Are Obama’s children more important than yours?
Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.
Follow @WestJournalism
Loading ...
When we make comments and dis the POTUS it makes his day
I agree with the ad. And as for the p undits who repsonded negatively on TV and in print; I say, my grandkids are just as important as the president’s children. His will always have protect, mine will have to depend on me or on themselves. They won’t have 24 hour protection by armed to the teeth secret service. The president’s executive actions today, are only the beginnning of a slide to tyranny, no matter what kind of bull he tries to spread as he attempted to do in his speech today. If you trust him, I pity you.
Actually the school already had armed guards. As do some 4700 others. Not that I agree with our Dear Leader in any way shape or form.
We have enough laws for ‘gun control’ it was the loony left that decided that the mentally unstable should be put out on the street because their rights were being infringed. Calif. is a prime example, we have a bunch of loons in Sacramento who should be locked up for the good of the state.
Can`t trust a communist/muslim. .
Could we make that a uncredentialed, BC less, restrained records, elitist hypocrite….aka the Faker in the WH.
It isn’t POTUS. It’s POS. Get it straight.
HE IS NOT JUST A HYPOCRITE BUT A NARCISSISTIC, PSYCHO-PATH WHO CARES ABOUT “NO ONE” BUT HIMSELF AND I DON’T THINK THAT HE WOULD GIVE HIS LIFE FOR HIS CHILDREN(?) IF IT CAME DOWN TO THAT FATAL MOMENT. ALL PROTECTION OF ARMED GUARDS SHOULD BE TAKEN FROM EVERY ONE OF THE HYPOCRITES IN THE GOVERNMENT AND THEIR FAMILIES AND THEY SHOULD HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THE CITIZENS THAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO STAND UP FOR AND PROTECT. THEY ARE THE “SEWAGE” OF HUMANITY. HE ALWAYS PLAYS ON THE SYMPATHY OF THE IDIOTS WHO BACK HIM WITH HIS PHOTO OPS (REMEMBER THE OBAMACARE SIGNING AND THE LITTLE BLACK BOY) OF CHILDERN (WHOSE PARENTS REALLY WRITE THE WORDS THE POOR, ROBOTIC, BRAINWASHED CHILDREN REPEAT) WHO ARE JUST LITTLE ROBOTS OF NARCISSISTIC PARENTS WHO WANT ATTENTION AS MUCH AS THE TERRORIST HIMSELF. IT IS SICKENING HOW PEOPLE USE CHILDREN AS PAWNS IN THEIR GAMES. I CAN’T STAND TO LOOK AT HIS DESPICABLE, EVIL EYES AND FACE OF PURE LIES, DECEPTION AND HATRED TOWARD AMERICA.
A known world class killer wants to disarm all that do not conform to his rule. Obama kills people, everyday.
Yep, Obama is the TOP child-killer in America. He slaughters more than one million unborn children, America’s future, in America’s muder(abortion) mills every day. He speaks with forked tongue when he says he cares about children’s lives. His tongue needs to be burned and purified with hot coals.
It`s really not very hard to find someone that is mentally ill and make sure thay have guns and ammo and a psycocrist to keep telling them that everything will be fine and fixed if you just go to the movies and be a hero and shoot all the bad people at the show and they are all really bad people and they need to die. It`s not all that hard to get someone that is mentally ill to shoot up a movie or a school, or a senator. Our military and CIA can do it very easy. Brainwash a nut, give him guns and ammo and turn him loose. Another tragedy. It`s how people are turned against anything like guns for example. Trust your government and you will be a slave sooner or later.
Did you know Obama was the FIRST President who had protection for his kids?
I mean, it’s not like anyone wishes him harm, ya know?
M O R O N S
I can’t wait until they “Pry” your guns out of your hands, one way or another.
Have a nice day!
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/16/flashback-in-1999-obama-wouldnt-support-tougher-prosecution-for-school-shooters/ This is enough to make you sick,were was the liberal media,a bunch of lying hypocrites .
A bit of perspective.
As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.– “Mein Kampf” — Adolf Hitler
Hello NRA, Are you reading this?
The fight to defend the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution has been undermined by Republican representatives’ refusal to honor their oaths of office and defend Article II of the very same Constitution!
In light of the fact that Chief Justice Roberts has referred the case (12A606) “Edward Noonan et al., v The Calif. Sec. of State, Deborah Bowen” to the full conference to be held on February 15th in which evidence of Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency shall finally be looked at by the Supreme Court, we now have the perfect opportunity to defeat the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s assault on the 2nd Amendment—‘The best defense is a good offense!’—by pressuring the Supreme Court to retro-actively abrogate the illegal election of a constitutionally ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself as eligible to be president, and even now proceeds in a cover-up of unparalleled magnitude forging official documents and paying law firms millions of dollars to keep his true background hidden.
Consider the following:
Could Chief Justice Roberts have been defensively posturing for the blow-back, “black-lash” if you please, of a decision he may have realized would be necessary to make on Mr. Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility when he ruled so surprisingly on Obamacare?
Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the Hell out of the world and rule against Obama as being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15th?
In the hope that this albeit far-fetched scenario is a possibility, is the NRA making any effort to promote such a decision which would be the best outcome in defense of the Second Amendment?
Might not the Chief Justice have been positioning himself and the Supreme Court as apparently not being unfavorably inclined towards Mr. Obama so as to insulate them both from certain to arise liberal charges of racism should a decision need to be rendered by the court on the issue of constitutional eligibility which would pronounce that Mr. Obama is not now and never has been eligible to be president?
If, after considering the evidence submitted to the Supreme Court in multiple cases which the court has turned down, the Chief Justice found it necessary to consider various paths that the Supreme Court eventually might have to take in defense of the Constitution, could the Chief Justice have strategically planned to first rule in favor of Obamacare—as a tax—knowing that such a ruling would theatrically demonstrate an apparent support for Obama—or, at the very least, demonstrate no antagonism towards the man—while still leaving Obamacare open to state by state dismantling until such time as a ruling on Mr. Obama’s eligibility would remove the law retro-actively as having been passed while Mr. Obama was in the commission of crimes and, most importantly, act as the perfect disclaimer to angry liberal entities which would scream “Racism!”as they rallied liberal-socialist Obama supporters to advance ‘Forward!’ towards anything but “civil” disobedience should the Supreme Court retro-actively abrogate the illegal election of the constitutionally ineligible fraud and forger, Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack ‘King Hussein’ Obama Jr., the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, a.k.a. Soebarkha, a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel?
Will the Chief Justice permit the two Supreme Court Justices appointed by Mr. Obama, (or whatever his legal name, the name written on his original long form birth certificate—not to be confused with the electronic file released by the White House in 2011 which has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt to be a poorly constructed forgery), to participate in hearing the case surrounding the issue of eligibility when their conflict of interest could not be greater? Their very appointments would too necessarily have to also be retro-actively abrogated—effectively annulled—as they were made while Mr. Obama was in the commission of the criminal usurpation of the office of the president of the United States concomitant with the military rank and authority of commander-in-chief.
The Republican Party is so far removed from where it should stand in defense of our Article II of our Constitution that on Jan. 16th Senator Marco Rubio said, “President Obama’s frustration with our republic and the way it works doesn’t give him license to ignore the Constitution.” This comment by a man who himself is constitutionally ineligible to be president or vice-president–not being a natural-born citizen as required by the Constitution—yet he made a clear and concerted effort to be the V.P. running mate for Republican nominee Mitt Romney in 2012—licentiously ignoring the Constitution—and is even now touted by many within the Republican Party as a potential presidential candidate in 2016! If they won’t defend Article II how can the NRA expect them to defend the Second Amendment? Perhaps the NRA and the Republican Party should come out with an itemized list of those parts of the Constitution they deem worthy of defending and those parts that they do not.
Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency is the most horrendous crime committed against the American people and our experiment in ‘government of the People, by the People, and for the People’ in our nation’s history. All those complicit in Mr. Obama’s crimes must be brought to justice if liberty is to be preserved.
At this point in time, the question of whether or not Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency shall be addressed by the proper authorities is completely in the hands of God and Chief Justice Roberts. ‘In God we trust.’
Obama doesnt care what he’s called…. he still gets his way no matter what. He got everything new when he moved into the white house.. A brand spanking new Cadillac for him… New everything….. Just hope he got all black Secret Service guys too…