It appears that Barack Obama has again ignored the rule of law by signing a defense appropriations bill that prohibits him sharing vital United States leading-edge strategic US missile technology with Russia, yet he has told both houses of Congress that he plans to share the US missile technology anyway. Why is this important? Because it goes light-years beyond partisan politics and into an area where our national defense will be put at unreasonable risk. It is believed that the Russians will pass this technology onto China, Iran and North Korea.
I find it bitterly ironic that this president pushes an agenda of excessive government regulation and oversight under the guise of consumer safety. Virtually everything in our homes, offices and automobiles is regulated to some extent by federal bureaucracy. Yet at the same time, he’s subjecting tens of millions of American lives to unreasonable risk by unilaterally giving away our deepest US missile technology to nations hostile to American interests.
So here’s the bottom line. There are those of us who would vote for a Republican candidate because we do not believe in the agenda of this administration. Then there are those of us who would vote again for Barack Obama under the belief that he will take care of us financially by redistributing wealth so that everyone can be more or less equal regardless of skills, talent or work ethic. There’s just one problem. If you take away the United States military’s ability to protect this great nation from a nuclear missile launched from North Korea or even someday Iran, then the concept of federal cradle-to-grave protection and enablement probably loses most of its meaning, doesn’t it?
If you’re concerned, then you might want to watch this video produced by Dick Morris. I think Dick sums it up best when he says that this president
“has defined the opinion of both houses of Congress, both political parties, in pursuit of some phantom agenda of getting the Russians to like us a little bit more…. I think we will beat this guy in November, but we may not have a country by then”.
Admittedly, that last statement was designed to be dramatic in order to get our attention, but it underscores what I’ve been writing about for the last three years. We have a President of the United States who believes he’s more of a king than a servant of the people. And letting one man, regardless of who he is, make decisions and dictate unilaterally to the other 300 million of us is not only unsettling and frustrating, it’s extremely dangerous. The framers of the Constitution knew that all too well. Unfortunately, too many Americans have little understanding of the timeless principles that founded this country.
And if you don’t understand the value of what you have, history has shown that you are sure to lose it.
OBAMA GIVES DEFENSE SECRETS TO OUR ENEMIES! DICK MORRIS TV: LUNCH ALERT!
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
It is unthinkable any President would make such a deal with Russia. But this one will. What is he getting in return? All he thinks about is getting votes for his reelection. He will get them any way he can, legally and illegally. Somehow I think there is money coming from Russia to his reelection campaign. Obama will not be doing this if it does not benefit him personally.
He is a darn muslim what other need to be said ?
Since Obozo, our Liar in Chief is above the law, he will do any damn thing he pleases, and Congress WILL approve!! Maybe he wants to be President of Russia, when he gets done destroying this country!
Geop. Sorros gave him half million to get elected, he paid him back 10 BILLION by investing in Sorros’ oil hunt in Brazil, plus a contract for a new car to Sorros company in Brazil!! Screw the American worker must be his motto, he will not help Americans Period!!
The ruling elites of the world want a total takeover of all the world’s governments to be replaced with dictatorial, communistic principles. This conspiracy goes way beyond what’s in it for Obama. He’s just one of the pawns in this sick game.
This is why I’m hopeful that Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse report due out in Feb. will nail BHO’s a** to the wall. Also, a Judge Malihi in Georgia is forcing Obama’s hand to prove that Obama’s eligible to be on the Georgia State ballot for 2012. He’ll have to show his records.
I hope the fraud that Obama’s has been committing against America comes out before this puke gives out technology away to whomever he pleases. So, let’s stay vigilant and see what comes of this. God help us. Our govt has been co-opted by enemy agents and it’s time to clean house and put their sorry a**ses in jail!
As someone who has studied Russia very intensely for a long time, and who has worked in Moscow as a journalist, let me just say that I have no doubt that what Obama proposes to do here is tantamount to treason. Russia constantly frustrates our foreign policy abroad, and there is no way that Obama can miss this. President Obama was groomed to be a traitor and a subverter, and there is really nothing more to it than.
If OBUMMA gives one word of our DEFENSE STRATIGY to RUSSIA or any other FOREIGN COUNTRY he can be charged with TREASON in effect that Congress stated he could not do this. Another Bennidict Arnold in our COUNTRY!!!
Bill Clinton passed on some of our technology to China in return for campaign contributions, so Obama is simply doing what anti-American Democrats like to do–sell us out. Just add this to the long list of impeachable offenses that Congress has refused to act upon.
this cretin is pure unadulterated slime, he will get himself re-elected hook or by crook, he will do ANYTHING to get it done, I don’t care if each of us who will not vote for IT, voted 5 or 6 times against the weasel, he would still come out the winner, the fix is on!!!!! and we are screwed!!!!
then screw his a$$ right back – and put everyone to work =
The people in Arizona – the Surpise Tea Party of Surprise, Arizona – filed a request for an investigation – with Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. His “Cold Case Posse” – a non-profit organization – is handling the investigation.
Do the same = File a complaint with the Sheriff in yr district – to demand an investigation into the long-form birth certificate that was released in April 2011 – stating that the integrity of yr vote is affected – if this document is forged and fraudulent – and is being used by Barack Obama to get his name on the election ballot for 2012.
you might want to mention the 22-page criminal complaint filed with the FBI – by DOUG VOGT – a document-imaging expert – who charges that individuals with the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama political operatives, and an unidentified graphic artist participated in a multi-state conspiracy to create a forged and fraudulent long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama.
Anything is worth a try – with this Pretender to the Throne, The Muslim Trojan Horse.
If Barack Hussein Obama isn’t the definition of traitor, communist, muslim, then I ask “What the hell is the correct definition. This would be Caliph/World President/Dictator performs some traitorous act at least once a day and our Hero Representatives in DC sit on their lazy, over-sized asses and remain complicit in this charade. Time for all of them to go – one way or another.
I second that motion
Me too.
Where in the HELL is the FBI, theCIA, the NSA and the secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air Force? This man is absolutely unfit to be president and the CIC of our armed forces. By November it may already be too late for our country if they allow him to unilaterally sell out our country like this. If this does not fall under the impeachable offense of “High crimes and misdemeanors” then I don’t know what does. Congress must act on this ASAP.
What’s the plan to make them act?
TREASON IMPEACH
UNCONSTITUTIONAL EVERYTHING
HE IS GO’IN TO GET US ALL KILLED
OR BE HIS SERVENT’S
This latest SCANDAL and Treasonous act – to provide Russia with our Missle Technology –
is no different than Obama’s OPERATION FAST and FURIOUS = arming ILLEGAL ALIENS and NARCO-TERRORISTS, providing safe haven on US soil, protecting their access in/out of The USA – and covering up the fact that these weapons were used to hunt with the intent to kill our US Border agents -
that would have gotten even more sinister – if WHISTLEBLOWERS had not come forward and contacted our elected members of Congress.
Although these TRAITORS to our country claim to not know anything about it,
Operation Fast and Furious was paid for within Obama’s $787 BILLION Stimulus legislation;
March 2009 press conference about it = Holder’s Deputy US Attorney w Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security; Eric Holder as US AG gave a speech in Mexico about it – April 2, 2009!
“The Stimulation of Murder” – http://www.Investors.com – July 8, 2011.
Eric Holder’s use of the race card to not take be held accountable for Operation Fast and Furious – that killed US citizens – is absolutely despicable.
http://ironicsurrealism.com/2011/12/22/allen-west…
These people should be removed from office by our US Military – and thrown in GITMO with the rest of the Terrorists!
It is time to impeach this anti-American bastard. There are now any number of justifiable reason for him to be impeached and action should be taken before he is allowed to do this. What is the purpose of Congress writing and passing laws if King Obama is going to do what he wants despite the law. It is time to put a stop this treasonous person and put him on trial.
Maybe ALL of us need to let congress know that they either start AND COMPLETE Impeachment and removal from office –Obama, Biden, Holder, Clinton (just for starters), OR WE THE PEOPLE will start AND COMPLETE the RECALL OF EACH AND EVERYONE OF THEM!!! “TRICKY DICKY” WAS IMPEACHED AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE FOR FAR LESS CRIMES THAN WHAT THIS illegal, Muslim,non-natural born citizen, has done on any one given day!! IT’S TIME TO STAND UP AND DEMAND THEY DO WHAT NEEDED DOING LONG AGO!!! Enough is enough!!!
If you are referring to tricky dicky as Bill Clinton or Richard Nixon, you are factually in error.
Nixon resigned before the articles could be issued, Clinton was found guilty of perjury in the house but not the senate, and was admonished. He served out his term and is now on the public dole for retirement benefits, secret service protection, and a stipend for clerical staff. People have almost an orgasm when Clinton speaks and other people that lie under oath are tossed in jail, and lose voting rights. ONLY IN AMERICA
You are incorrect. Nixon resigned. He was NOT “removed”, and he was NOT impeached.
What do you expect a Marxist president to do when dealing with a nation that has never let go of its Marxist past? Their most powerful leader is a career KGB officer. And, under Obama, we negotiated a new START treaty that was expressly advantageous to Russia. Yes, I know it took the consent of the Senate, but the reasoning of my state’s Senator (“We know the Russians will break the terms of the treaty; this will be our opportunity to catch them red-handed”) makes little sense, considering the mountains of evidence that the Russians (and their former incarnation, the USSR) have done this time and again should be all the proof we need not to deal with them on a level field. The ink wasn’t dry on the last START treaty’s preamble before the Russians were proclaiming victory and finding ways to circumvent its provisions. As usual, Obama played up to our adversaries and insulted our allies. “Trust among allies” must not be a term that Hahvahd teaches it’s students. These self-proclaimed U.S. elite are going to get their fellow Americans killed. The only consolation is that they, as traitors, will be the first to go.
Not merely a Marxist. A mole.
Alger Hiss on steroids.
How about we just impeach everybody! This POS called Obama and the Congress.
But I digress. Let’s see what comes of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse report due out in Feb. And, also, the Judge Malihi forces Obama’s hand in showing his documentation to be eligible to be on the Georgia ballot for the next election.
Obama’s house of cards is started to fall. What we need now, more than ever, is to reinstate the House Committee on Un-American Activities. This president (and Clinton too) giving away our missle technology to countries that are unfriendly to the U.S. Yes, this is treason! But, we have a do nothing Congress that let’s this president get away with whatever he wants. So, Congress is basically aiding and abetting this fool in the WH in his treasonous activities.
I urge everyone of you to contact Issa and Grassley and DEMAND that Obama be investigated also for his treasonous actions concerning our missile technology!
Don’t hold you breath waiting for Issa and Arpaio.
Arpaio doesn’t have the facts and lacks the power to get them.
Issa could subpoena the facts, but refused to do so a year ago.
We have a mole in the White House and fools nattering fecklessly at him. They sold out the litigation before Judge Malihi by stipulating the facts with Obama. See the suggestions below.
I’m afraid we’ve lost our Republic.
OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF GEORGIA
DAVID F. WELDEN, :
:
Plaintiff, : Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-
: 1215137-60-MALIHI
v. :
: Counsel for Plaintiff: Van R. Irion
BARACK OBAMA, :
: Counsel for Defendant: Michael Jablonski
Defendant. :
________________________
Application and Suggestions of Amicus Curiae
Comes now Albert W. L. Moore, Jr., of the Missouri and United States Supreme Court bars and others, and prays that the Court, in the interests of justice, judicial economy and enforcement of the United States Constitution, waive any pesky formal requirements for his submission of amicus curiae suggestions and take the following suggestions in this case and those consolidated with it, made on information and belief:
GENERAL
1. Court and counsel are to be commended for reaching the merits of the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama (“Obama”). However, the Court risks decision on incomplete facts posing a false issue regarding Obama’s eligibility at birth. Plaintiff in this case has been tricked by Obama into erroneously stipulating that Obama’s father was a man known to be an alien at the time of Obama’s birth, without obtaining discovery of Obama’s original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents. This wastes the Court’s time on a false issue. The Court should take over and conduct thorough discovery to avoid confusion, waste of judicial time, and a false precedent in disregard of the real constitutional eligibility issue, which is Obama’s possible loss of American citizenship from his naturalization as a citizen of Indonesia, a potentially expatriating act. Obama presses the Court extra-judicially by implicitly threatening the Court with violence in the streets, if it decides against Obama’s eligibility, by those who still believe Obama’s hoax that his birth father was a black alien.
2. The Court can quickly verify Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility as a natural born United States citizen, on the day of his birth, by taking over discovery and subpoenaing Obama’s DNA and all of his Hawai’ian vital records, probably consisting of an original birth certificate showing his actual birth parents and his amended birth certificate showing adoptive parents Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, an alien black Luo tribesman. Analysis of Obama’s DNA will prove that it is biologically impossible for him to be the son of his claimed birth parents, which conclusively disproves the “birth certificate” (actually an adoption certificate) proffered by Obama on 27 April 2011. Obama’s real, original birth certificate will show two American citizens, genetically consistent
- 2 -
with Obama, as his birth parents, thus corroborating the statement of Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino on 27 July 2009, set out in full in the discussion below. Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate, partly because it proves that he is not half Negro, but also to evade consideration of the real eligibility issue, his possible loss of American citizenship in acquiring Indonesian citizenship. If direct subpoena of the Hawai’ian custodian of Obama’s vital records be a problem, the Court could require that they be produced by Obama’s consent to their release by the custodian, with a certification by the custodian that they comprehend all of Obama’s vital records held by Hawai’i’s Department of Health. As substantiation of the Court’s finding and part of the case file, Obama’s vital records, or copies duly certified to be true and complete, should be public property open to public scrutiny, not held under seal and in secrecy. This Court is not a Star Chamber.
3. The Court should conduct thorough discovery of Obama’s Indonesian citizenship and its effect on his American citizenship. Investigation of Obama’s American citizenship is long overdue. It will take a long time, and must be started soon to complete before the Democratic Party’s 2012 nominating convention and the 2012 general election.
4. The Court should appoint an officer in the nature of a special master, or assign the Obama ballot matter to a specific judge, in either event the judge or
- 3 -
other officer to devote full time to verifying by original documents, and real evidence including genetic analysis, Obama’s eligibility at birth, and to confirm his naturalization as an Indonesian citizen and its effect, if any, on his American citizenship. Alternatively, the Court might require Obama’s consent to the release of all of his Hawai’ian vital records and such other evidence as the Court might require to confirm his American citizenship and his current status as a natural born American citizen as the term is used in Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution.
5. It appears that Obama has spun an elaborate scheme to be elected to the Office of President by pretending to be the son of the alien black man who adopted him. In furtherance of the scheme, he used a contrived controversy over his constitutional status at birth to distract attention from the question of whether he lost his American citizenship by voluntarily becoming a naturalized citizen of Indonesia with the intent of relinquishing American citizenship. This has been done with the able assistance of many dishonest lawyers, another subject that should concern the Court and attract its attention. In this very proceeding, counsel for Obama in particular should have known that there was an additional undisclosed long form birth certificate in Hawai’i’s Department of Health proving that the alleged alien birth father to Obama was not in fact Obama’s birth father.
- 4 -
Obama’s counsel has either been less than candid on the facts stipulated, or he has neglected to make due investigation of his client and the pertinent facts of the case. If the stipulated alien father is not in fact Obama’s father, it would seem that there is no case or controversy and the Court has no jurisdiction to decide the academic point of law. Should the controversy be more broadly defined, as whether Obama is eligible, the Court should be entitled to demand either directly or through the parties all evidence relevant and material to his citizenship. Counsel have served the Court and the law poorly by putting the case to the Court on incomplete and misleading facts that purport to create a case or controversy that is merely academic, or is a significantly incomplete and materially misleading statement of the facts of an actual case or controversy. The Court has jurisdiction to determine its jurisdiction. Confirmation that Obama retained his American citizenship (which is conceivable, though he might have long ago foresworn any allegiance that he might have had to the United States) requires extensive official investigation. If such investigation is not initiated very soon and prosecuted expeditiously, election officials and the Court will find themselves caught short. Bush, et al. v. Gore et al., 531 U.S. 98, 108 (2000): “The press of time does not diminish the constitutional concern. A desire for speed is not a general excuse for ignoring equal protection
- 5 -
guarantees.” Part of the Obama strategy is to play for time until it is too late to investigate the real issue of his constitutional eligibility.
OBAMA A NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN AT BIRTH
6. “Birthers”, those who believe Obama was constitutionally ineligible at birth, have often lost objectivity in analyzing the facts. (In all fairness, this is in part due to the paucity of known facts on the Obama matter.) Consequently, they have blundered into profound error and specious speculation, much of which has been counterproductive. Obama has played them as a toreador plays a bull – shaking a distraction off to the side, which the poor dumb beast charges. In this case, Plaintiff is tantalized by the prospect of a “quick fix”, a purported alien father to Obama. The problem is, the alien is not his father. He adopted him. This conjecture is hardly in a league with Poincare’s, which required many years, some geniuses, and computer science to solve. The Court can prove or disprove this conjecture by obtaining and analyzing Obama’s vital records and DNA. However, there are very strong clues pointing to Obama’s Hawai’ian adoption, starting with the 27 July 2009 statement by Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, then the Director of Hawai’i’s Department of Health and custodian of vital records, which follows in its entirety:
I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the
- 6 -
Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama
was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.
Indeed, this statement precludes any truly candid counsel from representing to a court that Obama’s father was Obama the alien black man. Such a representation is inconsistent with Dr. Fukino’s finding that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen.” Dr. Fukino refers to “vital records”. Obama was still alive, so there would not be a death certificate, but there must be a vital record in addition to his original birth certificate. How would such an additional vital record come to be? Read on.
7. When a child is born in Hawai’i, a contemporaneous record of birth is made, showing actual birth parents. This is retained to protect against violation of the rule against consanguinity. Dr. Fukino was referring to the original birth certificate when she stated that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen”.
8. When the child is adopted, as by hypothesis Obama was at birth, an amended birth certificate is created, showing adoptive parents. Obama’s amended birth certificate was the basis for the abstract entitled “CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH”, the proof of birth typically used in part to conceal the fact of an adoption. On 27 April 2011, Obama presented a photograph of his amended birth certificate, cropped or masked to delete the word “AMENDED”, probably typed above the printed title of the long form “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH”.
- 7 -
9. Dr. Fukino had to contend with the confidentiality of adoptions when making her statement of 27 July 2009. But she could not avoid giving away the fact of an adoption, by claiming the “original vital records” showed that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen”. Barack Hussein Obama the black Luo tribesman could not be Obama’s birth father if Obama was a natural born American citizen, because the Luo tribesman was an alien. Dr. Fukino was relying on the original birth certificate component of the “original vital records” to which she referred.
10. I assume that Dr. Fukino made her finding on the basis of an original birth certificate showing two U.S. citizen birth parents, but the Court’s subpoena of the “original vital records” referred to by Dr. Fukino is required for a definitive determination of Obama’s eligibility at birth. If the Court finds all the relevant facts, it need not decide whether to set a false precedent, confirming eligibility on a frivolous argument based on false facts that include an alien father who was not Obama’s, or denying eligibility on the false stipulation of the parties that Obama had an alien father. Either way, appeals would be taken, wasting the time of this and other courts, and Obama would eventually, if necessary, use his original birth certificate, submitted under seal and an order not to disclose, so that the electorate would not learn that he only pretended to be half Negro for fraudulent political
- 8 -
purposes. The Court can foreclose this waste of time and delay by obtaining all of Obama’s vital records from Hawai’i’s Health Department Director. Adoption confidentiality must yield to the interests of the state in determining Obama’s eligibility and the true basis for it. It must not be used to perpetrate election fraud or fraud on the Court.
11. Other clues pop up, from time to time, indicating that Obama’s original birth certificate remains undisclosed. Early in 2011, a character named Tim Adams, who had sworn that there was no long form birth certificate for Obama, broadcast a suggestion that Obama release his long form birth certificate, “if he has one”, even if it did not “go along with” Obama’s official autobiography. Adams offered the lame excuse that Obama was “fibbing” in his autobiography, standard operating procedure with politicians according to Mr. Adams. It seemed the cat was out of the bag, or was feared to be, and Adams was doing damage control. But the “birth certificate” released on 27 April 2011 was entirely consistent with the fraudulent autobiography; hence there must be another vital record, the original birth certificate, still undisclosed.
12. Dr. Fukino, in an interview with Michael Isikoff, described the original birth certificate as half typed and half handwritten. The document released by Obama on 27 April 2011 was entirely typed. This is another significant clue that
- 9 -
Obama’s original birth certificate, and the “birth certificate” released on 27 April 2011, are two different documents, and that Dr. Fukino based her conclusion that Obama was a natural born American citizen on the original, not the adoption certificate that Obama falsely claimed on 27 April 2011 to be his original birth certificate.
13. Obama conceals his original birth certificate identifying his actual birth parents because neither was Negro, not because it disproves his constitutional eligibility. The original would confirm his constitutional eligibility at birth, per Dr. Fukino. He fraudulently claims his adoptive parents as birth parents so that he can make racist appeals for votes while denigrating critics and opponents as racists.
14. Hence when Plaintiff says on page 1 of his Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, “The only fact relevant to this case is the fact that the Defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen”, he could not be more mistaken. He speaks in ignorance or willful disregard of Obama’s original birth certificate, showing actual parents, which has not been disclosed. If the Court will subpoena or otherwise obtain Obama’s original birth certificate, the Court will find that Obama was a natural born American citizen at the time of his birth. (And it will find other significant information not directly pertaining to constitutional eligibility.) Obama’s original birth certificate is the key documentary evidence required to
- 10 -
confirm Obama’s constitutional eligibility at birth. As the Court is charged with the duty of verifying Obama’s constitutional eligibility, it must have inherent power to discover and use the evidence necessary to that end, or to deny placement of the candidate on the ballot if the Court is denied access to the requisite evidence. When the Court has all of the relevant and material evidence pertaining to Obama’s constitutional eligibility at his birth, it becomes unnecessary to decide the academic point of whether a candidate with an alien parent is eligible or not. Again, the original birth certificate will prove that Obama was “a natural-born American citizen” at the time of his birth.
OBAMA’S POSSIBLE LOSS OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP
15. The Court should then move on to the real issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility, his possible loss of American citizenship. The status of natural born American citizen can be acquired only at birth. But it can be lost thereafter, by loss of American citizenship altogether. The term “natural born U.S. citizen” subsumes the term “citizen”. Obama can not be a natural born U.S. citizen
if he is not a U.S. citizen at all, even if he was a natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth. If in fact Obama relinquished his American citizenship, he became constitutionally ineligible for all time, and never became President.
- 11-
16. The State Department has noted that naturalization as a foreign citizen is a potentially expatriating act, as is a conviction for treason:
POTENTIALLY EXPATRIATING ACTS
Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Briefly stated, these acts include:
1. obtaining naturalization in a foreign state [my italics] (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);
2. taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);
3. entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-
commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);
4. accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one
has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);
5. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (Sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);
6. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only under strict, narrow statutory conditions) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);
7. conviction for an act of treason (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).
- 12 -
ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OF EVIDENCE
As already noted, the actions listed above can cause loss of U.S. citizenship only if performed voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. The Department has a uniform administrative standard of evidence based on the premise that U.S.
citizens intend to retain United States citizenship when they obtain naturalization in a foreign state, subscribe to a declaration of allegiance to a foreign state, serve in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or accept non-policy level employment with a foreign government.
See http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizensh….
17. Obama’s volition and intent are factual issues that require extensive evidence-taking, legal and factual analysis, and argument. Obama seems to believe (perhaps wrongly) that the issue would be resolved in favor of his relinquishment of U.S. citizenship, for he has almost certainly made criminal and seditious bargains with, among others, the government of Indonesia to conceal evidence of his Indonesian citizenship.
CONCLUSION
18. Determination of Obama’s current citizenship or citizenships does not lend itself to the birthers’ dream of a quick fix at his birth. Exhaustive official investigation is essential to resolve the issue of his American citizenship. A congressional or legislative investigating committee, or a prosecutor, would have the luxury of finding the facts inconclusive. A court, it is suggested, has an
- 13 -
obligation to decide one way or the other, on such evidence as can be found and inferences therefrom, or through sanctions for withholding evidence relevant and material to eligibility. Obama’s citizenship will require exhaustive investigation, much of it international. It would seem appropriate for the Court to appoint a special master, perhaps a retired judge, to take evidence on a full-time basis. I have over a decade of international legal experience worldwide, including Indonesia. I would be willing to help the special master for expenses only, and would plan to form a team that would tentatively include, if they be willing, Philip J. Berg, Esq., an attorney who has worked with Indonesian counsel on Indonesian citizenship, Tom Schweich, Missouri’s State Auditor, who has audited accounts in Afghanistan, Kris Kobach, Secretary of State for Kansas, an expert on the law of U.S. citizenship, and Wayne Madsen, who has reported on Stanley Ann Dunham’s activities in Indonesia.
19. For decades the United States Supreme Court held itself above the fray with regard to congressional reapportionment, refusing to enter that “political thicket”. Finally, it concluded that the political process could not cure itself, and took on the matter. Similarly, in this case, officials such as congressmen have refused to inquire into the facts, for fear of being branded racists, even though actual inquiry would reveal that the basis of Obama’s racist political appeal was a
- 14 -
hoax. Hence once again the courts must find the facts and enforce the law, the political process having failed. And the adversary system is failing.
20. The adversary system, for all its virtues and general effectiveness in grinding slowly but finely to find the truth, has its limits. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. Here both sides have their reasons for proceeding on the basis of misleadingly incomplete facts, but their want of candor or caution puts the Court needlessly in the position of risking race war if it decides the academic point consistently with over two hundred years of understanding. Plaintiff thinks he can win at the starting gate on the true definition of natural born citizen as used in Article II Section 1 of the Constitution. Defendant thinks he can prevail on a false and frivolous definition of natural born American citizen and a “birth certificate” proffered by Obama on 27 April 2011, which is a forgery in the sense that it is not what it purports to be: Obama’s original birth certificate. If so, this would not be the first time the law has changed as a result of specious and frivolous argument aided by judicial ignorance of the facts and a risk of civil strife if the Court decides according to the correct view of the academic point presented. Defendant also presses this Court extra-judicially with the implicit threat of a race war if the Court does not allow onto the Georgia ballot a presidential candidate fraudulently pretending to be half Negro. Further, if Defendant does not prevail on
- 15 -
the incomplete and misleading facts, then Defendant counts on his ability to disclose his hole card, his true original birth certificate showing two U.S. citizen parents, and to submit it under seal and safeguarded by a non-disclosure order, so that the electorate will remain ignorant of his true racial heritage and the real basis of his constitutional eligibility at birth. This after wasting the time of this Court and others in verifying Obama’s constitutional eligibility at birth, which could have been swiftly confirmed by the full disclosure of Obama’s vital records and DNA. Moreover, the real eligibility issue, the possible loss of Obama’s American citizenship by his naturalization as an Indonesian citizen, would have been totally ignored, and it would be too late to investigate it (see ¶¶ 5 & 15 above).
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Albert W. L. Moore, Jr., representing no party in this case or any other before this honorable Court, and wishing only to be the Court’s trustworthy and faithful friend in obeying his solemn oath as a lawyer to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, prays the Court read and heed his suggestions to cut to the heart of Obama’s constitutional eligibility by taking charge of discovery and uncovering the relevant and material facts required to effect a just and true resolution of open questions regarding Obama’s eligibility to the Office of President, and prays further that esteemed adversary counsel adopt
- 16 -
these suggestions and co-operate, with all diligence, probity and candor, to assist the Court.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On this twenty-first day of January 2012, I sent emails of this application and suggestions to the following adversary counsel:
Orly Taitz, orly.taitz@gmail.com
Van R. Irion, van@libertylegalfoundation.com
J. Mark Hatfield, mhatfield@wayxcable.com
Michael Jablonski, michael.jablonski@comcast.net
and to another aspiring amicus curiae, Paul Andrew Mitchell, supremelawfirm@gmail.com.
____________________________________
Albert W. L. Moore, Jr.
Missouri Bar No. 18921
Central Professional Building, Suite 114
221 West Lexington, Suite 114
Independence, Missouri 64050-3719
816.461.0993
Telefacsimile: 816.461.3231
eingriff@gmail.com
Applicant for Amicus Curiae
- 17 –
Just another of those little idosynchrocies that seems to be consistent with ithis uncredentialed and yet to be identified Oval Office ocupier…..Ther anyone in that damn congress or law enforcement with real guts?
It used to be against our laws, traitorous and un-American to promote an agenda like obumwad is doing. Where is Sen. Joe Mc Carthy when you need him? Someday soon, these so-called leaders will be begging for mercy from the GOD they don’t believe in. mrshinola (I know the difference between shoe polish and obama)
Further proof, if proof be needed, that Obama is a mole.