Attorney Orly Taitz vowed to shove everything she had concerning Barack Obama’s evidentiary problem at last week’s eligibility challenge in front of Indiana’s election board. Taitz, whose airline ticket to the hearing was purchased by a concerned citizen, presented evidence of a “stolen social security number and a forgery instead of a birth certificate!” She told WND reporter Bob Unruh that Indiana just removed their Secretary of State Charlie White for his discrepancies with voter registration irregularities over “minor” problems. Taitz said our sitting president’s eligibility problems are major in comparison.
But new questions about the status of BHO’s teen age mother Stanley Ann Dunham are surfacing as analysis at another web site is revealing a Congressional rule change for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986 puts in serious doubt Stanley Ann Dunham’s ability to confer citizenship status on her son.
Since Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born in 1961, this newly discovered law involves Dunham’s age because she was only 18 at time of delivery! The law says:
”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.” Stanley Ann Dunham did not meet requisite status according to blog discovery. One commenter said, “She was not old enough to register Obama’s birth in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S. as a Natural Born Citizen as she did not meet the residency requirements! Backing this statement up, another commenter reiterates:” The law specifically outlines the requirements for a CITIZEN mother to confer citizenship to her baby. Ann Dunham was NOT old enough-case closed!”
Judge Malihi in his pg. 6 footnote went back 20 years to cite Jill Pryor’s statement to the Yale Law Journal in which she said: “Despite its apparent simplicity, the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution has never been completely understood.” Pryor goes on to begin her next sentence with the nonsensical anonymous pronoun IT: “It is well settled that Native Born citizens, those born in the U.S., qualify as natural born.”
Huh? Who is “It” Judge?
The WND analysis found the state Supreme Court of North Dakota over seventy years ago threw out of office a governor because his “lack of residential qualifications is a legal disability!” You can view the C-Span video of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas telling Puerto Rican Representative Jose Serrno: “We’re evading that one!” when his questioner asked about the NBC clause. So a new angle enters the Obama NBC protest. While state and federal officialdom keeps ignoring American citizens, Attorney Orly Taitz, who was born in the USSR and who fears her beloved naturalized country is heading toward the fate of Germany, is keeping the controversy up on court dockets. If she and her other appeals colleagues get rebuffed on the birth father’s NBC issue, maybe they can start in on a new round of hearings using the birth mother’s status. They just won’t have President Obama’s own words telling them his father was NOT a U.S. citizen!
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.