular circumstances involving a covenant people chosen by God. These guidelines do not apply today because our modern governments are not the direct inheritors of the promises God made to the nation of Israel.
Apart from that unique situation, the Bible does not propose nor endorse any specific political system. The Bible, however, does provide a basis for evaluating various political philosophies because it clearly delineates a view of human nature. And every political theory rests on a particular view of human nature.
The Bible describes two elements of human nature. This viewpoint is helpful in judging government systems. Because humans are created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26–27), they are able to exercise judgment and rationality. However, humans are also fallen creatures (Gen. 3). This human sinfulness (Rom. 3:23) has therefore created a need to control evil and sinful human behavior through civil government.
Many theologians have suggested that the only reason we have government today is to control sinful behavior because of the Fall. But there is every indication that government would have existed even if we lived in a sinless world. For example, there seems to be some structuring of authority in the Garden (Gen. 1–2). The Bible also speaks of the angelic host as being organized into levels of authority and function.
In the creation, God ordained government as the means by which human beings and angelic hosts are ruled. The rest of the created order is governed by instinct (Prov. 30:24–28) and God’s providence. Insect colonies, for example, may show a level of order, but this is due merely to genetically controlled instinct.
Human beings, on the other hand, are created in the image of God and thus are responsible to the commands of God. We are created by a God of order (1 Cor. 14:33); therefore we also seek order through governmental structures.
A Christian view of government differs significantly from views proposed by many political theorists. The basis for civil government is rooted in our created nature. We are rational and volitional beings. We are not determined by fate, as the Greeks would have said, nor are we determined by our environment as modern behaviorists say. We have the power of choice. Therefore we can exercise delegated power over the created order. Thus a biblical view of human nature requires a governmental system that acknowledges human responsibility.
While the source of civil government is rooted in human responsibility, the need for government derives from the necessity of controlling human sinfulness. God ordained civil government to restrain evil (cf. Gen. 9). Anarchy, for example, is not a viable option because all have sinned (Rom. 3:23) and are in need of external control.
Notice how a Christian view of human nature provides a basis to judge various political philosophies. For example, Christians must reject political philosophies which ignore human sinfulness. Many utopian political theories are based upon this flawed assumption. In The Republic, Plato proposed an ideal government where the enlightened philosopher-kings would lead the country. The Bible, however, teaches that all are sinful (Rom. 3:23). Plato’s proposed leaders would also be affected by the sinful effects of the Fall (Gen. 3). They would not always have the benevolent and enlightened disposition necessary to lead the republic.
Christians should also reject a marxist view of government. Karl Marx believed that human nature was conditioned by society, and in particular, the capitalist economy. His solution was to change the economy so that you would change human nature. Why do we have greed? Because we live in a greedy capitalist society. Marx taught that if society changed the economy from capitalism to socialism and then communism, greed would cease.
Christians should reject the utopian vision of marxism because it is based upon an inaccurate view of human nature. The Bible teaches that believers can become new creatures (2 Cor. 5:17) through spiritual conversion, but that does not mean that the effects of sin are completely overcome in this life. The Bible also teaches that we will continue to live in a world tainted by sin. The view of Karl Marx contradicts biblical teaching by proposing a new man in a new society perfected by man’s own efforts.
Since civil government is necessary and divinely ordained by God (Rom. 13:1–7), it is ultimately under God’s control. It has been given three political responsibilities: the sword of justice (to punish criminals), the sword of order (to thwart rebellion), and the sword of war (to defend the state).
As citizens, Christians have been given a number of responsibilities. They are called to render service and obedience to the government (Matt. 22:21). Because it is a God-ordained institution, they are to submit to civil authority (1 Pet. 2:13–17) as they would to other institutions of God. As will be discussed later, Christians are not to give total and final allegiance to the secular state. Other God-ordained institutions exist in society alongside the state. Christians’ final allegiance must be to God. They are to obey civil authorities (Rom.13:5) in order to avoid anarchy and chaos, but there may be times when they may be forced to disobey (Acts 5:29).
Because government is a divinely ordained institution, Christians have a responsibility to work within governmental structures to bring about change. Government is part of the order of creation and a minister of God (Rom. 13:4). Christians are to obey governmental authorities (Rom. 13:1–4, 1 Peter 2:13-14). Christians are also to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world (Matt. 5:13–16) in the midst of the political context.
Although governments may be guilty of injustice, Christians should not stop working for justice or cease to be concerned about human rights. We do not give up on marriage as an institution simply because there are so many divorces, and we do not give up on the church because of many internal problems. Each God-ordained institution manifests human sinfulness and disobedience. Our responsibility as Christians is to call political leaders back to this God-ordained task. Government is a legitimate sphere of Christian service, and so we should not look to government only when our rights are being abused. We are to be concerned with social justice and should see governmental action as a legitimate instrument to achieve just ends.
A Christian view of government should also be concerned with human rights. Human rights in a Christian system are based on a biblical view of human dignity. A bill of rights, therefore, does not grant rights to individuals, but instead acknowledges these rights as already existing. The writings of John Locke along with the Declaration of Independence capture this idea by stating that government is based on the inalienable rights of individuals. Government based on humanism, however, would not see rights as inalienable, and thus opens the possibility for the state to redefine what rights its citizens may enjoy. The rights of citizens in a republic, for example, are articulated in terms of what the government is forbidden to do. But in totalitarian governments, while the rights of citizens may also be spelled out, power ultimately resides in the government not the people.
A Christian view of government also recognizes the need to limit the influence of sin in society. This is best achieved by placing certain checks on governmental authority. This protects citizens from the abuse or misuse of governmental power which results when sinful individuals are given too much governmental control.
The greatest threat to liberty comes from the exercise of power. History has shown that power is a corrupting force when placed in human hands. In the Old Testament theocracy there was less danger of abuse because the head of state was God. The Bible amply documents the dangers that ensued when power was transferred to a single king. Even David, a man after God’s own heart (1 Sam. 13:14; Acts 13:22), abused his power and Israel experienced great calamity (2 Sam. 11–21).
A key question in political theory is how to determine the limits of governmental authority. With the remarkable growth in the size and scope of government in the 20th century, it is necessary to define clearly the lines of governmental authority. The Bible provides some guidelines.
However, it is often difficult to set limits or draw lines on governmental authority. As already noted, the Old Testament theocracy differed from our modern democratic government. Although human nature is the same, drawing biblical principles from an agrarian, monolithic culture and applying them to a technological, pluralistic culture requires discernment.
Part of this difficulty can be eased by separating two issues. First, should government legislate morality? We will discuss this in the section on social action. Second, what are the limits of governmental sovereignty? The following are a few general principles helpful in determining the limits of governmental authority.
As Christians, we recognize that God has ordained other institutions besides civil government which exercise authority in their particular sphere of influence. This is in contrast to other political systems that see the state as the sovereign agent over human affairs, exercising sovereignty over every other human institution. A Christian view is different.
The first institution is the church (Heb. 12:18–24; 1 Pet. 2:9–10). Jesus taught that the government should work in harmony with the church and should recognize its sovereignty in spiritual matters (Matt. 22:21).
The second institution is the family (Eph. 5:22–32, 1 Pet. 3:1–7). The family is an institution under God and His authority (Gen.1:26–28, 2:20–25). When the family breaks down, the government often has to step in to protect the rights of the wife (in cases of wife abuse) or children (in cases of child abuse or adoption). The biblical emphasis, however, is not so much on rights as it is on responsibilities and mutual submission (Eph. 5:21).
A third institution is education. Children are not the wards of the state, but belong to God (Ps. 127:3) and are given to parents as a gift from God. Parents are to teach their children (Deut. 4:9) and may also entrust them to tutors (Gal. 4:2).
In a humanistic system of government, the institutions of church and family are usually subordinated to the state. In an atheistic system, ultimately the state becomes a substitute god and is given additional power to adjudicate disputes and bring order to a society. Since institutions exist by permission of the state, there is always the possibility that a new social contract will allow government to intervene in the areas of church and family.
A Christian view of government recognizes the sovereignty of these spheres. Governmental intervention into the spheres of church and family is necessary in certain cases where there is threat to life, liberty, or property. Otherwise civil government should recognize the sovereignty of other God-ordained institutions.
Moral Basis of Law
Law should be the foundation of any government. Whether law is based upon moral absolutes, changing consensus, or totalitarian whim is of crucial importance. Until fairly recently, Western culture held to a notion that common law was founded upon God’s revealed moral absolutes.
In a Christian view of government, law is based upon God’s revealed commandments. Law is not based upon human opinion or sociological convention. Law is rooted in God’s unchangeable character and derived from biblical principles of morality.
In humanism, humanity is the source of law. Law is merely the expression of human will or mind. Since ethics and morality are man-made, so also is law. Humanists’ law is rooted in human opinion, and thus is relative and arbitrary.
Two important figures in the history of law are Samuel Rutherford (1600-1661) and William Blackstone (1723-1780). Rutherford’s Lex Rex (written in 1644) had profound effect on British and American law. His treatise challenged the foundations of 17th century politics by proclaiming that law must be based upon the Bible, rather than upon the word of any man.
Up until that time, the king had been the law. The book created a great controversy because it attacked the idea of the divine right of kings. This doctrine had held that the king or the state ruled as God’s appointed regent. Thus, the king’s word had been law. Rutherford properly argued from passages such as Romans 13 that the king, as well as anyone else, was under God’s law and not above it.
Sir William Blackstone was an English jurist in the 18th century and is famous for his Commentaries on the Law of England which embodied the tenets of Judeo-Christian theism. Published in 1765, the Commentaries became the definitive treatise on the common law in England and in America. According to Blackstone, the two foundations for law are nature and revelation through the Scriptures. Blackstone believed that the fear of the Lord was the beginning of wisdom, and thus taught that God was the source of all laws. It is interesting that even the humanist Rousseau noted in his Social Contract that one needs someone outside the world system to provide a moral basis for law. He said, “It would take gods to give men laws.”
Unfortunately, our modern legal structure has been influenced by relativism and utilitarianism, instead of moral absolutes revealed in Scripture. Relativism provides no secure basis for moral judgments. There are no firm moral absolutes upon which to build a secure legal foundation.
Utilitarianism looks merely at consequences and ignores moral principles. This legal foundation has been further eroded by the relatively recent phenomenon of sociological law. In this view, law should be based upon relative sociological standards. No discipline is more helpless without a moral foundation than law. Law is a tool, and it needs a jurisprudential foundation. Just as contractors and builders need the architect’s blueprint in order to build, so also lawyers need theologians and moral philosophers to make good laws. Yet, most lawyers today are extensively trained in technique, but little in moral and legal philosophy.
Legal justice in the Western world has been based upon a proper, biblical understanding of human nature and human choice. We hold criminals accountable for their crimes, rather than excuse their behavior as part of environmental conditioning. We also acknowledge differences between willful, premeditated acts (such as murder) and so-called crimes of passion (i.e., manslaughter) or accidents.
One of the problems in our society today is that we do not operate from assumptions of human choice. The influence of the behaviorist, the evolutionist, and the sociobiologist are quite profound. The evolutionist and sociobiologist say that human behavior is genetically determined. The behaviorist says that human behavior is environmentally determined. Where do we find free choice in a system that argues that actions are a result of heredity and environment? Free choice and personal responsibility have been diminished in the criminal justice system, due to the influence of these secular perspectives.
It is, therefore, not by accident that we have seen a dramatic change in our view of criminal justice. The emphasis has moved from a view of punishment and restitution to one of rehabilitation. If our actions are governed by something external, and human choice is denied, then we cannot punish someone for something they cannot control. However, we must rehabilitate them if the influences are merely heredity and environmental. But such a view of human actions diminishes human dignity. If a person cannot choose, then he is merely a victim of circumstances and must become a ward of the state.
As Christians, we must take the criminal act seriously and punish human choices. While we recognize the value of rehabilitation (especially through spiritual conversion, John 3:3), we also recognize the need for punishing wrong-doing. The Old Testament provisions for punishment and restitution make more sense in light of the biblical view of human nature. Yet today, we have a justice system which promotes no-fault divorce, no-fault insurance, and continues to erode away the notion of human responsibility.
© 1999 Probe Ministries International
that’s a whole lot of cut and paste using someone elses homework. do you have any thoughts of your own on the matter or do you just go around plagarizing entire articles? just to take the last couple of paragraphs from your cut and paste the author clearly doesn’t understand what he’s talking about regarding our legal system and the bible. according to your bible if i commit murder i can accept jesus as my savior, be forgiven meet the person i murdered in heaven later on down the road. imagine how angry you would be if you were raped and murdered and then later met the person who did those things to you in heaven. it wouldn’t seem fair would it? in our legal system it doesn’t matter how much you beg you won’t be forgiven you will go to prison. see the difference?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
According to the All About Philosophy website, Situational Ethics crashed ...