PETA Compares Hunting Literature To Pornography

PETA SC PETA compares hunting literature to pornography

According to the deep thinkers at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, stores carrying hunting magazines should keep them behind the counter along with hardcore pornographic material.

In a letter to the CEO of a retail chain, the animal rights activist group suggested such magazines implicitly encourage kids to become murderers.

“If looking at pornography could encourage kids to become sexually active as some child advocates suggest,” the letter states, “what could looking at magazines that portray killing as exciting and rewarding do to them? We know that many of the school shooters who killed their classmates first hunted animals.”

These haters of the Second Amendment have no qualms about sharing their true, disturbing message. Like most of their fellow lunatic leftists, they feel anyone with a gun is a potential threat while conservatives know that an armed populace acts much more as a crime deterrent.

The main difference between PETA and other anti-gun nuts is the victim about which each group is concerned. Treating hunters as cold-blooded murderers, PETA’s letter states that “hunting can devastate not only entire families but entire communities.”

This group constantly grants animals the same rights, feelings, and cultural status as humans, thus giving their vapid arguments more weight to an uninformed public.

“Baby deer are often orphaned when hunters kill their parents,” PETA contends in an apparent attempt to reach emotional “Bambi” fans.

Appealing to individuals by demonizing those participating in a perfectly legal act is intellectually dishonest, but the left has made a very successful political platform by doing exactly that.
B. Christopher Agee founded The Informed Conservative in 2011. Like his Facebook page for engaging, relevant conservative content daily.

 

Photo credit: Eva Rinaldi Celebrity and Live Music Photographer (Creative Commons)

Bypass the Mass Media: Get Articles Straight To Your Inbox!


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.


Comments

  1. what’s needed is a book on paint ball hunting PETA LOL

  2. I wonder, when it comes time for true survival, and PETA weirdos get real hungry, I bet they’ll have wished they had some of those guns and training lessons. I’d much rather be prepared to shoot a squirrel, a bird, or whatever animal I could find, as opposed to starving, or, worse case scenario, turning to cannibalism. Or, if all else fails, they can eat one of those magazines to get their “fiber” intake. Really PETA, you have gone past the far left. Your closer to being “mental”.

  3. These PETA dumbed-down robotic morons don’t have respect for human life at all. They think we should save the planet and all the animals, but kill the humans. Is that STUPIDITY or what?

  4. PETA folks are total fools!

  5. Very many people know that a steady vegetarian (even worse, vegan) diet can lead to a chronic protein deficit. This causes instability and an incredible inability to think straight. PETA membership seems to constantly lend this entirely plausible theory real credibility!

  6. PETA members have a very distorted attitude. They think a child looking at porn will encourage them to become sexually active!?!?!?! Gee all this time I thought it was hormones. They also think that children looking at mags about hunting encourages kid to commit murder. Geeze!!!
    Why didn’t they start a People for the Ethical Treatment of Insects or People for the Ethical Treatment of Plants. Someone kills a bug it might be a female leaving behind her children. But that is exceptable.That is different. Life is life whether it is a plant or an insect, germ, parasite. How do we know a plant or an insect does not experience pain?
    They collect money to help animals. Why don’t they use that money to help children who are left with no parents, because some reader of a all those hunting magazines killed their parents.
    If our ancestors had that attitude the ones who did not die because of the elements would have died from the lack of nutrition.. I have as yet talked to a PETA member that makes any sense whatsoever

  7. If that’s the case, then the ACLU will now defend hunting.

Speak Your Mind