U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann has proven once more that she is no lightweight in the contest for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. But you are not likely to hear that view from any of the vacuous talking heads on the network news. It doesn’t fit their template.
Bachmann is currently neck-and-neck with Mitt Romney among likely Iowa GOP voters. She has made a professional case for herself, and shown that she has the stuff to take on Barack Obama in next year’s campaign. But the more viable she shows herself to be, the more reviled she will be by the professional left, which continues to make fun of her no matter what she does, much the same as they have done for the last three years with Sarah Palin. They call her “stupid” and worse.
Of course, most of the national media tend to chime right in with their usual inane non-analysis, the kind they always reserve for conservatives they fear and, hence, despise. I predict that they will attack, malign and mock the Minnesota congresswoman for being “inconsistent” or “hypocritical” or “talking out of both sides of her mouth.”
The venue was Fox News Sunday. Host Chris Wallace’s questions were designed to make him appear tough on the Republican candidate, but his demeanor seemed deliberately obtuse. The issue was same-sex marriage, and the question from Wallace was whether Rep. Bachmann favored the right of states to pass their own laws regarding marriage or a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man with one woman.
Bachmann said she supported both, which Wallace admitted confused him. He pressed her again to make a choice. Again she stated the constitutional answer.
Read More at GOPUSA by Doug Patton, GOPUSA
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
It's over Barack! One term! The writing is on the wall but since you only use teleprompters you probably don't understand it yet.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-snubbed-…
There is only one answer: Michelle Bachman = 1
The loon libs media =0
end of discussion
The Liberal main stream media will attack any conservative no matter if it is a male or female. Whether it is Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin they must stay focused & on the issues. The American public is looking for true change & anyone who is not main stream Washington or part of it's establishment.
Patton: It does not matter! U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann has the best platform to save America and stop this Marxist(Anti-Christ) takeover of u.s. However, while she'd get nearly 100% of the white men's vote, it has less influence in elections than the blacks ever have had! Watch! She certainly will not get the women's vote and they are the largest majority by far! No? Watch!
Like Rush says, I'll take Bachmann with 1/2 her brain tied behind her back before the IDIOT now in the Whitehouse !
You actually consider Rush a credible source? He is not a journalist, or an analyst, or a commentator- he's a shockjock who is defined as an "entertainer" and whose qualifications to do anything but spew hate rhetoric are ZERO.
Definition of a typical libtard:
"The principal feature of American lib-tardism is sanctimoniousness. By loudly denouncing all bad things–war and hunger and date rape–liberals testify to their own terrific goodness. More important, they promote themselves to membership in a self-selecting elite of those who care deeply about such things… It's a kind of natural aristocracy, and the wonderful thing about this aristocracy is that you don't have to be brave, smart, strong, or even lucky to join it, you just have to be libtard."
- P. J. O'Rourke:
Here is your typical liberal, Barack Obama supporter:
1. http://noiri.blogspot.com/2011/02/how-obama-got-e…
………and then we have this:
2. http://il.youtube.com/watch?v=4zRbe3kv70A
3. http://weaselzippers.us/2011/03/02/video-leftist-…
This is why the country is in the mess we are in. These are the typical people who support and vote for Democrats. Why do they vote this way. A simple answer of one word: "Entitlements". The Party of Free!
4. http://noiri.blogspot.com/2010/08/how-and-why-oba…
5. http://dailybail.com/home/meet-chairman-bernankes…
6. …………..and then we have this typical moonbat liberal, Joy Behar: http://weaselzippers.us/2011/03/16/lefty-loon-joy…
(continued):
7. At $174,000.00 per year plus expenses, Linda Sanchez (D), California just can't make it from week to week! Pathetic! http://www.ihatethemedia.com/congresswoman-linda-…
8. Now we have your typical liberal/Democratic Congresswoman: http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=43579
9. Twelve (12) reasons why people voted for a Democrat in the past:
http://visiontoamerica.org/story/top-12-reasons-w…
(continued):
10. Wisconsin capital, Tea Party, 4/15/2011 where left wing trash show their true selfs and the lowest form of morals and principals. http://weaselzippers.us/2011/04/16/new-civility-l…
11. The liberal, Democratic Party, known as the Party of Food Stamps has now entered a new "low" in morality and here is why:
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/04/20/liberals-hit-n…
(continued):
12. http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=43998
13. http://weaselzippers.us/2011/04/20/liberals-hit-n…
14. "If we can't get our entitlements from the government, then we will steal them"! http://www.theblaze.com/stories/flash-mobs-of-ban…
15. Here are e-mails of your typical left wing liberal Obama supporters who hate people of other political beliefs while they are suffering from the tornadoes. How low-life can these people get?
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/04/29/wapo-commenter…
The sniveling leftist loons are so intimidated by the likes of Bachmann and Palin that they resort to petty BS in an attempt to discredit them. God knows they can't attack them on issues or their
knowledge of the constitution since the left doesnt understand either. I pray that she can stay strong, focused and on track, she would make a great president that we would be proud of. She knows
how important the constitution and freedom are and would fight hard to preserve both.
The useful idiots in the lamestream media will pay for their nastiness someday. They are truly
miserable unhappy , hateful morons
Why do you not give Ron Paul any status as a viable contender for President, I like the information in your publications but once again, what about Ron Paul? He is much more Constitutional than Michele Bachman will ever be. She voted to extend a very un-Constitutional bill so called "Patriot Act". Ron Paul would never do that! With all that said I have to question your duplicities.
Until the so called Conservatives get behind the only REAL conservative we leave ourselves open for more of the same! Ron Paul has a proven history of being conservative. Let's give Michele her dues as one who sold out the American People with an extension of the un-Patriot Act extension.
Ron Paul is NOT a Constitutional Conservative – he is, by admission, a LIBERTARIAN…and has declared opposition to Constitutional principles – because they weren't LIBERTARIAN ENOUGH for him! All a Paul candidacy would do is ensure an Obama victory!
I, too like Ron Paul, & so do many others, however I don't think he could beat Obama. Why? I don't know, except sometimes he doesn't know when to stop, or shut up. I really believe he would do a better job in Congress backing a GOOD President, then actually being President himself. I also like Cain, however I think Bachman will win out over Cain. Romney is the one who scares me. If the republicans choose him to run, & if he could beat Obama, I believe he is too liberal, & would not be my choice for President. Bachman, Palin, & Cain, any two of the three for President & Vice President. Time for a real change.
The main stream media in America stands for everything the rest of America does not. They want no healthy debate, nor do they want anyone to obstruct their march to Marxism. They are incapable of tolerating any ideas that are contrary to their own, and they must destroy anyone who contradicts or disagrees with them. This means that they disagree with God; they stand for everything He condemns, and they quite willingly demean anyone who is a believer, like Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann. Won't they be surprised when they stand in judgment and must give an accounting to the Almighty! Won't they be surprised when every slanderous word they have uttered will be read back to them and they will have to defend their comments. And won't they be surorised when they can't buy off or make a deal with the Judge, like they did here! They will probably try to blame their failure to meet the mark on George W. Bush! Shame! But they won't be alone, there will be many others with them. Among them will be Barack Hussein Obama! Like they, he stood against everything America's forefathers stood for, and of course . . . Israel! Big, big mistake!
The more they try to marginalize her the more popular they will make her. She has the intelligence and ability to come out on top in any argument they want to make.
No one can say that i did not warn them about the Democrats online misinformation program 7 it's new saturation team. This site is getting pounded with both!
correction:& it's
Just Remember The Results Of This Election Is All Real Americans Must Take Care Of, Anyone But Pres Dumbocare, Yippee, "Let His (Obama) Days Be Few And Let Another Take His Office".Psalm 109:8 God Bless America And Susan Daniels.
Thank you so much for these links!!! Very informative.
What is this stupid obsession with the teleprompter? Every president since Reagan has used them- He was the one who introduced its use. Reagan couldn't talk in his sleep without a teleprompter. Bush couldn't talk WITH one. Before that presidents spoke from written notes. Nearly all elected officials, as well as candidates running for office use it now. Sniping about Obama's use of the teleprompter is not only idiotic, it's just plain ignorant.